Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Stopa Letter to Judge Sisco

Stopa Letter to Judge Sisco

Ratings: (0)|Views: 654|Likes:
Published by Foreclosure Fraud
4closureFraud.org
4closureFraud.org

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Foreclosure Fraud on Sep 15, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/15/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
TAMPA
2202 N. Westshore Blvd.Suite 200Tampa, FL 33607
 ORLANDO
4700 Millenia Blvd.Suite 175Orlando, FL 32839
 JACKSONVILLE
10151 Deerwood Park Blvd.Building 200, Suite 25Jacksonville, FL 32256
FORT LAUDERDALE
1560 Sawgrass Corporate Pkwy4
th
FloorSawgrass, FL 33323Telephone: (727) 667-3413
 
S
TOPA
L
AW
F
IRM
 
Mark P. Stopa, Esq.
September 14, 2011Honorable Michelle D. SiscoCircuit Court Judge800 East Twiggs Street, Room 506Tampa, FL 33602RE: Bank of America. N.A. v. Rodriguez;Hillsborough County Case No. 10-CA-2713Your Honor:I am in receipt of your September 9, 2011 Order, wherein you granted Plaintiff’s Motionfor Extension of Time to file an Amended Complaint,
ex parte
and without hearing. Lest therebe no misunderstanding, I have no qualms about this Order being entered
ex parte
and withouthearing, as an extension of time is a ministerial act that did not need a hearing. However, withall due respect, I am troubled at how you hand-wrote on the Order that Plaintiff “has sixty (60)days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint.” An extension of time isreasonable. But sixty days?Here’s what troubles me. In recent months, i.e. since the senior judge system ended,circuit judges in Hillsborough have been very assertive about their desires to move cases along,often adjudicating motions without hearings, sometimes even threatening sanctions againstdefense lawyers and homeowners. By way of example, it is not uncommon for me, when amotion to dismiss is denied, to see a judge curtly say I have ten days to answer, acting as if I’msomehow delaying, even though the motion had arguments that have been granted dozens of times in similar cases. I’m not saying you’ve done that, or that this happened in this case, but, asa general matter, this is the dynamic now in place in the Hillsborough courts, and in light of recent judges’ meetings, I trust you realize what I mean.As such, and given the dynamics here, I am, respectfully, troubled at how cavalier theCourt was in granting a 60-day extension of time to file an Amended Complaint. Let’s put it thisway – I’m confident that if the Motion to Dismiss were denied, then this Court would never havegiven me 60 days to file an Answer. Heck, I wouldn’t even have asked for 60 days.Respectfully, if I’m not being given 60 days to file an Answer (which is far more time-consuming than drafting an amendment to a complaint that has already been drafted), then whyshould a Plaintiff be given 60 days to file an Amended Complaint?

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->