Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Liberi v Taitz Objections and Opp to Intelius Req for Judicial Notice Doc 389

Liberi v Taitz Objections and Opp to Intelius Req for Judicial Notice Doc 389

Ratings: (0)|Views: 46|Likes:
Published by nocompromisewtruth
Liberi v Taitz Objections and Opposition to Intelius Request for Judicial Notice
Liberi v Taitz Objections and Opposition to Intelius Request for Judicial Notice

More info:

Published by: nocompromisewtruth on Sep 26, 2011
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/07/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Liberi, et al, Plaintiffs Opposition and Objections to Defendant Intelius, Inc. Request for Judicial Notice
112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Philip J. Berg, EsquirePennsylvania I.D. 9867
LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Telephone: (610) 825-3134E-mail: philjberg@gmail.com
 Attorney in prose and for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,SOUTHERN DIVISION
LISA LIBERI, et al, Plaintiffs,vs.ORLY TAITZ, et al,Defendants.:::::::::::::::::CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:
8:11-cv-00485-AG (AJW)PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION ANDOBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTINTELIUS, INC. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Date of Hearing: October 17, 2011Time of Hearing: 10:00 a.m.Location: Courtroom 10DPlaintiffs, by and through their undersigned counsel, Philip J. Berg, Esquirefiles the within Objections to Defendant Intelius, Inc.’s Request for Judicial Noticeas the Documents requested Judicial Notice of are
not
 public record and are in fulldisputeas they are
not
the documents portrayed by Defendant Intelius, Inc. and theaccuracy of the documents are under dispute as the documents Intelius, Inc. is
 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 389 Filed 09/24/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID#:9154
 
Liberi, et al, Plaintiffs Opposition and Objections to Defendant Intelius, Inc. Request for Judicial Notice
212345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
requesting JudicialNotice of are
not
the documents Plaintiffs received as claimed by Defendant Intelius.1.It isheavily disputed that Intelius Exhibit “1” to the Declaration of Benjamin Nelson [“Nelson Decl”] is in fact the report that Orly Taitz obtained andreceived on April 12, 2009. Orly Taitz did
not
have an Intelius account or accounts with any of the Reed Defendants.
See
the Declaration of Charles EdwardLincoln, III filed July 25, 2011, Docket No. [“DN”] 313.2.Exhibit “2” to Nelsons Decl isunder dispute as it is
not
the reportPlaintiff Lisa Liberi received on herself on April 10, 2010 throughwww.intelius.com.
See
the Declaration of Lisa Liberi with the report she obtaineddirectly from Intelius, Inc. and the receipt for said report.3.Plaintiffs have
not
incorporated into their Complaint Intelius, Inc.’sTerms of Serviceas falsely claimed by Intelius, Inc.
See
Intelius, Inc.’s Request for Judicial Notice, pg. 1, ¶4.4.Nelson’s Decl. Exhibit “6”, Letter from Lisa Ostella, is asking for copies of all reports supplied to third parties on behalf of her and her spouse.
See
 Nelson’s Decl., Exhibit “6”. Lisa Ostella’s letter is
not
simply asking for whoobtained her reports asstated by Benjamin Nelson on behalf of Intelius, Inc. andtheir attorney’s.
See
Intelius, Inc.’s Request for Judicial Notice, pg. 2, ¶6.Moreover, Plaintiff Lisa Ostella sent her letter with information that Intelius, Inc.
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 389 Filed 09/24/11 Page 2 of 6 Page ID#:9155
 
Liberi, et al, Plaintiffs Opposition and Objections to Defendant Intelius, Inc. Request for Judicial Notice
312345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
demanded, which Mrs. Ostella believed would be kept in strict confidence.Therefore, Plaintiffs Object to Intelius, Inc.’sand their attorney’smischaracterization of Lisa Ostella’s letterand the publication thereof.5.Plaintiffs Object to Intelius, Inc.’s supposed response referred to intheir Request for Judicial Notice on pg. 2, ¶7. Plaintiff Lisa Ostella never receivedsaid letter.
See
the Declaration of Lisa Ostella.6.Intelius, Inc.’s “Frequently Asked Questions” are
not
incorporatedinto Plaintiffs FAC referred to in Intelius, Inc.’s Request for Judicial Notice on pg.2, ¶8.7.Plaintiffs Object to Intelius, Inc.’s statement to the Court on page 3, paragraph 2, “
These documents available from Intelius’ websiteare the prope subject of judicial notice because they are incorporated into the First Amended Complaint…
This is untrue and nowhere in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaintwill any party find reference to Intelius, Inc. Terms of Service and/or FrequentlyAsked Questions.8.Plaintiffs Object to Intelius, Inc.’s statement to the Court on page 3, paragraph 2, “
 Accordingly, the Court is authorized to take judicial notice of pagesmade available to consumers performing searches through Intelius’ website,including Intelius’ “Terms and Conditions” and “Frequently Asked Questions
”.Defendant Intelius, Inc. is attempting to mislead this Court and confuse the issues.
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 389 Filed 09/24/11 Page 3 of 6 Page ID#:9156

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->