• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
CSIRO
PUBLISHING
www.publish.csiro.au/journals/rfd 
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 
, 2004,
16
, 403–413
New treatments associated with timed artificial inseminationin small ruminants
 Alejo Menchaca
A
,
C
and Edgardo Rubianes
A
,
B
A
Laboratorio de Fisiología de la Reproducción, Facultad deVeterinaria, Lasplaces 1550,Montevideo, Uruguay.
B
Departmento de ProducciónAnimal y Pasturas, Facultad deAgronomía, Garzón 780,Montevideo, Uruguay.
C
To whom correspondence should be addressed. email: alejomen@adinet.com.uy
Abstract.
Timed artificial insemination (TAI) is a very important tool in production systems, as it has a directimpact on cost-efficiency by reducing labour resulting from oestrus detection. However, to make TAI commer-cially feasible, hormonal treatments need to assure acceptable pregnancy rates and be economically viable. Recentadvances in the knowledge of ovarian physiology (e.g. determination of follicular waves, sensitivity of the earlycorpus luteum) in small ruminants allowed the development of new treatments focused on an efficient estimationand synchronisation of the time of ovulation of the females of a treated flock/herd. In this review we summarisenew information and concepts in the hormonal control of the life span of the corpus luteum, as well as methods tomanipulate follicular growth in small ruminants. Additionally, we elaborate on recent studies concerning the useofTAI associated with short progestogen treatment in goats and the newly developed Synchrovine
protocol (twodoses of prostaglandin F
2
α
given seven days apart) in sheep.
 Extra keywords
: ewe, goat, oestrus synchronisation, prostaglandin, progesterone.
Introduction
Artificial insemination (AI) at a fixed time or timed artifi-cial insemination (TAI) represents an important tool whendetection of oestrus is not feasible in commercial reproduc-tive programmes in small ruminants. Oestrus detection onceor twice daily during extended periods requires extra labour and has direct implications for nutritional management of the flock (mainly in extensive rearing conditions) and rep-resents a higher sanitary risk, which is an important aspectin countries with some enzootic diseases (e.g. foot rot). Inaddition,TAI allows a more efficient use of superior males ingenetic programmes. Taking these aspects into account, theuse of TAI may result in an important economic impact that justifies its application in commercial production systems.An efficient TAI programme requires the use of proto-cols that assure acceptable pregnancy rates (proportion of  pregnant females among all treated females) with very lowvariation in the response between flocks.The pregnancy rateiscloselylinkedtothesynchronisationofovulationsobtained in the treated females. Traditional TAI protocols consistingin a progestogen (e.g. progesterone or a synthetic analogue)treatment associated with equine chorionic gonadotrophin(eCG) around the end of the treatment (ewes: Gordon 1983;goats: Corteel
et al.
1988), result in high, but variable preg-nancyrates.Incontrast,theuseofprostaglandinF
2
α
(PGF
2
α
)or its synthetic analogues has not been recommended for TAI programmes (Gordon 1983; Evans and Maxwell 1990;Durán Hontou 1993), because increased variability in timingof oestrus and ovulation has been observed (Acritopoulou
et al.
1978).The incorporation of ultrasonography for the study of thereproductive tract in small ruminants during the last decadehas allowed a rapid advance in our knowledge of ovarian physiology and its control (see reviews, ewes: Evans 2003;goats: Rubianes and Menchaca 2003). Studies using thistechnique,complementedwithhormonaldeterminationsand  behaviouralstudieshaveledtoanewperspectiveonfolliculagrowthanditsmanipulationinruminants(Adams1999).Theobjective of this review is to summarise new information and concepts in hormonal control of ovarian dynamics in smallruminants, supporting the use of progestogen and PGF
2
α
intwo different strategies for TAI in sheep and goats. The useof gonadotrophins and other hormones associated with thesetwo strategies is also discussed.
Follicular dynamics in small ruminants
It is now well established that follicular growth occurs ina wavelike pattern during the interovulatory cycle in ewes(Ginther 
et al.
