Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
BARNETT v DUNN (E.D. CA) - 41 - ORDER ADOPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full - Gov.uscourts.caed.212414.41.0

BARNETT v DUNN (E.D. CA) - 41 - ORDER ADOPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full - Gov.uscourts.caed.212414.41.0

Ratings: (0)|Views: 541|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
09/06/2011 41 ORDER ADOPTING 34[RECAP] FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/05/11 and ORDERING that plf's 39[RECAP] Motion for Recusal is DENIED; dft USEAC's 9[RECAP] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; plf's 1[RECAP] Amended Complaint is DISMISSED w/o leave to amend in this court; dfts Bowen and Brown's 3[RECAP] Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as MOOT; plf's 11[RECAP] Motion for a Three-Judge Panel is DENIED as MOOT; this case is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court; Clerk to close case. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Benson, A.) (Entered: 09/06/2011)
09/06/2011 41 ORDER ADOPTING 34[RECAP] FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/05/11 and ORDERING that plf's 39[RECAP] Motion for Recusal is DENIED; dft USEAC's 9[RECAP] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; plf's 1[RECAP] Amended Complaint is DISMISSED w/o leave to amend in this court; dfts Bowen and Brown's 3[RECAP] Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as MOOT; plf's 11[RECAP] Motion for a Three-Judge Panel is DENIED as MOOT; this case is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court; Clerk to close case. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Benson, A.) (Entered: 09/06/2011)

More info:

categoriesTypes, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Sep 06, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

11/07/2011

pdf

text

original

 
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAPAMELA BARNETT,Plaintiff,No. CIV S-10-2216 KJM DAD PSv.DAMON JERRELL DUNN, et al.,Defendants.ORDERPlaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter wasreferred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).On March 24, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,which were served on all parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections tothe findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of thefindings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the findings andrecommendations. No reply has been filed.In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule304, this court has conducted a
de novo
review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the ///// 
1
Case 2:10-cv-02216-KJM -DAD Document 41 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->