Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Letter to Judge Bergmann RE Motion to Quash Denied w/o Hearing

Letter to Judge Bergmann RE Motion to Quash Denied w/o Hearing

Ratings: (0)|Views: 546|Likes:
Published by Foreclosure Fraud
4closureFraud.org
4closureFraud.org

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Foreclosure Fraud on Sep 20, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/15/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 
TAMPA
2202 N. Westshore Blvd.Suite 200Tampa, FL 33607
 ORLANDO
4700 Millenia Blvd.Suite 175Orlando, FL 32839
 JACKSONVILLE
10151 Deerwood Park Blvd.Building 200, Suite 25Jacksonville, FL 32256
FORT LAUDERDALE
1560 Sawgrass Corporate Pkwy4
th
FloorSawgrass, FL 33323
(888) 450-1549www.stayinmyhome.com
S
TOPA
L
AW
F
IRM
 
Mark P. Stopa, Esq.
 
September 19, 2011Honorable Charles Ed Bergmann800 E. Twiggs St.Room 526Tampa, FL 33602Re: BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. DiGiovanniHillsborough County Case No. 09-CA-32150Your Honor:I am in receipt of your September 15, 2011 Order wherein, you denied Defendant’sMotion to Quash, without notice or hearing, based on your belief Defendant waived his jurisdictional challenge by filing of a motion for extension of time. Respectfully, this ruling isdirectly contrary to controlling case law, which is set forth in the attached motion.Respectfully, it is very disappointing to lose on an issue like this when I never had anopportunity to be heard, particularly when it’s clear to me that the Court’s ruling is erroneous. Inother words, while I can understand the Court’s desire to move cases along and not havehundreds of hearings on the exact same issue (like is arguably the case with the Motion toDismiss), I don’t think the recent Administrative Order was intended for the Court to adjudicateissues that are not boilerplate foreclosure issues or to deprive Defendants of the right to be heardon such matters. After all, whether a motion for extension waives the right to challenge serviceof process is not a matter you hear every day, as if it were, you would have been aware of thelaw cited in the attached motion. Hence, I must respectfully request, in the future, that myclients be afforded hearings on such matters, as otherwise it just creates more time and expensefor everyone involved.Finally, as if this were not uncomfortable enough already, it is incumbent upon me tonote that the attached motion does not toll the time for my client to appeal your Order. Hence,unless you reverse your ruling on the Motion to Quash before October 13, 2011, my client willhave no choice but to seek review in the Second District. As the law on this issue is clear, Isubmit it would be appropriate for this Court to take appropriate action before that time, be it arehearing or a stay pending appeal.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->