Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Meat Causes World Hunger

Meat Causes World Hunger

Ratings: (0)|Views: 780|Likes:
Published by Our Compass

More info:

Published by: Our Compass on Oct 22, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/22/2013

pdf

text

original

 
3When representatives meetat the World Food Summitthey supposedly focus onhow to get food into themouths of nearly onebillion people who arecurrently undernourished.However, at all the dinnersthey attend you can expect to see theconsumption of large quantities of meat.And herein lies the contradiction.People go hungry because much of arableland is used to grow feed grain for animalsrather than people. In the US, 157 milliontons of cereals, legumes and vegetableprotein – all suitable for human consumption– is fed to livestock to produce just 28 milliontons of animal protein in the form of meat.In developing countries, using land to createan artificial food chain has resulted in miseryfor hundreds of millions of people. An acreof cereal produces five times more proteinthan an acre used for meat production;legumes such as beans, peas and lentils canproduce 10 times more protein and, in thecase of soya, 30 times more.Global corporations which supply the seeds,chemicals and cattle and which control theslaughterhouses, marketing and distributionof beef, eagerly promote grain-fed livestock.They equate it with a country’s prestige andclimbing the “protein ladder” becomes themark of success.Enlarging their meat supply is the first stepfor all developing countries. They start withchicken and egg production and, as theireconomies grow, climb the protein ladder topork, milk, and dairy products, then to grass-fed beef and finally to grain-fed beef.Encouraging this process advances theinterests of agribusinesses and two-thirds ofthe grain exported from the USA goes tofeed livestock. The process really gotunderway when “green revolution”technology produced grain surpluses in the1970s. The UN’s Food and AgriculturalOrganisation encouraged it and the USAgovernment linked its food aid programmeto the producing of feed grain and gave low-interest loans to establish grain-fed poultryoperations. Many nations have attempted toremain high on the protein ladder long afterthe grain surpluses disappeared.Human consequences of the shift from foodto feed were dramatically illustrated duringthe Ethiopian famine in 1984. While peoplestarved, Ethiopia was growing linseed cake,cottonseed cake and rapeseed meal forEuropean livestock. Millions of acres of landin the developing world are used for thispurpose. Tragically, 80 per cent of the world’shungry children live in countries with foodsurpluses which are fed to animals forconsumption by the affluent.The irony is that millions of consumers in thefirst world are dying from diseases ofaffluence such as heart attacks, strokes,diabetes and cancer, brought on by eatinganimal products, while the world’s poor aredying from diseases of poverty. We are longoverdue for a global discussion on how topromote a diversified, high-protein,vegetarian diet for the human race.
 Jeremy Rifkin is the author of Beyond Beef:The Rise and Fall of the Cattle Culture(Plume, 1992), and The Biotech Century (Victor Gollancz,1998). He is also the president of the Foundation on EconomicTrends in Washington DC, USA.
2
D
espite the rich diversity of foods foundall over the world, one third of itspopulation does not have enough toeat. Today, hunger is a massive problem inmany parts of Africa, Asia and South Americaand the future is not looking good. Theglobal population is set to rise from 6.5billion (2006) to 9.3 billion by 2050 (2) andWorldwatch reports (3) forecast severe globalfood shortages leading to famine on anunprecedented scale.This misery is partly adirect result of our desireto eat meat. Children inthe developing worldstarve next to fields offood destined for exportas animal feed, to supportthe meat-hungry culturesof the rich world. Whilemillions die, one third ofthe world's grainproduction is fed tofarmed animals in richcountries (4).If animal farming were tostop and we were to usethe land to grow grain tofeed ourselves, we couldfeed every single personon this planet. Consumingcrops directly - rather than feeding them toanimals and then eating animals - is a farmore efficient way to feed the world. This
Viva!
Guide looks at why eating meat is amajor cause of world hunger and howvegetarianism can provide a solution.
The roots of hunger
The developing world hasn't always beenhungry. Early explorers of the 16th and 17thcenturies often returned amazed at the hugeamounts of food they saw there. In parts ofAfrica, for example, people always had threeharvests in storage and no-one went hungry.The idea of buying and selling food wasunheard of.The Industrial Revolution changed all that.European countries needed cheap rawmaterials such as coal and iron ore thatdeveloping countries had plenty of. Throughthe process of invasion and colonisation,Western countries could not only take theraw materials but claim the land as their ownand make the indigenouspeople pay taxes or rent.Poor peasants (many ofwhom had never dealt inmoney before) wereforced to grow crops suchas cotton to sell to theirnew masters. Wealthycountries owned the land,all the food that wasproduced, and decidedthe price. After payingtaxes, peasants had littlemoney left to buy thisexpensive food and oftenended up borrowingmoney simply to live. Thiswhole process ofcolonisation continuedright up to the beginningof the last century.
The problemtoday
Drought and other 'natural' disasters are oftenwrongly blamed for causing famines. Localpeople have always planned for freak acts ofnature and although they may be the triggerthat starts a famine, the underlying cause isthe system of modern day neo-colonialism.The land in poor countries is still largely notowned by the people who work on it andrents are high. Huge areas are owned bylarge companies based in the West. It iscommon for people to be thrown off theland, often going to the towns where there
Meat makes the rich ill and thepoor hungry
byJeremyRifkin
“The earth hasenough foreveryone’s needs,but not for somepeople’s greed.”~ Mahatma Gandhi(1869 - 1948)(1)
   P   h  o   t  o  :   V   i   t   h  a   l   b   h  a   i   J   h  a  v  e  r   i   /   G  a  n   d   h   i   S  e  r  v  e   D  e  s   i  g  n  :   S  u  s  s  e   d   D  e  s   i  g  n .   C  o  v  e  r  p   h  o   t  o  s  :   O  x   f  a  m .   P  r   i  n   t  e   d  o  n  r  e  c  y  c   l  e   d  p  a  p  e  r .
 
