Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internet radio has been around since the late 1990s. Traditional radio broadcasters have used the Internet to simulcast their programming. But, Internet radio is undergoing a revolution that will expand its reach from your desktop computer to access broadcasts anywhere, anytime, and expand its programming from traditional broadcasters to individuals, organizations and government. Freedom of the Airwaves Radio broadcasting began in the early 20s, but it wasn t until the introduction of the transistor radio in 1954 that radio became available in mobile situations. Internet radio is in much the same place. Until the 21st century, the only way to obtain radio broadcasts over the Internet was through your PC. That will soon change, as wireless connectivity will feed Internet broadcasts to car radios, PDAs and cell phones. The next generation of wireless devices will greatly expand the reach and convenience of Internet radio.
Internet radio has no geographic limitations, so a broadcaster in Kuala Lumpur can be heard in Kansas on the Internet. The potential for Internet radio is as vast as cyberspace itself (for example, Live365 offers more than 30,000 Internet radio broadcasts). In comparison to traditional radio, Internet radio is not limited to audio. An Internet radio broadcast can be accompanied by photos or graphics, text and links, as well as interactivity, such as message boards and chat rooms. This advancement allows a listener to do more than listen. In the example at the beginning of this article, a listener who hears an ad for a computer printer ordered that printer through a link on the Internet radio broadcast Web site. The relationship between advertisers and consumers becomes more interactive and intimate on Internet radio broadcasts. This expanded media capability could also be used in other ways. For example, with Internet radio, you could conduct training or education and provide links to documents and payment options. You could also have interactivity with the trainer or educator and other information on the Internet radio broadcast site.
Internet radio programming offers a wide spectrum of broadcast genres, particularly in music. Broadcast radio is increasingly controlled by smaller numbers of media conglomerates (such as Cox, Jefferson-Pilot and Bonneville). In some ways, this has led to more mainstreaming of the programming on broadcast radio, as stations often try to reach the largest possible audience in order to charge the highest possible rates to advertisers. Internet radio, on the other hand, offers the opportunity to expand the types of available programming. The cost of getting on the air is less for an Internet broadcaster (see the next section, "Creating an Internet Radio Station"), and Internet radio can appeal to micro-communities of listeners focused on special music or interests.
the most popular form of audio downloads, but any type of audio file can be delivered through a Web or FTP site. Streaming audio is not stored, but only played. It is a continuous broadcast that works through three software packages: the encoder, the server and the player. The encoder converts audio content into a streaming format, the server makes it available over the Internet and the player retrieves the content. For a live broadcast, the encoder and streamer work together in real-time. An audio feed runs to the sound card of a computer running the encoder software at the broadcast location and the stream is uploaded to the streaming server. Since that requires a large amount of computing resources, the streaming server must be a dedicated server.
Simulation
A local turner simulation program includes all the online radios that can also be heard in the air in the city.
History
A November 1994 Rolling Stones concert was the "first major cyberspace multicast concert." Mick Jagger opened the concert by saying, "I wanna say a special welcome to everyone that's, uh, climbed into the Internet tonight and, uh, has got into the M-bone. And I hope it doesn't all collapse." On November 7, 1994, WXYC (89.3 FM Chapel Hill, NC USA) became the first traditional radio station to announce broadcasting on the Internet. WXYC used an FM radio connected to a system at SunSite, later known as Ibiblio, running Cornell's CU-SeeMe software. WXYC had begun test broadcasts and bandwidth testing as early as August, 1994. WREK (91.1 FM, Atlanta, GA USA) started streaming on the same day using their own custom software called CyberRadio1. However, unlike WXYC, this was WREK's beta launch and the stream was not advertised until a later date. In 1995, Progressive Networks released RealAudio as a free download. Time magazine said that RealAudio took "advantage of the latest advances in digital compression" and delivered "AM radio-quality sound in so-called real time." Eventually, companies such as Nullsoft and Microsoft released streaming audio players as free downloads. As the software audio players became available, "many Web-based radio stations began springing up." In March 1996, Virgin Radio - London, became the first European radio station to broadcast its full program live on the internet. It broadcast its FM signal, live from the source, simultaneously on the Internet 24 hours a day. Internet radio attracted significant media and investor attention in the late 1990s. In 1998, the initial public stock offering for Broadcast.com set a record at the time for the largest jump in price in stock offerings in the United States. The offering price was US$18 and the company's shares opened at US$68 on the first day of trading. The company was losing money at the time and indicated in a prospectus filed with the Securities Exchange Commission that they expected the losses to continue indefinitely Yahoo! purchased Broadcast.com on July 20, 1999 for US$5.7 billion.
