Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter1
IntroductorymaterialscomparingtheDistricttosurroundingdistricts Economicdata Recentenrollmenttrendsbygrade Privateschooldata
Chapter2
PlanningUnitmaps Mapsshowingvariousfactorsthataffectlongtermpotentialforresidential development,includingmunicipalboundaries,watersupplydata,floodplain,and parks/preserves Mapsandspreadsheetsofprojectedhousingoccupanciesbothsingleandmulti familyforthe10yeartimeframe Mapscontainingaerialimageryanddataonparcels,subdivisions,andmultifamily complexes
Inordertoprojectstudentenrollmentaccurately,PASAemployeesassessthe10year developmentpotentialforeachmajorparceloflandintheDistrict.Dataisgatheredfor
Chapter3
PASAmustunderstandhowmanynewstudentseachnewhousewillyield.Thecommon assumptionisthateachhomecontainsanaverageoftwostudents,butinreality,theratios ofstudentsenrolledintheDistrictatanygiventimeismuchlowerthanthat. Currentratiosofstudentsperhouseholdforbothsingleandmultifamilyhousing units Mapsandspreadsheetsofthisratiodata
Chapter4
Knowingwherenewhomeswillbebuilt(yieldingfuturestudents)isonlyhalfthepicture. PASAmustalsounderstandwherethecurrentstudentsliveandwherestudentshave redistributedwithintheDistrictoverthepastfewyears.Thesemapsillustrateareasin whichexistinghomesarebecomingmoreorientedtofamilieswithschoolagedchildrenand otherchangesthatarethenappliedtotheprojectionsoffuturestudentpopulation. Mapsofthecurrentstudentpopulation,geocodedbytheirhomeaddresses Mapsofpastchangesinthestudentpopulation,showingwhichareasareincreasingor declininginstudents
Chapter5
PASAdevelopsthreescenariosofgrowth,inanattempttobracketinallfuturegrowth patterns.TheModerateScenarioofGrowthisusedasthebasisoflongrangeplanningin thisreport,buttheLowandHighGrowthScenariosmustalsobeconsideredasfeasible possibilitieswhenplanningforfuturefacilityutilization. ThreescenariosofDistrictwide,gradelevelgrowth:LowGrowth,ModerateGrowth, andHighGrowth ChartscontainingprojectionsbyPlanningUnit,basedonallthreescenariosofgrowth MapsdetailingtheprojectionsbyPlanningUnit,basedonallthreescenariosofgrowth
Chapter6
PASAusesthedatapreparedintheDemographicUpdatetoassessthelongtermstabilityof eachexistingattendancezone,andalsoprojectswhenandwhereadditionalfacilitiesmight bewarranted.
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011 2
Socioeconomic Characteristics
Manynonspecificqualityoflifeopinionsheldbythepubliccanbestudiedempiricallyusingtwo factorsfromschooldistrictdata.First,thepercentageofstudentswhoqualifyforthe free/reducedpricelunchprogramistightlycorrelatedwithmedianhouseholdincomeandmedian housingvalue.Therefore,analysisofthefree/reducedlunchpopulationoffersanannually updatedassessmentofthisqualityoflifeindicator,asopposedtoCensusdata,whichisnow10 yearsold.L.T.I.S.D.hasonly14.2%ofenrolledstudentswhoareeligibleforthefree/reduced pricelunchprogram,comparedto60%ofallstudentsinTexaswhoparticipateinthisprogramfor economicallydisadvantagedfamilies.ThisranksLakeTravisI.S.D.7thintheStateoutofall170 Districtswith5,000ormorestudents. Anotherqualityoflifeindicatorcommonlybeingusedisperformanceonthestatemandated TAKStest.WhilemostDistrictsfocusonsmallsubsetsofthepopulationandscoresonspecific tests,amoreglobalanalysisprovidesagoodcomparisonofoverallperformancebetween districts.Therefore,PASAsummarizesthepercentageofstudentsinallgradeswhopassedall subjectsoftheTAKStestadministeredinSpring2010.Statewide,about76%ofallstudentsin TexaspublicschoolspassedallsubjectsoftheTAKStest.Comparatively,LakeTravisI.S.D.has anoverallpassagerateof94%,whichranksit4thoutof170DistrictsintheStatewith5,000or morestudents. Thus,analysisoftheeconomicallydisadvantagedpopulationandTAKSperformanceillustrates empiricallytheextremelypositiveperceptionofLeanderISDandpointstothecompetitive advantagethisdistrictholdsoverothersinattractingnewresidents. OthersocioeconomiccharacteristicsaresummarizedfortheDistrictinthenextchart,andLake TravisI.S.D.iscomparedtoothernearbylargeDistrictsandtheStateofTexas.Theageofthe residentpopulationofLakeTravisI.S.D.is41.6years,comparedtothemedianageinTexasof 33.1years,andsimilarlyorientedtofamilieswithchildren(19%ofthepopulationisschoolaged, comparedto19%oftheTexaspopulationinthisagerange).Notsurprisingly,theL.T.I.S.D. populationismoreeducated(54%hasaBachelorsdegreeorhighercomparedto26%inTexas), andthemedianhouseholdincomeisabout$96,387comparedto$48,259inTexasoverall. Interestingly,themedianincomeinLakeTravisI.S.D.declinedslightlysincelastyearsestimate of$97,119asdidtheStatewidemedianincome(downfrom$50,043lastyear). Alsonotsurprisingly,theL.T.I.S.D.populationspendsmoretimecommutingtoworkeachday, anaverageof29.2minuteseachway,comparedto27.6minutesforLeanderI.S.D.and21.1for EanesI.S.D.TheStateofTexasspends24.6minutescommutingonaverage.Theselonger commutetimesillustratethattheresidentsofLakeTravisI.S.D.haveastrongcommitmenttothe Districtandarewillingtospendmoretimecommutinginordertoliveinthearea.
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011 4
Fortunately,thoseemployedingovernmentjobs(basedontheAmericanCommunitySurveys ClassofWorker)representonly10%.ThisisincontrasttosomeotherdistrictsintheAustin area,suchasManorI.S.D.,with24%ofitsworkforceingovernmentpositions,HaysC.I.S.D.at 20%,AustinI.S.D.at17%,EanesI.S.D.at13%,andLeanderI.S.D.with11%inpublicsectorjobs. AlthoughtheStatesexpectedbudgetcutswillsignificantlyimpactgovernmentemployees,the LakeTravisSchoolDistrictismoreinsulatedthanotherdistrictsinthearea. ThisdatahasbeenpulledtogetherintoaShiftShareanalysisofemploymentsectors,which analyzesthecurrentemploymentcharacteristicsandcomparesthosetoprojectedgrowth patternsforthestateandthenation.Manyofthelocal,stateandnationaleconomicforces discussedinChapter2arecontributingtotheprojected65%growthofemploymentofresidents ofL.T.I.S.D.between2008and2018.Thesectorsgainingthemostemployeesareprojectedto betheProfessional,Scientific,Management,Administration,andWasteManagementsector, followedbytheEducationalServices,HealthCare,andSocialAssistancesector,withnosectors expectedtoloseemployees. Althoughtheseemploymentprojectionsbyeconomicsector(above)arebasedonsecondary data,itisinstructivetoemphasizethenewhospitalcomplexanditsassociatedemployment impacts(inPhasesOneandTwoalone)ofapproximately2,618jobs.Also,therewillbeamuch largersecondaryandtertiaryeffectonnewemploymentintheDistrict,possiblyaddingthree timesthisnumberofjobs.ThedevelopersaresuggestingadirecteconomicimpactofPhases OneandTwoof$172million,withatotaleconomicimpactof$222million.Itshouldbe emphasized,however,thatwhilemanyoftheinitialemployeeswillworkinthefacility,theywill likelyliveoutsidetheL.T.I.S.D.boundaries. EmploymentTrendsovertheNextFiveYears Theabovedatashowstheprojectedgrowthinemploymentbyplaceofresidenceoftheworkers thatis,withinL.T.I.S.D.TheAustinregioncontinuedtobeamagnetfornewemployees,evenin thedownturn,duetogoodjobsandabetterthanelsewhereeconomy,notesdemographer SteveMurdockandothers. KeithPhillips,asenioreconomistwiththeFederalReserveinDallassaidthatAustinhadbeen addingjobsatarateof3.1%ratesinceDecember,2009whichisthebestofthelargestmetro areasintheState.And,hightechindustriesareleadingusoutoftherecessionintermsof overallexportsfromtheState,Phillipsindicated(fromtheAustinStatesmanonMay21,2010). InthatsameStatesmanarticle,EdFriedman,adirectoratMoodysEconomy.comwhocoversthe Texaseconomy,wasquotedassuggestingthatAustinisweatheringtherecessionbetterthan DallasandHouston,becauseAustinhassomeofthebestfundamentalsinthecountry, includingstrongpopulationgrowthandawelleducatedbase.Also,heemphasizedthatthe Austinareacontinuestomarketitselfeffectivelytohightechindustriesasalowcostalternative toCalifornia.
Asnotedabove,theAustinareahashadoneofthelargestincreasesinpopulationofanyother metroareanationally.However,thelackofeasilyobtainablemortgagesandthenationaldebt couldstallAustinareaemploymentgrowth.Infact,manyeconomistssuggestthattherecouldbe anewnormalofhigherunemploymentandlowerlivingstandardsformanyarearesidents.But, AustinRoundRockhasbeeninsulatedfromthedownturnmorethananymajormetroarea(with theexceptionofWashingtonD.C.),atleastintermsofjobsandunemployment.So,thisstable economyshouldcontinuetobeapulltooutsiderswhoareseekingjobsandreasonablypriced housing. PASAsstudentprojectionsareorientedtoalongrecovery,withnoquickreturntotheboomera ofpre2007inTexas,dueequallytothelackofheavyimmigrationandthelackofsubprime mortgages.ThismirrorstheEconomicPolicyInstitutesHeidiShierholzstudy,andthe assessmentsofmanyothereconomists,thatwewilllikelyseeelevatedunemploymentatleast until2014fortheAustinarea,fortheState,andforthenation. PrivateSchoolEnrollment ThefinalchartinthischaptersummarizesthesurveyofareaprivateschoolsconductedbyPASA thisyear.SchoolsincludedinthissurveywereboththoselocatedwithinL.T.I.S.D.boundaries,as wellasthoselocatednearmajoremploymentcentersthatcouldpotentiallyenrollstudentsliving inL.T.I.S.D.Basedontheseinterviewswithheadmastersandenrollmentcoordinatorsateach privateschool,thereareanestimated191studentsinKN12thgradeswholivewithinL.T.I.S.D. thatattendtheseprivateschools.Inotherwords,approximately2.7%ofthepopulationattends privateschools.Thisisaverysmallpercentofthetotalstudentagedpopulationwithinthe District,implyingthattheperceptionofpublicschoolsinLakeTravisI.S.D.isverypositive. Basedontheschoolsplansforexpansionoffacilitiesandenrollmentgoals,theprivateschoolsin theareacoulddrawanadditional49studentsfromtheL.T.I.S.D.publicschoolsystemoverthe nextfiveyears,butduetotheexpectedgrowthinLakeTravisI.S.D.,theproportionofstudent populationinenrolledinprivateschoolsmightactuallydecline. Likewise,ifacontinueddownturnineconomicconditionsweretooccur,thenthiswilldiscourage familiesfromfinancingprivateschooleducations.Thus,L.T.I.S.D.couldreceivesomeofthese projected240studentsintothepublicschoolsystem.
Burnet County
Williamson County
Round Rock ISD 98.2 Lago Vista ISD 34.67 Johnson City ISD 535.41
Travis County Blanco County
Hays County
5 Miles
Deve lo pm e nt De nsi ty
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
February 2011: 207 students per square mile (sq. mi.) of built-out area Total area of Lake Travis I.S.D. is 116.6 sq. mi. ~33.5 sq. mi. are built-out/developed land [light purple] ~6.5 sq. mi. are currently active [dark purple] ~14.8 sq. mi. are undeveloped, but are planned to develop [orange] ~37.7 sq. mi. are undeveloped with no development plans [light orange] ~3.5 sq. mi. are rural housing on small acreage which could redevelop much later [brown] ~6.3 sq. mi. of the flood plain is built-out, and ~3.7 sq. mi. is undeveloped In the District there are at least ~20.6 sq. mi. of undevelopable land (parks, preserves and water/rivers) and ~59 sq. mi. of undeveloped land remaining (including active, planned and unplanned development)
Map Layers District Boundary Generally Built-OutDeveloped Active Parcels Undeveloped, but Planned Development Undeveloped Land Rural Housing, Possible Distant Redev. Preserves Parks Water/Rivers 100, 500 Year Flood Plain and Floodways Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone
District Land Uses Sq. Mi. % District 33.5 29% Built-out 6.5 6% Developing 14.8 13% Planned Dev. 37.7 32% Undeveloped 3.5 3% Rural Housing 6.2 5% Water/Rivers 6 5% Parks Preserves 8.4 7%
[
0 1 2 4 Miles
To t a l S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t
September 2010 (based on pre-PEIMS estimates)
Lampasas ISD 3,386 Killeen ISD 40,400 Belton ISD 9,280
AUSTIN
Rogers ISD 871
Academy ISD Salado ISD 1,064 1,358 Holland ISD 579 Burnet CISD 3,348 Florence ISD 988 Jarrell ISD 977 Liberty Hill ISD 2,670 Llano ISD 1,850 Bartlett ISD Rockdale ISD 370 1,702 Granger ISD Thorndale ISD 410 536
Thrall ISD Marble Falls ISD Taylor ISD 666 Round Rock ISD Leander ISD 4,019 3,102 42,683 31,898 Pflugerville ISD Coupland ISD Lago Vista ISD 126 22,641 1,275 Lexington ISD 936 Johnson City ISD Lake Travis ISD Elgin ISD Manor ISD 699 7,012 Eanes ISD 3,964 7,221 7,676 McDade ISD 184 Dripping Springs ISD Austin ISD 4,467 Del Valle ISD 85,714 10,693 Bastrop ISD 9,095
Blanco ISD 973 Wimberley ISD 2,005 Comal ISD Water Bodies 17,103 Counties
< 1,000 1,001 - 3,000 3,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 20,000 20,001 - 40,000 40,001 +
3.75
7.5
15 Miles
AUSTIN
Lampasas ISD 14
Rogers Belton Academy Killeen ISD ISD ISD ISD 44 Salado ISD 421 797 -11 8 Holland ISD Buckholts Florence 39 ISD ISD Bartlett 2 -32 ISD Jarrell ISD Rockdale -18 60 ISD Granger -51 ISD Liberty Thorndale Georgetown ISD -17 Hill ISD ISD 50 102 -12 Leander ISD 1,444 Round Rock ISD -325 Hutto ISD 301 Taylor ISD -66 Thrall ISD 22 Coupland ISD -10 Lexington ISD 7 Elgin ISD -31 McDade ISD 1
Lago Vista ISD 50 Lake Travis ISD 435 Dripping Springs ISD 136
Pflugerville ISD 581 Eanes ISD 178 Austin ISD 1,038 Manor ISD 289
Water Bodies Counties <0 1 - 50 51 - 100 101 - 500 501 - 1,000 1,001 +
Smithville ISD 3
3.75
7.5
15 Miles
Pe r c e n t C h a n g e i n S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t
1-Year Change: 2009-10 to 2010-11
(based on pre-PEIMS estimates in September 2010)
AUSTIN
Belton ISD 4.8 % Rogers ISD 5.3 %
Academy ISD Salado ISD Buckholts Holland -1 % 0.6 % ISD ISD Florence 1.2 % 7.2 % Burnet ISD Bartlett CISD -3.1 % ISD Rockdale ISD Jarrell -0.5 % -4.6 % -2.9 % ISD Thorndale Granger 6.5 % ISD ISD Liberty -2.2 % Georgetown -4 % Hill ISD ISD 4% Thrall 0.5 % Taylor ISD Hutto Marble ISD Round 3.4 % Leander ISD Falls ISD Llano -2.1 % Rock ISD 5.9 % ISD 0.2 % ISD -0.8 % 4.7 % Coupland -5.2 % Lago ISD Pflugerville ISD Vista ISD Lexington -7.4 % 2.6 % 4.1 % ISD 0.8 % Elgin ISD Lake Manor ISD Johnson Eanes ISD -0.8 % Travis ISD 4.17 % City ISD McDade 2.4 % 6.6 % 2.2 % ISD 0.5 % Austin Dripping ISD Del Valle Springs ISD 1.2 % ISD 3.1 % 5.3 % Blanco ISD 0% Hays CISD 4.3 % Lockhart ISD 1.9 % Bastrop ISD 1.8 % Smithville ISD 0.2 %
Killeen ISD 2%
Water Bodies Counties < 1.0 1.1 - 2.0 2.1 - 3.0 3.1 - 4.0 4.1 - 5.0 5.1 +
3.75
7.5
15 Miles
AUSTIN
Belton ISD Rogers Lampasas ISD 1,745 Academy ISD 34 Salado ISD 36 ISD 128 144 Buckholts Holland ISD ISD Florence Burnet 43 -44 ISD CISD Jarrell Bartlett ISD Rockdale -43 92 ISD -73 ISD 317 Granger -234 Liberty ISD Hill ISD Georgetown -71 Thorndale ISD 614 ISD 9 1,389 Thrall Hutto Taylor Marble ISD Round Leander ISD ISD Llano Falls ISD 106 Rock ISD 2,434 ISD 6 ISD 86 4,836 9,821 -45 Coupland ISD Lago 23 Pflugerville ISD Vista ISD Lexington 3,880 81 ISD Johnson -26 Elgin ISD Lake Manor ISD City ISD Eanes ISD 593 Travis ISD 2,672 McDade 17 521 1,705 ISD -48 Austin ISD Dripping Del 4,559 Springs ISD Valle ISD 905 2,451 Bastrop Blanco ISD ISD 1,112 Hays CISD -20 4,665 Wimberley ISD Smithville 52 ISD -118 Lockhart Comal ISD Water Bodies San Marcos ISD Counties 3,699 <0 CISD 171 1 - 300 301 - 2,000 251
3.75
7.5
15 Miles
Pe r c e n t C h a n g e i n S c h o o l D i s t r i c t E n r o l l m e n t
5-Year Change: 2005-06 to 2010-11
(based on pre-PEIMS estimates in September 2010)
AUSTIN
Belton ISD 23.2 %
Lampasas ISD 1%
Rogers Academy ISD ISD 13.7 % 4.3 % Salado ISD Buckholts Holland 11.9 % ISD ISD -20.2 % Florence 8% ISD Rockdale ISD -4.2 % Bartlett ISD -12.1 % Jarrell -16.5 % ISD Thorndale 48 % Granger ISD Liberty ISD -14.8 % Hill ISD 1.7 % Georgetown 29.9 % ISD Thrall 15.3 % Taylor ISD Hutto ISD Round 18.9 % ISD 0.2 % Leander ISD Rock ISD 81 % 44.5 % Coupland 12.8 % Lago ISD Lexington Pflugerville ISD Vista ISD 22.3 % ISD 20.7 % 6.8 % -2.7 % Killeen ISD 16.8 % Eanes ISD 7.3 % Austin ISD 5.6 % Manor ISD 58.74 % Elgin ISD 17.6 %
Del Valle ISD 29.7 % Bastrop ISD 13.9 % Smithville ISD -6.4 %
Blanco ISD -2 %
3.75
7.5
15 Miles
K i n d e r g a r t e n S t u d e n t s a s Pe r c e n t o f To t a l E n ro l l m e n t
Fall 2009
Lampasas ISD 6.3% San Saba ISD 7.2% Killeen ISD 8.2% Belton ISD 7.9% Salado ISD Bell 6.1% Holland ISD 5.9% Burnet CISD 6.5% Florence ISD 7% Bartlett ISD 7% Rockdale ISD 7.2% Granger ISD 4.9% Buckholts ISD Cameron ISD 8.7% 8.5% Academy ISD 6%
AUSTIN
Rogers ISD 6%
Burnet
Milam
Williamson
Georgetown ISD 7.2%
Llano
Hutto ISD 8.9% Leander ISD 8.6% Lago Vista ISD 6.8% Round Rock ISD 8% Pflugerville ISD 7.8%
Lexington ISD 7%
Lee
Johnson City ISD 6%
Travis
Eanes ISD 6.2%
Manor ISD 9%
Blanco
Dripping Springs ISD 7.6% Austin ISD 9.1% Del Valle ISD 8.1% Bastrop ISD 7.7% Blanco ISD 8% Wimberley ISD 7.3%
Bastrop
Hays
Caldwell Fayette
Prairie Lea ISD 5.3% Flatonia ISD 8.1% Luling ISD 9.2% Waelder ISD 7.2% Gonzales ISD 8.5%
Comal
Water Bodies Counties No High School
School Districts
< 5.5% 5.6% - 6.5% 6.6% - 7.0% Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD 7.1% Bexar 7.5% East ISD 6.7% North 7.6% - 8.0% Judson8.0% 7.5% > ISD Marion ISD
Guadalupe
Seguin ISD 7.1%
Gonzales
Moulton ISD Lavaca 5.8%
15
7.5%
6.8%
0
4.5
18 Miles
Source: Texas Education Agency, Public Education Information Management System Division
AUSTIN
Rogers ISD -9.3% Buckholts ISD -14.3% Cameron ISD 50.5%
Burnet
Milam
Williamson
Georgetown ISD -9.5%
Llano
Hutto ISD 10.3% Leander ISD 6.3% Lago Vista ISD -26.2% Round Rock ISD 5.7% Pflugerville ISD 12%
Lee
Johnson City ISD -6%
Travis
Eanes ISD -8.6%
Blanco
Dripping Springs ISD -4.9% Austin ISD 22.1% Del Valle ISD 12.6% Bastrop ISD -0.6% Blanco ISD -35.5% Wimberley ISD -6.3%
Bastrop
Hays
Caldwell Fayette
Prairie Lea ISD -20.8% Flatonia ISD -17.5% Luling ISD 4.5% Waelder ISD 5.9% Gonzales ISD 9.8%
Comal
Water Bodies Counties
School Districts
< -4% -3.9% - 0% 0.1% - 4% Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD 4.1% Bexar10% East ISD -7.5% North 10.1% - 15% Judson ISD 0.9% Marion ISD > 15%
Guadalupe
Seguin ISD 3.9%
Gonzales
3%
Moulton ISD 0% Positive Percentages: 1st > 5th Lavaca Negative Percentages: 5th > 1st
16
-31.8%
0
4.5
18 Miles
Source: Texas Education Agency, Public Education Information Management System Division
School Bee Cave Lake Pointe Lake Travis Lakeway Serene Hills Total
17
Historical Growth Trends by Grade and Grade Group in Lake Travis I.S.D.
% Chg. 2003-04 03-04/ 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05/ 05-06/ 06-07/ 07-08/ 08-09/ 09-10/ 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 % Chg. % Chg. % Chg. % Chg. % Chg. % Chg. 2010-11 % Chg. 10-11/ 09-10
% Chg.
