Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
.
_
*/
Anuradha
G o y le
et
a l.
8% h2u.?
w H % % K ;;)
Colostrum and Prelacteal Feeding Practkes
-
Prelacteal feeds are given under the belief that they act as laxatives, cleansing agents or
re -
hydrating agents4 or as a means of clearing the
m c o n iu m 5 .
Unfortunately, they are not aware that
prelacteals could be a source of contamination too.
A lot of work in this area has been carried out in slums and in urban and rural
a re a s .*-1 5

However, there is a paucity of data from squatter settlements. The present study was designed to look into the colostrum and prelacteal feeding practices of the families of pavement and roadside squatter settlements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
r
- . *

No enumeration of roadside squatter settlements had been made in Jaipur city when the present study was conducted from March 1999 to March 2001. The Jaipur Nagar Nigam and the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) officials provided some information on the whereabouts of a few squatter settlements; the rest of the information was obtained from the residents of the squatter settlements and their leaders, as also local people living nearby. Inmates of squatter settlements on the pavements and on vacant plots alongside the mainroads were approached for data collection. The sample comprised 294 families, which were purposively selected from 42 squatter settlements. In all, 294 mothers were interviened with the help of an interview schedule on the breast and infant feeding practices followed by them.

RESULTS
TABLE-l :
Colostrum and prelacteal feeding practices of families of pavement and roadside
squatter settlements

the mothers was poor (98.3%). Most of the families had a nuclear family structure (84.5%). The families were engaged in activities generating low incomes. They were exposed to the ill effects of the environment.

It is evident from Table-l that 14.3% mothers had given colostrum, while 85.7% had deprived their infants of this valuable food. Almost all the

J a g g e v W a te r
mothers (96.6%) aave
o re la c te a l
feeds to their
A jw a in
W a te r
In d b
J. Prev.S o t. M ed V ol:
35
! N o .l S z
2
5 9
1
61
(
20.7
1
20
1
6.6
J a n . -.W n e ,
2004
Anuradha
G o y le
et
a il
Colostrum and Prelacteal Feeding Practices
mothers (96.6%) gave prelacteal feeds to theirDairy Milk/Goat\u2019s Milk/
16
5.4
children. . . . .
Cow\u2019s Milk
_ I
_
Honey
6
2.0
-
Tea
2
0.7
-.*
Ajwain With
G h e e /O il
1
0.3
The prelacteal feeds included plain water
(4 8 .3 % ),
jaggery with
g h e e /o il
in the form of pellets
which were stuck to the palate
(4 6 .2 % ),
sugar water
(2 8 .2 % ),
gripe water
(2 4 .1 % ),
jaggery water
(2 0 .7 % ),
o rq u m
(a iw a in )
water
(6 .8 % ),
milk
(5 .4 % ),
honey
(2 .0 % ),
tea (0.7%) and omum
(a jw a in ).w ith
g h e e /o il
(0.3%).
DISCUSSION
. . :
1 1
:
:\u201c I
.
..:
.
.
C O ~ O S h .lIIl
feeding:In the present study, only 14.3% of the mothers had fed colostrum to their
babies. The rest had discarded it as they thought it to be immature dirty milk and therefore harmful to
their infants. The results of Kumari et
a ?
and Srivastava et
a /\u2019
corroborate those of the present study.
Kumari et
a16
reported that 16.9% of the infants had been given colostrum by their mothers with an
urban background from Delhi. Srivastava et
a /\u2019

found in their study that colostrum was discarded by 82.89% mothers because they were ignorant of its advantages. In rural areas of Haryana, the situation was even more dismal as revealed from a study by Punia ef

a p ,
where only 0.66% of the
respondents had fed colostrum to their infants.
However, higher figures for colostrum feeding have also been reported. Subbulakshmi et
a ?

carried out a study on a low socio-economic group of women from urban slums and rural areas of Maharashtra and Gujarat and noted that 22% of the mothers had fed colostrum to their infants. The reasons cited by mothers for not feeding colostrum were elders\u2019 negative attitude towards colostrum feeding,

d a i\u2019s

prohibition, belief that it is bad for the child\u2019s health, caesarean deliveries and absence of colostrum secretion. About 31% of urban and 80% of rural mothers from Coimbatore did not feed colostrum to their

in fa n ts g .
Singh eta ? reported from their study in some semi-arid rural areas of
Rajasthan that about 77% of the women
d is c n rd e d
colostrum
d u e
to different reasons: 42.7% women
considered it harmful to the infant, 30.7%
L \u2019.,.x d e d
it due to prevalent social customs or traditions.
However, 26.6% discarded it due to both. On the other hand,
G hosh\u201d

stated from his study on colostrum feeding of healthy newborns that none of the babies were deprived of colostrum. It was because all the babieshad been delivered

:.
? o s p ita l.
Barring just a few studies, colostrum feeding
In d iiz n J.
C Fb v .
Sec. ZM edVol:
35 No.1
d
2
6 0
Jan. -June, 2004
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more