Document Information
2,796 Reads | 2 Comments
Description
In the prevailing discourse, market and democracy are credited with such a
strong unity it almost appears impossible to separate the two. The market
is considered a manifest condition of democracy, the latter inexorably bound
up with the former. Neither the concepts—nor the realities—of what is or
what could be the market and democracy are questioned in this discourse.
In the same manner, globalisation and universalism are conceived in the discourse
as being practically synonymous. The “Global Village” constitutes one
of the fashionable catch-phrases which, though bereft of meaning, bear witness
to this confusion.
In this contribution, I will expatiate on the thesis that each of these
dichotomies (market/democracy and globalisation/universalis m) is more
contradictory than complementary. The association of these two sets of
issues, defi ned by an economic globalisation based on the market and a
democratic political universalism, is as a result, utter nonsense which forces
us to rethink the market, democracy and universalism within the perspective
of a far-from-fi nal history.
21 Pages