2001-02 2002-03
02-03/
01-02
25 0 347 369 374 363 383 365 373 388 391 462 353 337 273 -7.46% 316 15.75% 312 -1.27% 353 13.14% 15.02% 362 7.42% 402 11.05% 406 1.00% 426 373 3.22% 430 21.81% 415 -3.49% 441 6.27% 449 19.07% 456 -1.30% 483 5.92% 472 -2.28% 505 -2.74% 390 -0.26% 410 5.13% 436 6.34% 476 9.17% 6.99% 1.81% 4.93% 5.67% -1.02% 401 3.35% 413 2.99% 450 8.96% 460 2.22% -2.10% 386 3.49% 414 7.25% 427 3.14% 463 8.43% 482 473 469 535 485 436 395 4.89% 389 6.58% 405 4.11% 436 7.65% 474 8.72% 456 11.99% 377 -1.57% 407 7.96% 453 11.30% 437 -3.53% 488 -3.97% 392 7.99% 427 8.93% 417 -2.34% 457 9.59% 506 10.72% 11.67% -3.80% 4.10% 2.83% -1.47% 5.94% 8.02% 2.35% 5.90% 4.47% 394 5.35% 393 -0.25% 438 11.45% 474 8.22% 473 -0.21% 4.53% 376 1.90% 410 9.04% 429 4.63% 435 1.40% 468 7.59% -4.41% 387 11.53% 390 0.78% 398 2.05% 410 3.02% 456 11.22% 481 488 497 495 549 519 487 510 510 539 538 460 419 n/a 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 n/a 49
36
44.00%
40
11.11%
19
-52.50%
26
36.84%
22
-15.38%
32
45.45%
22
-31.25%
36
63.64% n/a 5.48% 4.27% 5.07% -2.17% 12.50% 13.82% 1.04% 7.82% 8.74% 0.75% 10.93% 5.50% 6.08%
7 97 506 507 514 515 539 561 541 521 551 573 542 519 447
-80.56% 97.96% 5.20% 3.89% 3.42% 4.04% -1.82% 8.09% 11.09% 2.16% 8.04% 6.31% 0.74% 12.83% 6.68%
n/a
326
363
11.35%
340
353
3.82%
336
358
6.55%
331
378
14.20%
335
342
2.09%
366
348
-4.92%
370
381
2.97%
375
392
4.53%
334
402
20.36%
360
388
7.78%
301
342
13.62%
314
293
-6.69%
EE PK KG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
5.33% 5,307 4.57% 5,578 5.11% 5,871 5.25% 6,144 4.65% 6,577
263
295
12.17%
Total
7.05%
6,940 5.52%
EE-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
6% 9% 6%
2,241 1,152 1,425 2,334 1,177 1,564 2,458 1,237 1,612 2,593 1,313 1,672
3% -2% 8%
4% 2% 10%
5% 5% 3%
5% 6% 4%
5% 7% 5%
6% 2% 6%
9% 6% 6%
4% 7% 6%
% EE-5th
47.05% 46.63%
% 6th-8th
24.66% 25.16%
18
Lake Travis I.S.D. : Kindergarten Enrollment Compared to Births (Moved Five Years Forward)
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
Kindergarten Enrollment
261 240 254 278 286 298 349 397 391 393 417 436 437 466
321
326
363
347
387
390
398
410
456
481
506
506
540
492 425
526 454
236
KN Enrollment vs Births
600
550
500
Students
450
400
350
300
250
200
1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2013- 201400 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Year
19
E c o n o m i c a l l y D i s a d v a n t a g e d S t u d e n t Po p u l a t i o n
AUSTIN
Cameron ISD 73.1% Burnet CISD 55.1%
School Districts
Milam
Milano ISD 54.5%
0% - 25% 25.1% - 40% 40.1% - 55% 55.1% - 65% 65.1% - 80% 80.1% - 100%
Burnet
Liberty Hill ISD 25.8% Georgetown ISD 42.8% Granger ISD 58.1%
Williamson
Llano
Marble Falls ISD 57.9% Leander ISD 22.5% Lago Vista ISD 29.4% Pflugerville ISD 49% Johnson City ISD 40.8% Round Rock ISD 28.6% Hutto ISD Taylor ISD 44% 64.9% Thrall ISD 30.6%
Burleson
Caldwell ISD 50.3%
Gillespie Travis
Lake Travis ISD 14.2% Eanes ISD 2.5%
Lee
Blanco
Dripping Springs ISD 13.2% Austin ISD 63.4%
Hays
Hays CISD 48.6% Bastrop ISD 63.2% Lockhart ISD 65.4% San Marcos CISD 68.6%
Bastrop
Smithville ISD 52.3%
Round Top-Carmine ISD 37.1% La Grange ISD 51.9% Fayetteville ISD 21.1%
Kendall
Caldwell
Fayette
Comal
20
20 Miles
Guadalupe
New Braunfels ISD 40.7% Navarro ISD 38.7% Prairie Lea ISD 60.9% Luling ISD 61.8% Waelder ISD 88.3%
10
Economically Disadvantaged Population PEIMS Snapshot 2009 All Districts with 5,000+ Students
Total Enrollment
6,448 7,745 7,498 5,970 9,982 33,973
Economically Disadvantaged
0 134 191 371 967 4,313
7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 170
6,577
18,242 13,671 31,569 6,392 30,453 37,611 7,329 14,164 13,843 54,939 10,266 18,308 50,840 6,714 11,718 7,813 12,063 23,933 6,883 43,008 8,745 59,078 16,700 34,923 10,102 9,896 69,374 49,629 44,824 31,662 7,342 5,041 16,126 ,, ,, ,, ,, , 7,665
935
2,895 2,465 5,834 1,282 6,865 8,525 1,664 3,234 3,237 12,903 2,432 4,474 12,946 1,711 3,066 2,067 3,214 6,425 1,885 12,304 2,510 17,048 5,262 11,298 3,333 3,383 24,305 17,749 16,179 11,452 2,798 1,923 6,175 , , , , ,, , ,, 7,660
14.2%
15.9% 18.0% 18.5% 20.1% 22.5% 22.7% 22.7% 22.8% 23.4% 23.5% 23.7% 24.4% 25.5% 25.5% 26.2% 26.5% 26.6% 26.8% 27.4% 28.6% 28.7% 28.9% 31.5% 32.4% 33.0% 34.2% 35.0% 35.8% 36.1% 36.2% 38.1% 38.1% 38.3% 99.9%
Statewide Average
3,761,932
2,224,660
59.1%
21
Pe r c e n t o f S t u d e n t s M e e t i n g 2 0 1 0 TA K S S t a n d a r d s
Fall 2010
Lampasas
Cor yell
Troy ISD 80%
AUSTIN
Lampasas ISD 73% Killeen ISD 72% Copperas Cove ISD 80% Belton ISD 81%
San Saba
Llano
Mason
Gillespie Blanco
Austin ISD 73%
Westphalia ISD 88% Bremond ISD Calvert ISD Rogers ISD 65% 81% Bell Temple ISD 77% Rober tson Rosebud-Lott ISD 65% Academy ISD Salado ISD Franklin ISD 67% Cameron ISD 84% 89% 89% Hearne ISD 74% Bartlett ISD Buckholts ISD 50% 59% Florence ISD 59% Holland ISD Rockdale ISD 76% Burnet CISD Jarrell ISD 83% 72% Gause ISD Bryan ISD 74% 78% 69% 88% Milano ISD Williamson Granger ISD Mumford ISD Burnet Milam 73% 74% Georgetown ISD 94% 84% Taylor ISD Thorndale ISD Snook ISD Round Rock ISD 69% 71% 69% 86% Liberty Hill ISD Caldwell ISD Thrall ISD 87% Marble Falls ISD 77% 80% Pflugerville ISD Leander ISD 75% Burleson 77% 86% Coupland ISD Dime Box ISD Hutto ISD 82% Lexington ISD 66% 72% Lake Travis ISD Dripping Springs ISD 94% 82% Somerville ISD 89% McDade ISD Lago Vista ISD 63% Manor ISD Elgin ISD 74% 87% Johnson City ISD Brenham ISD Lee 60% Eanes ISD 63% 82% 79% 96% Travis Del Valle ISD 66% Giddings ISD 69% Bastrop ISD 69%
Washington
Burton ISD 75%
Bastrop
Blanco ISD 79%
Hays
Round Top-Carmine ISD 89% Hays CISD 76% Smithville ISD 77% Lockhart ISD 80%
Austin
Bellville ISD 82% La Grange ISD 77%
Kerr
76%
Kendall
Fayette
School Districts
Columbus ISD 73% Schulenburg ISD Colorado 79% Weimar ISD Rice CISD Moulton ISD 62% 78% 84%
22
69%
San Marcos CISD Caldwell New Braunfels ISD 71% Gonzales ISD Seguin ISD 82% 72% Navarro ISD 71% Northside ISD 82% Prairie Lea ISD Waelder ISD Judson ISD Luling ISD 80% 56% 59% 69% Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD 62% Bexar Guadalupe 82% North East ISD Gonzales 80%
Lavaca
Source: Texas Education Agency, Public Education Information Management System Division
4.5
18 Miles
Rank
1 2 3
District Name
Highland Park ISD Carroll ISD Eanes ISD
4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 170
6,577
9,982 5,970 18,242 33,973 6,392 6,714 13,671 37,611 54,939 50,840 31,569 13,843 59,078 7,329 7,342 20,762 10,102 14,164 30,454 18,308 34,843 7,813 23,933 6,883 43,008 6,338 49,629 16,700 12,502 9,566 12,063 10,266 10,443 8,745 23,864 9,734 , ,,, ,, , , ,, 6,176
State of Texas
23
SelectedSocioeconomicCharacteristicsforLakeTravisI.S.D. ComparedwithAdjacentand/orComparableSchoolDistrictsintheAustinArea
Leander ISD
158,738
65,719 644,343
Number Percentage
Eanes ISD
Hays CISD
Austin ISD
State of Texas
24,782,302
Number Percentage
Total Population
Number Percentage
Housing
92% 8%
88% 12%
Age
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 19 years
5 to 17 years
20 to 24 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 59 years
60 to 64 years
65 to 74 years
75 to 84 years
Median Age
Class of Worker
Government
Self-employed
79% 14% 7% 0%
Total households
$10,000 to $14,999
$15,000 to $24,999
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $74,999
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
24
$150,000 to $199,999
$200,000 or more
SelectedSocioeconomicCharacteristicsforLakeTravisI.S.D. ComparedwithAdjacentand/orComparableSchoolDistrictsintheAustinArea
Leander ISD
158,738
65,719 644,343
Number Percentage
Eanes ISD
Hays CISD
Austin ISD
State of Texas
24,782,302
Number Percentage
Total Population
Number Percentage
Educational Attainment
H.S. graduate
Associate's degree
Bachelor's degree
24,399 436 733 3,255 5,529 1,182 9,078 4,186 2% 3% 13% 23% 5% 37% 17% 95% 54% 2% 3% 16% 29% 7% 30% 13% 95% 44% 1% 1% 5% 12% 3% 41% 37% 98% 78% 4% 10% 23% 27% 10% 21% 6% 86% 27%
15,361,557 1,561,235 1,532,431 3,906,082 3,500,412 944,093 2,618,635 1,298,669 9% 8% 17% 18% 5% 27% 15% 83% 43%
Same house
Same county
Different county
Same state
Different state
Abroad
Commuting to work
Walked
Other means
Worked at home
80% 11% 2% 2% 2% 4%
25
RecentEmploymentTrends LakeTravisI.S.D.
December 2009 City of Austin Employment Unemployment Rate Travis County Employment Unemployment Rate
June 2010
December 2010
-0.85%
-0.60%
-0.34%
-0.09%
26
Lake Travis ISD Employment Sector (Out of Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over) Employed Population: 17,032 (out of 35,201 in LTISD)
As Reported by 2007-2009 American Community Survey
Public Administration 4% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 1% Construction 6% Manufacturing 10%
Other services, except public administration 4% Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accomodation, and food services 7%
Wholesale Trade 4%
Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 21%
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 13%
Information 2%
27
LeadingIndicators(ShiftShare)AnalysisofEmploymentTrends: ProjectionsofEmployedResidentsLivinginL.T.I.S.D.byEconomicSector
Employment in LTISD
Avg. of 2005, 2006 Avg. of 2006, 2007 Avg. 2005-07 & 2007 & 2008 Relative to 2006-08 Avg. 2005-07 Relative to 2006-08
INDUSTRY -59 193 302 203 477 -5 -37 220 727 2,679 2,062 1,058 687 582 14,170 3,406 2,607 1,228 683 712 17,032 545 170 -4 130 2,862 26% 16% -1% 22% 20% 5,124 1,807 1,057 1,065 28,036 35% -2% -9% 11% 27% 38% 21% 21% 1,552 2,538 793 2,550 478 692 2,869 7,371 -31% 138
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, mining 189 900 1,458 536 1,377 1,854 739 1,760 1,093 130
8 459 778 54 696 217 303 699 3,965 2,517 579 374 353 11,004
6% 42% 44% 7% 38% 83% 78% 32% 116% 97% 47% 55% 50% 65%
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Educational services, health care, social assistance Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food services Other services
Government
28
TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
December 2010
Address
Grades
% of Students Estimated % of from Current Students enrollment LTISD Enrollment from LTISD that are KN+ Estimated Estimated % of Estimated Students from Enrollment Students enrollment Students from LTISD in KN+ in 5 yrs. from LTISD that are KN+ LTISD in KN+
Additional Information
Expanding this September. Students coming from Downtown Austin and as far as RRISD
90% 5% 2% 50% 3% 6% 0% 0% 0% 5% 66% 115 76 29% 22 66 3 9% 0 40 0 13% 0 80 90 100 465 2 93% 2 550 20 0 100% 0 40 0 2 0 5 66 62 4 0% 0 100 6 163 5 63% 3 170 5 70 35 43% 15 80 40 43% 63% 0% 100% 93% 13% 9% 29% 405 7 75% 5 415 7 75% 325 15 57% 9 345 16 57% 9 5 17 3 0 0 2 0 0 19
22
20
40%
95
86
40%
34
15099 Debba Dr
Might build a new building in next 5 years, but unlikely. Other 50% of students from Leander. No plans to expand
9704 Circle Dr
Most students from Leander. No plans to expand. Plan to add a grade every year.
Hill Country Christian School 12124 Ranch Road 620 S PK - 12th of Austin
Lohmans Ford Rd
600 N Cuernavaca Dr
3930 FM 620 S
Montessori School of the Epiphany - Lake Travis Inf - K K - 12 PK - 8 9th - 12th 6th - 12th K - 8th
59% 4% 7% 6% 1% 9% 660 417 4,632 420 369 25 25 7 36 378 District Enrollment 860 35
175
103
9 35 23 25 7 36 191 6,940
112 36 25 27 7 63 418
27 36 23 27 7 63 240 9,263
2500 Wimberly Ln
No plans to expand
Plan to have class sizes target 100 students, but no huge increase is expected. No plans to expand
TOTAL
29
2.7%
2.5%
Housing Projections
ConceptPlansandPlattingActivity o Showstheshorttermexpecteddevelopment,basedoninitialconceptplans, preliminaryandfinalplats Existing,Active,andFutureSubdivisionsandDevelopments o CreatesavisualimageofwhichportionsoftheDistrictaregrowingrapidlyand whicharemorestable,aswellasoutliningthespecificboundariesofeachcurrent andfuturedevelopment ExistingandFutureApartmentComplexes o Pinpointscurrentandfuturelocationsofhighstudentdensity ExistingSchoolsandFutureSchoolSites o Showswhichparcelstotakeofflineforfutureresidentialorcommercial developmentandenablesviablelongtermattendancezoneplanning
assessmentofsparselydevelopedparcelsforpotentialreplacementwithhigherdensity residentialuses,orothertypesoflanduses
Reliability of Projections
Theprojectionsareconsideredmostusefulforthenextfiveyears,asfewdevelopersorland ownershavelongtermplansthatexceedafiveyeartimetable.Thus,onlythefirstfiveyearsof residentialprojectionsareconsideredreliableandusefulforshorttermplanning,andthe remainingyearsareincludedforcompleteness,representingusefulbenchmarkdatafor applicationstoschoolfacilityplanning. PASAdevelopedtheseprojectionswithstudyof,butwithoutheavyconsiderationof,pasttrends. Thus,thisassessmentisauniquelyindependentanalysisgearedtowardfuturetrendsratherthan adependencyonpasttrends. Somelandowners,builders,ordeveloperswilleithergetaheadorbehindtheirconstruction schedule.ForLakeTravisI.S.D.,PASAhasattemptedtodevelopaconservativeModerate GrowthScenarioforexistingsubdivisions,andthebuildoutpotentialofasyettobedeveloped subdivisions.Thus,therewillbeastrongpotentialfortheprojectednumberofnewhousingunits tobeslightlylowrelativetoactualhomesconstructedforeachyearoftheprojectedtimeframe.
32
Also,Briarcliffhad104salesandApacheShoreshad146salesbotholder,builtoutsubdivisions. Theaboveexamplessignifythattheregenerationprocesshadbeguninearnest.Manyofthe homesintheareaarereaching34yearsofage,andthisisoftenthetippingpointforwhenthey aresoldtoyoungerheadsofhouseholdswithschoolagedchildren. KeyFactorsAffectingResidentialandCommercialDevelopment ManyparcelswestofRR620onbothsidesofSH71havenosewerandnowatersupply.LCRA mayprovidesewerwithin5ormoreyears,butispresentlyattemptingtoselloffthewatersupply andalsothewastewatertreatmententities,andconcentrateonelectricalutilitysupplies(as notedabove).Thislackofsewerislimitingmultifamilydevelopment,despitethegreatdemand onbothsidesofSH71forapartmentdevelopments. ItisalsopossiblethatLCRAwilllimitanyfuturemajorwatersupplysystems,asthecurrent subdivisions(withwaterprovidedbyLCRA),ifbuiltout,wouldmeetLCRAscapacity. Manylargetracts,particularlyonLakeAustinandBartonCreek,couldbecomeconservation districts,preserves,orparks.AmongtheseparcelsarePatriciaMurfinstwotractsinPlanning Units6A&5B,PatriciaandRobertAyerstractsin3F&3E,MitchellWongstractsin3G,andother similarparcels,someofwhicharealreadyadjacenttotheCityofAustin,TravisCounty,orthe UniversityofTexasownedparcels. Thereareseveralolder,unpavedroadsthatcouldbeallowedtodevelopasmajorarterialsover thelongterm.ThemostdiscussedsuchroadisPeacockReimersRoad,withadditional possibilityofacurrentlaneononeoftheGrumblesparcelsthatcouldbecomeasecondarterialto provideaccessbetweenHamiltonPoolRoadandSH71. QualityofLifeFactorsandResidentialDevelopment ResidentialandpopulationgrowthhasbeenencouragedtotheeastofIH35,duetotheCityof AustinsSmartGrowthInitiative,preparedin2004,andimplementedoverthelasteightyears. Muchofeasterndevelopmentthathasensuedhasbeensuccessful,butatlowerpricerangesthan thedevelopmentinL.T.I.S.D.ThisdemandforhomesinL.T.I.S.D.isamonghigher socioeconomichouseholdsduetothefactthatthecostofbuildinginthewesternportionof TravisCountytendstobemoretopographicallychallenging(andthusmorecostly),andthe demandforlakesideproximitycontinues,whichisalsocostly.Insum,despitetheemphasison developmentintheeasternsectorofTravisCounty,awayfromtheEdwardsAquiferandits contributoryzone,thedemandforhousingintheaestheticallypleasinglocationsnearLake AustinandLakeTravishasremainedhigh,evenduringtheeconomicdownturn. AnothercriticalfactorinLakeTravisI.S.Dsaccelerationofresidential,population,andstudent growthhasbeentheincreasingTAKStestscores.Eachyearforapproximatelytenyears,TAKS scoresinL.T.I.S.D.haverisen,andarebecomingcomparabletoEanesI.S.D.(thelatterofwhich thisyearhada96%passagerate,comparedtothe94%passagerateinL.T.I.S.D.).TAKSpassage
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011 34
ratesareroughlycorrelatedwithotherqualityoflifefactors,suchasmedianincome,median educationallevelsofthose25+,andmedianhousingvalues.Insum,commercialbrokers,whosell largeparcels,anddevelopersalso,areveryinterestedininvestmentinL.T.I.S.D.,aninterest whichwillcontinuetospawnnewresidentialdevelopmentintheDistrict. BecauseEanesI.S.D.hasbeenthemosthighlyregardeddistrictintheAustinregion,ithastended toattractuppersocioeconomicstudentsformorethanthreedecades.Now,theEanesSchool Districthasbecomealmostbuiltout,andtheinfrastructure(suchasutilitiesandschools)isaging. TheschoolsinEanesI.S.D.rangefrom19yearsoldto40yearsold(average30yearsold),while L.T.I.S.D.schoolsarerelativelynew(326yearsold,average12yearsold).Withthesignificant newutilitybasedinfrastructure,manynewlyaddedsubdivisions,anewhospitalcomplex,and significantnewretailandofficeactivity,LakeTravisI.S.D.isdevelopingacompetitiveadvantage overotherhighlyregardedschooldistrictsinthearea,suchasEanesI.S.D.
35
Type of development Apartments Condos - built-out Condos - developing MHP Subdivisions - built-out Subdivisions - actively building
Added Students 2009 to 2010 Resident Resident Percent Students in Students Actual in 2010 Change Change 2009 143 156 13 9% 160 189 29 18% 10 26 16 160% 10 16 6 60% 4,106 4,274 168 4% 1,604 1,847 243 15% Percent of Growth 2009 to 2010 3% 6% 3% 1% 35% 51%
Apartments Condos - built-out Condos - developing MHP Subdivisions - built-out Subdivisions - actively building
TheactivelygrowingsubdivisionsthataddedthemoststudentsthisyearincludedFalconhead West(68students),RidgeatAltaVista(26students),FalconheadTheChampions(24students), WestCypressHills(24students)andPalefaceRanch(21students).Ofthe243studentsaddedto activelybuildingsubdivisions,about116ofthem(48%)wereelementarystudents,suggesting thatthegrowthintheseactive,newneighborhoodsisnotnecessarilyduetoonlyyoung homebuyerswithyoungchildrenbutisbalancedwithfamilieswitholderchildrenaswell. Theolder,builtoutsubdivisionsbothaddedandloststudentsinvariousareas,withanetgainof 168students.Someareasgainedsignificantnumbersofstudents(LakePointeTheEstates:21 students,TravisLanding2:14students),whileotherareasloststudents(TheUplands:11 studentsandTravisLanding:8students).Justover51%ofthegaininthesesubdivisionswasin theelementarygrades.
36
lower,buthasaffectedthenumberofnewhousesrequired,orindemand.Nationally,basedona studybytheJointCenterforHousingStudies(HarvardUniversity)1.5millionnewhomescreated byoverbuildingduringthehousingboomwouldbegonebynow,IFhouseholdformationrates hadnotfallenbelowhistoriclevels.Demographersandhousingexpertsattributethisdropin householdformationstomillionsofindividualdecisiontoforgoimmigrationtotheU.S.,ortoput offamoveandbunkwithrelativesandfriends(AnnysShin,TheWashingtonPost). Tothinkabouthouseholdformationsasrelatedtoimmigrationaswasnotedaboveahigh percentofnewhouseholdformationsintheAustinareabetween2001and2007wereafunction ofhighimmigrationpushingnewcomersintotheinnercoreofmetroareas,whileallowing growthoutwardtosuburbanlocationsforthosewhowishedtoleavelifeinsidetheloops.So, immigrationhashadamajorimpactonthetremendouspopulationandhousinggrowthbetween 2001and2007withinTexassuburbanschooldistricts.But,inflowsofimmigrantshaveslowed, andillegalimmigrantsnetinmigrationisdowntoaveryslowgrowthinTexas(PewHispanic Center).Thisimmigrationdownturnnotonlyaffectsdemandforhomes,butalsoaffectsthe availabilityofconstructionworkers,ashomebuildersinLakeTravisI.S.D.seektospeeduptheir newhomestarts. Also,Texas,liketherestofthenation,sawtremendousincreasesinhomepurchasesduetothe subprimeloanavailabilitybetween2002and2007.PASAsdemographicteam,alongwithmost economists,feelsthattheU.S.,theState,andtheAustinregionspecifically,willnothaveany subprime,oranyothertypeofreadilyavailable,mortgageloansineithertheshorttermorinthe longterm. Inassessingsinglefamilytrendsforthenextfiveyears,theagingofthepopulationshouldbe keptinmind.TheLakeTravispopulationcouldstarttoseehigherratesofgrowthintheages50+ thaninyoungerheadsofhouseholdsforsomespecificsubdivisionsandtownhomes.Hopefully, housingthatappealstotheyounghomeownercohortwillcontinuetobemadeavailable.Also, PASAdoesassumethatmanyhomesinolderneighborhoodssuchasthoseinLakewaywill acceleratehomesalestoyoungerheadsofhouseholds. Nationally,throughOctober,2010,housingsalesweredownanother25%fromthesamequarter lastyear,andstillwere30%lessvaluedthanin2006.So,demandintheAustinregionhasbeen muchmorepronouncedandpositivethanthenationasawhole,whilestillshaky.Also, nationally,loanmodificationshavehelped100sof1,000sofhomeowners,buthelphasbeen neededformillions.Likewise,thebanksandothermortgagecompaniesintheAustinregion havebecomeverystringentinprovidingpotentialhomeownerswithloans.And,bankregulators donotdistinguishamongstatesinsettingstringentdevelopment,builder,andotherloan requirements,thusverybadlyaffectingTexaspotentialforresidentialdevelopment,aswellas forhomeloans. JamesGaines,economistattheRealEstateCenteratTexasA&MUniversitysuggeststhat: Everyoneshouldbecautiousindeclaringthehousingmarkettohavebottomed.Somuchofthe datajustdonotsupportitforeclosures,theshadowinventory,newhomesalesrunningroughly halfofthelongtermnormlevel,andsalesdeclinesafterthetaxcreditexpired.
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011 38
PU
3D 3A 2C 5B 3D 3H 2C 8D 3D
2015-2020
425 335 357 150 250 250 250 220 250
2010-2020
572 532 482 375 350 350 320 320 300
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011
39
TheseprojectionsaredetailedbyPlanningUnitandyearforallsubdivisions, townhomes/condos,apartments,andmobilehomeparksinspreadsheetandmapform,atthe endofthischapter. HousingProjectionsThroughBuildOutoftheDistrict PASAhasalsoconductedananalysisofthepotentialhousingsupplythroughBuildOutofthe district.Itshouldbenotedthat,relativetolastyearssimilarbuildoutanalysis,therehavebeen severallargeparcelssetasideforconservation,parkandotherpurposes,sothattheprojected numberofnewhousingunitshasdeclinedinsomelocations. Secondly,threepotentialmultifamilydevelopmentshavebeenaddedtothebuildoutdata, thusincreasingthenumberofnewhousingunitsinthreePlanningUnits(after2020).Itshouldbe emphasizedthatmultifamilydevelopmentsmayoccurinlocationsnotheretoforeconsidered possibleforhigherdensitydevelopmentatanyyearduringthegradualbuildoutperiod,andare verydifficulttopinpointlocationally.Insum,thesebuildoutprojectionswillunderestimatethe actualnumberofhighdensitydevelopments,sincethemunicipalitiesarenotallowingsuch growthatthistime(butarealmostcertaintodosointhefuture).Also,fortheparcelsnotin municipalities,thereisnoinfrastructuretoallowhighdensitydevelopmentinthenearfuture, and,insomecases,mayneverbeavailableinsomelocations(evenpost2020)primarilydueto environmentalandtopographicconstraints. Bothhighdensity,aswellasconventionalsinglefamily,developmentwilloccurwhenLCRA allowsnewwastewaterpipelinesalongSH71,ormakescommitmentsforwaterandwastewater inthesouthwesternPlanningUnitswithintheDistrict.(Inthesouthwestatthistime,theAyers ~6,700acres,thePuryearparcelsouthofRockyCreekRanch,theMitchellWong~750acres southwestofSpanishOaks,andthePeacock[i.e.,HuthnanceandHolland]tractshaveno commitmentsfromLCRA,althoughthereareconceptplansfortwooftheselandownersparcels. And,itislikelythatotherwatersources(otherthanLCRA)willhavetobeusedintheDistrictto allowfullbuildoutpotential.TheTrinityAquifer,andeventheCarrizoWilcoxAquifer,haveboth beendiscussedforutilizationwithinL.T.I.S.D. Insum,thebuildouthousingprojectionswillchangeeachyear,and,justaswithalllongrange planningefforts,changeisthenorm.Atthesametime,itisanticipatedthatthefirstfiveyearsof theprojectionperiod(20112015)willyieldreliablehousingprojections,althoughtheseestimates canexceedorlagthetimeframesofexpecteddevelopment.Thelastfiveyears(20162020)of thetenyearstudytimeframeareusedasapproximationsofthelocationalconfigurationof growth,andannualorperiodicrevisionswillberequired,justaswiththebuildoutprojections.
40
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Pace Ben d
Rd
H
n ili
12B
s Hud
e . Rd
an
en d
Th ur m
s t Cree k Rd
Hu r
Clu bh o
wi nd Dr .
