Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Cell Phones and Wireless Dangers

Cell Phones and Wireless Dangers



|Views: 1,474|Likes:
Published by BioElectricShield
Report by Arthur Firstenberg on Dangers of Cell phones. One conclusion: The implications for us? Two minutes on a cell phone disrupts the blood-brain barrier, two hours on a cell phone causes permanent brain damage, and secondhand radiation may be almost as bad. The blood-brain barrier is the same in a rat and a human being.
Report by Arthur Firstenberg on Dangers of Cell phones. One conclusion: The implications for us? Two minutes on a cell phone disrupts the blood-brain barrier, two hours on a cell phone causes permanent brain damage, and secondhand radiation may be almost as bad. The blood-brain barrier is the same in a rat and a human being.

More info:

Published by: BioElectricShield on Oct 12, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Cell Phones And Wireless Dangers - TheFundamentals
 By Arthur Firstenberghttp://educate-yourself.org/cn/wirelessandcellphonedangers05oct07.shtmlOctober 5, 2007
Cell Phones And Wireless Dangers - The Fundamentals (Oct 7, 2007) Original title:The Largest Biological Experiment Ever
Introductory Remarks by Sepp Hasslberger
It is getting quite difficult to imagine a world without mobile communications. Wireless internetaccess is set to blanket the planet, just like cell phone networks already do. There has been anexplosive development - practically all during the last three decades - that brought mobile to thefarthest corners of the earth. But the technology is not without danger. The microwaves thatcarry bits and packets of data also carry a germ of destruction. Some people - as many as120,000 Californians - and by implication 1 million Americans - are actually unable to work asthey suffer from the incapacitating influence that this cacophony in the ether has on them.We might say they are the unlucky ones who have to suffer for progress to continue - but haveyou ever heard of canaries in the mines? They were the first ones to die when a potentiallydeadly but otherwise undetectable accumulation of "mine gas" threatened the lives of the minersworking underground. What if those 120.000 Californians and the one million Americans and byextension tens of millions of people world wide are in a very real sense our equivalent of deep-mine canaries? Are we not ignoring their plight at our own very imminent peril?Arthur Firstenberg, himself a sufferer of what the Russians call "microwave sickness" has puttogether the salient facts about the largest biological experiment ever, in a very readable articlepublished in the Eldorado Sun.We cannot call ourselves informed in the wireless debate unless we start looking at its dark sideas well as all the positive aspects. Firstenberg's article is as good as any to get us going in thisdirection ...
Original title:The Largest Biological Experiment Ever
 By Arthur Firstenberg
(original in Eldorado Sun- http://www.eldoradosun.com/Archives/01-06_issue/Firstenberg.htm)In 2002,
Gro Harlem Brundtland
, then head of the
World Health Organization
, told aNorwegian journalist that cell phones were banned from her office in Geneva because shepersonally becomes ill if a cell phone is brought within about four meters (13 feet) of her. Mrs.Brundtland is a medical doctor and former Prime Minister of Norway. This sensational news,published March 9, 2002 in Dagbladet, was ignored by every other newspaper in the world. Thefollowing week
Michael Repacholi,
her subordinate in charge of the
International EMF(electromagnetic field) Project
, responded with a public statement belittling his boss’sconcerns. Five months later, for reasons that many suspect were related to these circumstances,Mrs. Brundtland announced she would step down from her leadership post at the WHO after justone term.Nothing could better illustrate our collective schizophrenia when it comes to thinking aboutelectromagnetic radiation. We respond to those who are worried about its dangers — hence theInternational EMF Project — but we ignore and marginalize those, like Mrs. Brundtland, whohave already succumbed to its effects.As a consultant on the health effects of wireless technology, I receive calls that can be broadlydivided into two main groups: those from people who are merely worried, whom I will call A,and those from people who are already sick, whom I will call B. I sometimes wish I couldarrange a large conference call and have the two groups talk to each other — there needs to bemore mutual understanding so that we are all trying to solve the same problems. Caller A,worried, commonly asks what kind of shield to buy for his cell phone or what kind of headset towear with it. Sometimes he wants to know what is a safe distance to live from a cell tower.Caller B, sick, wants to know what kind of shielding to put on her house, what kind of medicaltreatment to get, or, increasingly often, what part of the country she could move to to escape theradiation to save her life.The following is designed as a sort of a primer: first, to help everybody get more or less on thesame page, and second, to clear up some of the confusions so that we can make rationaldecisions toward a healthier world.
