Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
A History of Anthropology

A History of Anthropology

Ratings:

5.0

(1)
|Views: 2,781|Likes:
Published by api-3709748

More info:

Published by: api-3709748 on Oct 15, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

03/18/2014

pdf

text

original

CONTENTS
Preface
vi
1. Beginnings
1
2. Victorians, Germans and a Frenchman
16
3. Four Founding Fathers
36
4. Expansion and Institutionalisation
54
5. Forms of Change
76
6. The Power of Symbols
96
7. Questioning Authority
111
8. The End of Modernism?
135
9. Reconstructions
157
Bibliography
179
Index
192
v
1 BEGINNINGS

How long have anthropologists existed? Opinions are divided on this issue. The answer depends, largely, on what one means by an anthropologist. People have always been curious about their neighbours and more remote people. They have gossiped about them, fought them, married them and told stories about them. Some of these stories or myths have been written down. Some writings were later criticised as inaccurate or ethnocentric (or flatly racist). Some stories were compared with others, about other peoples, leading to more general assumptions about \u2018people elsewhere\u2019. In this sense, we start an anthropological inquiry the moment a foreigner moves into the neigh- bouring flat.

If we restrict ourselves to anthropology as a scientific discipline, some would trace its roots back to the European Enlightenment during the eighteenth century; others would claimthat anthropology did not arise as a science until the 1850s, yet others would argue that anthropological research in its present-day sense only commenced after the First WorldWar. Nor can we avoid such ambiguities.

It is beyond doubt, however, that anthropology, considered as the science of humanity, originated in the region we commonly but inaccurately call \u2018the West\u2019, notably in three or four \u2018Western\u2019 countries: France, Great Britain, the USA and, until the Second World War, Germany. Historically speaking, this is a European discipline, and its practitioners, like those of all European sciences, occasionally like to trace its roots back to the ancient Greeks.

HERODOTUS AND OTHER GREEKS

Thanks to research carried out by anthropologists, historians and archaeol- ogists, we today believe that \u2018the ancient Greeks\u2019 probably differed fairly radically from ourselves. In the classical, \u2018democratic\u2019 city-states, more than half the population were slaves; free citizens regarded manual labour as degrading, and democracy (which was also \u2018invented\u2019 by the Greeks) was probably more similar to the competitivep o t l a t c h feasts of the Kwakiutl (Chapter 4), than to the institutions described in modern constitutions (see Finley 1973; P. Anderson 1974).

Going back to the Greeks is thus a long journey, and we peer into their
world through cracked and smoky glass. We catch sight of little city-states
1

surrounded by traditional IronAge farmland, and connected to the outside world through a network of maritime trade relationships between urban settlements all along the Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts. The trade in luxury goods and the slaverybrought considerable wealth to the cities, and the citizens of thepolis, with their distaste for physical labour, had at their disposal a large surplus, which they used, among other things, to build temples, stadiums, baths and other public buildings, where male citizens couldmeet and engage inphilosophical disputes and speculations about how the world was put together.

It was in such a community that Herodotus of Halicarnassus (c. 484\u2013425
BC) lived. Born in a Greek colonial town on the south-west coast of present-

day Turkey, Herodotus began to travel as a young man and gained an intimate knowledge of the many foreignpeoples that the Greeks maintained contacts with. Today, Herodotus is mainly rememberedfor his history of the Persian Wars, but he also wrote detailed travel narratives from various parts of westernAsia and Egypt, andfrom as far away as the land of the Scythians on the northern coast of the Black Sea. In these narratives, far removed as they are from our present world, we recognize a problemthat has followed anthropology, in various guises, up to this very day: how should we relate to \u2018the others\u2019? Are theybasically like ourselves, or are theybasically different? Much anthropological theory has tried to strike a balance between these positions, and this is exactly what Herodotus did too. Sometimes he is simply a prejudiced and ethnocentric \u2018civilized man\u2019, who disdains everything foreign. At other times he acknowledges that different people have different values because they live under different circumstances, not because they are morally deficient. Herodotus\u2019 descriptions of language, dress, political and judicial institutions, crafts and economics are highly readable today. Although he sometimes clearly got the facts wrong, he was a meticulous scholar, whose books are often the only written sources we have about peoples of a distant past.

Many Greeks testedtheir wits against a philosophical paradox that touches directly on the problem of howwe should relate to \u2018the others\u2019. This is the paradox ofuniversalism versusrelativism. Apresent-day universalist would try to identify commonalities and similarities (or even universals) between different societies, while a relativist would emphasise the uniqueness and particularity of each society or culture. TheSophists of Athens are sometimes described as the first philosophical relativists in the European tradition (several almost contemporary thinkers in Asia, such as Gautama Buddha, Confucius and Lao-Tze, were concerned with similar questions). In Plato\u2019s (427\u2013347BC) dialoguesProtagoras andGorgias, Socrates argues with the Sophists. We may picture them in dignified intellectual battle, surrounded by colourful temples and solemn public buildings, with their slaves scarcely visible in the shadows between the columns. Other citizens stand as spectators, while Socrates\u2019 faith in a universal reason, capable of ascertain-

2
A History of Anthropology

Activity (0)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Johnald Chau liked this
doggie69a liked this
eznor77 liked this
eznor77 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->