n September 11, 2001 the denition of National Security changed for most U.S. citizens. For an entire postwar generation, “National Security”meant protection from nuclear attack. On that day, Americans redened that threat. On September 11, 2001 three hijacked airliners hit three separate buildings with such precision and skill that many observers believe those ights were controlled by something other than the poorly trained hijackers inthe cockpits. This report contends that not only were the buildings targets, but that specic ofces within each building were the designated targets. This
report makes clear the understanding that the planes were, in fact, drones, piloted by unknown individuals attached to the military industrial complex
of the United States.The ofces targeted in the Twin Towers; buildings 1, 2, 6 and 7, and Pentagon unknowingly held information which if exposed, subsequently wouldexpose a national security secret of unimaginable magnitude. Protecting that secret was the motivation for the September 11th attacks. This report is
about that national security secret, its origins and impact. The intent of the report is to provide a context for understanding the events of September 11th
rather than to dene exactly what happened that day. This report speculates as to how the event was accomplished and provides insight into the actual
reasoning used by the perpetrators to justify the attack.
Initially, it is difcult to see a pattern to the destruction of September 11th other than the total destruction of the World Trade Center, a segment of the Pentagon, four commercial aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives. However, if the perceived objective of the attack is re-dened from its commonlysuggested ‘symbolic’ designation as either ‘a terrorist attack’ or a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and one begins by looking at it as purely a crime with specic
as opposed to a political action
), there is a compelling logic to the pattern of destruction. This report provides research into the early claims
by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz that the September 11th attacks were meant as a cover-up for nancial crimes beinginvestigated by the Ofce of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose ofces in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th and the Eldorado Task Force,
a group consisting of 55 government agencies. After many years of research, this report presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims,and proposes a new rationale for the September 11th attacks. In doing so, many of the anomalies – or inconvenient facts surrounding this event take on ameaning that is consistent with the claims of Eastman et al. The hypothesis of this report is: the attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the
clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which
‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas. The attacks of September 11th also served to derail
multiple Federal investigations away from crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justied under the cardinalrule of intelligence: “protect your resources” and is consistent with a modus operandi of sacricing lives for a greater cause.