Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 365 - RESPONSE filed by Defendant ORLY TAITZto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.365.0

LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 365 - RESPONSE filed by Defendant ORLY TAITZto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.365.0

Ratings: (0)|Views: 90 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
09/02/2011 365 RESPONSE filed by Defendant ORLY TAITZto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, 343[RECAP] (Cook, Peter) (Entered: 09/02/2011)
09/02/2011 365 RESPONSE filed by Defendant ORLY TAITZto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, 343[RECAP] (Cook, Peter) (Entered: 09/02/2011)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Sep 02, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/11/2011

pdf

text

original

 
   S
   C   H   U   M   A   N   N
 ,   R
   A   L   L   O
   &   R
   O   S   E   N   B   E   R   G
 ,   L   L   P
   A
   T   T   O   R   N   E   Y   S   A   T
   L
   A   W
   3   1   0   0   B   R   I   S   T   O   L   S   T   R   E   E   T ,   S   U   I   T   E   4   0   0   C   O   S   T   A   M   E   S   A ,   C   A   L   I   F   O   R   N   I   A   9   2   6   2   6  -   7   3   3   3   T   E   L   E   P   H   O   N   E   (   7   1   4   )   8   5   0  -   0   2   1   0
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
-1-
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED AUGUST 12, 2011
Kim Schumann, Esq., State Bar #170942Jeffrey P. Cunningham, Esq., State Bar #151067Peter Cook, Esq., State Bar #232742
SCHUMANN, RALLO & ROSENBERG, LLP
3100 Bristol Street, Suite 400Costa Mesa, CA 92626Telephone (714) 850-0210Facsimile (714) 850-0551Attorneys for Defendant, ORLY TAITZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
LISA LIBERI,
et al.
Plaintiffs,vs.ORLY TAITZ,
et al.
Defendants._________________________________)))))))))))))))))))Case No. 8:11-CV-00485-AG (AJW)Hon. Andrew GuilfordCourtroom 10D
DEFENDANT, ORLY TAITZ’SRESPONSE PURSUANT TO COURTORDER DATED AUGUST 12, 2011RE: LITIGATION HISTORY
Date Action Filed:May 4, 2009Discovery Cut-Off:March 5, 2012Final Pre-Trial Conf.:May 21, 2012Trial Date:June 5, 2012
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEYS OFRECORD:
This matter, as to Defendant, ORLY TAITZ, has been stayed pursuant to thisCourt’s Order dated August 19, 2011. Despite this stay of proceedings, in anabundance of caution, and in order to keep with the spirit of the Order of this Courtdated August 12, 2011, ORLY TAITZ hereby submits the following response: ///  /// 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 365 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#:8408
 
   S
   C   H   U   M   A   N   N
 ,   R
   A   L   L   O
   &   R
   O   S   E   N   B   E   R   G
 ,   L   L   P
   A
   T   T   O   R   N   E   Y   S   A   T
   L
   A   W
   3   1   0   0   B   R   I   S   T   O   L   S   T   R   E   E   T ,   S   U   I   T   E   4   0   0   C   O   S   T   A   M   E   S   A ,   C   A   L   I   F   O   R   N   I   A   9   2   6   2   6  -   7   3   3   3   T   E   L   E   P   H   O   N   E   (   7   1   4   )   8   5   0  -   0   2   1   0
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
1
Items numbered 1, 2 and 3 are each related to petitions regarding the presidential electionof November of 2008.
2
Items numbered 4, 5 and 6 are each related to similar Freedom of Information Act claims.
3
This matter involved a breach of lease agreement as to property owned by Ms. Taitz’sdental practice.-2-
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED AUGUST 12, 2011
I.Cases Filed by Defendant, Orly Taitz, on Her Own Behalf, or onBehalf of Affiliated Entities
Defendant, Orly Taitz has filed seven cases on her own behalf, or on behalf of affiliated entities, in the last three years, as follows:1.
Taitz v. Dunn
, Orange County Superior Court, Case No.30-2010-00381664
1
2.
Taitz v. Bowen
, California Supreme Court, Case No. S1843843.
Taitz v. Obama
, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:10-CV-00151-RCL4.
Taitz v. Astrue
, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:11-CV-00402-RCL
2
5.
Taitz v. Ruemmler 
, United States District Court for the Districtof Columbia, Case No. 1:11-CV-01421-RCL6.
Taitz v. Fuddy
, Circuit Court for the First Circuit Honolulu,Hawaii, Case No. CIVIL 11-1-1731-087.
 Medical Dental v. Pierson
, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30-2010-00367447
3
Furthermore, in the spirit of full disclosure as ordered by this Court,Defendant, Orly Taitz has also sought to intervene by way of filing Motions toIntervene in two cases, as follows:
 Hornbeck v. Salazar 
, United States District Court for the EasternDistrict of Louisiana, Case No. 2:10-CV-01663-MLCF-JCW ///  /// 
 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 365 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 5 Page ID#:8409
 
   S
   C   H   U   M   A   N   N
 ,   R
   A   L   L   O
   &   R
   O   S   E   N   B   E   R   G
 ,   L   L   P
   A
   T   T   O   R   N   E   Y   S   A   T
   L
   A   W
   3   1   0   0   B   R   I   S   T   O   L   S   T   R   E   E   T ,   S   U   I   T   E   4   0   0   C   O   S   T   A   M   E   S   A ,   C   A   L   I   F   O   R   N   I   A   9   2   6   2   6  -   7   3   3   3   T   E   L   E   P   H   O   N   E   (   7   1   4   )   8   5   0  -   0   2   1   0
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
-3-
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER DATED AUGUST 12, 2011
State of Florida v. U.S. Department of Health and HumanServices
, United States District Court for the Norther District of Louisiana, Case No. 3:10-CV-91-RV/EMT
II.Cases In Which Defendant, Orly Taitz, Has Been a Party
Defendant, Orly Taitz, has personally been a party to the 11 cases in the lastthree years. These cases include the nine cases listed in the previous section(numbered 1 through 9, which include the matters in which Ms. Taitz hasintervened as a party), and also two cases in which Orly Taitz has been a Defendant,including the present matter (numbered 10 and 11), as follows:1.
Taitz v. Dunn
, Orange County Superior Court, Case No.30-2010-003816642.
Taitz v. Bowen
, California Supreme Court, Case No. S1843843.
Taitz v. Obama
, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:10-CV-00151-RCL4.
Taitz v. Astrue
, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:11-CV-00402-RCL5.
Taitz v. Ruemmler 
, United States District Court for the Districtof Columbia, Case No. 1:11-CV-01421-RCL6.
Taitz v. Fuddy
, Circuit Court for the First Circuit Honolulu,Hawaii, Case No. CIVIL 11-1-1731-087.
 Medical Dental v. Pierson
, Orange County Superior Court, CaseNo. 30-2010-00367447.8.
 Hornbeck v. Salazar 
, United States District Court for the EasternDistrict of Louisiana, Case No. 2:10-CV-01663-MLCF-JCW (asan Intervenor)9.
State of Florida v. U.S. Department of Health and HumanServices
, United States District Court for the Norther District of Louisiana, Case No. 3:10-CV-91-RV/EMT (as an Intervenor)
 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 365 Filed 09/02/11 Page 3 of 5 Page ID#:8410

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->