Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
TBU Newsletter No1 Oct 2011

TBU Newsletter No1 Oct 2011

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,125|Likes:
Newsletter of the Blue Union October 2011
Newsletter of the Blue Union October 2011

More info:

Published by: Keeping Everton In Our City on Oct 24, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Financial Presentation
t would appear that theoverwhelming majority of Evertonians, including thecurrent board, agree thatthere is a genuinerequirement for a successfulchange in the ownershipstructure of Everton FootballClub; a change that will first of allcatalyse the resurgence of a clubthat is being left behind by itspeers, and, secondly, a changethat will allow Everton to addressand develop their infrastructurewhich will enable them tomaximise their income streamsand minimise the perceivedconstraints and the potential biastowards the establishedChampions league clubs arisingfrom the implementation of UEFA’s financial fair play policy.Bill Kenwright’s contention is that he is the man best placed to deliverthe change in ownership that is required; whilst the Blue Union,unmotivated by personal gain, are of the opinion that the current boardare exclusively responsible for far too many catastrophic businessdecisions over the past decade, and that they are completely anddemonstrably unsuitable to undertake what is perhaps the mostimportant task in Everton’s recent history.Consequently the Blue Union advocate that to facilitate a successfulchange, one that will ensure a successful outcome for the club, the saleprocess should be outsourced to professionals who can demonstrateevidence of success and expertise in this field and, once appointed, theywill have the autonomy to identify and complete the sale to theorganisation that can best demonstrate the resources, ability and agenuine desire to take the club forward on both a commercial andfootball level in preference to any organisation that simply meets anasking price; a price solely predicated on the need to deliver a return onthe main shareholders investment in shares.Following an ad hoc meeting in September, the result of which was awell attended demonstration, the Blue Union‘s second meeting, atZeligs in Liverpool One, drew an equally impressive crowd who came tohear the group’s speakers and meet Everton’s former manager Howard Kendall andthe FA Cup.The primary focus of the meeting was education; the Blue Union’s main presentationgave an overview of the club’s finances and how the strategies that have beenadopted by the board have inhibited Everton’s ability to compete with their peers off the field, which in due course, if not addressed, will inevitably lead to an inability tocompete with them on the field.The Finance presentation began with an explanation that the Blue Union in no wayclaim to be experts, they’re just an ordinary group of Evertonians who have taken aninterest and sought information from experts in various fields whose advice hasproven to be astonishingly accurate in the past.With many supporters enquiring as to where the money comes from and how it isspent, the first part of the presentation focused on highlights of the profit and lossaccount. It can be seen here, fig 1, that Everton’s income is derived from three mainsources; matchday income, from tickets and programme sales, media income,distributed by the Premier League and commercial income from sponsorship,advertising and, in Everton’s case, payments from the outsourced catering andmerchandise operations.From their annual turnover Everton need to pay their staff and cover their other operating costs, stated hereas expenses. The accountancy term, EBITDA, is an important metric as it indicates whether or not a businessis generating sufficient earnings, before they cover additional items including interest, taxation, depreciationand amortisation; hence the acronym EBITDA.A rudimentary explanation of how Everton end up with either a profit or a loss can be seen on the next pagein fig 2. Wage costs, expenses, bank interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation, [the sum by which thevalue of assets are reduced annually to give a fair representation of their value on the balance sheet] are addedtogether and subtracted from the turnover figure. To the product of this calculation any profit from the
Financial epot fom tepublic meeting at Zeligs
With its second meeting attractingan estimated seven hundred concerned Blues,
