This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under thedoctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10thCir. R. 32.1.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judgepanel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of materialassistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10thCir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
United States Court of AppealsTenth Circuit
September 8, 2011
Elisabeth A. ShumakerClerk of Court
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSTENTH CIRCUIT
MEKBIB G. ADGEH,Plaintiff - Appellant,v.STATE OF OKLAHOMA,Defendant - Appellee.No. 11-6171(D.C. No. 11-CV-00619-C)(W.D. Okla.)
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Mekbib G. Adgeh appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action with prejudice. 1 R. 7. In an order of dismissal,the district court held that Mr. Adgeh’s claim of a legal right to have more thanone wife, contrary to Okla. Stat. tit. 21, §§ 881, 882, failed as a matter of law andwas frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (ii); 1 R. 5-7.