9A
lv d
9C
2B
s os Cr
ew
2C
la High
La
L R vd . a kew a B ay Bl lvd .
62
3A
ay
D R.O.
ld
y
1A
R
10C
Rd .
r Fer
Ben d Rd. on
2A
d oa
Be e
12A
RM 620
1B
9F
k Cr e e
Ro
ad
9E 9B
rive
St 10A ew ar tR d.
11D 11E
ee rT
rl.
7E
.
9D
r.
Dr 7D se 7G 6C 7B 7C M
Kol lm e
11B
r D r.
La k
ye
ew
nds B
7A
Mu rfi
6B
d.
2D 3B 2E 8D
am
8B 8G 8E 8C
SH 71
7F 6D
ilt on
3C
Po ol
8A
nR
6A
5B
RM
0 62
5A 5C
SH 71
F M 22
44
0 0.5 1
3D
8F
Rd
4 3J
ol Roa d mil t on Po Ha
Crum ley
3G
3H
3E
Ra n ch
3F
ad
[
2 3 4 Miles
Ro
41
Mu ni ci p al J u ri sd ic ti on s
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
P ace Bend Rd
Hi
e lin . Rd
12B
s Hud
1A
10C
Ben d Rd. on
BRIARCLIFF
12A
AUSTIN ETJ
11A ro ve 10A Blvd ew 11D . Running art Rd De . er 7E Tr Ko l. . l lm 11B Dr e ye se D r. 6C
G
St
BRIARCLIFF ETJ
2A
B
. D riv .O
e
ak
RM 6
9F O
10B
20
11C 11E
9A
Dr .
9B
3A
1 SH 7
LAKEWAY
9C 2C
k
7G
7B
win d
2B
s os Cr
La ewa yB v
l
Clu bho
9D
Hu rs t
9E
e
7D
3B
2E 8E 8D 8C 3D
8G
RM
LAKEWAY ETJ
2D
8B
6D
62
C e ekR oa
Map Layers
District Boundary 3C
Ha m ilt Planning Units on
Streets
Municipalities
AUSTIN
oo
AUSTIN LTD
Crum l ey R n c a
BEE CAVE BEE CAVE ETJ BRIARCLIFF BRIARCLIFF ETJ LAGO VISTA LAGO VISTA ETJ LAKEWAY LAKEWAY ETJ THE HILLS
AUSTIN ETJ
3E
7C
d.
7A
Mu
7F
rfi n
6B
Rd .
AUSTIN LTD
THE HILLS
6A
AUSTIN
5B
RM
0 62
8A
8F
BEE CAVE
4
l Ro a
ol Rd Po
d
3J 3G 3H
S
H
71
Hamilto
AUSTIN ETJ
3F
hR
oad
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
42
Map Layers
District Boundary Streets
Municipalities
0.2 - 0.7 0.8 - 3.1 3.2 - 7.2 7.3 - 13.2 13.3 - 16.5 16.6 - 30.1
H
BRIARCLIFF ETJ
c e Bend Rd
ilin
eR
d.
Ro
BRIARCLIFF
ur m an
Pa
en
Th
C r ek e
r st Creek Rd.
Gr
ov eB
St ew
lv d .
RM
Hu
Du
Flami
LAKEWAY ETJ
kew
nds B Highl a
d. a y B lv
B a kew a y
d.
62
ng o
y Dr.
L ck
D r.
Clu bh
r ive R. O . D
us
vd
UNINCORPORATED LAND
Old
Hu d
F e rr
y
n Bend R d. so
ad
d.
AUSTIN ETJ
0 62
Be
O ak
Roa d
art
Rd .
Running D
ee
rT
LAKEWAY
d. lv ak
o
K ol
r. eD
r l.
lm eye r
Dr.
AUSTIN LTD
THE HILLS
e ak
La
lv
Mu
rfin
Rd .
RM
62 0
Ha
SH 71
Po ol R
d
P H a milton ool Ro a d
BEE CAVE
SH 71
FM 2 244
AUSTIN ETJ
Cru m ley R
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
anc
h Road
43
Major Aq uife r s
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
Brown County Brookesmith ISD Mullin ISD Hamilton County Star ISD Mills County Goldthwaite ISD Richland Springs ISD Lometa ISD Lampasas County Evant ISD Jonesboro ISD Coryell County Gatesville ISD Crawford ISD Oglesby ISD McGregor ISD Waco ISD Robinson ISD Lorena ISD McLennan County Chilton ISD
TRINITY AQUIFER
Killeen ISD Lampasas ISD Copperas Cove ISD
Moody ISD Bruceville-Eddy ISD (McLennan) Falls County Troy ISD Westphalia ISD Belton ISD Rosebud-Lott ISD Temple ISD Rogers ISD Academy ISD
Salado ISD
Holland ISD Florence ISD Mason ISD Llano ISD Mason County Llano County Liberty Hill ISD Georgetown ISD Williamson County Granger ISD Bur net Cons ISD Burnet County Jarrell ISD Bar tlett ISD
Hutto ISD Leander ISD Lago Vista ISD Round Rock ISD Pfluger ville ISD Taylor ISD
Thrall ISD
EDWARDS-TRINITY AQUIFER
Gillespie County Fredericksburg ISD Johnson City ISD Blanco County
Manor ISD
Harper ISD
Travis County Dripping Springs ISD Austin ISD Del Valle ISD
Kerrville ISD Bastrop ISD Wimberley ISD Hays Cons ISD Hays County Smithville ISD Lockhar t ISD Boer ne ISD Comal ISD Comal County New Braunfels ISD San Marcos Cons ISD Caldwell County Prairie Lea ISD Luling ISD Fayette County Flatonia ISD Bastrop County
Blanco ISD Comfort ISD Kerr County Center Point ISD Kendall County
Navarro ISD
Waelder ISD
EDWARDS AQUIFER
Hondo ISD Medina Medina Valley ISD County
Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City North East ISD Marion ISD ISD Alamo Heights Randolph Field ISD ISD Judson ISD
Moulton ISD
Bexar County Lackland ISD South San East Central ISD Antonio ISD Harlandale Southwest ISD ISD Somerset ISD
La Vernia ISD
CARRIZO AQUIFER
Nixon-Smiley Cons ISD Stockdale ISD Cuero ISD
Yoakum ISD
Wilson County De Witt County Poth ISD Karnes County Westhoff ISD Yorktown ISD
Devine ISD
5 10
20
30
Meyersville ISD
[G
44
Aqu i fe r s
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets Lakes and Rivers Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Trinity Aquifer
Rd
Pace Ben d
H
n ili
12B
e . Rd
1A
O
s Hud
an
B en
Th ur m
Cree k Rd
9B
wi nd Dr .
Clu bho
3A
D R. O.
rive
9D
Hu
7D 7G
rs t
6 20
2B
s os Cr
ew
lv d
2D 3B 2E 8G 8E 8D
am
RM
ld
r Fer
10C
R
Ben d Rd. on
2A
d oa
Be e
Rd .
12A
R M 620
1B 11C 9F O
ak
k Cr e e
10B
G
Ro
ad
9E
9A 2C
High
B la nds
La k
r 9C 7B L vd . a ke w a B lv ay Bl d. 7A
8C
ilt on
Lak ew yD a
Mu rfi
6B
nR d.
ll
8B
7F
6A
6D 5B
RM
0 62
8A
3C
SH 71
5A 8F 5C
SH 71
FM 22
44
Po ol
Rd
3D
4 3J
ol Roa d mil t o n Po Ha
Crum ley R a n ch
3G
3H
3E
3F
Ro
ad
0 0.5 1
4 Miles
45
In hi bi tor s to Devel op m e nt
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
Area of Development Inhibitors
Parks Preserves Water/Rivers Contributing Zone Sq. Mi. 6 8.5 6.2 29.3 % District 5% 7% 5% 25.1%
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Development Inhibitors
Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Parks Preserves Water/Rivers
Pace Ben d
Rd
H
n ili
12B
e . Rd
1A
O
s Hud
an
B en
Th ur m
Cree k Rd
9B
wi nd Dr .
Clu bho
3A
D R. O.
rive
9D
Hu
7D 7G
rs t
6 20
2B
s os Cr
ew
lv d
2D 3B 2E 8G 8E 8D
am
RM
ld
r Fer
10C
R
Ben d Rd. on
2A
d oa
Be e
Rd .
12A
R M 620
1B 11C 9F O
ak
k Cr e e
10B
G
Ro
ad
9E
9A 2C
High
B la nds
La k
r 9C 7B L vd . a ke w a B lv ay Bl d. 7A
8C
ilt on
Lak ew yD a
Mu rfi
6B
nR d.
ll
8B
7F
6A
6D 5B
RM
0 62
8A
3C
SH 71
5A 8F 5C
SH 71
FM 22
44
Po ol
Rd
3D
4 3J
ol Roa d mil t o n Po Ha
Crum ley R a n ch
3G
3H
3E
3F
Ro
ad
[
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011
0 0.5 1
4 Miles
46
Sl op e of Ter r ain
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets Water Bodies Rivers and Streams
Slope in Degrees
0 - 1.84 1.85 - 4.29 4.3 - 7.05 7.06 - 10.4
Pace B en
dR
10.5 - 14.4
in Hil
12B
eR d.
1A
Hu d
Bend R d. son
10C
R
ry
Th ur ma n
Be
nd
r ee R k
st Creek Rd.
Hur
20
Lakew
RM 6
9B 3A
r ive R. O. D
ay
us
Du
Dr.
9A 2C
ds B l v Highla n
Sa
wind
9C
wa
y B
L ck e D
ak
Clu b h
2B
La
d.
ke
2A
d oa
Rd.
12A
R M 620
1B 9F
k Oa
Gr
3B
B ee C
oad
9E
. Dr
7E 7D
er ast ilm
9D
. e Dr
Ko l lmey er
11B
D
r.
7G
6C
Mu rfin Rd.
s C ro
. l vd
r. 7C B a kew a y d .
lv
6B
7A
8B
7F
6A
2D 2E 8E 8D 8C
Ha m
RM
8G
6D 5B
0 62
8A
3C
ilto n
5A 8F 5C
SH 71
FM 2 244
SH 71
Po ol
Rd
3D
4 3J
ol Road Hami lto n Po
3G
3H
3E
C ru mley
3F
ch Road
R an
0 0.5 1
4 Miles
[
47
Deve lo pm e nt De nsi ty
L a k e Tr a v i s I . S . D .
February 2011: 207 students per square mile (sq. mi.) of built-out area Total area of Lake Travis I.S.D. is 116.6 sq. mi. ~33.5 sq. mi. are built-out/developed land [light purple] ~6.5 sq. mi. are currently active [dark purple] ~14.8 sq. mi. are undeveloped, but are planned to develop [orange] ~37.7 sq. mi. are undeveloped with no development plans [light orange] ~3.5 sq. mi. are rural housing on small acreage which could redevelop much later [brown] ~6.3 sq. mi. of the flood plain is built-out, and ~3.7 sq. mi. is undeveloped In the District there are at least ~20.6 sq. mi. of undevelopable land (parks, preserves and water/rivers) and ~59 sq. mi. of undeveloped land remaining (including active, planned and unplanned development)
Map Layers District Boundary Generally Built-OutDeveloped Active Parcels Undeveloped, but Planned Development Undeveloped Land Rural Housing, Possible Distant Redev. Preserves Parks Water/Rivers 100, 500 Year Flood Plain and Floodways Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone
District Land Uses 33.5 29% Built-out 6.5 6% Active 14.8 13% Planned Dev. 37.7 32% Undeveloped 3.5 3% Rural Housing 6.2 5% Water/Rivers 6 5% Parks 8.4 7% Preserves
[
0 1 2 4 Miles
48
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Alexan Galleria Angel Bay Annie Stewart Addition Apache Shores Arbolago Barton Creek Preserve Beby's Ranch Bee Cave West Bee Creek Estates Bee Creek Ranchettes Bella Montagna Estates Bella Strada Belvedere Big Bee Creek Briarcliff Brooks Hollow Buffalo Gap Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills Canyons at Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Estates Cardinal Hills Estates 2 Casa Verde Cedar Glen Cherry Mountain Commanders Point Costa Bella Courtyard at the Preserve Cove at Lakeway Coves at Lake Travis Creekside Crosswind Destiny Hills Edgewater Beach Enclave Enclave North
Class Apartment Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes
Phase Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2008 26 19 37 17 11 42% -2 -11% 2005 0 0 1 0 1 100% 0 0% 1982 21 10 22 10 1 5% 0 0% 1995 545 277 589 304 44 8% 27 10% 2004 16 9 20 11 4 25% 2 22% 2001 6 2 6 3 0 0% 1 50% 1984 8 5 8 6 0 0% 1 20% 1989 10 1 6 1 -4 -40% 0 0% 2008 6 2 11 5 5 83% 3 150% 1999 6 2 7 2 1 17% 0 0% 2006 15 5 17 6 2 13% 1 20% 2008 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 2005 21 11 32 22 11 52% 11 100% 1976 9 2 6 2 -3 -33% 0 0% 1997 197 101 210 104 13 7% 3 3% 1989 21 5 16 4 -5 -24% -1 -20% 1989 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 2005 54 32 51 29 -3 -6% -3 -9% 1999 64 38 81 39 17 27% 1 3% 2000 19 8 16 12 -3 -16% 4 50% 2005 7 5 10 6 3 43% 1 20% 6 4 15 7 9 150% 3 75% 1994 13 4 6 2 -7 -54% -2 -50% 2001 9 2 7 1 -2 -22% -1 -50% 1992 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 2002 28 16 35 20 7 25% 4 25% 56 20 58 24 2 4% 4 20% 2002 7 4 8 4 1 14% 0 0% 2003 9 7 8 6 -1 -11% -1 -14% 1994 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 1992 15 7 19 12 4 27% 5 71% 2003 11 6 12 6 1 9% 0 0% 1978 5 1 8 1 3 60% 0 0% 2000 0 0 8 3 8 100% 3 100% 8 2 11 4 3 38% 2 100%
49
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Enclave South Falconhead Falconhead - St. Andrews Falconhead - The Champions Falconhead - The Heights Falconhead - The Legends Falconhead - The Links Falconhead - West Flint Rock Estates Flintrock at Hurst Creek Glen Heather Greens Condos Hamilton Hills Hazy Hill Ranchettes Highland Club Village Highland Creek Lakes Hill Top Manor Hills of Lakeway Hudson Bend Colony La Hacienda Estates La Hacienda RV Park La Isla at Angel Bay Lake Chandon Lake Country Estates Lake Oak Estates Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista Lake Pointe - The Estates Lake Pointe - The Landing Lake Pointe - The Preserve Lake Pointe - The Setting Lake Pointe - Vista Pointe Subdivision Existing 1988 1,058 22 437 10 1,096 22 451 11 38 0 4% 0%
Class Townhomes Apartment Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision MHP Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision
Phase Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 16 5 23 8 7 44% 3 60% 2003 74 25 70 25 -4 -5% 0 0% 2006 24 14 29 14 5 21% 0 0% 2006 169 81 193 103 24 14% 22 27% 2006 26 15 30 18 4 15% 3 20% 2004 5 5 5 4 0 0% -1 -20% 2005 24 10 26 12 2 8% 2 20% 2009 72 37 140 73 68 94% 36 97% 1999 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 2006 89 37 93 42 4 4% 5 14% 1978 4 1 1 0 -3 -75% -1 -100% 1999 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 1998 2 1 1 0 -1 -50% -1 -100% 1989 11 2 7 1 -4 -36% -1 -50% 1988 7 6 5 3 -2 -29% -3 -50% 2000 10 4 11 5 1 10% 1 25% 2002 4 2 4 2 0 0% 0 0% 1997 432 203 482 227 50 12% 24 12% 1983 34 12 31 12 -3 -9% 0 0% 1991 41 20 45 23 4 10% 3 15% 2008 0 0 6 2 6 100% 2 100% 2005 3 2 3 2 0 0% 0 0% 2006 0 0 2 2 2 100% 2 100% 2000 6 2 4 2 -2 -33% 0 0% 1999 40 27 52 27 12 30% 0 0% 2003 46 32 51 37 5 11% 5 16% 1999 373 215 394 219 21 6% 4 2% 2000 44 29 45 24 1 2% -5 -17% 2000 83 54 85 53 2 2% -1 -2% 1999 87 46 93 52 6 7% 6 13% 2004 130 62 125 52 -5 -4% -10 -16% 14 1 3% 10%
PU 5B 8A 8A 8A 8A 8A 8A 8C 2E 8G/8E 7F 8B 3C 2A 11C 3E 3E 8B 12B 10C 10C 1B 9C 2E 6C 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 7A/7B/7C 7G/9A/9B 9C/9D/9E 9C Townhomes Existing
Lakeway
50
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Lakewood Estates Lakewind Estates Las Entradas on Lake Travis Laws Addition Lick Creek Ranch Lohmans Crossing Estates Madrone Ranch Majestic Hills Ranchettes Maravilla Marina Club Villas Marina Village Masters at the Hills Meadowfox Estates Mountain Acres Mountain Creek Lakes North Lakeway Village North Lakeway Village Old Ferry Paleface Ranch Perdenales Canyon Pinnacle at North Lakeway Preserve at Barton Creek Ranches at Hamilton Pool Reserve at Hudson Bend Reserve at Lake Travis Retama Ridge at Alta Vista Rough Hollow - East Rim Rough Hollow - The Bluffs Rough Hollow - The Enclave Rough Hollow - Water's Edge Saddletree Ranch Sadik Santorini Villas Siesta Shores
Class Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision MHP Townhomes Subdivision
Phase Existing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 1984 13 5 17 8 4 31% 3 60% 2002 31 12 25 9 -6 -19% -3 -25% 2002 3 0 3 1 0 0% 1 100% 2005 14 6 16 6 2 14% 0 0% 1996 15 4 15 7 0 0% 3 75% 1990 197 92 202 96 5 3% 4 4% 1999 8 2 6 1 -2 -25% -1 -50% 1999 24 9 22 7 -2 -8% -2 -22% 2004 28 10 33 8 5 18% -2 -20% 1981 5 3 4 2 -1 -20% -1 -33% 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 2 1 3 0 1 50% -1 -100% 2000 15 7 13 5 -2 -13% -2 -29% 1995 4 0 2 1 -2 -50% 1 100% 1999 14 8 13 7 -1 -7% -1 -13% 2009 1 0 3 1 2 200% 1 100% 2009 3 3 11 9 8 267% 6 200% 1983 23 13 23 8 0 0% -5 -38% 2003 0 0 21 8 21 100% 8 100% 1996 4 0 2 0 -2 -50% 0 0% 1 0 6 1 5 500% 1 100% 2004 26 16 28 16 2 8% 0 0% 2008 0 0 3 2 3 100% 2 100% 2004 36 22 40 23 4 11% 1 5% 2009 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 12 6 16 5 4 33% -1 -17% 2007 241 125 267 134 26 11% 9 7% 2007 4 2 3 2 -1 -25% 0 0% 2009 0 0 2 0 2 100% 0 0% 2007 11 9 17 13 6 55% 4 44% 2008 3 1 6 2 3 100% 1 100% 2001 61 30 58 25 -3 -5% -5 -17% 10 7 10 6 0 0% -1 -14% 2 2 2 2 0 0% 0 0% 1987 21 7 18 7 -3 -14% 0 0%
51
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Spanish Oaks Stoney Creek Terrace at the Preserve The Enclave @ Kollmeyer Sprgs The Homestead The Uplands Thurman Bend Estates Tiburon Hills Travis Landing Travis Landing 2 Travis Oak Trails Travis Settlement Twin Lake Hills Valley Lake Hills Villas at Flintrock Villas at the Hills Vineyard Bay Vista Estates Vista Grande Vista Grande Amend Vistas @ Lake Travis Vistas at Lakeway West Cave Estates West Cypress Hills Whitecliff Windmill Bluff Estates Windmill Bluff Estates Windsor at Bee Cave Windy Walk Estates Woods of Lake Travis World of Tennis Townhomess Yaupon Creek
Class Subdivision Townhomes Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Apartment Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision
Phase Developing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2006 70 38 71 34 1 1% -4 -11% 1975 4 4 6 5 2 50% 1 25% 6 3 13 8 7 117% 5 167% 2005 7 1 9 2 2 29% 1 100% 1997 88 25 81 29 -7 -8% 4 16% 2000 162 69 151 63 -11 -7% -6 -9% 2002 2 0 6 4 4 200% 4 100% 2003 3 0 5 1 2 67% 1 100% 1988 51 22 43 16 -8 -16% -6 -27% 1988 90 44 104 60 14 16% 16 36% 1992 19 7 21 11 2 11% 4 57% 2002 110 51 102 49 -8 -7% -2 -4% 2002 39 21 37 19 -2 -5% -2 -10% 2003 29 14 38 18 9 31% 4 29% 1 1 1 1 0 0% 0 0% 3 0 2 0 -1 -33% 0 0% 1998 35 18 33 16 -2 -6% -2 -11% 2005 5 2 6 2 1 20% 0 0% 1993 14 9 13 7 -1 -7% -2 -22% 1987 2 1 1 1 -1 -50% 0 0% 1988 33 11 32 11 -1 -3% 0 0% 3 0 4 0 1 33% 0 0% 2000 67 36 66 33 -1 -1% -3 -8% 2007 58 30 82 39 24 41% 9 30% 1982 1 0 2 1 1 100% 1 100% 1999 12 3 12 2 0 0% -1 -33% 1998 19 5 17 6 -2 -11% 1 20% 1991 43 21 49 27 6 14% 6 29% 2007 0 0 3 2 3 100% 2 100% 1994 37 10 35 10 -2 -5% 0 0% 27 7 29 10 2 7% 3 43% 2006 3 2 1 0 -2 -67% -2 -100%
Total:
6,033
2,860
6,508
3,092
475
8%
232
8%
52
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 4 1B/2B 12A 9E 3G 12A 9E 5A 3D 2A 6A 11A 7F 1B 12B 3E 1B 8G 2E 3D 3A 3E 8B 11C 2E 3G 10A 10B 11C 10C/12B 1B 3C 3E 2C
Name The Uplands Travis Settlement Travis Landing Cedar Glen The Homestead Lakewind Estates Brooks Hollow Lake Pointe - Vista Pointe Bee Cave West Hazy Hill Ranchettes Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Estates Glen Heather Big Bee Creek Hudson Bend Colony Saddletree Ranch Siesta Shores Cherry Mountain Lake Country Estates Madrone Ranch Perdenales Canyon Twin Lake Hills Yaupon Creek Highland Club Village Majestic Hills Ranchettes Meadowfox Estates Mountain Acres Vineyard Bay Windmill Bluff Estates Woods of Lake Travis Coves at Lake Travis Hamilton Hills Mountain Creek Lakes Rough Hollow - East Rim
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Existing 2000 Developing 2002 Existing 1988 Developing 1994 Existing 1997 Existing 2002 Existing 1989 Existing 2004 Existing 1989 Existing 1989 Developing 2005 Developing 2000 Developing 1978 Existing 1976 Existing 1983 Existing 2001 Existing 1987 Developing 2001 Developing 2000 Developing 1999 Developing 1996 Developing 2002 Developing 2006 Existing 1988 Existing 1999 Existing 2000 Existing 1995 Existing 1998 Existing 1998 Existing 1994 Developing 2003 Developing 1998 Developing 1999 Developing 2007
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. -11 -7% -6 -9% -8 -7% -2 -4% -8 -16% -6 -27% -7 -54% -2 -50% -7 -8% 4 16% -6 -19% -3 -25% -5 -24% -1 -20% -5 -4% -10 -16% -4 -40% 0 0% -4 -36% -1 -50% -3 -6% -3 -9% -3 -16% 4 50% -3 -75% -1 -100% -3 -33% 0 0% -3 -9% 0 0% -3 -5% -5 -17% -3 -14% 0 0% -2 -22% -1 -50% -2 -33% 0 0% -2 -25% -1 -50% -2 -50% 0 0% -2 -5% -2 -10% -2 -67% -2 -100% -2 -29% -3 -50% -2 -8% -2 -22% -2 -13% -2 -29% -2 -50% 1 100% -2 -6% -2 -11% -2 -11% 1 20% -2 -5% 0 0% -1 -11% -1 -14% -1 -50% -1 -100% -1 -7% -1 -13% -1 -25% 0 0%
53
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Vista Grande Amend Vistas @ Lake Travis West Cave Estates Marina Club Villas Vista Grande Bella Strada Creekside Falconhead - The Legends Hill Top Manor La Isla at Angel Bay Las Entradas on Lake Travis Windmill Bluff Estates Barton Creek Preserve Beby's Ranch Flint Rock Estates Lick Creek Ranch Old Ferry Angel Bay Bee Creek Ranchettes Highland Creek Lakes Reserve at Lake Travis Spanish Oaks Annie Stewart Addition Buffalo Gap Commanders Point Cove at Lakeway Destiny Hills Lake Pointe - The Landing Vista Estates Whitecliff Bella Montagna Estates North Lakeway Village Rough Hollow - The Bluffs The Enclave @ Kollmeyer Sprgs
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Developing 1987 Developing 1988 Developing 2000 Existing 1981 Existing 1993 Developing 2008 Developing 1994 Developing 2004 Developing 2002 Developing 2005 Developing 2002 Developing 1999 Existing 2001 Existing 1984 Existing 1999 Existing 1996 Existing 1983 Developing 2005 Developing 1999 Developing 2000 Developing 2009 Developing 2006 Existing 1982 Existing 1989 Existing 1992 Existing 2002 Existing 2003 Existing 2000 Existing 2005 Existing 1982 Developing 2006 Developing 2009 Developing 2009 Developing 2005
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. -1 -50% 0 0% -1 -3% 0 0% -1 -1% -3 -8% -1 -20% -1 -33% -1 -7% -2 -22% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% -1 -20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% -1 -33% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 75% 0 0% -5 -38% 1 100% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% 1 10% 1 25% 1 100% 1 100% 1 1% -4 -11% 1 5% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100% 1 100% 1 100% 1 14% 0 0% 1 9% 0 0% 1 2% -5 -17% 1 20% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100% 2 13% 1 20% 2 200% 1 100% 2 100% 0 0% 2 29% 1 100%
54
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmenforApartmentsbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 8A 3H 5C
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2003 74 25 70 25 -4 -5% 0 0% 1991 43 21 49 27 6 14% 6 29% 2008 26 19 37 17 11 42% -2 -11%
Total
143
65
156
69
13
9%
3%
55
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforTownhomesbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 8B 8B 9C 9C 8G 9D 6A 8B 9C 6A 9C 9A 5B 8B 7E 6A 5B 9E
Name Villas at the Hills Greens Condos Lakeway Patio Homes Santorini Villas Villas at Flintrock Marina Village Vistas at Lakeway Masters at the Hills Lake Chandon Courtyard at the Preserve Stoney Creek World of Tennis Condos Enclave North Retama Pinnacle at North Lakeway Terrace at the Preserve Enclave South Casa Verde
Phase Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. -1 -33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 10% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100% 1 33% 0 0% 1 50% -1 -100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 4% 4 20% 2 50% 1 25% 2 7% 3 43% 3 38% 2 100% 4 33% -1 -17% 5 500% 1 100% 7 117% 5 167% 7 44% 3 60% 9 150% 3 75%
Total
170
65
215
89
45
26%
24
11%
56
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforMobileHomeCommunitiesbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 2B 10C 2008
Yr. Blt.
