Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
WARDEN v. TUCSON MAYOR BOB WALKUP

WARDEN v. TUCSON MAYOR BOB WALKUP

Ratings: (0)|Views: 131|Likes:
Published by Roy Warden
Tucson Community Activist Roy Warden Files a Petition for Special Action to Overturn the Civility Accord, and a Tucson City Council Rule Which Now Prohibits Free Speech.
Tucson Community Activist Roy Warden Files a Petition for Special Action to Overturn the Civility Accord, and a Tucson City Council Rule Which Now Prohibits Free Speech.

More info:

Published by: Roy Warden on Sep 30, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/13/2011

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONAIN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA
ROY WARDEN,Petitioner,v.MAYOR BOB WALKUP, for theCity of Tucson,Respondent,andTHE CITY OF TUCSON,Real Party at Interest
 )))))))))))))))))))))))
Superior Court No.
C20117276
Oral Argument Requested
The Honorable Steven Villarreal
PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION TO THE PIMA COUNTYSUPERIOR COURT
Roy Warden, Petitioner In Forma Pauperis1015 W. Prince Road#131-182Tucson Arizona 85705roywarden@hotmail.com
1
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
PageTable of Citations3Jurisdictional Statement3-4Statement of the Issue4Statement of the Facts4-7Argument7-13Conclusion14-16Prayer17Certificate of Compliance20Certificate of Service21Transcript September 07, 201122-26Transcript September 13, 201127-33Transcript September 20, 201134-37
2
 
TABLE OF CITATIONSCASE: PAGE
1Sabelko v City of Phoenix, 846 F. Supp 8225, 10, 11, 122Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement,112 S.Ct. 23955, 11, 123Revised Arizona Jury Instructions8Rule 3(b), (c) of Rules of Procedure foSpecial Action10, 114Hynes v Mayor & Council of Oradell, 96S.Ct. 1755105Grayned v City of Rockford , 92 S.Ct. 229412, 156Wright v U.S Army, 307 F.Supp.2d 1065127Cox v State of Louisiana, 85 S.Ct. at 463128State v. Brown, 207 Ariz. 23110, 12, 13, 159Coates v. Cincinnatti, 91 S.Ct. 16861110Gregory v City of Chicago, 89 S.Ct. 9461511Arizona Right to Life Political Action vBayless, 320 F.3d 10021612Boos v Barry, 108 S.Ct. 115716
JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT
1.
The foundational issue of this case, in which Tucson City Mayor Bob Walkup has arbitrarily and capriciously employed the“Civility Accord” and a “Mayor and Council Meetings PublicParticipation” rule, (hereinafter referred to as “The Rule”), to block public commentary he deems “uncivil, impertinent andslanderous,” presents constitutional issues of great publicsignificance and statewide importance.
3

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
silverbull8 added this note
How do you get this stuff typed to legal format?
silverbull8 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->