Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Kernel Records Oy v Timothy Mosley Appellate Brief

Kernel Records Oy v Timothy Mosley Appellate Brief

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,545|Likes:
Published by Terry Hart
Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al.
Appellate Brief, Eleventh Circuit
Case: 11-12769
8/30/2011
Appealed from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7357444373111116218
Kernel Records Oy v. Timothy Mosley p/k/a Timbaland, et al.
Appellate Brief, Eleventh Circuit
Case: 11-12769
8/30/2011
Appealed from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7357444373111116218

More info:

Published by: Terry Hart on Sep 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

09/08/2011

pdf

text

original

 
Case No. 11-12769-A
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________________________KERNEL RECORDS OY,Plaintiff-Appellantv.TIMOTHY Z. MOSLEY P/K/A TIMBALAND; UMG RECORDINGS, INC.;INTERSCOPE-GEFFEN-A&M, A DIVISION OF UMG RECORDINGS,INC, D/B/A INTERSCOPE, D/B/A GEFFEN; MOSLEY MUSIC, LLC;UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP DISTRIBUTION, CORP.; NELLYFURTADO; EMI MUSIC PUBLISHING, EMI BLACKWOOD MUSIC,INC.; VIRGINIA BEACH MUSIC, WB MUSIC CORP., AND WARNERCHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.,Defendant-Appellees________________ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA___________________PRINCIPAL BRIEF OFPLAINTIFF-APPELLANT KERNEL RECORDS OY___________________Richard S. BuschKING & BALLOW315 Union Street, Suite 1100Nashville, Tennessee 37201Tel: (615) 259-3456Fax: (615) 248-2860
Case: 11-12769 Date Filed: 08/30/2011 Page: 1 of 67
 
i
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and Eleventh CircuitRule 26.1, Appellant states there are no changes to the previously filed Certificateof Interested Parties.
Case: 11-12769 Date Filed: 08/30/2011 Page: 2 of 67
 
ii
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
Appellant requests oral argument. The district court
‘s decision conflicts
with other authority on this subject. No Circuit has interpreted the definition of 
―United States work‖ in 17 U.S.C. § 101.
This case presents an important issue
regarding the United States‘ treaty obligations under the Berne Convention for the
Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.
CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE AND STYLE
This brief contains 13,770 words, excluding the parts of the brief exemptedby Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(B)(iii).This brief has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using TimesNew Roman in 14-point font.
Case: 11-12769 Date Filed: 08/30/2011 Page: 3 of 67

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->