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 0 0% -1 -14% 6 100% 2 100%
Total
10
16
60%
6%
57
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Falconhead - The Links Lake Pointe - The Preserve Laws Addition Preserve at Barton Creek Tiburon Hills Travis Oak Trails Cardinal Hills Estates 2 Ranches at Hamilton Pool Rough Hollow - Water's Edge Windy Walk Estates Edgewater Beach Falconhead - The Heights Flintrock at Hurst Creek Thurman Bend Estates Arbolago Crosswind La Hacienda Estates Lakewood Estates Reserve at Hudson Bend Bee Creek Estates Maravilla Falconhead - St. Andrews Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista Lohmans Crossing Estates Rough Hollow - The Enclave Lake Pointe - The Setting Costa Bella North Lakeway Village Enclave Valley Lake Hills Belvedere Lake Oak Estates Briarcliff Travis Landing 2
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Existing 2005 Existing 2000 Existing 2005 Existing 2004 Existing 2003 Existing 1992 Developing 2005 Developing 2008 Developing 2008 Developing 2007 Existing 1978 Developing 2006 Developing 2006 Developing 2002 Existing 2004 Existing 1992 Existing 1991 Existing 1984 Existing 2004 Developing 2008 Developing 2004 Existing 2006 Existing 2003 Existing 1990 Developing 2007 Existing 1999 Existing 2002 Developing 2009 Existing 2000 Developing 2003 Developing 2005 Developing 1999 Developing 1997 Existing 1988
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2 8% 2 20% 2 2% -1 -2% 2 14% 0 0% 2 8% 0 0% 2 67% 1 100% 2 11% 4 57% 3 43% 1 20% 3 100% 2 100% 3 100% 1 100% 3 100% 2 100% 3 60% 0 0% 4 15% 3 20% 4 4% 5 14% 4 200% 4 100% 4 25% 2 22% 4 27% 5 71% 4 10% 3 15% 4 31% 3 60% 4 11% 1 5% 5 83% 3 150% 5 18% -2 -20% 5 21% 0 0% 5 11% 5 16% 5 3% 4 4% 6 55% 4 44% 6 7% 6 13% 7 25% 4 25% 8 267% 6 200% 8 100% 3 100% 9 31% 4 29% 11 52% 11 100% 12 30% 0 0% 13 7% 3 3% 14 16% 16 36%
58
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Canyons at Cardinal Hills Paleface Ranch Lake Pointe - The Estates Falconhead - The Champions West Cypress Hills Ridge at Alta Vista Existing Existing Existing Developing 1995 1997 2009 545 432 72 277 203 37 589 482 140 304 227 73 1988 1,058 437 1,096 451 38 44 50 68 4% 8% 12% 94%
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Developing 1999 Developing 2003 Existing 1999 Developing 2006 Developing 2007 Developing 2007
Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th 81 39 21 8 394 219 193 103 82 39 267 134
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 17 27% 1 3% 21 100% 8 100% 21 6% 4 2% 24 14% 22 27% 24 41% 9 30% 26 11% 9 7% 14 27 24 36 3% 10% 12% 97%
Lakeway
Total
5,710
2,723
6,121
2,926
411
7%
203
3%
59
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
S t u d e n t Tr e n d s b y D e v e l o p m e n t E E - 1 2 t h G r a d e A b s o l u t e a n d P e r c en t C h a n g e f o r A p a rt m e n t s , F a l l ' 0 9 t o S p r i n g ' 11
7C 6C
7A
Mu rfin Rd .
6B 6A
[
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
7F 8B
RM
6 20
Apartments
Absolute Change
6D
-4 6
5B
8G
11
8E
8A 8C
5A
SH 71
8F
5C
FM 2244
Hamilton Pool Ro a d
3H 3G
3F
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
60
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
S t u d e n t Tr e n d s b y D e v e l o p m e n t E E - 1 2 t h G r a d e A b s o l u t e a n d P e r c en t C h a n g e f o r S u b d i v i s i o n s , F a l l ' 0 9 t o S p r i n g ' 11
Las Entradas on Lake Travis 0, 0% Old Ferry 0, 0% Whitecliff 1, 1% Marina Club Villas -1, -0.2%
H
ilin
12B
1A
Lakewood Estates 4, 0.31% Reserve at Lake Travis 1, 1% Thurman Bend Estates 4, 2% Edgewater Beach 3, 0.6% Coves at Lake Travis -1, -0.11%
10C
d. eR
o Huds
Be
nd
Th ur ma n
F Ol d
Paleface Ranch 21, 1% Perdenales Canyon -2, -0.5% Lick Creek Ranch 0, 0%
end Rd. nB
er ry
2A
Bee Creek Ranchettes 1, 0.17% Hazy Hill Ranchettes -4, -0.36% Tiburon Hills 2, 0.67% Vista Estates 1, 0.2% West Cypress Hills 24, 0.41%
9E
Vistas @ Lake Travis Big Bee Creek -1, -0.03% -3, -0.33% Crosswind 4, 0.27%
9B
L a ke w
ay
3A
9A 2C
ds B l Highla n
d.
Sadik 0, 0%
La
ke
wa
2B
D 9C . y B l vd
7G o L u ck e 7C 7B D r Lak e wa B l vd. 7A
Clu bh
us e
9D
Hur st Creek
Rd.
r.
ad Ro
Be e
Cr
Rd.
12A
Commanders Point 1, 1%
ee k
Angel Bay 1, 1%
R M 620
1B
oad
11C 9F
k Oa
10B
7D
d. ossi n g R
Gr o ve 11E 10A Bl v 11A d. 11D Ste Running D war t Rd eer . Trl . 7E Koll 11B m ey er r. Dr. D
8B 2D
Lohm
Cr ans
6C
M
0 62
ak
6B
Mu rfin Rd .
7F 6A
3B 2E 8E 8D 8C 3C
Ranches at Hamilton Pool 3, 1% Hamilton Hills -1, -0.5% Belvedere 11, 0.52% Madrone Ranch -2, -0.25%
8G
6D
5B
RM
0 62
8A 8F
5A 5C
SH 71
FM 2 244
SH 71
3D
Bee Cave West -4, -0.4%
4
Destiny Hills 1, 0.09%
3J
3H
Hamilton Pool R o a d
3G
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Subdivisions
Twin Lake Hills 3E -2, -0.05% West Cave Estates Valley Lake Hills -1, -0.01% 9, 0.31% Mountain Creek Lakes -1, -0.07% Highland Creek Lakes 1, 0.1%
C ru mley
3F
R an
ch Road
Absolute Change
-11 - -5 -4 - 0 1-5 6 - 14 15 - 26 27 - 68
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
61
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
S t u d e n t Tr e n d s b y D e v e l o p m e n t E E - 1 2 t h G r a d e A b s o l u t e a n d P e r c en t C h a n g e f o r S u b d i v i s i o n s , F a l l ' 0 9 t o S p r i n g ' 11
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
Map Layers
Woods of Lake Travis -2, -0.05% Hudson Bend Colony -3, -0.09%
12B
[
Thurman Bend Estates 4, 2% Reserve at Lake Travis 1, 1% Edgewater Beach 3, 0.6%
Subdivisions
10C
La Hacienda RV PArk 6, 1%
Absolute Change
-11 - -5 -4 - 0 1-5 6 - 14 15 - 26 27 - 68
La Isla at Angel Bay 0, 0% Annie Stewart Addition 1, 0.05% Brooks Hollow -5, -0.24% Vineyard Bay -2, -0.06% Costa Bella 7, 0.25% La Hacienda Estates 4, 0.1%
12A
Vista Grande Amend -1, -0.5% Lakwind Estates -6, -0.19% Beby's Ranch 0, 0% Commanders Point 1, 1%
1B
10B
62
11C
Maravilla 5, 0.18% Windmill Bluff Estates 0, 0%
9F
Marina Village 1, 1%
Cove at Lakeway 1, 0.14% Buffalo Gap 1, 1% 11A Bella Strada Lochan Ora Addition 0, 0% Cedar Glen -1, -1% 10A 9E -7, -0.54% Mountain Acres Casa Verde Arbolago -2, -0.5% Cardinal Hills Estates 9, 1.5% 4, 0.25% -3, -0.16% Lakeway North Lakeway Village 14, 0.04% 8, 2.67%
11E
11D
Apache Shores 44, 0.08%
r.
7D 9D
Lohmans Crossing Estates 5, 0.03%
Flami n
Hig h
0, 0%Lake Chandon Stoney Creek2, 1% 2, 0.5% Villas at the HillsRetama World of Tennis Condos -1, -0.33% 4, 0.33% 2C 2, 0.07% Masters at the Hills The Bluffs 1, 0.5% 2, 1% Greens Condos ds Blv d . 0, 0% lan Hills of Lakeway 50, 0.12%
La ke
9A
wa
9B
yD
11B
Lakeway 8, 0.11%
The Enclave @ Kollmeyer Sprgs 2, 0.29% Pinnacle at North Lakeway 5, 5% Lake Oak Estates 12, 0.3% 7E
7G
Lakeway 1, 0.01%
7B lv Lake wa y B
Lakeway -3, -0.04%
Bella Montagna Estates 2, 0.13% Lakeway 6C 2, 0.02% Canyons at Cardinal Hills 7C 17, 0.27%
Kollm eyer Dr .
d.
Courtyard at the Preserve Mu 2, 0.04% rfin at the Preserve Rd. 7FTerrace7, 1.17% Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills -3, -0.06%
6B
7A
Glen Heather Travis Oak Trails 2, 0.11% -3, -0.75% Vistas at Lakeway 1, 0.33% Yaupon Creek -2, -0.67% Laws Addition 2, 0.14% Ridge at Alta Vista
6A
2D
8B 2E
Enclave Majestic Hills Ranchettes 8, 1% -2, -0.08% Lake Country Estates -2, -0.33% Flint Rock Estates 0, 0% Creekside 0, 0%
6D
26, 0.11%
5B
8E
Enclave South Cherry Mountain Enclave North 7, 0.44% -2, -0.22% 3, 0.38%
8D
Falconhead - West 68, 0.94%
8C
SH 71
Falconhead - St. Andrews 8A 5, 0.21% Falconhead - The Links 2, 0.08% Falconhead - The Legends Falconhead - The Champions RM 0, 0% 24, 0.14% Falconhead - The Heights 4, 0.15%
8F
Bee Cave West -4, -0.4%
5C
3D
Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista 5, 0.11% Lake Pointe - The Preserve 2, 0.02% Lake Pointe - The Setting 6, 0.07% Lake Pointe - The Landing 1, 0.02% Lake Pointe - The Estates 21, 0.06%
5A
620
n Pool R o ad H amilto
Destiny Hills 1, 0.09%
SH 71
3G
3H
Spanish Oaks 1, 0.01%
44 FM 2 2
3J
62
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family Renovations Likely Multi-family Townhomes Existing Townhomes Developing Townhomes Future
WEST BEACH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 43.93 LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY 102.09
LCRA ~96.65
WEBB EVELYN & MARGARET WEBB WI ~78.44 SIKES CAROLE MCINTOSH TRUST 50.85
Emerald Point
Y
C
THE WO OF
DR
EA CH
IFF LN
LAG
ME DI
Single Family
LTISD Facilities
CL
RO C
S DOS
A W
LN
La Hacienda RV Park
HU D
N SO
A LT
RI T
10C
RD
AL LE NW
R D
PO OL
TE L NH AK O EV LO IEW NG E DR HO RN LA N D IN G
CA NY ON
LA
RI DG E
RD
KY
BEACON LAND COMPANY LLC 17.05 DR ORE TRAVIS LANDING PROPERTY OWNERS INC SH S 83 OD D R U
KE SI DE
RD
TR L
Woods A UN of Lake '10 PARADISE COVE MARINA & YACHT C Travis '11 '10 PARADISE COVE MARINA & YACHT C Reserve at Hudson Bend ~257.4
HE R
WE ST
T R AIL
AN
RD
500 year
HO
12B
100 year
PK
IN S
Flood Plain
O WEST BEACH MARINA LTD LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY ~47.44 20.9
RE
ST
W
V
D R
AC O
BE
KIDD LN
Lakewood Estates
La Hacienda Estates
SOONER ST
KA
FLYING J
LE T
LU
C IR
AU
PO TE
TH
FISH
A TER D
GO
VI
EW
1B
LE D
CR
ED
LA
CV
AS T
Lakewind Estates
ARITA AG
DR Coves
at A N D C Travis Lake
RD
RM 620
AG
Commanders Point RD
A
R ITA
~34.88
Cashion
R D T D
SC OT TD R
BEAU MO
MCADAM BROOKS W LIVING TRUST FORD CREED L & LYNN 10.97 18.56
Vista Grande
OKLAHO MA S T
HIGH L AND DR
ANSFIE M LD
A RITA
E NTO
AW
CV
R SCHNEIDER WALTER B MA 15.27 Angel Bay HALE JOHN J & BETH E 40.03
N BEND
NG F LYI
J BLVD
JAMES LN
CI
ANCE L N
YR
CH
WE
TS
A BARBARO W
EC K
LN
SCENIC DR
LN
Edgewater R Beach
D AN
LOO K
9F
CI R
COYOTE CT
RE E
BEL
PA LC H
DR
LA
FO
BROOKS HOLLOW
RD
TAINE
FO
HU K Annie OA
RU
B IT
Stewart H AdditionST U R
LA
CT
V VineyardABay
CH AT EAU
OU CL
LO W
Hudson Bend
E
VE
DY
WA
CV
ER
LA
N E
IS
EF
10B
AVE
SO
Cardinal Hills O PC Estates 2 HOLDINGS GROUP LLC IC 16.6 Canyons S C EN at Lake Travis
CANYO
RI D G E
ID
11C
R TE
TA N IN E
IR D
CO ST
ULL
RAB
PYRAMI
CASABL ANCA
HURST D CR E E K R
ART CV
IN D
Cove at Lakeway
OA K GL EN
BU F
RA
H PARK ER
9E
ER
EXPLO R
ER S
Q UANA
SILVER CI
NE Y
WESTWAR
N A VILL
JA CK S
PA S
BO NI
RED
ARI
RD
RA
RD
CT E LE RA
AF
ST A
9A
SA
Lakeway
E AK
Lakeway
CT Crossing
SH A
F IL
IS
Y A
DR
PE OP
CO
Estates
E RL
AL
Lohmans
LN
C IR
FO Y
RP S
Lakeside Pinnacle at Greenbelt at North KO 6CLLM North North Lakeway Village Lakeway EY ER Lakeway Lakeway Lake Travis Elementary 7G DR
T RS HU
DR
I AC
M Marina Village
NA
9B
C HAL
7D
LA DI N
RE IL LY
GI L
11B
CH
RL
EZ
9D
NG LE
Lakeway
RO C
DR
7E
COLT D
DE E
TR
TR
T L IT TL E
BE A
BA R
FOX
TA
IN
NN
Park
IN O A RB O RO UNSan Casciano Arbolago D M at North CE Round Mountain Ranch CL D A Lakeway SEND E Hamilton
N
AI NT U O
BE
RU
PAS
DEB BA
RD
DR
PI M
LA
LA GO
SU
TU
er Tr l.
HU
Casa
U AP AC Verde
Lim STEW AR it TR
DR
DR
O LC
Running De
HO
SA
DR
NT
Cit y
CA
AG
Cedar Glen
ST
ST
CV
SP
G RIN
RO
VISTA
UP
HARVEY CT
CR WHITEB AZ EA D
EW
DR
TR L
TRL NCH
Bella Strada
TECK CIR
ov e
I AN
10A
11A
SC O TT L N
LCRA ~122.56
EN
LO
D DR
Brooks Hollow
Buffalo Gap
P O
KE
B Costa Bella A
EL
LE I
SU TT
RL Maravilla
LA RI AT
W IL LI AM
CT
SO
LLA
LA
OA K
AM GR OV Oa BIS CT Ek LV GrD
STO RM
DR
CT
O N DR
GRE
DR
O GERO NI M
BR
EA GL E O TR W L TR L
AS
S
BUTTONS TRL
HUMMINGBIRD LN
D EK R
11E
Bl vd
DEXL
ER
Y HO R SE
S PAS
~12.51
C IR
TRL
A P SS
11D
Apache Shores
VER T
R
BO W
T
RL
VE
CRO
RD
H A
TR
SS
MUNDAY WILLIAM F TRUSTEE MOORE JAMES E & JOSIE 10.93 HANZLIK WILLARD M & ~20.79 FALCON OF LAKE TRAVIS INC 49.25 ~14.28
IN
IOWA ST
GR
FO R T ES
L HI
EL M
EB B LN DS DR
lin RD Hi E IN
eR
d.
O R
K C
L R
GE ID
LA
C HA
Travis Landing
D R
Beacon Ridge
EN ID DR
A ND IE
ND BE
DR
DO SS RD
RD
Travis Landing 2
RAINBO
W
~25.41
ONE
IN TA
R THU MAN B
DR
R D
~131.98
T
O H
RN SB
12A
Y HILL
RD
Beby's Ranch
RD
O CI PESCAD
GEL SON G AN
J TE O N
CI
G AN
EL
BA
~46.83
DA M
R T D LIG H
~41.17
NDY H A R BOR WI
GE
S CU
EV K
R NE
TER
IN
UNK R D
AL
FF CT LU
LN
NC
MA N
DR
M TRL CHISHOL
MA CI
TR
GAP R LO D FA
LON
RE FI B
I R
B RA N D
BIG HOR N DR
R P L UM D
AR
SH
A R
AW
N VA
TU
NE
T KE
DR
LN
63
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
[
TR L
LL Y
NN IN GD
NA
RD
620 RD
EY C
SAI L
SA
IR D E LA N
ST AR
FM
KE
BE
T CV
PIKE RD
E
RN
ME
KOLL MEY
CAPR I
RE MO
LN
R AD AC
ES
S DR
EA L Lakewa yD r.
AVE
nE TJ
LAKEH U
ALAB
EAG
NG WOO LO D
DR
ub
RBUDA D R BA
ARTINIQ UE M PASS YACHT C
V
The Enclave
LU
RDRAG O A N
SE
ER AST ILM SA
LA S T
CROS SWIND DR
DR
I ND
CLUBHOUS E
SC
DR
BL VD
DR
Crosswind
9A
Santorini Villas
Duck
SQ U
DR JH
NE AY
AD O
Water's Edge
Y
U RO
G U D O AR
Lakeway
CV KE
LA
HORNSBY LN
T RL G H
C
DO R
Dr.
nd
ssw i
D R MMY L N U
D UFFY LN
DR
AN
SF M
LV
2C
TE
GU
AM
Canyonlands Park
CITY OF LAKEWAY 19.48
EL E
Serene Hills
C LU B ESTAT
ST I
LLMEAD
W O
CH
D TRL
MEDICAL
G R E E N LN
WATERF AL L
AV E
SE RE
R R E NE HILLS D
MIATA AVE
APP L
BELF
T
R
R E
ORTE
2D
BAKER JOHN HICKMAN 24.61 LAS VENTANAS LAND PARTNERS LTD ~492.89
SW
TI
CA
FAR VEL A
DGE
IN DI AN W RU
TA PAS S
DR OD O
N
City Limit The Hills S DR DR T HE HILL LO Villas at Flintrock II EL ty Limit BOR WO Lakeway Ci J LLE
A CK
N
CREEKSIDE CT
LN
Yaupon Creekside
FLIN T
LN
2B
Future MS
MYERS NORMAN A & SUZANNE 23.26
H ON
OR S
DR
TI
K AC BL
ES
F OL W
PAS S
K OUT
MYERS NORMAN A & SUZANNE C Palomba at Flintrock RD 15.65 CK WELLS HARRIETTE A FLINT R O 20.13 HELLER ANDREW R & MARY ANN Serene Hills 10.18
A
TON KA W
TR
PAW NEE
IL
WE S
DC HE RR Y
2E
CAV
RA
CV
Villas at Flintrock Overlook at SAVIO CT Flintrock DR Falls Flintrock at Hurst Creek Overlook at Pawnee Pass
K U LA
VI NE
8G
GOL D
PAS S
DR
PAW
EN
WAY
Creekside
8E
L
E NE
Cherry Mountain
LO AK PE
Enclave North
SU
NR
IS E
RI
DG
Enclave South
E
CV
AQUA LAND LAKEWAY MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT LLC 51.7 Discovery Point KNOP TODD J & LAURA S ~18.8
A R
W
Potential Elem
ES PED E R NAL
PA
MM SU
IT
!
71
8D
La ke w
PK
Flintrock
T BLANC ON DR VA IL D IV IDE S PASS E NE
NS M UM
RL OA F
PIO
PI
SU
CV
BAY
ON
H ER
CA V
CUEVA DR
BE
WA Y BALDWIN
PL E
AS
RD
ST
16.8
Creeks Edge
3J
of Austin
3G
!
71
MA RK
SH 71
3H
H IL LC OU '10 HILL COUNTRY GALLERIA L P NT '11 GALLERIA TEXAS LLCRY B LV 57.53 GA D LL ER IA CIR
16.56
M R
ET
Galleria Park
2244 RD FM
RD 44 F M 22
BA
Ladera Ranch
WY PK
FAIR
Future HS
MCDANIEL JOE W & ALMA R CAMPA INVESTMENTS L L C 1 10.04 GRUMBLES ARTIE ET AL CITY OF AUSTIN GRUMBLES AUBREY ELDON ~96.37 BORGELT LTD & ROGER & 23.27 AV 78.04 IS 18.95 Grumbles Parcel PA
CH
3D
- The Champions
AM
SH 71
W STATE HWY 71
GA
ANCH LO L L M AN R O P Falconhead
8F
CR
Lake Pointe - The PreserveNE DR Canyon LAKE STO Vista 6D RANCH LTD Lake Pointe 49.75 B - The SO EMERA R A F X R ID LD Lake Landing NOMA Lake GE FA 5C CITY OF AUSTIN CA PL CV LL SC Pointe S A VILLAGE OF BEE CAVE AD Pointe - The 59.41 R NO E C WEST TRAVIS COUNTY MUD L S Estates The 5 FA 50 Setting 6D RANCH LTD LL Bee Cave ETJ NITO B EE N 22.84 S D Village Central Park CAV A N 9.63 E EP EL B GA KW DG RD FM 22 LL N Y '10 HILL COUNTRY GALLERIA LIP R CT 44 44 F M 2244 ER Galleria A L 22 Alexan IA C IL '11 CITY S BEE CAVE OF RD D Lake Pointe Elementary H CDDR PROPERTIES LLC FM IR SONOMA DR AN NT
T
ROD-AVE LP 12.48
NLake Pointe EV AD A DR
RE
WA Y
Sweetwater Ranch
SA VW CA BL VD
ay ET Au J st in ET J
Falconhead - West
C RO
8C
E YR
DR
KS D
AV
N EEnclave
W AY
T C
HIGHTR AIL
A
N ME
Laws Addition
D
6D
Falconhead
SP
8A Falconhead
NC RA
FALC ON HEA
Rough Hollow
Madrone Canyon
WO M
BU RO N
DR
CT
Trails
~25.93
ER RK PA
RI VE R
HI G H L
WHITE RON 20
HIL L
BN
8B
SI
HE
O AT RG IN HE SL N DR
R
RD
S PASS
PO ST WO ORAD N R DR DR O D
N E
S BLVD
GL EN
WK
SP
ST
K WY
A ND
DR
Hills of Lakeway
O TT
RI NG
SD 7F
R
Glen Heather G
LE N
BA
LN E RRI
DR
N DALE RD
ON
CT
L TR
WAR
SS LN R RO
KI
GH LA
NDS
Academy Place
Greens Condos
HI
Lakeway Elementary
L OHMA
FA L
7A
FARRIS
14.71
YA N
LV D L AK
EH ILL S
DR
DR
TH
CR ES
LS IE
DR
DE
DA VE DR
Rd .