US royalty controversy
In October 1998, the US Congress passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). One result of the DMCA is that performance royalties are to be paid for satellite radio and Internet radio broadcasts in addition to publishing royalties. In contrast, traditional radio broadcasters pay only publishing royalties and no performance royalties.
A rancorous dispute ensued over how performance royalties should be assessed for Internet broadcasters. Some observers said that royalty rates that were being proposed were overly burdensome and intended to disadvantage independent Internet-only stations that "while Internet giants like AOL may be able to afford the new rates, many smaller Internet radio stations will have to shut down." The Digital Media Association (DiMA) said that even large companies, like Yahoo! Music, might fail due to the proposed rates. Some observers said that some U.S.-based Internet broadcasts might be moved to foreign jurisdictions where US royalties do not apply.
Many of these critics organized SaveNetRadio.org, "a coalition of listeners, artists, labels and webcasters" that opposed the proposed royalty rates. To focus attention on the consequences of the impending rate hike, many US Internet broadcasters participated in a "Day of Silence" on June 26, 2007. On that day, they shut off their audio streams or streamed ambient sound, sometimes interspersed with brief public service announcements. Notable participants included Rhapsody, Live365, MTV, Pandora, and SHOUTcast. Some others that did not participate, like Last.fm, having just been purchased for 280 million dollars by CBS Music Group,, stated that they did not want to punish their listeners.
SoundExchange, representing supporters of the increase in royalty rates, pointed out the fact that the rates were flat from 1998 through 2005 (see above), without even being increased to reflect cost-of-living increases. They also declared that if internet radio is to build businesses from the product of recordings, the performers and owners of those recordings should receive fair compensation. Opponents argued that the purchase price paid for Last.FM reflected that it was primarily a social network service that included a radio service.
On May 1, 2007, SoundExchange came to an agreement with certain large webcasters regarding the minimum fees that were modified by the determination of the Copyright Royalty Board. While the CRB decision imposed a $500 per station or channel minimum fee for all webcasters, certain webcasters represented through DiMA negotiated a $50,000 "cap" on those fees with SoundExchange. However, DiMA and SoundExchange continue to negotiate over the per song, per listener fees.
SoundExchange has also offered alternative rates and terms to certain eligible small webcasters, that allows them to calculate their royalties as a percentage of their revenue or expenses, instead of at a per performance rate. To be eligible, a webcaster had to have revenues of less than $1.25 million dollars a year and stream less than 5 million "listener hours" a month (or an average of 6830 concurrent listeners). These restrictions would disqualify independent webcasters like AccuRadio, DI.FM, Club977 and others from participating in the offer, and therefore many small commercial webcasters continue to negotiate a settlement with SoundExchange.
An August 16, 2008 Washington Post article reported that although Pandora was "one of the nation's most popular Web radio services, with about 1 million listeners daily...the burgeoning company may be on the verge of collapse" due to the structuring of performance royalty payment for webcasters. "Traditional radio, by contrast, pays no such fee. Satellite radio pays a fee but at a less onerous rate, at least by some measures." The article indicated that "other Web radio outfits" may be "doom[ed]" for the same reasons.
On September 30, 2008, the United States Congress passed "a bill that would put into effect any changes to the royalty rate to which [record labels and web casters] agree while lawmakers are out of session." Although royalty rates are expected to decrease, many webcasters nevertheless predict difficulties generating sufficient revenue to cover their royalty payments. In January 2009, the US Copyright Royalty Board announced that "it will apply royalties to streaming net services based on revenue."
Popularity
In 2003, revenue from online streaming music radio was US$49 million. By 2006, that figure rose to US$500 million. A February 21, 2007 "survey of 3,000 Americans released by consultancy Bridge Ratings & Research" found that "as much as 19% of U.S. consumers 12 and older listen to Web-based radio stations." In other words, there were "some 57 million weekly listeners of Internet radio programs. More people listen to online radio than to satellite radio, high-definition [sic] radio, podcasts, or cell-phone-based radio combined."