1995; Evans
et al.
2000) and goats (Ginther and Kot 1994; de Castro
et al 
. 1998; Gonzalez de Bulnes
© CSIRO 2004 10.1071/RD04037 1031-3613/04/040403
 
404
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 
A. Menchaca and E. Rubianes
et al.
1999). Follicular waves have also been demonstrated inewes during both the seasonal anoestrus (Souza
et al.
1996;Bartlewski
et al.
1998) and the transitional period to the breeding season (Ravindra and Rawlings 1997). A wave isdefined as the emergence of a group of small antral folliclesfrom which commonly one or two follicles reach a diameter of 5mm or more.According to different authors the number of follicular waves per cycle ranges between two and fivewith large variability in both sheep and goats.The most com-monly found pattern in ewes is three follicular waves duringa cycle (Leyva
et al.
1998; Gibbons
et al.
1999; Evans
et al.
2000; Viñoles
et al.
2000) and 4 follicular waves in goatswithaninter-ovulatorycycleofnormallength(19to22days)(Ginther and Kot 1994; de Castro
et al 
. 1999; Schwarz and Wierzchos 2000; Menchaca and Rubianes 2002). The inter-wave interval is the period between the emergence of thelargest follicle (3mm in diameter) of two consecutive waves,whichisaroundfourtosevendaysinbothspecies.Thedayof emergence for each wave is variable in both ewes and goats,anddependsonthenumberofwavesineachcycle.Predictionof the day of emergence of each follicular wave is thereforeverydifficult,withtheexceptionofthefirstwaveofthecycle(Wave 1). All studies in sheep and goats agree that Wave 1emerges around the day of ovulation (Day 0) of the previouscycle.The characteristics of follicular waves have been recentlyreviewed (ewes: Evans 2003; goats: Rubianes and Menchaca2003)andsomeofthemorefrequentlyobservedaspectscom-mon to both species are: (
1
) at least one follicle attaining
5mmdiameterisobservedperwave;(
2
)thelargestfollicleofeachwavegrowsfor5–7days,withagrowthrateofaround 1mmday
1
;(
3
)themaximumdiameterofthelargestfollicleof a wave differs between waves; (
4
) as the luteal phase pro-gresses and the serum progesterone concentrations increase,follicular turnover is facilitated and the inter-wave intervalsare shorter than during the early luteal phase; (
5
) during themid–late luteal phase the follicles that do not grow beyond 4 mm are often not part of the wave phenomenon and it has been suggested that they represent an underlying dynamic pool; (
) most of the follicles that are the largest on the dayof luteolysis are the ones that ovulate; (
) in most doubleovulatory cycles the ovulatory follicles emerge as part of thesame follicular wave, but in a few cases also as a part of dif-ferent waves; and (
8
) the double ovulations occur within 24hfrom each other.
Progesterone and follicular growth
The insertion of an intravaginal progesterone device (CIDR-G
®
) in anoestrous goats results in a sharp increase in serum progesterone concentration (
>
5ngmL
1
) for three or four days, which is higher than those observed during the physio-logicalmid–latelutealphase(Rubianes
etal.
1998).Aftersixdaysoftreatment,serumprogesteroneconcentrationsdeclineto subluteal levels (2ngmL
1
) and remain low until thedevice is withdrawn (i.e. Day 12). Similar pharmacokineticresults have been reported using intravaginal sponges con-taining medroxiprogesterone (MAP) (Greyling
et al.
1994)and fluorogestone (FGA) (Gaston-Parry
et al.
1988) in ewes.Therefore, the progesterone serum profile induced by thesetreatments is the opposite of that observed during the nor-mal oestrous cycle, when progesterone concentrations are atfirst low and then increase until luteolysis. The effects of  progesterone on follicular dynamics have been studied insheep (Johnson
et al.
1996; Rubianes
et al.
1996; Leyva
et al.
1998; Viñoles
et al.