~15.26
R AR SP
MU
PE C
LA G
EA
LD
EN
GR
L ING OAKS T RL
Lakeway The Woodlands NThe Overlook DS B TRITON CT Airpark LAS VENTANAS LAND PARTNERS LTD The Future Condos ~416.8 Bluffs World of Tennis Condos T Cypress Ridge CLUBCORP GOLF OF TEXAS L P E WA B
HL A
HI G
VD
L
FL IN TV T CT IE W DR
DR
C ro
VIXEN CT
La kew a TR O
62
EE
GR E
Mu rfin
R D
D ER
LE
L NS
IN G
DR
ER
LL
LA
0R D
KE
IE DR JO SE PH DR DO RO TH YD R
IL L
DE
N R
TH E
BA
RR
R D
DR
lv y B d. D
RM
East Rim T
AS
SN
SCHOONER DR
EW
62 0
CO
UT
ILUS AVE
C IPE
Lakeway
CHA
BL UE
HO LL O
EL
LID O
R
LI
DR
PH ZE
7B
7C
lv yB
Lake Chandon
EE
K
G TA ON
NA
IN
TI EL AZ H
GOLF CRE S T
CV
A Y
DR
GO
I B
9C
. Dr ke La
DU
CK
D KE LA DR O
R NE D
La ke wa yC it y Li ew m S ME i t ay AD ET OW J LA
TRAD EW
IRES D
CV
L
RK
~20.31
E A GL E
. vd Dl VB
Lakeway
ilm Sa
E
7G
BE
ST
LL
Au st i
LE
Stoney Creek
CR
MP ION
SE
HE CROSS R LN W IN D
SA N
GH HI L A
L BROOK
ND
ho us
KE
EST M A ATE L A B AR S
DR
N E F I NN A G E S
MA
FA
L AI NT
BL VD
LA
1B
LA
ASS UT C ER RIN
L
COR I NT
N IA H
V
ALIS T
SH AY FI EW AK
CT
CO
SK A
L PER
RU
DR
TE
S L LU
EA
AL U
UDA RM
9E
9B
BE LL
9D
7D
ter as
San Casciano FO Y at North DR Lakeway 7E North Lakeway Village GIO D R Lake Travis Elementary A Lakeside Pinnacle ALLEN KATHRYN E CA at North VA ~12.7 ER at North LI ER Lakeway The Enclave @ Lakeway ~35.03 CA BO HO r. NY WL LL eD ON Kollmeyer I Y LN N G DR LN Sprgs N IG 6C Lake Oak ~14.8 L SP E Estates Mirabella BE C
MO DR CO
RS HU N TL
LAKEWAY M U D 74.88
I AC
RE I
THUNDE HEA R
IL
DE BB A
DR
TH FORT SMI
11B
AG
LL
MO
FL AM
LN
IN GO
KOLL MEYER
ewa Lak
E AT
Lakeway
CV
D AY BLV
La
6B
d.
Travis County
RF IN
RD
6A
MURFIN PATRICIA ETAL 2
H oney C re ek
City of Lakeway
RGESS BU
LN
TL HI
I VA
LC
LN
City of Lakeway
CITY OF LAKEWAY 100.63
5B
Aust in ET J Bee C ave E TJ
ARIA
City of Austin
RD
S TU
CH
Lakeway
ETJ
Marina Village
MC
DR
Lakeway Park
9F
ON P E T E RS
LN DIN LA
UN
ING DE E R T RL
EZ
Lakeway
RO UN D
Arbolago
M
Mountain Acres
10A
EER TR L
PLU
COLT DR
11D
Apache Shores
L TR
Legend
District Boundary Planning Units Planned Thoroughfares Owner Changes '10-'11 Streets
N BIG HOR
RO C
KE
KE LA DR
R DA CE
EX
TCHEW A
UE BL
E PLO R
ELECT R A
NT HU
P RU
YP JA
DR
R SNAPPE
M AN
DR
ER S
D U
LN
RK EY
EN
GO
D R
O COR R SO
W ASH
SS
PA
IN
ASS
CL
N SU
OP LO
AN AV AR
OE
FI SH
SA
CIR
DR
RP PO
DE
LL MI ND LL WI HE AS NFISH SU
N RU RS ILO CT RN HO ER
IR SA R OI O C PORP O I S E
Flood Plain
DR
NG A LE HT I
AWIND
LO
Kollme y
BI SC N AY
AN HM
GO L F CREST
NTA GN A CIR
E CV
PIAZ Z A
EL
Single Family
Developing Existing
AK
S ER EN
RI
E DASH
E WA
LN
AK
E
R DR
R DE
MSMJM LAM LLC 57.75 STEINER RANCH MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 41.45
KI
EY
RO K Y
TE
W
DR
K LA
CO L
DW
T OP
N RL
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family Renovations Likely Multi-family Townhomes Existing Townhomes Developing Townhomes Future
B ISSE T
LAKE W
AY
R D
O AD
S E
R NS C
LTISD Facilities
School, Existing School, Planned School, Future
PANTERA HUECO L P 14.9
AU T U
O MN
TIBURON DR
HM LO
IC
SA
DR O RC VA DR EY
HE
SE
NS
S BA
Y LE
DR
RU
IA
GE ID
KA
A JO NAV
NIG DR H EN
E
HIL L
Heritage Park
S GRO ZA
W AY
HA RR
RD
LM IL
N A
5A
RS
A LC BAT F
K IE
SS
HD AC RTLE BE MY
S
R
PS AL
P OO H L
ON DR
6 RM
20
R FO
TU
A N
DR ET
AD ELAN
PA A
DR
TO CT
DR
IM RE SC
YC VO SA
Conservancy of Texas
64
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
CH ATEA U
[
ED
BROOKS HOLLOW
DR
IT
k R d. R
eC Be
LA
FO
LAZY J LAKE TRAVIS LTD 12.55 LAZY J LAKE TRAVIS LTD 136.02 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTIN 11.31 LAZY J LAKE TRAVIS LTD "Lake Travis Ranch" 23.68
ES
CI R
11C
W IL LI AM
COYOTE CT
HO LW
RE E
EF
UN
BEL
HURST
DR
RD
A T INE
AVE
LA W
FO
PA L
K OA
CH
HU
Costa Bella A
A RI V
RE NC
CT
Hudson Bend
VE
NE GE
Vineyard Bay
TA N IN E
VE
K I EV
CO S
SH
TA
LN
ANCA
62 0
CASABL
RM
SI E
NF M6 20 R
CT
EXPLO R ER
DR
ACAP UL CO CT
BO NI TA
I N A VILL
RD
SH AR
Y CT
SAI L
H ONEY
DART
ALIST
IR D EL
UD A
RA DO
R K R I D GE D
T CV
KEHU LA
L BROO K LN
lub
AVE
RT R
IG H
ST
SQ U IRE SD
CROSSW IND DR
CLUBHOUS
EK R D
SC
U AR D
EC RE
OA K
LA KE
BE
BL UE
Dr.
'10 HUTH HANS J & MARIA H '11 HUTH FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 11.17
EL
LN
win d
os s
La kew a TR O
IN T
LA
D R
ES TV IE W
LE
OAKS TR L
L MU IR VD FI
D UFFY LN
BL AC
M KS
RI D
IR
W H
L L ING
EL EO N
OW
CV
LN
8B
Hills of Lakeway
ON
Rough Hollow
Potential Elem
V
CH
TACK CV YS HA
2B
EA D
RE EK
AM
Canyonlands Park
C
DR
DALE RD
CV
CT
L TR
B E S TATES
GL E
WAR
Travis Settlement
LN
HO
RS E
ST
ER
ROSS LN
KI
LV
NDS B
Academy Place
Greens Condos
FA
HI TE
2C
HI GH LA
Lakeway Elementary
LOHMAN
7A
FARRIS
G
S HT
GU YA N
EI
Cypress Ridge
H IL LS
CR
DR
DR
L
CV WIND
TH E
DR
DA VE DR
Rd .
~15.26
RO AR SP
MU RF
IN
500 year
RD
PECA
Single Family
Existing Mobile Home Comm.
RI VE
R BAR
LN IE
6A
City of Austin
ST I
O TT
7F D
R
LLMEAD
PO ST WO ORADN R DR DR O D
DR
D TRL
MEDICAL
GR E E N LN
DR
ID DE N
WATERF AL L
SE R E
DR
2D
TI
R E NE HILLS
EL EC TR I C AVE
BAKER JOHN HICKMAN 24.61 LAS VENTANAS LAND PARTNERS LTD ~492.89 WILEMON S JAY & TERRY L 20
SE
RI D GE
IAN W RU
IN D
Future MS
R BO JA CK
SA
N
TI C
HON
N
IC
TA TE
HW
71
O RS
DR
K AC BL
ES C
OL W
RY
3B
RGK RENTALS LTD 669.2
ST
RGK Ranch
PASS
2E
Flint Rock Estates
DC HE R
AV RA E
CV
Villas at Flintrock Overlook at SAVIO CT Flintrock DR Falls Flintrock at Hurst Creek Overlook at Pawnee Pass
F
K U LA S
L VIL NE
O EW
TA PAS S
71
DR OD O
T HE HILL S DR
LO EL
FAR VEL AL N
SH
KS
AV E N
W AY
LTISD
APP L
T
R
T C
Enclave
HIGHTR AI
DARW I
SW
Laws Addition
8G
D
G OL DEN BEA
NE
SE
3D
Serene Hills
SERENE HILLS LTD 310.26
PAW
EN
WAY
Creekside
N
8E
NE
Cherry Mountain
LO AK PE
D K OUT
RE
PA
8A
DG
SU
N R IS
RI
le it Pk s wy
WY
na
Potential Elem
3C
"Holland Trust"
Sweetwater Ranch
SU M LE S PE DE R NA
M IT
PK
8D
!
71
8C
ZAG
Falconhead - West
Estates at Flintrock
- The Champions
SS
DG E
Enclave North
A
CV
AW
PAWNEE
E IL W A
6D
AQUA LAND LAKEWAY MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT LLC 51.7 Discovery Point KNOP TODD J & LAURA S ~18.8
W
R Falconhead M 620 SLC AUSTIN PARTNERS LP 38.38 Falconhead - St. Andrews Cottages at Falconhead 5C - The Links Spillman Ranch
'10 DRIFTWOOD LAND COMPANY LTD '11 LAKE TRAVIS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 88.98
BU R
N E
Madrone Canyon
O WO AM
ON
L HIGHL AN D S B
CR
CT
WHITE RON 20
HIL L
EE K
SI
AT HE
R
BN
D VistasRat Lakeway
~25.93
R PA
R KE
Likely SF
H oney C re ek
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family Renovations
City of Lakeway
RGESS BU
LN
TL HI
CO IL VA
LN
5B
City of Lakeway
CITY OF LAKEWAY 100.63
LTISD Facilities
School, Existing School, Planned School, Future
ARIA
Enclave South
HE
RD
G Glen HeatherLE
DR
D EL
EA G
H IT
D R U MMY L N
HI
CV
k R oad
GEPO LE
GH
KE
FL
DR
LN
LA
SF M 62 DE 0R LS D IE DR
Cr
The Woodlands
The S B ND
Overlook
TRITON CT
TH E
CT
DR
VIXEN CT
RM
ON NO
East Rim
VD
SCHOONER DR
Lakeway Airpark
d.
62
V Y C DA
TA VE R
N RD
CO
UT
9C
SN IP EC T
LID O
Lake Chandon
AL OY
O N
HORNSBY LN
TRL G H
U
HO LL O
D U
LI
DO R
DR
PH ZE
Duck L
AD O
CV
B BO
LN
Water's Edge
RO
Lakeway
D
ake D
R E IR W RYAN
A UGE
Crosswind
9A
F FL la
m AM I
NE AY
Santorini Villas
DU
DR
DR WEST JH
AD OW L
TRAD EW
I ND
L o OB ing NG
BL VD
ME
La ke w ay
LAKEWAY DR
LAKE D CK
r.
Lakeway
HA
DR INE LT ZE
SU
AR
~20.31
CV
LA
lv VD
7B
7C
lv yB
A GN TA ON M PIEMONTE
CV
CORENBLITH JAY C BA RN DR ET 12.19 TG RO LE FOLK ROBERT L & MARJORIE T NR D 25.6 DECKER KENNETH L & LORRAINE R 14.17 BILAWSKY GLENN P LCRA 10 ~27.45 D
W LL O N PY H ER HA P V TA
ALAB
E A GL E
d.
Lakeway
ilm Sa
E
NG WO O LO
DR
RBUDA D R BA
C V
The Enclave
D R RAG O N A
SE
EAG
LE
I LUS AVE
CHA MP ION
Stoney Creek EW D AY BLV D Boulevard at Lakeway Retama VD ~18.01 Blvd. Lakeway BL y D LA AY N R KEW Vista Oaks at Lakeway R O LL LN IN N S Villas at the Hills G E
K LA
GR
SE
BE
ER AST ILM SA
LA S T
R.O. Drive
OA
SA N
Tiburon Hills
AM
HE CROSS R LN W IN D
GH HI L A
9D
ho
ND
TE
RA D A
EST M A ATE L A B AR S
DR
CAPR
AL
KE
N E F I NN A G E
CV
S DR
RE MO
CHURCH
KOLL MEY
PIKE RD
E
RN
ES
LA
ME
BER M
DO
MA
FA
L AI NT
BL VD
HI VE
HI L
9B
WEE
BE LL
COR I NT
BE E
ST AR
OOP
T RS
S PA
AN E
CRAWFORD RD
VIN CA DR C O P
BE
E AK
Village
CHAL
CT
CO
GB R
N IA H
AN
CH
DR
H FORT SMIT
1B
S FI
AY
DRMarina
RLE PE
AF
MA
AL U
PS
7D
T
ter as
7G
74.88 San Casciano FO Y at North DR Pinnacle Lakeway Lake Travis Elementary at North IO D R AG Lakeway Lakeside ALLEN KATHRYN E CA at North ~12.7 ER VA LI ER . Lakeway CA BO ~35.03 HO The Enclave e Dr NY WL LL us ON IN Y @ Kollmeyer G LN DR LN N Sprgs IG Lake Oak ~14.8 L 6C SP E Estates 620 BE C Mirabella LL GO
NG A LE HT I
L BE LA
C IR
LN
LAKEWAY M U D
I AC
11B
MO
Legend
CITY OF AUSTIN ~334.8
NB
Kollme
IR D
Hills
11.8
DR
LN
PLACE LLP 10
6B
ew Lak a
CO L
DW E AT
Lakeway
R HE
LAKEWAY ETJ
Travis Flood Plain County
GR EE
DR
RI ED R JO SE PH DR DO RO TH Y DR
BA R
Mu rfin
100 year
CULVER JOSEPH H CAPITOL ROD & GUN CLUB 28 20 HORTON WILMOT ROBERDEAU & 27
C HAL
RD
AR
RA
SEND E
RD D X THUNDE HEA R FO D RE
RD
RE IL LY
Lakeway
RO C
EX
DE
W ASH
HU
2A
LU A N D GU N C
NG LE
AC
DR
BB
M
N CLAR A VA DR MO CO KE LA N D R AI NT LN U ST HUR
COLT D
UN
TR L
RA IN
AG
IR
HURST CR
BA RN
BE
Park
7E Arbolago
WESTWAR
SILVER
CO VE
PI
De er Trl .
LA
EE
RE
SU
TU
EY
RD
DR
CIR
AC Casa Verde
D Ru En E R niT nR g
y er Dr.
AT NT ER E RS PA DR SS
SA
HO
KAT HY L N
IL LY
RD
AP
Mountain Acres S te wa rt R d.
ST EW AR T
DR
CV
9E
SP
G RIN
UP
O LC
~12.51
C IR
11A
TRL
CRA Z
E WA
RA
Cedar Glen
OA K
GL EN
ST
ST RO
HARVEY CT
DR
IN D
RT CV
S TA
BU F
TRL NCH
Bella Strada
TECK CIR
IA N
ov eB
CR
SI ES
DE
O BC
LO
BE
DR
LN
Hurst Cree
K EN
OR
Siesta Shores
DY IN R O SH
9F
LCRA ~122.56
LLA
MA CI
PYRAMI D DR
OR E
Brooks Hollow
AB B
K RD
ULL
Buffalo Gap
P O
KE LA
TA
BE
SO
SU
LE
TT
Maravilla
O N DR
LA RI AT
CT
LN
TR L
SO
11E
N DR
MA N
SH
R ek re oad
IL
GRE
B
A
G
L M ONI O T R ER
OP LO
Cove at Lakeway
10A
AM GR OV Oa BIS CT Ek LV Gr D
10B
EA GL
STO RM
DR
TR L
TR L
EEK R D
Apache Shores
GAP R LO D FA
lvd .
DEXLE R
SS R HO SE PA
L IL D
11D
C
I R
RO
R PL U M D
EB B A D
ON P E T E RS
A SH
R DA CE
W NE
TU
KE
LO N
E PLO R
LN DIN LA LN
ELECT RA
P RU
R SNAPPE
EN
N GO
L TR
R D
O COR R SO
L EN
N SU
OP LO
R GE SH FI
OE C IR
DR
RP PO
SA
DE
LL MI ND LL WI HE AS NFISH SU
UN SR OR IL CT RN HO
ER
IR SA R OI O C PORP O I S E
CT
L A KE
AWIND
PANAGOS DR IM
LN
H LO
GO LF CR EST
NS MA
T RD RS U
NTA GN A CIR
PIAZZ A
SING RD OS CR
EL
O RI
K Y EWA
ER DASH DR
LN
. Dr
DR
T GOLF CRE S
ER
RO
IT
DR
C K
DR
AU GE R CV
ST A
T OP
ee e Cr Be
N RL
L UB EST PK A T ES
A H
DO
WY
PK
S CR
W O
AU T U
N M
TIBU RON DR
S AN HM LO
O
ANIE L
N ME
DR O RC VA DR EY
SE
NS
S BA
Y LE
DR
A RI
KA
RI
r Ped e m Su m
M 62 0
RD
ILLS DR NE H RE SE
SN OW DO
AY S W RO
5A
CV
65
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
[
6D RANCH LTD 40.75
AW A
HE R
TON K
ASS
T DR OU
Enclave North
R
EN
W AY
OK
Cherry Mountain
ID GE
R A
IA Enclave
DR
2E
KA
WI
LD
City of Lakeway
IA AR
South Cielo
AMSTAR/SOUTHERN CIELO LP 40.11
Estates at Flintrock
Serene Hills
T RL
8E
WEEMS JAMES S 12.14
L AK PE
VA
DR
AI L
RY
IL C O
TR
LN
T ES W
6D
Discovery Point
8G
A JO NAV
8D
Falconhead - West
Alta Vista/Reserve
RM 6
20
S POIN DE SA LI
TE L N
Heritage Park
5B
Cottages at Spillman Ranch Falconhead - St. Andrews
S
W O SN O D IA N
HA
SW
AL K
MONT
R K
PA TH
PY
N RE
S EE PASS
BL AN CD VA R IL DIV IDE
CV
RR
OS GR ZA
AWK
CV
IE R
MA
8A
H DR
AM
RU N
M SU
8C
T
LO AF
CH AM
AR
DR
SH 71
S PI
LL MAN
SU G
ROD-AVE LP 12.48
GALLERY
IN
C V
H ER ON
Grumbles Parcel
DR
GE
BE E
AV IS PA
ST AR ID
CUEVA
TS T
LE
VI
TWIN ACRES
MA R
PERKINS CECIL D & MOZELLE W 16.96 PERKINS CECIL D & MOZELLE W 30.25
HAMILTON POOL RD
Hamilton Pool R oa d
H A
MEISSNER LIVING TRUST 36.69 STEELE GLENN H JR & ROBIN 10.28 KRATZER FAMILY TRUST 17.5
Creeks Edge
KE NO
MARINO LANDON & MICHELLE Spring Creek Estates 9.98 STONE KEYES HOLDINGS LLC 10.22
COUNTRY STORE GALLERY INC ~11.92 SBS REAL ESTATE LLC CLARK BARRY LYNN 49.86 12.81
CCNG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS II LP CCNG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS II LP 27.22 30.8 CCNG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS II LP 18.72
!
71
KE
HWY 71 W STATE
C IR
JU
PE NI
FO
AV IS PA WAY
DR
BURN
ET RD
SH 71
GA LL
UN T
PLE
U TH
16.8
TEHAMA C T
CDDR
'10 OPUS WEST PARTNERS INC B EE C '11 BEE CAVE TX - HC APTS SYNDICATED HOLDINGS LLC AVE PKW 10.52 GA Y LL ER Alexan Galleria IA C IR PROPERTIES LLC
H IL LC O
ERI A
Galleria Park
O
O IT
N SA
E DG RI
LN
3D
5C
LCRA 12.27
BAY
RL
BR
Future HS
DD
8F
IT T ANY
K EP AV EC BE
WY
T IN O
LN
VA DA - The DR
PI O
PEM-JTOC LLC 17.57 VILLAGE OF BEE CAVE 50 WY DEJORIA JOHN PAUL FAMILY TRUST THE PK CCNG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS II LP E V 17.57 15.36 SKAGGS TIM & BRENDA 37.5
Ladera Ranch
SB AD
Lake
E
FA IR W
POI
DR
CH LOO RAN P
NE
NT
ST A
RE SA
WA Y
5A
S EA E A G L
ER AZ RG
CV
Lake Pointe
CA BL VD
VIE W
62
City of Austin
D
0 620 R
AS PLELake
T AN
PANORAMA VW
F
M
DR
Y WA
RS
GY
CT
RA
PAS S
SE
GILLIANS
HI
Meadowfox Estates
CITY OF AUSTIN ~296.93 CITY OF AUSTIN 167.03
RI DE
GH
NE
WA
LO
CA
LK
O NY
PE C
AN
Spanish Oaks
E
ENDA R CI
CI R
~28.02
D ENHA I R L
N
TE XA
The Homestead
'10 126 BEE CAVE INVESTMENTS L P '11 CASSANDRA INTERESTS LTD 10.55
W I L DL IF
City of Austin
E TRL
LA BA R
ON EDO
U IT A
OVERLA ND
BR
S C LUB BLVD
MA I
PASS
O ND
NE S
CH
YL ER R
U H
3G
DR
S
CIR OP DT UN RO
EL T E R AU R
A AL M
LY
CV
D SA
CK BA LE
S PA
EMO
ON
UF BL
R IM
CA LA BR IA
A US
MU SK E
RY O A
K LN
IR
N
TR IM
EL
3F
KR
MOCKFORD PHIL ET AL DALE MOCKFORD 11.95 University of Texas UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS '10 WONG MITCHEL '11 MRW GRIT LTD ~12.57
255.3
H A
C RO
I SW
LM SPIL
N LCO BAT FA
KI
ES
SS AL CT PS
MYRTL E
AN
A R
MI
DR
H DR AC
DR
P O
OL D
S
WN RO
LE NW OO D
LN
CT
A M R
ND
H NT SA
BAY TO
L IL
CT
SONOMA Lake DR
Pointe Elementary
D 4R
2 FM 2244
D 4R 24
FM 2244
Legend
District Boundary Planning Units Planned Thoroughfares
PA A D
O RC O
DR
DR
RE
T TO C
RE IM
RY BL VD
2244 RD FM
F M 2244 R D
CA SA
D BLV
4 F M 22
SC T
44
RD
N DR
UPLANDS RIDGE DR
N EN B
n rto Creek Ba
YD HA
D F M 2244 R
E RC RT
The Uplands
AS TO
RI A
DR
Flood Plain
4
Nature Conservancy of Texas
IL
LE
DR
G ID
'10 126 BEE CAVE INVESTMENTS L P WONG '11 CASSANDRA INTERESTS LTD 20.98 '10 126 BEE CAVE INVESTMENTS L P '11 CASSANDRA INTERESTS LTD 9.64 '10 126 BEE CAVE INVESTMENTS L P ~20.1 '11 CASSANDRA INTERESTS LTD 83.39
Single Family
Developing Existing Mobile Home Comm. Planned Likely SF
L TR
3J
IN RB CA
STAGE STO P C
3H
IVID T D EA GR
E DR
SPAN
A R Z
Verde Trails
LA ZO
N B
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family Renovations Likely Multi-family
IN
IS H
IR
AK
TR
T OT
HO EN ME
R PA AI SO
SPEARFISH C ANYON
M US KE
PK
W Y
OV ER LO OK
W
M
AR
PASS
BL ER
CT
R RO
LTISD Facilities
YO C
F PL
DU AD X C
LE
School, Existing
O N DR
DG
Y AN
66
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
[
BE
8F
SH 7 1
RK E
GA
TS T
LLE R IA
MA
C IR
RA
CREEKS EDGE LTD 58.77 HATCHETT JOHN & SANDRA ~425.53 JPH CAPITAL LTD ETAL ~483.99
INY ST DE CV
AL
SW
Belvedere
Destiny Hills
DES TINY
3D
GILLIAN
DR
HA
AN D
'10 SIERRA ASSOCIATES GROUP INC '11 BERDOLL PHIL & LINDA 12.56
City of Austin
C
CI R
~28.02
AN SP IS H O
3H
SPANISH OAKS LP 31.08
LA BA RZ
LAB O
ET
A P RI OU
VE
PAS S
Bee
Hamilto n Poo
Y CR E
PEA
l Road
Cave
Aust in
in st Au
ETJ
D SA D
RO
UN
ETJ
CK BA LE
UH
CV
3G
C OP DT
IR
LY
TA
The Homestead
KS
Verde Trails
D N
SH RU
LN
PA S
CI R
MUSKET
T R IM
MUSKET CV
PK W Y
RIM
E MO
RY O
SPEARFISH CANYO N
~19.53
O RL OV E
OK
OY
KR
AYRES ROBERT ATLEE & PATRICIA SHIELD AYRES ~140.49 AYRES PATRICIA SHIELD & 40
TE XA
av e
Spanish Oaks
PA
RL
Preserve at Barton
EE Creek R TR L
C
AN
anch
'10 LEGACY TEXAS BANK '11 RC TRAVIS LP 260.39 '10 LEGACY TEXAS BANK '11 RC TRAVIS LP 10
R o ad
ley R
University of Texas
Crum
LOWENTHAL EUGENE & LINDA ~56.28 KRAFT AUGUST C & DORIS E 21.5 POUTTU MAURI E KRAFT AUGUST C & DORIS E 40 ~35.42 SPECK ELIZABETH RICE B & VAN ACKEREN TIMOTHY L & TERRI S ~96.28 17.93
CRUML E Y
3F
3E
"Puryear" Parcel
RA N
CH RD
Bart o n Cr eek
Legend
District Boundary
BOLTON RONALD H 15 BURNS WILLIAM & LAURA & 14.98 GALBRAITH ARTIE LUELLA CRUMLEY 66.26 SMITH GEOFF 10.01 ~10.66 WAHLBERG CHRISTOPHER S 75.72 AYRES PATRICIA SHIELD 22.5 STINSON JOHN H ~196.17
W I DLIFE TRL L
IL LS
PO ON MILT
3J
ENDA CI HA
Meadowfox Estates
L O NE R IDE R
PEC
AN
TR
'10 126 BEE CAVE INVESTMENTS L P '11 CASSANDRA INTERESTS LTD 83.39
SS
Barto n
TE
LL EY
KE NO
Creeks Edge
CT
CCNG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS II LP 27.22 BEE CAVESGALLERIA I LP & HO PS CCNG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS II LP 40.68PK WY 18.72
R SO NOMA D Lake Pointe 4 RD Elementary Alexan Galleria Lake F M 2244 RD 5A F M 224 JU Galleria Park N Pointe - Bee Cave City Limit R D 5C The Estates GE UPL RI D
The Uplands
AS TO RI
'10 126 BEE CAVE INVESTMENTS L P '11 CASSANDRA INTERESTS LTD 20.98
71
LL
E DR
4
Nature Conservancy of Texas
k ee Cr
Y O N DR
Be
A N DS
ve Ca
J ET
TWIN ACRES
IN RB CA
STAGE STO P C IR
VE CA
IPE
PK
RT
R TO
TI L
GR
IVIDE DR TD EA
SS
I RA PA
RO C
US K M
SO
B EK LVD
N
UF BL
AR
ET J
F PL
Flood Plain
100 year 500 year
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family Renovations Likely Multi-family Townhomes Existing Townhomes Developing Townhomes Future
Tr av
is
Co un ty
Single Family
Developing Existing Mobile Home Comm.
