Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 381 - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants LexisNexis Choicepoint, Inc - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.381.0

LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 381 - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants LexisNexis Choicepoint, Inc - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.381.0

Ratings: (0)|Views: 530|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
09/16/2011 381, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants LexisNexis Choicepoint, Inc, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc., LexisNexis Seisint, Inc, LexisNexis, Inc., Lexisnexis Group, Inc, Reed Elsevier, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/17/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(McCabe, James) (Entered: 09/16/2011)
09/16/2011 381, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants LexisNexis Choicepoint, Inc, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc., LexisNexis Seisint, Inc, LexisNexis, Inc., Lexisnexis Group, Inc, Reed Elsevier, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/17/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(McCabe, James) (Entered: 09/16/2011)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Sep 17, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

09/17/2011

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
sf-3045405
 JAMES F. McCABE (CA SBN 104686)JMcCabe@mofo.comADRIANO HRVATIN (CA SBN 220909)AHrvatin@mofo.comMORRISON & FOERSTER
LLP
 425 Market StreetSan Francisco, California 94105-2482Telephone: 415.268.7000Facsimile: 415.268.7522Attorneys for DefendantsReed Elsevier, Inc., LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc.,LexisNexis, Inc., LexisNexis Risk Solutions,Inc., LexisNexis ChoicePoint, Inc., LexisNexisSeisint, Inc., d/b/a Accurint, and LexisNexisGroup, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASOUTHERN DIVISIONLISA LIBERI,
et al
.,Plaintiffs,v.ORLY TAITZ,
et al
.,Defendants.Case No. CV11-00485 AG (AJWx)
REED DEFENDANTS’ NOTICEOF MOTION AND MOTION TODISMISS FIRST AMENDEDCOMPLAINT; MEMORANDUMOF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Date: October 17, 2011Time: 10:00 a.m.Judge: Hon. Andrew J. GuilfordPlace: Courtroom 10D
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 381 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 23 Page ID#:8812
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
sf-3045405
 
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
TO THE CLERK OF COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIRATTORNEYS OF RECORD:PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on October 17, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., or assoon thereafter as counsel may be heard before the Honorable Andrew J. Guilford,in Courtroom 10D of the above-captioned Court, located at 411 West Fourth Street,Santa Ana, California 92701, defendantsReed Elsevier, Inc., LexisNexis Risk andInformation Analytics Group, Inc., LexisNexis, Inc., LexisNexis Risk Solutions,Inc., LexisNexis ChoicePoint, Inc., LexisNexis Seisint, Inc., d/b/a Accurint, andLexisNexis Group, Inc.(the “Reed Defendants”) will, and hereby do, movepursuant to Rules 8 and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for anorder dismissing plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.Good cause exists to grant this motion.
First 
, the First Amended Complaint,a 172-page, 423-paragraph pleading with a ten-page prayer seeking 53 species of relief, violates Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and hence fails tostate any claim against any Reed Defendant.
Second 
, all of plaintiffs’ claimsagainst the Reed Defendants should be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure toproperly allege any wrongdoing by any Reed Defendant, and thus any plausibleclaim, with respect to plaintiffs.
Third 
, various of plaintiffs’ claims (specifically,Claim Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19 and 20) against the Reed Defendants shouldbe dismissed with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6) as to all plaintiffs, since the claimsare either non-existent or are unavailable to plaintiffs.
Finally
, the First AmendedComplaint fails to state any claim on behalf of plaintiffs Go Excel Global, Philip J.Berg or his Law Offices against any Reed Defendant, which separately warrantsdismissal under Rule 12(b)(6).Prior to bringing this motion, and as required by Local Civil Rule 7-3, theReed Defendants conferred at length with plaintiffs’ counsel regarding the issuesraised herein, including on August 5, 8 and 12 and thereafter on September 9, 13
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 381 Filed 09/16/11 Page 2 of 23 Page ID#:8813
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
sf-3045405
 
2
and 14. Moreover, on August 19, the Court granted the Reed Defendants’ requestto file the instant motion. (Docket No. 356.)This motion is based upon this notice of motion, the accompanyingmemorandum of points and authorities, all pleadings and other records on file inthis action and any such further evidence and arguments as may be presented at orbefore any hearing on the motion.Dated: September 16, 2011 JAMES F. McCABEADRIANO HRVATINMORRISON & FOERSTER
LLP
 By: /s James F. McCabeJames F. McCabeAttorneys for DefendantsReed Elsevier, Inc., LexisNexis Risk and InformationAnalytics Group, Inc.,LexisNexis, Inc., LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., LexisNexis ChoicePoint,Inc., LexisNexis Seisint, Inc., d/b/aAccurint, and LexisNexis Group, Inc. 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 381 Filed 09/16/11 Page 3 of 23 Page ID#:8814

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
GeorgetownJD added this note|
Who, on Berg's team, wants to claim ownership of the stoopit "back-door to Oracle database" theory? Berg ought to nonsuit against these defendants before he finds himself facing Rule 11 sanctions.
Jack Ryan liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->