have a lot in common with Lot’s wife after she turned around and had a last look at Sodom andGomorrah. No wonder hypertension is among the top five causes of morbidity among Filipinos.
IT’S SAID
that the Filipinos’ love affair with salty food is the natural result of being surrounded byseawater, as well as the need to preserve food, usually fish, in preparation for lean months. Theway we are loading up on sodium these days, we may just as well be turning into daingourselves. But this may be more true among the lower classes, who, much as they would want to,are unable to buy fresh produce most of the time and so settle instead for the sodium mini-bombsmasquerading as packaged food. In comparison, many among the better-off still have lucidmoments during which they spend some of their market money on delectables that do not comeout of a can or plastic or foil packets.In bygone days, it was the poor folk who feasted on fresh foods whilethe landed gentry took pride in their hoards of preserved food.According to Gilda Cordero-Fernando, author and keen observer of Philippine culture, preserved food indicated surplus or an abundanceof goods, proof of a landlord’s wealth. This was before the advent of processed food, which actually began a U.S. solution to its problemof how to keep its soldiers fed even when they were spending daysdeep in the trenches. Preserved food for the Filipino rich then meantpork cooked
adobo
style, which was stored in clay jars, as well as anassortment of sausages and cured meats. At the same time, thelandlords had the pick of everything — from the fattest hens to thewhitest and finest sugar, to drinking water fetched from the clearestsprings. Their daily meals were the
comida
fiesta of the
kasama
, whogot the egg whites while the
amos
used the yolks for flan, had
muscovado
instead of refined sugar, and had no fancy pastries or
pastillas
for dessert, just fruit. Meat to the
kasama
was a luxury.Everyday fare consisted of rice, the catch of the day from the sea or a nearby stream or rice paddy, and vegetables.Guess who came out more fit? As Cordero-Fernando writes rather gleefully, “The peasants grewstrong and healthy from eating all that nutritious, second-class food. The landlords, on the other hand, suffered from overweight, high blood pressure, diabetes, bursitis, and gout — all theafflictions of people who have too much in life and dine too heartily and too well.” And, it must beadded, from leading a too leisurely life as well. The landlords obviously didn’t even have to breaka sweat preparing their favorite food; somebody else made sure the chickens grew plump andthen ran after them with the cleaver and plucked them clean of feathers to meet the masters’demand for
pollo afritada
. (And remember that scene in
Oro, Plata, Mata
, where the help peeledthe salted watermelon seeds one by one for the
señoritas
who thought nothing of eating these bythe handful at a time?)Today, however, neither rich nor poor
can
boast to be healthier than the other, especially withrapid urbanization and its evil twin, environmental degradation (although some may say both areas cursed), wreaking as much havoc on our lives as clueless politicians and confused policymakers, and having a profound impact on what we all eat and how often. Another version of thedining divide, though, has managed to emerge: while more Filipinos are surviving on just onemeal a day, those who are able to indulge themselves have been turning frantically to diets to getrid of the evidence of food devoured in huge quantities amassing around their middle.
IN THIS
country, of course, one can be too thin, and you will know you have reached that pointwhen people start asking you if you have lost your job or your lover, become a drug addict, or been stricken with tuberculosis. But while Filipinos like to have some meat on their bones, thesehave to be in the proper places and in the proper quantities. Otherwise, they may just wake up
Photo courtesy of The Manila Times
Add a Comment