Colin Fitzpatrick 
delivered a superb presentation onEverton FC’s finances. Here wetake another look at it.
The Blue Union in no way claimto be experts, they’re justan ordinary group of Evertonians who havetaken an interest and soughtinformation from experts invarious fields whose advicehas proven to be astonishinglyaccurate in the past.
Everton Profit and Loss Highlights 2007 – 2011 [millions]
year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Matchday 17.1 21.3 21.9 19.2 17.4Media 27.5 46.6 48.6 50.2 52.9coMMercial 6.9 7.7 9.2 9.7 11.7total 51.4 75.7 79.7 79.1 82.0 Wages [38.4] [44.5] [49.1] [54.3] [58.0]expenses [11.7] [22.6] [22.5] [23.8] [23.6]eBitda 1.3 8.6 8.1 1.0 0.4interest [2.8] [3.7] [4.0] [4.5] [4.1]d&a [12.2] [14.1] [14.8] [18.7] [17.6]disposals 4.3 9.3 3.8 19.2 15.9profit / [loss] [9.4] 0.0 [6.9] [3.0] [5.4]
Fig 1
Everton’s Key Financial Figures [millions]
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011turnover 51.4 75.7 79.7 79.1 82.0 Wages 38.4 44.5 49.1 54.3 58.0expenses 11.7 22.6 22.5 23.8 23.6interest 2.8 3.7 4.0 4.5 4.1taxation 0 0 0 0 0depreciation 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.4aMortisation 10.4 12.3 13.0 17.1 16.2
total operating costs
65.1 85.0 90.4 101.2 103.3disposals 4.3 9.3 3.8 19.2 15.9profit / [loss] [9.4] 0 [6.9] [3.0] [5.4]
Fig 2
It can be seen that Everton hasn’t made a profit in the period covered here. Recently Bill Kenwright, in aninterview given to talksport, explained that for the future period in which we’ll be searching for a new owner,losses in the region of £5m per year would be experienced; looking at the bottom right hand corner of thechart you can clearly see that this is the case, 2011 should show a loss of £5.4m.However, this isn’t the full story, the line above the profit / loss line, the disposals line, indicates the profitderived from the sale of players and other assets. In 2010 the figure of £19.2m represented the sale of Lescottto Manchester City; in 2011 the figure of £15.9 included the profit from the sale of Bellefield, £9m; land thatwas a legacy of the foresight of Sir John Moores who purchased the land in 1964 for £26,000. Sadly none of this legacy found its way to David Moyes as, according to the note in the 2010 accounts, by company secretary,Martin Evans, it went to the banks to reduce debt.The £5m losses are therefore dependent on continuing the strategy of the disposal of assets, or to be precise,players. The 2012 accounts, due to be submitted to Companies House in 2013, will show the profit on the salesof Ruddy, Jutkiewicz, Pienaar, Vaughan, Beckford, Yakubu and Arteta.In 2008 KEIOC questioned the validity of this strategy and received this reply from Everton CEO Robert Elstone:Clearly the above scenario, predicted three years ago, has now happened; we have no money to offer themanager, the banks, according to Bill Kenwright, were about to shut Everton down earlier this year, only forhim to produce, in his own words, “a document that prevented them from stopping Everton trading.”
“Tis asset utilization and disposal plan,it can't be sustained foee can it;won't teassets un out and te loan epaments oewelm te clubs abilit to poide sufficient funds toobtain bette plaes?”
“No;we ae a igl qualified finance team and a good elationsip wit te bank;tat wouldn't be allowed to appen.”
So this is where we are today;the business doesn’t produceenough money to enable us tocompete with the rest of thepremiership, we have a majorissue with the stadium, an issuewhich is the root cause of manyof our problems, and we have afour man board of directors,three of which appear to donothing whatsoever and thefourth appears to stagger fromone self-made crisis to another.What are the possible solutions?The accounts shown on the nextpage, in fig 3, are for a period upto 31st May 2010. Everton couldattempt to increase its turnoverto cover its shortfall but lookingat the figures you begin toappreciate what a herculeantask that would be.

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
spudv added this note
TBU is a total joke and unsupported by the vast majority of EFC fans. Why another protest? The last one was embarrassing for you,give it up now. If you don't like it then make your own team like the mancs did. Nothing new in report,we all know the finances of the club. Take down DD's pic and use the clown,more fitting

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->