1999) and goats (Menchaca and Rubianes 2002). Special attention has been given to theeffects of induced subluteal progesterone concentrations onfollicular health. In ewes, subluteal progesterone levels pro-motedexcessivegrowthandpersistenceofthelargestfollicle(Viñoles
et al.
1999), increasing the age of the ovulatoryfollicles(Johnson
etal.
1996).Twelve-dayprogestogentreat-mentsinduceovulationofagedfolliclesinthisspecies(Flynn
et al.
2000;Viñoles
et al.
2001). In cattle, the ovulation of anaged follicle is followed by low fertility (Savio
et al.
1993;Stock and Fortune 1993; Mihm
et al.
1994; Austin
et al.
1999), apparently because an early resumption of meiosisoccurs in the oocyte (Revah and Butler 1996). Although asimilar detrimental effect of a long progestogen treatment(Viñoles
et al.
2001) or the use of a depleted progesteronedevice(UngerfeldandRubianes1999)ontheconceptionratehas been observed in the ewe, this issue is still a matter of debate (Evans 2003).Progesterone has a negative feedback influence on LHsecretion and pulsatility (Goodman and Karsh 1980) and LH pulses regulate the final growth of antral follicles (McNeilly
et al.
1991). A consequence of low levels of serum pro-gesterone is an increase of LH pulse frequency, which isassociated with an increment in the diameter of the largest(dominant) follicle. Normally, when the progesterone con-centrations are very low (i.e. after luteolysis), positive feed- back is established between oestradiol from the growingdominantfollicleandGnRHandLHfromthehypothalamus–  pituitary-axis. This positive loop ends with the preovulatoryLHsurgeandovulationofthefollicle.Sublutealprogesteroneconcentrations increase the LH pulses frequency, but theLH surge does not occur. In consequence the largest follicle persists and its dominance is prolonged.Highprogesteroneconcentrations,incontrast,haveapos-itive effect on follicular turnover increasing the number of young large follicles with the potential to ovulate. Supra-luteal progesterone levels affect the dominance of the largestfollicle of Wave 1, inducing early regression and accelerat-ing the emergence of the next follicular wave, which resultsin the ovulation of a healthy young follicle (ewes: Rubianes
et al.
1996; goats: Menchaca and Rubianes 2002). Overall,thesefindingssuggesttheconceptthatahigh-levelshort-term progestogentreatmentcouldbebetteratcontrollingfollicular 
 
TimedAI in small ruminants
Reproduction, Fertility and Development 
405
dynamicsandinimprovingconceptionrateinaprogestogen- based small ruminant breeding programme than long-termtreatments.
Progesterone and timed artificial insemination:‘short treatments’
Progestogens are the main hormones used for oestrus syn-chronisation in small ruminants (Bretzlaff and Romano2001). In traditional treatments progestogens are used for long periods similar to the lifespan of a cyclic corpus luteum(CL) (i.e. 11 to 19 days; Corteel
et al.
1988; Gordon 1983)regardless of the stage of the cycle or the follicular status of the ovary at the time of treatment. Long-term progestogentreatments efficiently synchronise oestrus, but with variablefertility. These traditional protocols were designed beforethe 1990s and did not take the current knowledge of fol-liculardynamicsintoaccount.Accordingtonewinformationreviewedabove,longlastingprogesteroneprimingcaninduceinappropriatelylowconcentrationsofprogesteroneattheend of the treatment.As follicular waves emerge every 5–7 days,extended long priming is not justified. In recent years our grouphasevaluateddifferentalternativeshort-termprogesto-gen treatments (so-called short treatment) in sheep and goatsconsisting of 5–7 days of progestogen priming.In ewes, different trials during seasonal anoestrus were performed to evaluate fertility using different progestogensand periods of priming associated with a mild dose of eCG(300 to 400IU) at the time of sponge withdrawal. The pregnancy rate after the application of intravaginal spongescontaining MAP (60mg) for one, two, three, six and 12 dayscombined with ram-mating resulted in pregnancy rates of 12.5, 20.0, 50.0, 75.0 and 68.8%, respectively (six-day group
v.