Ha ys Co un t
LTISD Facilities
School, Existing School, Planned School, Future
Planned
y
FLEMING KEVIN A 11.59 '10 MARTINEZ ALFONSO G
'11 WORLEY GINNEY S 55.74
Likely SF
67
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
[
Sweetwater Ranch MCCALLA DUDLEY D
37.67
ers R
ck
Stagecoach Ranch
PELZ DAVID TODD & JOANN 24.23 COLDWATER DEVELOPMENT LTD GULLAPALLI KIRAN KUMAR & NEELIMA 15.05 17.46 ELLSWORTH CRAIG M KHOLLMAN MAURICE S & MARGO A 15.31 15.23 FILIPOVICH SILVIO S & LAURA C 15.42
d.
MOORE ROBIN M 22.21 PRESERVATION RANCH LIMITED PAR ~445.04 HARRIS JAN M ETAL 389.03
Pe
im Re o ac
"Holland Trust"
Future HS
Grumbles Parcel
DR
Creeks Edge
CREEKS EDGE LTD 58.77 HATCHETT JOHN & SANDRA ~425.53 JPH CAPITAL LTD ETAL ~483.99
IN ST DE V YC
DR
ty
3C
V
MO R
CALICANTO CONSTRUCTION LLC TIN C Hamilton Hills R 26.36 MA SIVLEY STEVE R 22.22 DAHM JONATHAN C & MARY L 64.39 SIVLEY STEVE R 16.69
LN
3D
LY
FL AG LE R
Destiny Hills
DES T INY
IL LS
3J
CITY OF AUSTIN 167.03
~436.66
BELYO STEVEN C & CATHERINE M ~21.78 HARGADON PATRICK C & JANN D 29.99 DORSETT C ROBERT TRUSTEE FOR ~20.16
RD GS
DE ME
Belvedere
~41.55
'10 SIERRA ASSOCIATES GROUP INC '11 BERDOLL PHIL & LINDA 12.56
City of Austin
C
VE SA CO
Be
LA BE L
Madrone Ranch
MOFFETT JANICE ELAINE BELK 1.47 MOFFETT MELVIN L 10
av e
ON DR E N RA
ROLL I NS DR
SP
RI N
ER GL F LA
ET J
IA NC
R D
~38.22
CH
TRL
LA HIGH P INS DR
DUNCAN ERNEST M & KATHLEEN R ~11.14 STOWE DAVID L & SYLVIA ~14.53 SAN RAY CORPORATION
BE
LL
RO C
67.91
FESCU
E
in st Au
LN
PEA
DR
SA DDLEHORN
SH RU
B EK
CI R
R Y ~19.53
WI L
LVD
ET
ET D R
WIN C H ESTER DR
~11.5
TWIN
DR
NK
BROOKS RANCH
SA
DR
BL A
NK
RD
TE
S ADD L E
DR
RY
Saddletree Ranch
SE SH OE
WE
ST
E LOO P
HOR
SS
12
SHE
RR
RKW
GE OR
GE
HI
AWAY CV
LL D
ERDS PH
CORRAL
AK
HID E
SK VIL W Y LA
E G
ST WE
B VE LV CA
LAK E
NT
MO
KE
Legend
District Boundary Planning Units Planned Thoroughfares Owner Changes '10-'11 Streets
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family Renovations Likely Multi-family Townhomes Existing Townhomes Developing Townhomes Future
PAN O
A D
RA M
Flood Plain
100 year 500 year
Single Family
Developing Existing Mobile Home Comm. Planned Likely SF
LTISD Facilities
School, Existing School, Planned School, Future
BL
NO
BUBB AS
LA KE
FA W NS
N XI
M A
C
IR
MA RA
B EAC
LA
KE
PA
N SO
DR
ECI
TO
VD BL
N XO DI
PARK
DR
LITT LE
LOWENTHAL EUGENE & LINDA ~56.28KRAFT AUGUST C & DORIS E 21.5 POUTTU MAURI E KRAFT AUGUST C & DORIS E 40 ~35.42 SPECK ELIZABETH RICE B & VAN ACKEREN TIMOTHY L & TERRI S ~96.28 17.93
CRUML E Y
RA NC HR D
IR
Crum ley
PA
CI
H I LL
G H
JA N
RN
ET
Ran ch R
IN CH
SK
ES
o ad
LO
IR
IN
U R
HI LL
ST
YL
D D LE
DR
DR
LO N
CO M
TWIN
L
DR
O
D O DR
O LO P
O TH
S LN MA
E OR SH
3F
DR
RK
LA
DR
"Puryear" Parcel
N CH
~39.62
USENER GERALD DAVID & CINDA L ~19.83 BURNS WILLIAM & LAURA & 14.98 GALBRAITH ARTIE LUELLA CRUMLEY SWAN JERRY & ITALIA SHAR SWAN 66.26 9.81 SMITH GEOFF AYRES PATRICIA SHIELD 10.01 22.5 ~10.66 WAHLBERG CHRISTOPHER S 75.72
Tr av
is
Co un ty
Cr ton Bar
eek
68
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
DR
LL O
RC ANY ON
FORD RD
STA
D R
RA DO
KR DR I D GE
KEHU LA
ZY
IG H
CROSSW I ND DR
Legend
Planning Units Planned Thoroughfares Owner Changes '10-'11 Streets
BL VD
9A
D
U D
TA
ES
e Creek Ro Be a
EN R
CK
SR AN
oss
A RITO
Future Elem.
LN
d.
CV
TACK C V YS HA
HO
RS E
EN
2B
CV
I EV
RE EK
er Reim
REIMERS LENORA 19.33 LAKE TRAVIS I S D 43.29
co ea sP
TE
SS LN R RO
KI
HIG HL A NDS B
Rough Hollow
Bee Creek Estates
AN AV ER Y
SH 71
N
Potential Elem
PATH
HIGHLANDS BLV D
71
Developing Multi-Family Renovations Likely Multi-family Townhomes Existing Townhomes Developing Townhomes Future
WATSON DIANE 167.07
Future MS
RGK RENTALS LTD 51.38
EL
EC
D GE
Future MS
RGK Ranch
RI
HON
ORS
SE R
E NE
TR
LTISD
I C AVE
2D
BAKER JOHN HICKMAN 24.61
R HILLS D
RE
Existing Multi-family
H W
'10 DRIFTWOOD LAND COMPANY LTD '11 LAKE TRAVIS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 88.98
IL L S
3B
RGK RENTALS LTD 19.91 RGK RENTALS LTD 669.2
LTISD Facilities
School, Existing School, Planned School, Future
Serene Hills
r Ped e Su m m
C MYERS NORMAN A & SUZANNE CK R D Creek 15.65 WELLS HARRIETTE A Palomba at 20.13
BL
at Hurst
AC K
Estates
3C
Flintrock Creekside D
KA
EN
le it Pk s wy
WY
na
PK
Potential Elem
PED E R NAL
ES
SUM
M IT
3D
SWEETWATER AUSTIN PROPERTIES LLC 1392.24
!
71
8D
La ke w ay ET Au J st in ET J
KESTER JIM HALL (VLB) 11.38 LANE SHERI 10 ELKINS DANIEL RAY JR & 11.18
Po H oA lM RId LT
"Holland Trust"
N
Sweetwater Ranch
Falconhead - West
FALCONHEAD WEST LP 11.79
Ha
ys
GR A ND S U
OL
PRESERVATION RANCH LIMITED PAR 362 MCCALLA DUDLEY D 79.1 MCCALLA DUDLEY D 37.67
BLVD '10 JOSHUA HOLDINGS LP MIT '11 M STANASZEK THEODORE F & VALERIE A 15.35
PELZ DAVID TODD & JOANN 24.23 Ranches at Hamilton Pool COLDWATER DEVELOPMENT LTD 17.46 GULLAPALLI KIRAN KUMAR & NEELIMA 15.05 MOORE ROBIN M 22.21
69
PA
Madrone Canyon
S
Multi-Family
ID DE
WHITE RON 20
8B
C
Hills of Lakeway
R
F OL W
WAY
8E LN
Henning Heights
8C
Future HS
Grumbles Parcel
LV
LN
DR
Single Family
AG
HOLT JACK H & LINDA D 10 MERSHON CACIE COLLIER & LENORA REIMERS 11.26
CO RD ILL
RI
Sadik
IR L
CV WIND
2C
HI TE
Cypress Ridge
D UFFY LN
500 year
Y LN U MM
ET C BISS
HI G
LN
LL DR
GEPO LE
L U EBE
HL A
100 year
Cr
LN
BE E
The WoodlandsDS B N Future T The Condos World of Bluffs The Overlook Tennis Condos
L
VD
Flood Plain
TE
WORKMAN KYLE & CHRISTEN '10 HUTH HANS J B MARIA H R & LN ELLISON BOYD K & GLORIA M LANTZ 10 '11 HUTH FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 11.17 10 V Y C DA SIMMONS GLENNIS H ON EDWARDS CHERRY NO 10 18.42 ARNOLD STEVEN J Travis 15 '10 FELTNER FRITZ W & JACKS HARVEY A '11 JETT VIRGINIA M REVOCABLE TRUST Settlement 1 13.47
AU G ER
VI
Dr.
TA VE
CYPRES
O R N RD
HORNSBY LN
GH
HO LL O
win d
CO East Rim
DR
DR DR BA CORENBLITH JAY C BA RN Colonia P Serendipity YOUMANS DONALD E R LAKEHURST VISTAS LP The Enclave ET 12.19 TG LE FOLK ROBERT L & MARJORIE T 17.82 27.47 ARTINI NR QU M PARSE MELVIN DOUGLAS & ROBIN L LUMPEE PROPERTIES LTD D E PAS 25.6 '10 SPICEWOOD 71 DEVELOPMENT LTD K & K BURNETT TRUST YA LTD S ROUGH HOLLOW YACHT CLUBCHT C R ~33 12.65 '11 DECKER KENNETH L & LORRAINE R R 15.42 CH 21.56 Y B N JGW INVESTMENTS O D LLC ~19.98 WA CV 14.17 ~20.31 Crosswind BO R RA TRAVIS COUNTY TRUSTEE SHARPLIN ARTHUR & KATHRYN R '10 RICKETTS GARY R NO 11.46 R N AC LARRY D BILAWSKY GLENN P Yacht Club Villas MCDONALDK H '11 A 1159.66 62.19 YO H TYLER RICHARD JH WEST LAND VENTURES LTD N LCRA ~30.72 10 14.62 IL L CA Water's Edge 15.06 15.92 ~27.45 DRIFTWOOD LAND COMPANY LTD ZHOU YAN & ZHU WANG 107.09 WALLACE DEAN EDWARD BUTLER WILLIAM C TRUST ETAL SCT 10.06 RYAN WILLIAM J & SALLY D TE 3A 24.01 Vista 17.81 20.83 RD DOVE LIFE N & LINDA Z E IR Estates 12.51 W TA
Y
L TR
V C T
E TR
E A T
TRL LIMESTONE
SE
RE
R T TiburonRHills AM
BE
AL
A B AR
R.O. Drive
RBUDA
ALAB
R A
EA G
LE
E AGL E
HI
Creek
H C ROS ER L SW N IN D
Lakeway
CAPR
IN G
A
L TR
R AW
Travis County
RS
DO
1B
ES
S DR
T ON FR TE R WA
E AV
ASS UT ER RIN MA
L
9B
I
LA GH N
9C
DR
UT
ILUS AV E
Lakeway Airpark
TENNIS SQ
S CHOONER DR
WORLD OF
C D E OR I NTH IAN R
TR L
HONEY
ER
2A MCCASKILL VIRGINIA 15.54 WLECZYK DALE R & VALERIE K 1 TERRY DUANE JAMES & PATRICIA B 10.67
ER ES N
S
BE
A G
LN
TA
IL L
ZY
r ive
LE T
CULVER JOSEPH H CAPITOL ROD & GUN CLUB 28 20 HORTON WILMOT ROBERDEAU & 27 BEE CREEK HILL L P
LOOP
A ND GU N
U CL
10.16
O H O LL
TA IN
KN '10 REESE MARIANNE & MARY A OLMSTEAD & VE R DE '11 THERING MICHAEL R & DOROTHY A 12.13 R LD OL KN THERING MICHAEL R & DOROTHY
KAT HY
LN
P O
O M
SIE S
TA S
OR E
OL
VE CANTU DIANA N CO L 10
Tierra Vista
DR
Z A Y
RO
Lakeway
ETJ
A SP
H IS
W PK
PE
SS PA
ES AL RN DE
LN
RN
O NY
NS O LS
CT
LN
U L A KE H
O B
. vd
LU
T RD RS
U IF
L P
LA K
ER DASH
EWA
H AP
W LL O N PY H VER TA
RO
A UGE
ER
R O
DR
C K Y
DR
T AS
IL H
CV
CR
LE T A N O LD TM ES
S XA
N RE E HI LL
D KS OA AUTU M N
NE
N RU
HAN I E STEP
S ER E N
E
S DR HILL
m Ha on ilt
0.25
0.5
1 Miles
L TR
~940.59
DR
I GR
SH
IR HIS C
E OR
Flood Plain
100 year
RD
LAKE
E OR SH
BE N
Multi-Family
Existing Multi-family Developing Multi-Family
PA CE
A CH MP CA
IN
ITY
Renovations
L TR
Old Ferry
LA K
Pace Bend Rd
"Paggi Grandinetti"
EN TR AD COVES AT AS DR
LTISD Facilities
School, Existing School, Planned School, Future
FEL
ICIA
'10 MAGICLAND LTD '11 LYTAL JAMES & MARY BETH 9.39 '10 SEWELL DOUGLAS W & '11 SIMS GRANT E SIMS & PATRICIA S 11.43
PED E
FE
LL OW
RNA FF LES LI C
RR Y
1A
BEND N PACE
H CAT
CL UB
L TR
LD
DR
Whitecliff
TA U
UA
ER R IV RD
RD
DR
A
IE EV
RD
DR
IFF
Single Family
Developing Existing Mobile Home Comm. Planned Likely SF Owner Changes '10-'11
RD
TATU
DR
RO L
NC
NR ON AY
B
BUCKLAND REAL ESTATE L P 203.45
J ET if f rcl ria
BR IA R
AL D R W
R AI CL IN
DR
AT
CL
DR
R TARBE T D
ER
KE L D DR
CONE
OBAN
Briarcliff OERTEL RUSSELL L & ELAINE G 20 PAUL FREDERIC LEE R 39.75 TD FFA BRIARCLIFF PROPERTY M O OWNERS DR L 12.53 IL D
ALL O W AY
DU N
DR
RD
SKYLINE DR
JO H
W ON NS
AY
CE
R THU MAN B L
MO C
Lakewood
KING B Estates IR A R LN LN
D
FLYING J
KNIGH
UF
VI
SUCCE SS OR
DR
E DR
BR IA
S CO WAL D
Be nd
I SLEY DR
LA CE
Th ur m an
RO S CO TRE
Lim it
Pedernales
Paleface Ranch
H
OS C
2A
Br ia r
'10 CAUSEY JOHN W & SANDRA '11 CAUSEY INVESTMENTS - PEDERNALES LLC 7.34
TRCE
iar cli f
Perdenales Canyon
LI N
RL
HWY 71
PACE CHEYNE C & SANDRA A UR SP ADAMS MARK S & 68.35 24'10 KASPAR TRACY & CHERYL D PACE CHEYNE C & SANDRA A 32.39
'11 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 9.62
INDIAN DIV
IDE COVE
CKL
Br
YS U
NL IGH T
LA
LN
NE
RK H
HOLT JACK H & BETTY L ~14.96 NEWTON LESLIE A & ANN M 14.7 PACE CHEYNE CONARD PHILLIP R & 43.94 14.84 LOIS
LN
fE TJ
E M CV
KT ON D
cli ff
R ST
Ci ty
r ve Ri
CI
LO C
SA L
DR
~610.24
ROVE R IMP
HO
LL A
1B
"Lake Travis Ranch"
CENIZA WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT & ECOLOGICAL SLA CV LAZY J-LAKE TRAVIS LTD 22.99 LA FAMILIA PARTNERSHIP LTD 59.67 19.17 LAZY J LAKE TRAVIS LTD 12.55
RL
E R TRL
TA
3A
PE DE RN
DE
TY X
AL ES
AIL
TR L EE K
Travis County
L OL VERDE KN
DR
TH
Y LN
9D
Lakeway
70
LENG AL E CH
THRE
N YO
N
L TR
SI E
TR
SI ES
S TA
C EB
Siesta Shores
IN W R O SH
DY
DR
25.02
CK
13.24
SH
SH OR
Vistas at Perdenales Lick Creek Ranch Canyon DZOGCHEN FOUNDATION INC L HIGHWAY 71 JHM LC OUT TR BA
rn Pede
Tierra Vista
ES
RD ND BE CE KING DAVID PA
OR
10
LAKE TRAVIS I S D 20
DR
Bee
k ee Cr
LAZY J LAKE TRAVIS LTD 136.02 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF AUSTIN 11.31 LAZY J LAKE TRAVIS LTD 23.68
S
MO
LN
BAY C IR
AS
EN
DR
ST OW
OW
TL
LAUD
PA
Y VO
E D
DR R
R E C
LI N
AW
EL LIGH A NG
LI K
T DR
ED
BOGUSKIE JERRY COVES ON LAKE TRAVIS HOMEOWNER G 15.1 CV Lago Vista ETJ 17.65 FORD CREED L III & LYNN S 14.73 Y DR Coves at A N D C Travis Lake BURKE MIRIAM M 10.08 SERENDIPITY HOLDINGS LLC BURKE MIRIAM M ~34.88 12.53 15.68 MCADAM BROOKS W LIVING TRUST FORD CREED L & LYNN 10.97 18.56 FUNG COLEMAN F 12.12
AN
L GE BA
EW AT ER D
FI F
R d.
FISH
RC L BRIA
RO
AN OB
Edgewater R Beach
LN
R E P LIC
NA Y
O LD
RD
DR
LS GA
Streets
EW
LTISD
RD
TO
MTR AI L
OLD
TU TA M
VI E IFF CL
DR
DR
RYAN D R
KYLE DR
R D
FF
RG CA
'10 SCHILFFARTH RICHARD A JR & '11 KIPP JAMES M & CYNTHIA S 11.39
TS
CH
ANCE L
AY BARBARO W
N
DR
NG F LY I
J BLVD
SCHNEIDER WALTER B 15.27 Angel Bay HALE JOHN J & BETH E 40.03
GEL S O N AN
SCENIC DR
MO
D U N D
DR
R D
DR
RS H EC O
R ER D
AN GEL
LIG H
R T D
R EC BE
EE
OP LO
Road
X TY
E AT ST
HW Y 71
9E
R
SH
71
7
1A
Pace Bend Rd
H
n ili
0
12B
s Hud
e . Rd
Th ur m an
B en
Cre ek Rd
9E
Hu rs t
kewa y
Dr .
R. O
1 SH 7
Club ho u
20
3A
9D
win d
9A
7
2B
s os Cr
ke
41
2C
La
0 10
8B 7A
RM
0
2D
0
3B
2
2E
0
8D
Ha m ilt
4
3C
on
ol Rd Po
131
8C
9
3D
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Hamilto
oo
l Ro a
23
3E
0
3F
Planning Units
0 - 10 11 - 40 41 - 80 81 - 200 201 - 500 >500
hR
La
ld
r Fer
3
10C
Ben d Rd. on
11
2A
d oa
r Bee C
eek
Rd .
7
12A
RM 6 20
14
1B
7 0 0
9F 10B 11C
ve . D ri
ad Ro
3 0
9B
r.
1
10A
9
11A
0 0
11D 11E
57
7E r. eD
Ko l lm ey e
0
7D 0
0
11B
r.
9C Blv d. 7B wa y
7G
0
20 Mu
13
6C
rfi n
7C
0
6B
Rd .
0
7F
11
6A
18 2
8G 8E
0
6D
3
5B
12
8A
1
5A
20
0
8F
0
5C
FM
224 4
0 1
3J 4
S
H
0
3G
16
3H
71
Crum l ey R n c a
oad
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
71
50
1A
Pace Bend Rd
H
n ili
46
12B
s Hud
e . Rd
Th ur m an
B en
Cre ek Rd
9E
Hu rs t
ld
r Fer
18
10C
Ben d Rd. on
70
2A
d oa
r Bee C
eek
Rd .
49
12A
RM 6 20
172
1B
76 8 0
9F 10B 11C
3A
Dr .
R. O
1 SH 7
Club ho u
249
ve . D ri
win d
46
2B
s os Cr
ke
529
2C
La
13 122
8B 7A
RM
ad Ro
17 0
9B
8
10A
57
11A
2 1
11D 11E
344
7E r. eD
Ko l lm ey e
0 ing Flam 9A
35 d. lv 9D B 36
0
7D 0
2
11B
r.
7G
0
20 Mu
89
6C
rfi n
9C Blv d. 7B wa y
7C
21
6B
Rd .
25
2D
2
7F
90
6A
0
3B
23
2E
117 50
8E 8G
0
6D
182
8D
Ha m ilt
243 179
8A
RM
0 62
5B
67
3C
on
ol Rd Po
221
8C
6
5A
147 416
3D 8F
21
5C
FM
224 4
0 32
P
4
S
H
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Hamilto
oo
l Ro a
3J
33
3G
188
3H
71
Crum l ey R n c a
209
3E
0
3F
Planning Units
0 - 10 11 - 40 41 - 80 81 - 200 201 - 500 >500
hR
oad
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
72
110
1A
Pace Bend Rd
H
n ili
35
12B
s Hud
e . Rd
Th ur m an
B en
Cre ek Rd
9E
Hu rs t
kewa y
Dr .
R. O
1 SH 7
Club ho u
537
3A
9D
win d
9A
62
2B
s os Cr
ke
681
2C
La
45
2D
185
8B
79 7A33
7F
RM
0
3B
64
2E
419
8D
Ha m ilt
198
3C
on
ol Rd Po
1205
3D
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Hamilto
oo
l Ro a
428
3E
0
3F
Planning Units
0 - 10 11 - 40 41 - 80 81 - 200 201 - 500 >500
hR
La
ld
r Fer
13
10C
Ben d Rd. on
100
2A
d oa
r Bee C
eek
Rd .
62
12A
RM 6 20
283
1B
42 29 0
9F 10B 11C
ve . D ri
ad Ro
3 0
9B
r.
6
10A
70
11A
0 0
11D 11E
172
7E r. eD
Ko l lm ey e
0
7D 0
0
11B
r.
9C Blv d. 7B wa y
7G
0
20 Mu
26
6C
rfi n
7C
28
6B
Rd .
135
6A
104 127
8E 8G
0
6D
419 339
8A
RM
0 62
5B
0
8C
3
5A
349
8F
14
5C
FM
224 4
0 38
3J 4
S
H
195
3G
324
3H
71
Crum l ey R n c a
oad
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
73
160
1A
Pace Bend Rd
H
n ili
81
12B
s Hud
e . Rd
Th ur m an
B en
Cre ek Rd
9E
Hu rs t
ld
r Fer
31
10C
Ben d Rd. on
170
2A
d oa
r Bee C
eek
Rd .
111
12A
RM 6 20
455
1B
118 37 0
9F 10B 11C
3A
Dr .
R. O
1 SH 7
Club ho u
786
ve . D ri
win d
108
2B
s os Cr
ke
1210
2C
La
70
2D
307
8B
92 7A35
7F
RM
ad Ro
20 0
9B
14
10A
127
11A
2 1
11D 11E
516
7E r. eD 6C
20 Mu
Ko l lm ey e
0 ing Flam 9A
37 d. lv 9D B 42
0
7D 0
2
11B
r.
7G
115
rfi n
9C Blv d. 7B wa y
7C
49
6B
Rd .
225
6A
0
3B
87
2E
221 177
8E 8G
0
6D
601
8D
Ha m ilt
662 518
8A
RM
0 62
5B
265
3C
on
ol Rd Po
221
8C
9
5A
496 1621
3D 8F
35
5C
FM
224 4
0 70
P
4
S
H
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Hamilto
oo
l Ro a
3J
228
3G
512
3H
71
Crum l ey R n c a
637
3E
0
3F
Planning Units
0 - 10 11 - 40 41 - 80 81 - 200 201 - 500 >500
hR
oad
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
74
605
1A
P ace Bend Rd
Hi
13
12B
s Hud
e lin . Rd
Th ur m an
B en
Cre ek Rd
9E
Hu rs t
kewa y
Dr .
R. O
1 SH 7
Club ho u
1141
3A
9D
win d
9A
289
2B
s os Cr
ke
826
2C
La
22 44
8B 7A
RM
55
2D
1400
3B
58
2E
54
8D
Ha m ilt
1110
3C
on
ol Rd Po
3008
3D
Map Layers
District Boundary Planning Units Streets
Hamilto
oo
l Ro a
1903
3E
0
3F
Planning Units
0 - 10 11 - 40 41 - 80 81 - 200 201 - 500 >500
hR
La
ld
r Fer
5
10C
Ben d Rd. on
612
2A
d oa
r Bee C
eek
Rd .
