Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
“It Takes a Village”
PresidentWilliam J. Clinton (D)
“It’s time for aNew World Order”
PresidentGeorge H.W. Bush (R)
GLOBALISMSOCIALISM
Broadening the Conservative Base
The Mathematics of Success ina Three-Party Race
Forced to Choose Between Republican Globalism and Democratic Socialism,the Path to Political Empowerment is a Short One, Indeed
French philosopher and moralist Marquis de Vauvenargues (1715-1747) wrote in his
Reflexions et Maximes
that
“It is easier to construct a new party than it is to rise gradually to the head of an old one.” 
 
In the context of the modern-day American political process, such a theory seems to contradictevery conventional wisdom and instinct given the fully vested nature of the Two-Party system in America’s political psyche. With the Republican andDemocratic Parties wholly dominating practically every state and federal election cycle while cumulatively amassing 98-100% of the casted vote, it wouldappear that de Vauvenargues’ postulation is baseless and is nothing more than a navigation of idealism and wishful thinking. Moreover, given thetremendously high stakes on a broad spectrum of issues ranging from skyrocketing healthcare costs to accelerated offshoring of American jobs towidening trade deficits and rising taxes, a principled vote in support of a new political movement with “no chance of winning” is a novelty that cannot beconsidered in the full throes of a political war against an enemy on the cusp of making significant gains in America’s policy-setting objectives. Such a“wasted vote” would only provide aid and comfort to the opposition Republican/Democratic Party whose policy agenda is clearly directed at promotingwhat is known to be evil and which threatens the values of a country you love and see becoming more unrecognizable on practically a daily basis.However, when one stops and carefully considers (1) the dynamics and vulnerabilities of the current Two-Party structure, (2) the mathematics of victoryin a three-party race, and (3) the efficiency of a targeted and resonant recruitment strategy, the impulse of hopelessness that characteristically dampensthe enthusiasm of a new political party movement is quickly displaced with a sense of urgency and purpose that can only be inspired by a very real andreachable finish line of success.
1. For Most People, Political Affiliation is More an Expression of Disdain AGAINST the Opposition Party than it is a Reflection of Support FOR the Affiliate Party. As Such, the Bonds of Party Loyalty are Artificial, Shallow and Capable of Being Broken.
Take this little test. Seek out any opinionated friend or co-worker with a well-known political affiliation and pose this simple observation and question:
“I can’t believe you support Mitt Romney for President. Why are you voting for Mitt Romney in the upcoming election?” 
Almost instinctively and bydefensive reflex, your friend’s response is likely to sound something like this:
“Well, AT LEAST HE’S BETTER THAN Barack Obama who is an avowed Marxist trying to destroy America!” 
If you approach the question from the standpoint of political affiliation, your friend’s retort will have asimilar defensive undertone:
“Of course I’m Republican! IT’S BETTER THAN being an idiot Democrat who only wants to ____________!” 
If your friend is like most Americans, his response to questions challenging his candidate or party loyalties will have two (2) characteristic features thatgive tremendous insight into the basis of his political affiliation. First, his response very likely reflects a
basis of animosity and disdain for thealternative candidate or party
- and he’s probably right in his assessment. Secondly, your friend’s response will likely
fail to include articulable,discrete reasons that reflect a positive basis for promoting his candidate or party of choice.
 Perhaps without even being conscious of doing so, your friend will be communicating a very common and very telling secret shared by countless millionswho participate in the American political process:
Political loyalty is driven by DISDAIN of the opposition, not necessarily SUPPORT for thecandidate or party of choice.
 When directly engaged about the basis of their political affiliation and support, most people will openly acknowledge thattheirs is a selection based on the “lesser of two evils”. Although they are not particularly excited about the candidate or party they support in any givenelection, they are
absolutely certain
that the opposition candidate or party must be defeated at all costs, even if it means giving little-to-no criticalscrutiny to the positions and values of the candidate or party ultimately getting their vote!
 
 
CONSTITUTION PARTYCONSTITUTION PARTY
Americans of Color,Elderly,Under-educatedRank-and-FileLabor and Non-Labor Union Membership
Social Libeals, Ga / eminis Aciiss, Inellecual Elie Labo Leadeship 
Main StreetFiscalConservatives
 WallS tree t Fiscal Eli te 
SocialConservatives
Registered, but Politically Inactive
With the
Wall Street Elite
awash in luxury and excess,
Main StreetProfessionals
struggle for economic survival as white-collar livelihoodsare routinely offshored to India and corporate scandals bankrupt 401(k)retirement savings — all as the dutiful Main Street handmaidens faithfullymarch to slaughter by the steady drumbeat of Republican globalism.Meanwhile,
Social Conservatives
helplessly watch the steady drain on American sovereignty and freedoms as the corporate elite shift economicinvestment, job creation, and national loyalty from the United States tothird-world nations for the sole and exclusive purpose of furthering thecomforts of the Wall Street Elite.What was once a proud party that advanced the interests of the Labor Class and those excluded from the American Dream, the Democrat Party istoday a mere tool of the Cultural Elite who are wholly disconnected from thevalues of the party’s traditional and current base.Over the past 30 years, the Democratic Party has shifted its focus from theadvocacy of the
Labor Class
and the
Economically Distressed
to the fullembrace of 
Radical Feminists
,
Homopolitical Activists
and
IntellectualElitists
who have starkly different values and political objectives from America’s
Elderly
,
Blue Collar Labor 
, and her 
People of Color 
.
 
DEMOCRATIC PARTY
 
REPUBLICAN PARTY
 
 Anti-Democrats Anti-Republicans
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more