12-day group;
P
>
0.05; Ungerfeld and Rubianes 1999).The use of intravaginal devices with different progestogens(sponges with FGA or MAP or a CIDR-G with proges-terone) for six days in seasonally anoestrous ewes resulted in similar percentage of induced oestrus (91.5, 94.1 and 95.9% respectively) and conception rates (67.4, 62.5 and 59.6%respectively)betweengroups.Weconcludedthatshorttreatments of six days effectively induce oestrus during thenon-breeding season resulting in high fertility. During the breeding season and using natural mating, Viñoles
et al 
.(1999) obtained a higher pregnancy rate after a short treat-ment (six days of MAP sponges, 87%) compared to thetraditional 12-day treatment either with (67%) or without(63%) an eCG dose at the time of sponge withdrawal. How-ever, the timing of oestrus was variable probably becauseluteal regression was delayed in some cyclic ewes becauseno PGF
2
α
was used.As described above, to obtain an acceptable oestrousresponse after the use of short treatment during the breed-ing season it becomes necessary to ensure luteal regression.If luteolysis is induced at time of onset of short treatment, all
Table 1. Pregnancy rate (PR) in anoestrous and cycling goatsobtained after different intervals of short treatment with a pro-gestogen device associated with a mild eCG dose (200IU) at thetime of sponge withdrawal. In cycling goats a dose of PGF
2
α
wasalso given at time of device insertion.A single cervical timed artifi-cial insemination (TAI) using undiluted semen was performed 54hafter the end of treatment (pooled data from Red Capra,Faculty of Veterinary, Uruguay)
Short treatment4 days 5 days 6 days 7 days 8 days% PR 34.8 64.8 60.5 60.7 50.8(total
n
) (89) (216) (38) (122) (59)
the females will maintain similar and adequate serum levelsof exogenous progestogen during the treatment. This can beachieved with a PGF
2
α
dose at the time of sponge insertion(Beck 
et al.
1993). This approach in a TAI programme hasnot been extensively performed yet in sheep, but has beensuccessful in goats (see below).Short treatment has been routinely used in dairy goatsassociated with 200–300IU of eCG given at the time of device withdrawal. In the breeding season this treatment wasalso associated with a dose of PGF
2
α
given at the time of device insertion. For an acceptable oestrous response dur-ing the non-breeding season, it was necessary to associatethe short treatment with eCG treatment (A. Menchaca and A.Guarino,unpublisheddata);theresponsewithuseofeither 200 or 400IU eCG at time of device removal did not result ina difference in the pregnancy rate (progesterone alone, 22%,
n
=
18;associatedwith200IUeCG,58%,
n
=
26;associated with400IUeCG,64%,
n
=
25).Otherstudiescomparingtheuse of short treatment for four, five, six, seven or eight dayssuggested a higher pregnancy rate when progestogen prim-ing was applied for five days (Table 1).With this protocol theoverall percentage of goats coming into oestrus was
>
90%andthemeanintervalfromtheendoftreatmenttooestruswasaround30h.Thepregnancyratewas80%afternaturalserviceandusingartificialinseminationwithfreshsemenat12hafter theonsetofoestruswasalsohigh(
>
70%).WhenthemomentofasingleTAIwasevaluated,theoptimaltimewas54haftedevice withdrawal with a pregnancy rate that ranged between60% and 70%. Further details on the response to this treat-menthavebeenreviewedbyRubianesandMenchaca(2003).The ovarian response to five days of progesterone treat-ment has been evaluated in goats (Menchaca and Rubianes2001, 2002). Recently, an ultrasonographic study was con-ducted in cycling dairy goats (
n
=
24) to specifically eval-uate the effect of short treatment on follicular dynamics(A. Menchaca and E. Rubianes, unpublished observations).The treatment was started irrespective of the day of thecycle using a progesterone device (CIDR-G) for five days.A PGF
2
α
dose (i.m.) was given at the onset of the treatment.A schematic representation of the response is presented in
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...