 The most basic fact about cell phones and cell towers is that they emit
microwave radiation
; sodo Wi-Fi (wireless Internet) antennas, wireless computers, cordless (portable) phones and theirbase units, and all other wireless devices. If it's a communication device and it's not attached tothe wall by a wire,
it's emitting radiation
. Most Wi-Fi systems and some cordless phones operateat the exact same frequency as a microwave oven, while other devices use a different frequency.Wi-Fi is always on and always radiating. The base units of most cordless phones are alwaysradiating, even when no one is using the phone. A cell phone that is on but not in use is alsoradiating. And, needless to say, cell towers are always radiating. Why is this a problem, you might ask? Scientists usually divide the electromagnetic spectruminto "ionizing" and "non-ionizing." Ionizing radiation, which includes x-rays and atomic
radiation, causes cancer. Non-ionizing radiation,
which includes microwave radiation
, issupposed to be safe. This distinction always reminded me of the propaganda in George Orwell'sAnimal Farm: "Four legs good, two legs bad." "Non-ionizing good, ionizing bad" is as little to betrusted.An astronomer once quipped that if Neil Armstrong had taken a cell phone to the Moon in 1969,it would have appeared to be the third most powerful source of microwave radiation in theuniverse, next only to the Sun and the Milky Way. He was right. Life evolved with negligiblelevels of microwave radiation. ** An increasing number of scientists speculate that our body'sown cells, in fact, use the microwave spectrum to communicate with one another, like childrenwhispering in the dark, and that cell phones, like jackhammers, interfere with their signaling. **In any case, it is a fact that
we are all being bombarded, day in and day out, whether we usea cell phone or not, by an amount of microwave radiation that is some
ten million
times asstrong as the average natural background
. And it is also a fact that most of this radiation isdue to technology that has been developed since the 1970s.As far as cell phones themselves are concerned, if you put one up to your head you are damagingyour brain in a number of different ways. First, think of a microwave oven. A cell phone, like amicrowave oven and unlike a hot shower, heats you from the inside out, not from the outside in.And there are no sensory nerve endings in the brain to warn you of a rise in temperature becausewe did not evolve with microwave radiation, and this never happens in nature. Worse, thestructure of the head and brain is so complex and non-uniform that "
hot spots
" are produced,where heating can be tens or hundreds of times what it is nearby. Hot spots can occur both closeto the surface of the skull and deep within the brain, and also on a molecular level.Cell phones are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, and you can find, in thepackaging of most new phones, a number called the
Specific Absorption Rate
, or
, whichis supposed to indicate the rate at which energy is absorbed by the brain from that particularmodel. One problem, however, is the arbitrary assumption, upon which the FCC's regulations arebased, that the brain can safely dissipate added heat at a rate of up to 1 degree C per hour.Compounding this is the scandalous procedure used to demonstrate compliance with these limitsand give each cell phone its SAR rating. The standard way to measure SAR is on a "phantom"consisting, incredibly, of a homogenous fluid encased in Plexiglas in the shape of a head. Presto,no hot spots! But in reality, people who use cell phones for hours per day are chronically heatingplaces in their brain. The FCC's safety standard, by the way, was developed by electricalengineers, not doctors.
The Blood-Brain Barrier
 The second effect that I want to focus on, which has been proven in the laboratory, should byitself have been enough to shut down this industry and should be enough to scare away anyonefrom ever using a cell phone again. I call it the “smoking gun” of cell phone experiments. Likemost biological effects of microwave radiation, this has nothing to do with heating.The brain is protected by tight junctions between adjacent cells of capillary walls, the so-calledblood-brain barrier, which, like a border patrol, lets nutrients pass through from the blood to the

Activity (18)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Awang Firdaus liked this
Nana NurulJannah liked this
only1trinity7675 liked this
only1trinity7675 liked this
Bre_Lawson_285 liked this
nelly1 liked this
kirba liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->