billion people, could be fed on the proteinconsumed and largely wasted by the UnitedStates’ beef herd (10).Because of the demand for animal feed, aWestern meat-based diet uses four and a halftimes more land than is necessary for a vegandiet and two and a quarter times more thanfor a vegetarian diet (11). The WorldwideFund for Nature (WWF) recommend thatpeople reduce their intake of dairy and meatproducts in order to reduce grazing pressureon land (12).
Where does the animalfeed come from?
The amount of land used to grow animalfeed in Western countries is not enough tomeet their own needs and more is importedfrom developing countries. Land in somedeveloping countries, like India, is also usedto grow grain for animals who are rearedand killed for export.Currently farmed animals eat one-third ofthe world’s cereal production. In theindustrialised world, two-thirds of theagricultural land produces cereals foranimal feed. The EU imports 45 per cent ofits oilseeds (soya) and, overall, imports 70per cent of its protein for animal feed(1995-6). As the European Commissionadmits, ‘Europe’s agriculture is capable offeeding Europe’s people but not of feedingEurope’s animals’ (4). The EU also importscattle feed such as peanuts or soya becauseit is cheaper than buying animal feedgrown in Europe.At the height of the Ethiopian famine in1984-5, Britain imported £1.5 million worthof linseed cake, cottonseed cake and rapeseed meal. Although none of this was fit forhumans to eat, good quality farmland wasstill being used to grow animal feed for richcountries when it could have been used togrow food for Ethiopians.In the United States, farmed animals, mostlycattle, consume almost twice as much grainas is eaten by the entire US population (13).70 per cent of all the wheat, corn and othergrain produced goes to feeding animals (14).Over 100 million acres of US agricultural landis used to grow grain for animals (13) andstill more is imported.In Central and South America, ever-increasingamounts of land are being used to grow soyabeans and grain for export - to be used asanimal feed. In Brazil, 23 per cent of thecultivated land is currently being used toproduce soya beans, of which nearly half arefor export (13). The Oxfam Poverty Reportexplains that the subsidised expansion of theEU’s dairy and livestock industry has created ahuge demand for high protein animalfeedstuffs and that the demand has in partbeen met through the expansion of large-scale, mechanised soya production in Brazil.Smallholder producers of beans and staplefoods in the southern part of the countryhave been displaced to make way for giant5is little other work. About 160,000 peoplemove from rural areas to cities every day (5).Many migrants are forced to settle in shantytowns and squatter settlements.Much of this land is used to grow “cash crops”for export - like coffee, tobacco and animalfeed - rather than to grow food for indigenouspeople. Countries agree to grow cash crops inorder to pay off their crippling debts. Fifty-twoof the world’s poorest countries owe the richworld in the region of £213 billion. Annualrepayments total £14 billion - the majority ofthis from countries where most people areliving on lessthan one dollara day (see p7:Why arecountries indebt?). (6)The sad ironyis that theworldproduces morethan enoughplant food tomeet theneeds of all itssix billion people. If people used land to growcrops to feed themselves, rather than feedingcrops to animals, then there would be enoughto provide everyone with the average of 2360Kcal (calories) needed for good health (7).If everyone were to take 25 per cent of theircalories from animal protein then the planetcould sustain only three billion people (8). Insimple, brutal terms, if we were all toimitate the average North American diet,we would only be able to feed half theworld’s population.
Breeding animals meansstarving people
Breeding animals is an incredibly inefficientway to try and feed the world's growingpopulation. Yet after food rationing duringthe second world war, intensive animalfarming was actively encouraged as a way ofensuring our future “food security”.Most meat in Western Europe is nowproduced in factory farms which, as thename implies, are production lines foranimals. To meet the large demand for meat,billions of animals are kept in cramped, filthyconditions, often unable to move properlyand not allowed fresh air or even naturallight. Unable to feed outdoors naturally, theyare fed grain, oil seeds, soya feed, fish mealand sometimes the remains of other animals.High quality land is used to grow grains andsoya beans - land that could be used to growcrops for humans.The grain fed to animals does not convertdirectly into meat to feed people. The vastmajority is either excreted or used as “fuel”to keep the animal alive and functioning. Forevery 10 kilograms of soya protein fed toAmerica’s cattle only one kilogram isconverted to meat. Almost the entirepopulation of India and China, nearly two4
“Muchagricultural landis alsoincreasinglydevoted to cashcrops for export,depriving poorlocal people ofland to farm andfood to eat.”United NationsPopulation Fund
(5)
Livestock increase inBritain 1946-2005
(9)19462005IncreaseCattle2.0m10.3m515%Sheep7.4m35.2m475%Pigs2.2m4.8m218%Poultry31.9m159.3m499%Imagine an area of land the size of five footballpitches (10 hectares). It will grow enough meat tofeed two people, or maize to feed 10; or grain tofeed 24; or soya to feed 61 (7).
   P   h  o   t  o  :   C   h  r   i  s   t   i  a  n   A   i   d   /   A   d  r   i  a  n   A  r   b   i   b   P   h  o   t  o  :   C   h  r   i  s   t   i  a  n   A   i   d   /   A   d  r   i  a  n   A  r   b   i   b

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->