An April 2008 Arbitron survey showed that, in the US, more than one in seven persons aged 25 54 years old listen to online radio each week. In 2008, 13 percent of the American population listened to the radio online, compared with 11 percent in 2007. Internet radio functionality is also built into many dedicated Internet radio devices, which give an FM like receiver user experience.
General
The following tables compare general and technical information for a number of streaming media systems both audio and video.
FIRST LATEST STABLE PUBLIC VERSION RELEASE (YYYY-MM- (RELEASE DATE) DD) ? 0.1217
NAME
CREATOR
COST (USD)
LICENSE
MEDIA
MEDIA PLAYER
PeerCast
Free
GPL
Audio/Video
{?}
$4,500
proprietary
Video
Flash Player
Any with appropriate protocol support, including Flash players, Free Developer Silverlight players, QuickTime license, $995 players, VLC players, Safari 2.1.2 (2010-07Perpetual, 2007-02-17 proprietary Audio/Video/Data (HTML5), iPhone/iPad/iPod touch, 20) $65/mo 3GPP (Android, Blackberry, Subscription Symbian, etc.), IPTV set-top boxes, game consoles (Wii, PS3 and other). 5.5.5 (2007-0510) 0.6.1 (2009-0909) Any with appropriate protocol support. Any with appropriate protocol support.
Apple Inc.
1999-03-16
Free
APSL
Audio/Video
Flumotion
2004-11-30
Free
GPL
Audio/Video
Firefly
Ron Pedde
Free
GPL
Audio
Any with appropriate protocol support. FreeCast client Any with appropriate protocol support.
FreeCast
Alban Peignier
Free
GPL
Audio/Video
RealNetworks
2003-01-22
Free
RCSL/RPSL
Audio/Video
RealNetworks
Audio/Video
Microsoft
Video
Broadwave
NCH Software
2006-07-21
1.01
Audio
Icecast
Xiph.Org Foundation
1998-12
Free
GPL
Audio/Video
Red5
Free
LGPL
Audio/Video
SHOUTcast
Nullsoft
1998-12
Free
proprietary
Audio
Any with appropriate protocol support. Flash, Windows Media, UMedia players Flash
2003-10
7.0 (2010-03-22)
proprietary
Audio/Video
CasparCG
Audio/Video
Mammoth Server
http://mammothserver.org/
Audio/Video
Free
Flash
Yes No Mac OS X
Yes No Linux
Yes No Solaris
? ? ? Yes
? ? ? Yes
? ? ? Yes
? ? ? Yes
? ? ? Yes
? ? ? Yes
? No No ?
Protocol support
Name HTTP RTSP MMS RTP RTCP UDP TCP RTMP MPEGTS ? ? Real Data Transport ? ?
Yes ?
? ?
? ?
? ?
? ?
? ?
? ?
? ?
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Flumotion
Yes
Streaming Server FreeCast Helix DNA Server Helix Universal Server Yes Yes No Yes No No ? Yes ? No ? Yes ? Yes ? ? ? ? ? Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes (WMRTSP)
Yes
Yes (WMRTSP)
No
No
No No No
No No No
? No No
? No No
? ? ?
? ? ?
? ? ?
? ? ?
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Name
HTTP
RTSP
MMS
RTP
RTCP
UDP
TCP
RTMP
MPEGTS
Supported website
The design website is a dynamic website that changes or customizes itself frequently and automatically, based on certain criteria. The websites can have two types of dynamic activity: Code and Content. Dynamic code is invisible or behind the scenes and dynamic content is visible or fully displayed , so that the current propramms and the future programme will be automated . This type of website displayed in plain view. Variable content is displayed dynamically on the fly based on certain criteria, usually by retrieving content stored in a database. A website with dynamic content refers to how its messages, text, images and other information are displayed on the we b page, and more specifically how its content changes at any given moment. The web page content varies based on certain criteria, either pre defined rules or variable user input. For example, a website with a database of news articles can use a pre-defined rule which tells it to display all news articles for today's date. This type of dynamic website will automatically show the most current news articles on any given date. Another example of dynamic content is when a retail website with a database of media products allows a user to input a search request for the keyword Beatles. In response, the content of the web page will spontaneously change the way it looked before, and will then display a list of Beatles products like CD's, DVD's and books.