18
12A
RM 6 20
421
1B
60 220 0
9F 10B 11C
ve . D ri
ad Ro
0 0
9B
r.
0
10A
115
11A
0 0
11D 11E
97
7E r. eD
Ko l lm
0
7D 0
e ye
0
11B
D
9C Blv d. 7B wa y
7G
0
20 Mu
0
6C
rfi n
r.
7C
0
6B
Rd .
6
7F
40
6A
0 107
8E 8G
0
6D
100 80
8A
RM
0 62
5B
0
8C
0
5A
404
8F
150
5C
FM
224 4
0 0
3J 4
S
H
0
3G
535
3H
71
Crum l ey R n c a
oad
[
0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles
75
1A
Briarcliff Whitecliff condos
in this PU; Girl Scout
1A
Marina Club Villas & LCRA has over 1,700 ac.
1A
1A
1A
1A
Resort Ranch of Lake Travis
36.42 +160.61 + 35.17 = 232.2 total acres Dec. 2010: is a resort that has rustic cabins and cottages for short-term stays; it also has 31 RV sites and tent sites; there is also conference rooms with an outdoor pavillion [PASA: strong potential for SF dev. at a later time]
Nov. 2009: have all but 1-2 occ'ed & did have in-fill (on Cat Hollow Club Dr.)
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 37 42 79 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 0 9 0 7 0 8 0 6 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 2 7
0 0 0 0 2 4 5 7 8 10 2 34 36
1 2 3 5
0.39
0.13
0.38
0.11
0.38
0.38
76
PLANNING UNIT
Michael Paggi has 111.83ac.; Janet Paggi Grandietti has 63 ac. Jayne Dibrell has 121 ac.; Steven Taylor has 63 ac. John McFarlane has 80 ac.; Jeffrey Elliott has 10 ac.; but 6 heirs given land w/agreement not to dev, so would lose share . if try to dev.; adj. to Briarcliff w/ access off Thurman Bend Rd.; sold off ~120 ac. earlier; in 2010, had Aquapalooza at Ranch; Also, not conducive to dev. since no lake view corridors, except Dick Pickens has 30 ac.; Frederic Paul has 39 ac. BF Private Capital has 52 ac.; Marlee Peurifoy has 48 ac. Michael Mohan has 50 ac.; Sheridan Berthiaume has 21 ac.; Russell Oertel has 28 ac.
1A
Northern portion of Planning Unit is
Dec. 2010: expect dev. as SF & part for pot. MF-long-term,
1A
Big Bee Creek built out Holmes Family (HF Prop's) = 391 + 92 + 146 ac. = 629 ac. public domain
1A
1B
1B
1B
"Vizcaya"-Covert tracts: 602 + 158 + 15 + 120 = 895 ac.
Dec. 2010: plan earlier approved for 394 SF & ~46 condos= ~440 total lots-California dev'er; 2 yrs. to dev. infrastructure-perhaps slowed by downturn; incl's dev. of sewer treatment plant; access off Siesta Shores or Thurman Bend Rd. Nov. 2009: no activity, but has plans for SF & condos
NEW TOTAL:
part on Lake; family suggests that they will not dev.
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
interest in selling)
0 7 9 9 11 14 17 20 21 24 28 50 110 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 4 5 6 6 8 4 29 33
0 9 13 17 21 24 26 29 31 33 60 143 203
0 0 0 0
0.38
0.38
0.29
0.36
0.45
77
PLANNING UNIT Reserve at Lake Travis has 300-ac. w/ all of Frost Bank's 139 ac. & 37+ ac.
Dec. 2010: 3 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 4 UC & 111 dev'ed lots LTBO & 37 cottages left to build; Nov. 2009: 0 Occ'ed, 0 Aavil., 3 UC, & 115 dev'ed lots LTBO; In 2008: LCRA tract purchased also; w/186 ac. to dev. and w/118 lots (was 129 lots) &~37 (was 25) cottages, so 155 hs. units;
Dec. 2009; had pre-sold 55 lots worth $300,000 to $4 mil.w/1-5 ac. lots; had largest marketing effort in Lake Travis history-already $40 mil. in sales; 250 boat slips; swim center w/400'lazy river, no golf course, open air pavilion
1B
John & Beth Hale have 41 ac. & Walter Schneider = 15 ac.
both bet. Angel Bay & Coves at Lake Travis S. off Thurman Bend Rd.
1B
1B
1B
The Vistas at Lake Travis
245 total lots
E. side of Bee Cave Rd., N. on Lakehurst Rd.
Angel Bay- Dec. 2010: 11 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 2 UC & 32 dev'ed lots LTBO;
Dec. 2010: 84 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 1 UC & 160 dev'ed lots LTBO Nov. 2009: 82 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 1 UC, & 163 dev'ed lots LTBO
NEW
(at old Sunshine Boys Club) w/restaurant; equestrian (English & Western); covered & uncovered paddocks; trails;
La Isla at Angel Bay- Dec. 2010: 8 Occ'ed & 11 dev'ed lots LTBO;
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
2 3 3 2 4 2 3 3 2 4 14 14 28 16 61 83 144 14 15 17 21 18 15 12 9
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 4
2 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 16 17 33
0.03
0.09
0.34
0.49
78
1B
Crosswind basically built-out also refer to PU 2B Thurman Bend Estates Travis Settlement Dec. 2010: Lazy J Lake Travis LTD has built-out
1B
1B
1B
1B
1B
1B
1B
59.67+136.02+23.68+12.55+12.72+8.73= 253.37 ac. used for farming and summer camps-no development Joe Barker has 32.05 ac.; Joseph Culver has 28 ac.; Wilmot Horton has 27+26.23=53.23 acres; La Familia Partnership Ltd has 19.17 ac.; Bauman-Ceniza Wildlife Mgmthas 58.82 acres
1B
Siesta Shores built-out older subdivision; [median home age=1979] could have some regeneration within 5-7 yrs.
Siesta Shores
built-out
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 2 1 0 2 1 2 2 1 2 6 8 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 7 6 13 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 6 8
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0
0.18
0.08
0.13
0.29
0.53
0.08
0.55
0.08
0.16
79
PLANNING UNIT
Capital Rod and Gun Club will not likely dev., due to lead in soil, etc. Bee Creek Hill LTD still has 18 ac.& Jeffrey Langle=23.8 ac.; Joni Langle; Bee Creek Realty - 264-1565; July 2008: 4 occ'ed & 2 UC Ronald Albee has 21.5 ac. off of Hwy. 71; Phil Penny has 15.5 ac.; JGW Investments has 11.5 ac.; George Scott =19 ac. (formerly Spicewood 71 Dev.); Bennie McWilliams =56.31 ac.; Gene Taylor=29.5 ac.; Jeffrey Langle has 24+12.75=36.75 ac.; Robert Woods has 19.5 ac.; Michael Hatch has 23.06 ac.; all=potential to be used for higher density development, but many will remain as large single-family homesites Nov. 2009: 9 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC, & 12 dev'ed lots LTBO; Thomas Tiner has 71.4 ac.; John Hogge has 69 ac.-both prime for dev. off of S. Pace Bend; Dec. 2010: 10 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC & 11 dev'ed lots LTBO; Archie/Mary Paul off Bee Creek Rd. have 223.57 ac.; Russell Jedlicka has 64.09 ac.;
1B
Bee Creek Ranchettes-older dev. by Bee Creek UMC
Dec 2010: Allen Hostetlerhas 45.7ac.; Phillip Miller has 25.19+12.98= 38.17 ac.;
1B
2A
2A
2A
Colonia Serendipity
14 total lots just off of Crawford Rd. Dec. 2010: 3 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC & 11 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 3 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC, & 11 dev'ed lots LTBO
Lakewood Estates
built-out
NEW TOTAL:
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 7 4 11
0 0 0 0
0.29
0.45
0.22
80
2A
Paleface Ranch
Tiburon Hills basically built-out basically built-out
2A
2A
2A
2A
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
1 2 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 11 1 12 4 15 20 35 4 1 1 4 6 10 4 2 5 0 3 2 2 0 3 1 4 0 3 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.12
0.45
0.45
1.25
81
2A
Travis Settlement
also refer to PU 1B Dec. 2010: 183 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 2 UC & 93 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 176 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 2 UC, & 99 dev'ed lots LTBO
2A
2B
2B
2B
Lawrence Williams has 100 ac.; Bee Creek Stables - 17.5 ac.; AG&M Bee Caves Invest's - 19.24 ac. Kyle Chapman has 17.58 acres Armfamint LLC - 18.34+11.48=29.82 ac.; all are N. of Hwy 71 & W. of Bee Creek Rd.
(& it may be possible that LTISD 89 ac. would resell)
41 lots in Ph . I on 63 acres w/Bobby Day (dev'er/friend) with 1 & 2 ac. lots Dec. 2010: no activity, but developed section(s) Cindy Schumann realtor - (512) 736-0420 gated
overlooking River & P. Bridge; Dev. will be like Barton Cr. Lakeside
NEW TOTAL:
HOUSING
developer has 607 acres to build ~420 large homesite lots in the future
OCCUPANCIES:
232 + 302 + 53 + 63 + 20 ac.-670 ac. on CAD + 18 ac.-was for school, but resold
1 11 11 17 17 14 20 18 20 20 22 70 100 170 3 8 13 21 3 2 3 2 3 1 2 6 4 5 6 5 5 6 5 24 27 51 2 4 3 5 6 6 8 9 9 10 12 21 48 69
1 3 2 2 1 0 1 3 2 2 9 8 17
0.49
0.08
0.64
0.36
82
2B
School site e further col's for existing subdivisions' data in Rough Hollow 2011: 58 occ'ed & 728 lots remaining in dev'ed subd
also in this PU 35 acres for commercial; 10 acres for hotel; 8 acres for yacht club; 300+ acres for parks
Nov. 2008: Phase II will occur in 3-5 yrs.; big infrastructure investment incl.
2B
dev'er has ~1,455 ac. for 1,162 homesite lots & ~330 fut. condos; so ~1,492 total housing units;
2C
2C
Rough Hollow (Highlands) pot.condos to develop with higher density units nearer the end of the projection period as Rough Hollow gets more built-out could be very oriented to students or could be oriented ot 2nd homeowners
2011: by The Overlook, expect TH's/condos-6/ac.;
S. off R.O. Dr.: James Spencer has 15 ac.; Laas Sara Puig has 20 ac.;
Jett Revocable Trust has 13.47 ac.; Travis Hausman has 11.48 ac.;
NEW
S. Shore Yacht Club & Marina; Las Ventanas also has Lakeway Highlands
Life N Dove - 12.5 ac.; Hans Huth has 11.17 ac.; Robert Folk has 25.6 ac.;
HOUSING TOTAL:
w/Rough Hollow (1,500 ac.); Potter: 340 condos & 1,404 SF=1,744 units;
Yan Zhou has 10.06 ac.; Richard Tyler has 15.06 ac.;
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 20 50 50 50 50 50 50 70 250 320
0.45
0.36
0.08
83
2C
Rough Hollow-Yacht Club Villas Rough Hollow-Waters Edge Rough Hollow-East Rim
2C
2C
2C
2C
Rough Hollow-The Bluffs
53 total lots Dec. 2010: 5 Occ'ed, 2 Avail., 0 UC & 46 dev'ed lots LTBO Nov. 2009: no home construction but infrastructure is in place now custom homesites in the $800s
Dec. 2010: 18 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 1 UC & 62 dev'ed lots LTBO Phil Briggs 800-984-3810; $729s-78'-85' wide
NEW
Rough Hollow dev.=Haythem Dawlett
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
2 4 8 10 12 11 10 6 0 0 36 27 63 0 24 0 24 0 21 10 31 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7 5 6 6 5 5 4 9 11 10 4 2 0 0 0 42 6 48 5 3 7
8 10 9 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 44
0.28
0.08
0.55
0.27
0.4
84
2C
Madrone Canyon dev. as Highlands Blvd. is opened; and builds out TOTAL: 6 parcels of Parcels will Flint Rock Estates
July 2008: built-out older, small subd.
2C
2C
2C
2D
2D
2D
2E
2E
Creekside at Flintrock
11 total lots on Kaden Way Dec. 2010: no construction; Nov. 2009: no construction
on 33.25 ac.-100' wide lots
Rough Hollow-Overlook
55 total lots
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
5 41 61 103 146 178 146 140 131 128 136 529 681 1210 1 0 21 12 33 1 5 5 6 7 1 3 3 6 6 8 10 4 33 37 6 0 2 0 9 12 12 9 5 1 1 0 0 49 7 56 0 65 23 88 0 1 9 13 17 15 13 9 12
0 2 6 8 9 8 11 7 9 10 25 45 70
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 7 4 11
12
15 1 0 0 0
12
0 53 1 54
0.4
0.4
0.22
0.63
0.3
1.5
0.18
85
PLANNING UNIT Majestic Hills Ranchettes & Norman Myers has tracts of 15+23+41 ac.
along the Westside of PU and other large landowners are developed ranchette lots Dec. 2010: built out Nov. 2009: 35 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 2 UC & 2 dev'ed lots LTBO
2E
Harriette Wells has 20.12 ac.- rd cuts through tract existing subdivision, which is built-out Wells tract will be opened up with Serene Hills now complete; arterial to be thoroughfare through PU & to also open up Heard tract (2nd means of access) TOTAL: Travis County has 1,160 ac. Lick Creek Ranch
2E
2E
2E
3A
3A
3A
Dec 2010: Cheyne Pace has 44 & 32 & 68 ac.;
Moran Family has 207 ac.; Dzogchen Foundation has 25 ac.; Thomas Edwards has 32+37=69 ac.; Melvin Parse has 32 ac.; Arthur Sharplin has 62 ac.; Bodhicitta Trust has 38 ac.; Blazing Saddles Real Estate=30.7 ac; and ~67 3-15 ac. dev'ed tracts off both sides of Little Creek mainly will remain large homesites for SF homes
19 toal lots
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
1 2 2 4 9 6 11 10 12 14 17 23 64 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 14 58 72 13 11 9 8 5 6 3 0
1 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 2 2 8 6 14
0 2 2 4
0.27
0.63
0.63
0.45
0.37
0.45
86
PLANNING UNIT West Cypress Hills -1,481 tot. lots-all phases (Topfer Family-Castletop Capital=dev'er-starting Ph. 3 in ~3 to 4 years)
Dec. 2010: 113 Occ'ed, 12 Avail., 3 UC & 103 dev'ed lots LTBO; developer (Allen Topler)=858.7 ac. to build Ph. 2 & 3, which should have ~1,050 to 1,250 fut. lots (Castletop Capital Rutter LP); builders in 2011: Milestone & Streetman Homes; Jan., 2011; dev'er states that there should be 45 closings in 2011; 60 in 2012; 80 in 2013; 90 in 2014; 100 in 2015; Nov. 2009: 89 Occ'ed, 7 Avail. (2 models), 2 UC, & 133 dev'ed lots LTBO, & still 192 undev'ed lots left in Ph.1; Nov. 2008: dam problems previously & sediment that polluted Lick Creek; 423 total lots in 1st phase & West Cypress Hills/The Creek; need 2nd water well to continue develop;
3A
3A
3A
Jeff Maddux ~130 ac. S. on Hwy 71, but
Driftwood Land Co. (Ranches and Rivers Realty) (but, could still have high density in 3-4 yrs.);
had 292 ac. for sale & Mrs. Reimers may still reside on tract;
Peacock Rd.; also, "Hamilton Pool Rd. Scenic Corridor" has lobbied
also, likely 1+ ac. residential because have a prelim. plat for ~120 ac. w ~92 lots;
Alan Topfer has offered water supply; & LCRA also could provide sewer in 5+ yrs, so could have MF)
NEW
against it; but the engineering study for this road is complete, and
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
19
0 0 0 7 9 12 13 15 17 18 16 75 91
0.37
0.76
0.56
87
3A
RGK Ranch - Kozmetsky & RGK Rentals - 1,561 ac.; 1,400 maximum
3A
3A
3B
lots based on water and waste water commitments fromTravis County (Rick Wheeler); Nov. 2011: No activity: held in trusts for children/grandchildren by Greg Kozmetsky & his sister These parcels will not begin dev. until 1/2 or even 3/4 of Sweetwater is complete; SW off Hwy 71 and west of Sweetwater subdivision (family is enjoying parcels as recreational at this time & may donate parcels to have as a park/conversation area; otherwise, there will be ~350 MF units
3B
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.37
0.35
0.34
88
3C
Stagecoach Ranch Rajendra Persaud has 10 ac.; Steven Steigmeyer has 10 ac.; Jimmy Nassour has 100 ac.; Michael Sanders has 10 ac.; Jonathan Dahm has 64 ac.; Randy Heckman has 26 ac.; Herbert Chapman has 15 ac.; Robert Dorsett has 20+13= 33 ac.; Calicanto Construction - 26 ac.; Jueri Svjagintsev has 17 ac.; all tracts are south off Hamilton Pool Rd. 2009: Petite Rancho=72.5 ac.; Davis Floyd=288 ac. S. off H. Pool
3C
3C
3C
3C
Nov. 2009: Steve Sivley has 22 ac.; Paul Calabro has 25 ac.; Arthur Costello has 21+17= 38 ac.; Ruby Sisk has 22 ac.; Robin Moore has 22+21= 43 ac.;
all tracts are nrth off Hamilton Pool Rd.
Hamilton Hills
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
1 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 0 9 6 15 1 3 3 6 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 3 2 3 3 4 1 3 8 14 22 1 0
1 0 1 0 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 17 21
0 14 10 24
0.34
0.22
0.28
0.36
0.49
89
3C
Madrone Ranch 34 sites, equestrian focus, custom homes
large custom homes, 223 total lots in 2 phases Dec. 2010: 39 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 8 UC, 120 dev'ed lots LTBO & 55 undev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 37 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 2 UC, & 120 dev'ed lots LTBO developer is planning on having another 63 lots in the future dev'er: Joel Robuck (214)361-7830 - Eng. John Clark LJA Co.
3C
Belvedere avg. parcel size=3 ac.;
Dec. 2010: 14 Occ'ed & 20 dev'e d lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 14 Occ'ed & 20 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2008: 7- 8 houses occ.
TOTAL
3D
3D
3D
Destiny Hills
built out
N. of Hamilton Pool Rd. & over to LTISD boundary; may sell 200 ac. as of 2010; & have concept plan in west portion of 3C, but no commitment for utilities (i.e., no water or sewer);
NEW
HOUSING
these parcels are referred to as Peacock Ranch - for both sisters' tracts
OCCUPANCIES:
could potentially dev. up to 1/2, but very rugged terrain, esp. in east;
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.36
0.4
0.79
1.71
90
PLANNING UNIT Sweetwater Ranch (Lazy 9 Ranch) - Pedernales Summit Pkwy=UC; plan=1,808 lots; LCRA contract for water; expect 20-30 ac. of MF w/own MUD sewer system and own opportunity for affluent spray for large parcel anticipate 300 or more units in reserve parcel -- which will develop later in the projection period
unknown price in Nov. 2010; Perdernales Summit Pkwy. will continue to have construction; LCRA contract for water; has own MUD; (orig. up to 3,200 lots on ~1,000 ac.) Engineer: Rick Wheeler of Malone/Wheeler; replica of Lake Pointe , so 50'+ lots Don Fry suggests they sold 1000 ac. & will dev 1000 homes
3D
Sweetwater Ranch (Lazy 9 Ranch) - Pedernales Summit
3D
3D
Creeks Edge - 32 lots platted
Competitive Design Development-59 ac. Michael Moore Group = dev'er (Ed Moore) 512-442-0377; 900 feet N. of Caudill Ln. & Hamilton Pool Rd. Dec. 2010: no activity
Dec. 2010: Bank Midsest reclaimed tract in auction for $34 mil., then bought by Wheelock Street Capital for
original plan was on 1,000 ac. with 1,808 lots; Wheelock will newly capitalize MUD for ~1,700 units
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 2 4 5 6 6 4 3 1 1 17 15 32
0.51
0.17
0.51
91
PLANNING UNIT Following tracts=no water: Preservation Ranch=445+367+113= 925 ac.; Serengeti Fdtn has 393 ac.; John Graul has 138 ac. Michael Murphy = 399 ac.; Jan Harris = 396 ac.;
but part of Grumbles~350 ac.=newly152 ac. for sale & these tracts are just E. of the planned new high school site ; [old rd. out to Hamilton Rd. is in other portions of the Grumbles parcels]; this 152 ac. is also in ETJ w/no zoning; expectMF w/sewer from Sweetwater (see next col.), & office/warehouse space -- all in the 152 ac.; In this PU, ~90 ac. has caves, springs, waterfalls, & hiking trails (portion is just E. of Sweetwater)
3D
Artie, Robert, Carolyn, & Ferrell Grumbles parcels: Jan., 2011: no activity, 73+76+78+ 110= 337 ac.,
3D
3D
3D
Artie, Robert, & Ferrell Grumbles parcels: should have one reserve tract that will be MF, but this cannot occur without wastewater line S. along Hwy 71 from Lowe's w/line out to potentially W. Cypress Hills
(one portion of Grumbles land is S. of Hamilton Pool Rd).; expect long-term potential for MF
JPH Capital LTD=484 ac.; John Hatchett = 425 ac. Cecil Perkins has ~45 ac.; & Ann Bettis has 201 ac. LCRA may decline new subdivisions in long-term; rugged terrain Parcels above & 1 sm. tract=~3,500 ac., but no water yet
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 5 9 11 13 15 15 17 14 71 85 13 14 14 17 20 70 90 12 11 7 2 0
0 0 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 250 300
11 10 42 52
0.51
0.31
0.49
0.12
92
3D
and Highland Creek Lakes
3D
3E
3E
Twin Lake Hills; Valley Lake Hills; Mountain Creek Lakes; Dec. 2010: 318 Occ'ed, 5 Avail., 5 UC & 738 dev'ed lots;
Nov. 2009: 313 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 3 UC & 750 dev'ed lots LTBO; slow growth do to infrastructure & expect several double lots; will have continued in-fill, but needs improved infrastructure (water)
built-out
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 9 22 53 133 199 210 220 245 257 273 416 1205 1621 27 67 125 192 27 25 24 22 19 16 14 11
6 9 11 13 11 12 12 13 13 12 50 62 112
0 0 0 0
0.23
0.49
0.49
93
PLANNING UNIT Deer Creek & Hilltop Manor & new "Deer Creek" w/~$200,000 home values; Hilltop Manor- Dec. 2010: 9 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 8 UC, 118 dev'ed lots LTBO & 73 undev'ed lots LTBO builder: D.R. Horton ;
Nov. 2009: 128+80 lots w/ 60 dev'ed lots LTBO; grandfathered plat from 1972-starting home const.-2010; was ~1,000 ac.; August Kraft has 35 & 20 ac.; Elizabeth Speck=94 ac.
3E
Elmer Puryear =425 ac may dev. soon (2011: Jeff Maddux);
Artie Galbreath=65 ac.; Saati Family=56 ac.; other small parcels; plus, Robert Ayres=~140 ac. & Patricia Ayres=40 ac.; & other small tracts, incl. new purchase of 15 ac. by Harold Sawyer
3E
3E
3E
Saddletree Ranch (~2/5's of this subd.
is in the District) built-out
3E
Nov. 2009: 105 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., in this new development of Deer Creek; older parts of Deer Creek has many complaints about water supply; for new dev., water from LCRA (older homes=Deer Creek Water Corp) Nov. 2009: Driftwood Land Co. has 98 ac. termed new "Deer Creek"; could add another ~330 SF lots in the future
Dec. 2010: Driftwood Land Co. has 98 ac. termed new "Deer Creek";could add another ~330 SF lots in the future
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
1 12 14 17 20 23 26 26 27 28 72 130 202
0 0 0 3 8 14 18 21 24 26 11 103 114
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
2 8 8 16
0.48
0.49
0.49
0.76
94
3F
Meadow Fox Ests built-out use, including CCNG's 31 ac. for potential TH's/ condos or lofts TOTAL
(part could become preserve/park)
3F
Other smaller parcels along, and Mitchell Wong did own, but in
3G
3G
3G
3G
3G
3H
Spanish Oaks @ Bee Cave - 2011; moving out of bankruptcy
gated; 477 total lots; $600-$2.5 mill. 100'-200' wide lots, except Spanish Oaks/Verde w/20 - 70' lots Dec. 2010: ~108 occ'ed (excl. Verde) and ~12 under construction Nov. 2009: 93 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 4 UC, & 245 dev'ed lots LTBO developer still has 134 lots still to develop in the future
NEW TOTAL:
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
14 15 15 16 15 14 15 15 15 15 75 74 149
0 0 0 0
0.49
0.47
2.17
0.08
0.35
0.43
95
3H
William Formby=89 ac. on Barton Creek, Formerly Los Robles apts 293 units-across from HEB 95% Occ. Ratio = 0.14 built-out Windsor at Bee Cave apts Barton Creek Preserve
3H
3H
3H
3H
3H
The University of Texas parcels reach outside the School District, but 22 + 13 ac. & other parcels are in L.T.I.S.D. just N. of Barton Creek
3H
Senna Hills is out of the District
Verde Trails
20 lots
in Spanish Oaks
NEW
as of Jan., 2011
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 13 0 13
0.63
0.08
0.17
0.14
0.54
0.63
96
3J
Preserve at Barton Creek Mitchell Wong has no activity;
undev'ed parcel N. of Hwy 71 - 10.5 ac., but all other parcels are develooped likely commercial all lots built-out in past year mature, none sold or dev.
3J
Uplands has 333 + 162 +
167 = 258 ac.
