Rule of Law

‘Rule of Law’ does not mean the governance of the system, which is based upon the utopian
sovereignty. ‘We, the people’ does not mean the representative of the people in democratic
parliamentary system of governance of our citizen by the beauraucratic supremacy of power. The
purpose of parliamentarian is to premalgate the legislature, which does not mean the preuliage
orientation. Every institution of the democratic system is meant to serve the need of the citizen,
instead of ruling upon the prurliage without fulfillment of the concomittment of its obligation
towards them. The right and duty is correlated as represent two sides of a coin. There is no one
superior than the statutory power. However, the present scenario of all the three organs in our so
called parliamentary system of representation and indirect representation for choosing the
president of our country and to make the governance of the politician occupying the offices as the
head of the government is nothing but an anarchy created by so many despotic monarchs which is
worst then the slavery of the citizens of our nation. Let us have introspection upon the prevailing
melodies resulting in deterioration of every norms of a civilized society. Why the parliamentarian
attack accused suspected to be mastermind of the assassination of our democracy has been
acquitted in absence of any evidenced? Whether the conversation made by such accused namely
Jilane would not have been preserved to be the evidence under the provisions of the Evidence Act?
Whether the conversation made by Jilani to the assistance using automates and semi-automatic
weapons within the premises of parliament were not sufficient to punish the mastermind of the
crime? Whether the electro magnetic filed converting the transmission in the visual expression and
in conversations without recording the actual wording of the conversation may not lead the
presumption of the guilt for imposing punishment? Why we repelled enactment of Tata and POTA
only on the protest of the antler national citizens? Why not common civil law is applicable and there
is no demand for separate criminal law according to the sehiriat by the Muslims which is based on
retributive theory of punishment and the detrend measurement of conversion? Can anyone may
justify the Fatwa issued against an individual living in Denmark and the follower of Christian
religion may not have his Rights of Expression for making cartoons of any individual? Why Hazi-
Yaku is issuing the warrant of death sentence to such cartoonists in India and thereby terrorizing
the people of other religions namely the catholic, presidents,
I witness Hindus, Parsi People? Whether issuance of Fatwa by Muslims and the call to boycott
the President of America George W. Bush is a secular character? Why minister of Awas namely
Azam Khan speaks of the utterance by saying Hindu, Hindi and Hindustani as traitors in our
nation? Why subsidy is provided from the Income Tax of Hindus to the Hajj pilgrimage where 5
thousand cows, thousands camels and 20 thousand sheep are slaughtered everyday by the
butchers in an organized manner? Who is Kafir and Kufr, killing of which is Jehad and the suicide
Jehadi may be awarded with Nishamat and Hurrein? Even we may call it as a secular welfare state
to our nation. We may feel proud by killing Jessua Lal by Manu Sharma and V.Yadav the sons of
Hary and minishter and D.P. Yadav and get them acquitted of the charge of murder upon them in
the absence of any evidence. If in retaliation of Godra killing by the Muslims, the riots strickal
places have some incidence of anson in which about 900 muslims and 600 Hindus were killed,
these shall be the retrial just to enquire the killing of Muslims and that too outside the state of
Gujrat in Maharashtra what was wrong with Narendra Modi as the Chief Minister when the riots in
representations of Godra gone aside were taking place at Gujrat, then issuance of Fatwa by
minister Haji Yaku and terroristing the citizens from the terror of Islam at Hajratganj Lucknow and
no one has blamed Mulayam Singh Yadav as communal? Whether Lalu Prasad Yadav conducting
the illegal evquiry by appointing justice U.C. Banerjee the retired judge of supreme court as an
enquiry commission and getting a report that Godra massacre by burning the Ram Bhakt returning
from Ayodhaya was a mere accidental fire and not a carnage? Why the Chief Justice of Patna High
Court Justice B.M.Lal recommended for the use of Army personnel to get the enforcement of the
Hon’ble Court’s order as the police is defunged to arrest the politicians? Whether the call of
Shasbuddin that if the D.G.P. has the courage to arrest me, then arrests me. I am sitting at my
home? Why Pappu Yadav could not be arrested in the State of Bihar till intervention by the
Supreme Court? How does Atique Ahmed could have come out from prison just after the resume of
Mayawati during Mylayam Singh period, when there are 76 cases of murder against him and he
himself being avoided from being released from jail? Why Raja Bhaiya, his brother Gopal Ji and his
father were released from the charge of POTA as the skulls of the human body and 30 carvive vertic
reserved from their palace, were the crocodiles are natured through the flesh of human beings?
Being the rival of Raja Bhaiya whether the call of Atique Ahmed not to fight the elections of MLA
chile to Raju Pal otherwise in case of his win from BSP ticket, there will be the by-election within 6
months and killing of Raju Pal, the defeat of Puja Pal by demonstration of the muscle power and
ultimate of Mohd. Aslam from the said crime is the rule of law in the society? Whether the hosting
of the tri-colour flag of our nation at Idgaj by Uma Bharti at Karnataka my oust her from Chief
Ministership and still we may call it a nation. There were 30 madrassas now they are 96 thousand
and about 1 crore 20 lakh people have migrated from Bangladesh to get the conversion of our
nation in Islamic nation? Why we may not remember the period offering king Daler’s minor
daughter to Mohd. Bin Qasim in 7th century and the repition of the same thing in our nation? Why
the politicians are worried about the percentage of Muslims in recruitment or armed forces and still
then we may not say that Islam is a crime and the people of our country are the slave of the system
of our governance, Our parliamentarian democracy is a framed in which accused, and traitors are
spared and innocents are punished unnecessarily.
Yogesh Kumar Saxena
Advocate, High Court,
Chamber No. 139, High Court,
H.I.G. 203, Preetam Nagar, Sulem sarai, Allahabad
0532/ 2637720, 2436451, Mobile 9415284843