3J
mature development
5A
Lake Pointe built out
5A
Lake Pointe-Canyon Vista built-out
but only 50 ac. now owned by SBS Real Estate, w/earlier application for 30-34 condos
as well as applic. for SF lots (SF-20) via the Village of Bee Cave;
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
Bee Cave expects potential for lofts or condos on these small tracts
TOTAL:
1 1 3 7 9 12 15 11 8 3 1 32 38 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 9 12 15 11 8 3 1 32 38 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.61
0.72
0.63
0.97
0.54
1.19
97
5A
Lake Pointe-Vista Pointe 85 lots in this section
Dec. 2010: 10 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC & 9 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 9 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC, & 10 lots LTBO
5A
Lake Pointe-Heritage Park has 41 ac. in the District, and parts of other tracts, but are predominately OOD; Stonehenge Star Prop's has 7.6 ac. on Lake Austin; TOTAL: 6D Ranch LTD built-out entire Lake Pointe dev.= is now 944 total lots $500-$3,000,000 are the diverse prices for these homes built-out built-out
5A
5A
5A
5A
5A
5A
5B
The Ridge at Alta Vista at Lakeway 287 lots total
Dec. 2010: 269 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 2 UC & 16 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 265 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 2 UC, & 19 dev'ed lots LTBO 2008:17 homes UC &25 dev'ed lots LTBO
built-out
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 6 3 9
3 4 5 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 17 1 18
0 0 0 0
1.08
0.9
0.77
0.78
0.9
0.55
0.54
98
5B
Enclave at Alta Vista (is now Enclave South)
the 40 ac. at 3501 RM 620, but as of Jan., 2011, sale sign remained for 78 ac. (w/adj. 38.3 ac.); 2009: planned 147 townhomes/condos; but,in 2011: Village of Bee Cave (ETJ) suggests the orig. plan could be used, or more likely, MF as a Ph. II of Alta Vista Reserve; site is in ETJ; [Bury & Partners/Megan Perry were involved] adjacent 40 ac.; mixed use but still has a for sale sign with the 2011: Bee Cave has plat for 375 MF
5B
AmStar Southern Cielo may still own and 487.5 + 59 ac.; and City of Lakeway=100 ac. Alta Vista Reserve (is now Enclave North) Nov. 2009: built-out and Nov. 2009: built-out and fully occupied 92 total lots (w/42 in N. and 42 in S.) and 42 in S.) owner w/38.3 ac. TOTAL: 92 total lots (w/42 in N. SLC Austin Partners=likely still fully occupied
5B
5B
5B
5B
5C
Alexan Galleria 512-265-2500 309 total units 294 are occupied: Jan 2011 95% Occ. Ratio = 0.13
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 18 19
0.44
0.13
0.59
0.09
0.09
0.13
99
5C
Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills Trails
54 tot lots; (MS)
5C
Travis Oak 106 condos - 60'-80' wide lots $192-$700
The Courtyard was Cardinal Hills 4 & 6
6A
Terrace at the Preserve Courtyard at the Preserve
6A
6A
6A
6A
Vistas at Lakeway - townhomes
102 Glen Heather Ct.-was Toll Brothers (Toll's no. is 512-263-8490); original plan for 175 units, but, as of 2011, may be 150;
~40+ TH's could dev. on small tracts off RM 620 487.5 + 59 ac. City of Lakeway has
& newly platted Dec. 2010: 34 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 12 UC & 6 dev'ed lots LTBO; Meritage Homes Nov. 2009: 28 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 3 UC, & 17 dev'ed lots LTBO
NEW
100 dev'ed lots LTBO; plans for ~45 more lots Trails East all built out
Travis Oaks
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 6 7 8 6 6 2 0 0 21 14 35 9 23 35 58 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 19 5 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 2 6 0 4 4 0 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 8 10 11 16 19 22 22 18 0 47 81 128
0 21 14 35
0.12
0.25
0.18
0.32
0.64
100
PLANNING UNIT
City of Austin 434 ac. & pt. of 487 ac.
6A
Fred Zimmerman has 6 ac.;
City of Austin has 433.8 & 460.4 + other ac. Travis County has 301 & 26+ other ac. & 17 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: no construction yet 0 UC, & 31 dev'ed lots LTBO Dec. 2010: 2 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC Nov. 2009: 54 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., between Meadowlark St. & Whippoorwill 2008: 8 lots LTBO & 15 lots total; 0 UC & 34 dev'e dlots LTBO; 31 lots on 5.9 ac.; $180-$250 Nov. 2009: 11 Occ'ed & 3 dev'ed lots LTBO Dec. 2010: 70 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., garden Homes
6A
Lake Oak Estates ~$1M homes;
Dec. 2010: 11 Occ'ed & 3 dev'ed lots LTBO;
6B
Mirabella Kollmeyer Springs/Enclave R. Hull = 9 ac.; R. Jones=5 ac.; Schmid Investments=33 ac.; MSMJM LAM has 56 ac that is
isolated & off Kollmeyer & on Lake Austin;
6B
6C
6C
6C
6C
Canyons at Cardinal Hills 316 lots in 3 phases
Dec. 2010: 255 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 6 UC & 55 dev'ed lots LTBO;
Patricia Murfin
has 148.5
ac. in this PU
NEW
Christorpher Layton has 10 ac.
Nov. 2009: 205 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 2 UC, & 22 dev'ed lots LTBO
HOUSING TOTAL
Kollmeyer Springs/Overlook
2008: ~3 lots LTBO
OCCUPANCIES:
0 11 19 20 17 23 27 31 32 30 15 90 135 225 9 21 28 49 9 21 28 49 0 29 5 34 8 8 0 6 6 0 0 14 3 17 1 0 4 4 1 1 1 1 3 2 9 9 5 3 6 6 5 4 4 4 7 4 2 2 7 2 0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 3
7 8 9 9 11 8 6 2 1 0 44 17 61
6 1 19 20
0.15
0.37
0.67
0.29
0.33
101
PLANNING UNIT
Laws Addition Marjorie Winborn
6C
Discovery Point (Honey Creek) mixed use; 3101-3209 RM 620 S.
S. of Lakeway Elem and E. of Lohmans, w/part used for a town center-lofts/mixed use; Also, continuation of Tuscan w/ age-restricted nursing/assisted living; Dec. 2010: no activity; plans for mixed use Nov. 2009: 13.5 acres-used for office/retail/restaurants 2 phases-finished with 1st phase & working on 2nd phase
6C
Lakeway MUD=82.5 ac. built-out
west of Laws Addition
6D
has 33.86 ac
6D
6D
6D
7A
7A
JTT Enterprises - 43.4 ac. & Witt-5 ac.
(Don Kahn did have JTT parcel) for
7A
The Summit *Assisted Living 95 units
possible town center-mixed use that will have lofts, etc. and willl be pot. merged with current Glen Heather subd. to reposition this subdivision also
NEW TOTAL
Dawlett has no final plans for ~12 ac.
HOUSING TOTAL
OCCUPANCIES:
0 13 18 20 19 19 13 9 3 1 0 89 26 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 11 12 14 16 18 19 13 79 92
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 6 17 23
0.33
0.9
0.56
0.07
0.08
0.23
102
7A
Lakeway built out Arbolago on Lake Travis
7A
7B
7B
7C
7C
7D
7D
7E
7E
North Lakeway Village - Overlook at North Lakeway
71 SF lots; 60'-80' wide lots; 81.3 & 18 ac. on E. side of Clara Van
Lakeway
built-out
Dec. 2010: 31 Occ'ed, 5 Avail., 7 UC & 75 dev'ed lots LTBO builder: Ryland - $250-$270 Nov. 2009: 9 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 4 UC & 57 dev'ed lots LTBO
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 0 0 2 11 12 14 16 18 19 13 79 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 18 20 17 12 4 1 1 0 0 81 6 87
0 0 0 0
0.25
0.25
0.19
0.69
0.61
0.42
103
7E
Round Mountain Ranch
4 lots Dec. 2010: land is being cleared just off Clara Van Dr. septic systems; WCISD # 17
[31 ac.=greenbelt? & 51 ac. of pot. mixed
7E
Lakeside at North Lakeway
Dec. 2010: ~19 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 2 UC,
7E
North Lakeway Village = 88 condos
7E
7E
(The Pinnacle of Lakeway - 512-266-6655) 88 units total w/heavy ratio of students now Ryland Homes-all No. Lakeway are on both sides of Clara Van now selling these condos -- 3 UC Jan. 2011: 15 occ'ed w/portion as 2nd homes
7E
Mira Lago at Harbor Hills-22 lots 8 lots with 3 homes UC and none occ'ed (just placed in ETJ for C. of Lakeway)
Nov. 2009: 7 units Occ'ed, 4 Avail., 12 UC, & 65 dev'ed unit lots LTBO
for 130 SF lots tot (Shannon Burke-2011) use? could there be other SF or MF?] builder: Ryland Homes
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
14 15 15 13 6 3 1 0 0 0 63 4 67 0 8 3 11 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 14 5 0 0 76 35 111 2 0 16 1 1 17 2 1 16 2 1 15 2 1 15
13
14 16 14 11 14 13 15 14 18 19 69 79 148
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.42
0.14
0.35
0.14
0.48
0.09
104
PLANNING UNIT Lakeway MUD has 75 ac. of which 18 ac. will be for
Dec. 2010: 8 older homes and MH; no new activity; Nov.. 2009: only had 8 occ'ed, old area with MHs and no activity but will ultimately build-out 2008: plans for 28 ac. owned by Don Kahn; to be mixed use; with some residential, & incorporating Glen Heather into a town
7E
Glen Heather built-out Lakeway Dawlett's fut. retiree living & also "mixed use", inl. lofts, maybe MF) & Larry Niemann's Trust of 35+ ac. that will be exclusively comm-no MF TOTAL
square concept w/lofts, etc.;
7E
7E
7F
7F
7G
7G
8A
Falconhead - The Champions
240 total lots - builder: Monterrey Homes Dec. 2010: 233 Occ'ed, 2 Avail., 3 UC & 4 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 200 Occ'ed, 4 Avail., 1 UC & 35 dev'ed lots LTBO;
Monterrey Homes
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
$730-$1.8 mil.;
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9
0.42
0.23
0.82
105
8A
Falconhead - The Links St. Andrews
Spillman has 49 & 61 ac.,
8A
Falconhead completed in 2003 248 Total Units 91% occ. Ratio = 0.03 Falconhead Falconhead Apts.
8A
8A
8A
8A
8A
SW corner of Falconhead & RR 620 =MF Had been planned for MF; now Cottages (was MF w/Spanos-Greek billionaire for 300 units -- Barry Lewis had permitted for MF earlier)
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
3 4 4 5 3 3 1 0 0 0 19 4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 25 32 103 135 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 30 50 50 50 50 50 20 80 220 300
0.76
0.27
0.47
0.83
0.52
0.03
0.09
106
8A
Yaupon Creek
Dec. 2010: 42 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 1 UC & 2 dev'e dlots LTBO; almost built out; Nov. 2009: no activity yet Nov. 2008: 90 condos based on old general dev. plan approved by Austin & by Lakeway on both sides of the Creek & behind Lohman's Crossing retail
8A
Yaupon Creekside
Dec. 2010: no activity; for sale by C.B.R.E.;
8B
8B
45 dev'ed lots LTBO; builder: Ash Creek Homes-$230s 2009: trying to get a 51 unit develoment going, (shows GIS ownership as John Franklin
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 7 13 18 22 19 8 2 1 38 52 90
0.16
0.03
0.12
107
8B
Retama Garden Homes
53 total 2008: all built out, w/1 LTBO in Est's misc. bldrs & $330-$1.2 mil 70-110' wide lots Dec. 2010: built out Nov. 2009: built-out 21 units Nov. 2009: an assisted living
8B
Hills of Lakeway Villas Greens Condos Vista Oaks at Lakeway
8B
8B
8B
8B
Lake Travis Community Library Dec. 2010: under construction at 1930 Lohmans Crossing
S. of Lohmans Crossing-104 S/F cottages, 66 TH's & 100 condo units = 270 total units on 42 ac.
also will have on this side: 30,000-60,000 sq.ft. of office/retail space & 10,000-15,000 sq.ft. Library
NEW
Nov. 2008: 1930 Lohmans Crossing, some S/F & M/F, remainder=office/retail/library
N. of Lohmans Crossing-210 M/F units & a 50,000 sq.ft. office/retail spce on 19 acres
HOUSING
Dec. 2010: 2 Occ'ed, 1 Avail., 9 UC & 258 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: being cleared;
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
9 13 17 20 22 24 26 27 27 29 81 133 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.66
0.47
0.47
108
8C
8C
8C
8D
Serene Hills - Drees Homes - 2011: new sec. 1 will be in NE;
300+ SF w/100 ac. of commercial; 2011: considering smaller lots & 40 ac. of greenbelt (no middle sch.); was Heard Brothers; Mason Wood=dev'er; SF-dev'er=Meredith 425 ac. recently removed from Austin ETJ to Lakeway ETJ Dec. 2010: no activity; but roads & infrastructure is going in;
152 lots in Ph. I and 301 future lots by Dec. 2009, so total of 453 lots;
Dec. 2010: 232 Occ'ed, 17 Avail. (7 are models), 28 UC & 176 dev'ed lots LTBO;
NEW TOTAL
Nov. 2009: 91 Occ'ed, 23 Avail. (7 are models), 40 UC, & 148 dev'ed lots LTBO;
HOUSING
developer has 106 dev'ed lots still to be leveled; developer also is planning
OCCUPANCIES:
0 8 17 25 32 35 37 40 42 45 82 199 281
0.66
0.12
0.67
109
8D
Henning Heights 14 total lots Palomba at Flintrock Todd Knop has 18.5 ac. Andrew Heller has 10 & 5 ac.;
8D
8E
8E
8E
8E
8E
Flintrock Estates-Rusty Parker=dev'er;
R2 Development Prop. owns 101.2 ac. south off Flintrock Rd; now in City of Lakeway; as of2011: dev'er wants smaller lots, but still 15,000 sq. ft. lots; thus, new max.=2.9 lots/ac., so may increrase no. of lots; in the earlier July, 2008 plan, was to be 110 fut. lots
8E
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
0 0 5 9 13 15 16 16 17 18 27 82 109
2 2 12 15 19 21 24 24 28 30 50 127 177
50
50
50
20
50
50
0.17
0.44
0.5
0.5
0.5
110
8F
Reese Commercial=19 ac.; John Paul Dejoria=18 ac. Tim & Brenda Skaggs=37+ ac.; PEM-JTOC=17 ac.; Kenneth Margolis (Pacific Summit Ptnrs)=36 ac. Estates at Cherry Mountain
8F
8F
8F
8G
Dec. 2010: 13 Occ'ed & 25 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 12 Occ'ed & 26 dev'ed lots LTBO;
Nov. 2008: just been annexed by City of Lakeway and are 1-ac., single-family (R-1)
8G
Cherry Hill Farms (previously Hutto & Mitchum parcels) 28 large SF lots near Est's of Flintrock
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
1 2 3 3 2 2 3 4 3 2 11 14 25
0 0 0 3 5 4 3 3 2 1 8 13 21
11
15
16
18
18
19
21 39 92 131
0.38
0.12
0.51
0.54
0.5
111
8G
Flintrock/ Flintrock Falls Flintrock Falls/Villas I & Villas II
3 total lots
8G
8G
8G
8G
8G
9A
World of Tennis condos and Portion of Lakeway and Club Corp. Golf of Texas has 14.71 ac.
9A
Flintrock
The Overlook at
Flintrock/Bluffs
Pawnee Pass
7 tot. lots Nov. 2009: 184 Occ'ed, 4 Avail., 4 UC, & 150 dev'ed lots LTBO Nov. 2008: ~82 LTBO
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
TOTAL
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 4 85 77 162 0 12 0 18 0 23 0 20 0 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 19 2 1 17 3 0 16 2
14
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0.45
0.48
0.45
0.44
0.06
1.07
112
9B
Stoney Creek Santorini Villas Lakeway Patio Homes The Boulevard at Lakeway Marina Village at Lakeway
70 total waterfront condos
9B
9C
9C
9C
9C
9C
9C
9D
Dec. 2010: 50 units are built & 20 units still need to be completed; Nov. 2009: but only 40 now built Nov. 2008: demolished the casitas &
9D
Built-out
portion of
9D
Lakeway
Lakeway/Waterfront
built-out
and portion of
Lakeway
NEW TOTAL
built-out
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
TOTAL
0 4 7 9 9 7 2 2 0 1 0 26 4 30 1 1 0 36 6 42 2 3 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 10 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 5
7 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 35 2 37
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 35 2 37
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0.6
0.08
0.16
0.11
0.11
0.43
0.03
0.78
113
9E
Estates above Hurst Harbor 6 total lots lots ready for construction TOTAL TOTAL built-out & Lochan Ora addn. Lakeway/Cove Casa Verde Lakeway Annie Stewart Addn. MOF Yacht Harbor Mountain Acres
9E
9E
9E
9E
9E
9E
9F
9F
10A
10A
10A
Bella Strada - (previously part of Costa Bella)
Dec. 2010: 6 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 1 UC & 12 dev'ed lots LTBO; Nov. 2009: 5 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC, & 14 dev'ed lots LTBO July 2008: 4 homes avail. & 4 dev'ed SF lots ($1.3 mil-$2.5 mil) & 10 attached units
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
2 3 3 4 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 17 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 6 6 12
2010-2015
13
2015-2020
2010-2020
16
0.15
0.42
0.2
0.75
0.12
0.3
0.1
0.24
0.46
0.17
114
10A
Vineyard Bay MUD # 17 has
18 total attached units platted; and Nov. 2009: 41 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 1 UC, & 13 dev'ed lots LTBO slow growth - because it is an older neighborhood 1 UC & 12 dev'ed lots LTBO Dec. 2010: 45 Occ'ed, 0 Avail.,
10A
Jess King has 6.47; RV Park 58 ac. in this PU and in PU 10C & Reserve at Hudson Bend other PU's
(part of this subd.
10B
Travis County La Hacienda Estates La Hacienda Estates Vista Grande
10B
10B
10B
10C
10C
10C
10C
13 smaller parcels
in floodway and on Lake Travis that can still be subdivided with 4 homes under const. at this time - need to channel & improve drainage for lots
10C
LCRA has two parcels in this PU
Buffalo Gap
built out
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
TOTAL
0 1 2 2 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 8 6 14 0 0 37 37 0 0 29 29 0 0 8 8 4 4 8 0 7 0 7 1 0 6 0 6 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 5 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 5 0 5 1 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 5 6 0
1 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 2 11 9
3 5 3 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 18 13 31
2010-2015
2015-2020
2010-2020
0.34
0.67
0.4
0.12
1.08
0.06
0.13
0.34
115
11A
Maravilla & Maravilla Hills Apache Shores
11A
11A
11A
11B
Nov. 2009: basically built-out also refer to PU's 11D & 11E
11B
Balcones Canyonland Preserve, with
no development in this permanent environmental preserve
NEW TOTAL
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
4 3 2 4 3 4 3 4 2 4 16 17 33 19 10 9 3 1 8 10 32 43 75 2 9 3 9 1 7 2 8 3 6 2 8 1 6
9 10 12 13 13 12 15 15 11 17 57 70 127
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
2010-2015
2015-2020
2010-2020
0.45
0.57
0.33
0.66
116
11C
Cardinal Hill Estates II & Windmill Bluff Estates Highland Club Village
11C
11C
11C
11C
11C
11D
Apache Shores
Nov. 2009: built-out in PU 11 D also refer to PU's 11B & 11E
11D
Preliminary Plan filed in Jan. 2008-CW Capital Fund One = 70 lots (63 SF, 6 Open, & 1 ROW)
Dec. 2010: no home construction, but infrastructure is in; waiting on varience; gated
Nov. 2009: no home construction yet; electricity and water and other infrastructure are in;
NEW
variance filed to build on steep slope, Planning Dept., City of Austin recommended acceptance
HOUSING
(part may have been planed Cloudy Ridge dev. w/398 apt. units, but need continued review)
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
TOTAL
2 6 7 9 10 9 8 6 4 2 34 29 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 40 13 53 0 0 8 0 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 8 0 0 6
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
7 12 16 20 21 17 11 8 4 2 76 42 118
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
2010-2015
2015-2020
2010-2020
0.66
0.22
0.34
0.33
0.43
0.66
117
11E
Lakewind on Lake Travis The Enclave at Hudson Bend
22 townhomes total Dec. 2010: 10 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 0 UC & 12 dev'ed lots LTBO Nov. 2009: 2 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 6 UC, & 14 dev'ed lots LTBO some clearing of the land; Garret-Ihnen Engr. (Aaron Pesek - 512-454-2400) Nov. 2009: no home construction yet; land; Michael Marino-214-696-3968 Dec. 2010: no activity; some clearing of built out
11E
Beby's Ranch Point built-out Vistas of McCormick Mountain - 71 lots Commander's and
$500-$700
12A
12A
12A
12A
12A
12A
12A
Villas on Lake Travis (was Villas at Commander's Point)
Dec. 2010: 48 Occ'ed, 0 Avail., 2 UC & 28 dev'ed lots LTBO; gated Nov. 2009: 48 Occ'ed & ~27 dev'ed lots LTBO July 2008: 50'wide lots; ~44 UC/occ'ed, 39
Apache Shores
in PU 11 E
NEW
HOUSING
vacant lots & 10 avail.; potentially 74 total lots when completed; $400-$800
OCCUPANCIES:
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 13 0 12 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 7 8 9 16 37 53 1 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 5 1 0 1 0 4 2 0 6 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
2 2 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 3 14 16 30
2010-2015
2015-2020
2010-2020
0.66
0.12
0.68
0.12
0.44
0.06
0.67
0.05
118
12A
Hudson Bend Colony Reserve at Hudson Bend basically built-out 2004: built-out
(part of this subd. is also in PU 10C)
12B
Emerald Point-plat submission and now in floodway of Lake Travis, but could have higher density residential land uses, and do not expect any commercial use TOTAL 16 parcels which are smaller 39 lots built-out
12B
12B
12B
12B
12B
12B
GRAND TOTAL
built-out
NEW
HOUSING
OCCUPANCIES:
TOTAL
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 14 50 2 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 11 1 0 14 3 3 4 4 4 5 8 20 28 0 0 10 2 1 0 7 2 0 0 5 1
12
11
10
14
10
6 6 4 5 46 35 81
12
13
13
2010-2015
49
2015-2020
62
2010-2020
111
437 549 731 888 993 1,068 1,094 1,016 1,024 1,064 3,598 5,266 8,864
0.34 0.11 x
17 35 51 252 358 355 324 349 352 324 713 1,704 2,417
454 584 782 1,140 1,351 1,423 1,418 1,365 1,376 1,388 4,311 6,970 11,281
0.45
0.06
0.13
1.08
119
of Ratios
Planning Unit
2A 3G 3D 2A 5A 5A 10C/12B 9A 6C 5B 2A
Development
Bee Creek Ranchettes Meadowfox Estates Destiny Hills Tiburon Hills Lake Ponte - Canyon Vista Lake Pointe - The Estates Reserve at Hudson Bend Lakeway The Enclave at Kollmeyer Springs Ridge at Alta Vista Windy Walk Estates
Ratio
3.00 2.17 1.71 1.25 1.19 1.08 1.08 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00
120
Thelowestratioswerefoundinthefollowingsubdivisions:
Planning Unit
10A 8E 9F 8B 2C 2C 10C 9C
Development
Buffalo Gap Henning Heights Lochan Ora Addition Retama Garden Homes Rough Hollow - The Overlook Rough Hollow - The Woodlands La Hacienda Estates RV Park Lake Chandon
Ratio
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.08
121
122
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Brass Buttons Trail Chisholm Trail White Dove Pass Whitebead Trail Branding Iron Pass Colt Dr 1.40 28 20 15 0.75 7 0.35 1.25 40 32 22 0.69 7 0.22 0.74 14 19 10 0.53 0 0.00 4 11 6 0.48 10 21 5 0.24 2 0.10 3 0.29 8 28 0 0.00 5 0.18 3 0.28 15 54 6 0.11 4 0.07 5 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.21 0.34 0.30 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
Apache Shores
58
0.33
25
0.14 22%
0.08 0.00 0.17
32
0.18 28%
2 1 4 0.15 0.07 0.67
7E
Arbolago
Weighted Ratio: 20 Percent by Grade Group:
Hornsby Hill Rd 0.18 4 22 4
0.61 33
11
0.33 55%
0.18
0.06 10%
0 0.00
0.21 35%
0 0.00
12A
Weighted Ratio: 4 Percent by Grade Group:
Avispa Way Cueva Circle Cueva Drive 0.22 0.00 0.29 4 0 2 14 3 9
Beby's Ranch
0.18 22
0.18 100%
0 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.11
0.00 0%
1 0 0 0.07 0.00 0.00
0.00 0%
3 0 1 0.21 0.00 0.11
3D
0.23 6
3
1 26
0.04 17%
1 1 1.00
0.04 17%
1 1.00
0.15 67%
1 1.00
2A
Weighted Ratio:
3.00 3 1
1.00 33%
0.17 1 6 0 0.00
1.00 33%
1 0.17
1.00 33%
0 0.00
10A
Bella Strada
0.17 1 6
0.00 0%
0.17 100%
0.00 0%
123
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Flagler Lynchburg Glenville Cv Bellancia 1.50 3 2 3 1.50 0 0.00 0 1.20 6 5 4 0.80 1 0.20 1 0.77 10 13 6 0.46 2 0.15 2 0.54 7 13 6 0.46 0 0.00 1 0.08 0.15 0.20 0.00 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
3D
Belvedere
Weighted Ratio: 26 Percent by Grade Group:
Lake Drive Rd Oak Ridge Dr Cory Ln 0.00 0 2 0 0.00 0.45 5 11 1 0.09 3 0 0.00 0 4 0 0.00 0
19
0.58
0.09
0.12 15%
0 1 0 0.00 0.09 0.00
1B
0.29 17 20%
0.00
0.06
0.18 60%
1 0.08
0.06 20%
4 0.33
9E
Weighted Ratio: 5 Percent by Grade Group:
Buffalo Gap Rd (1488-1899) 0.00 0 10 0
Brooks Hollow
0.42 12
0.00 0%
0.00
0.08 20%
0 0.00
0.33 80%
0 0.00
10A
Weighted Ratio: 0 Percent by Grade Group:
Delsie Sledge Barrie Joseph 0.16 0.39 0.21 0.14 2 4 14 5
Buffalo Gap
0.00
0 10
0.00 0%
14 25 36 24 1 3 10 3 0.07 0.12 0.28 0.13
0.00 0%
1 0 2 2 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.08
0.00 0%
0 1 2 0 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.00
6A
0.25 25
2.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 4 2 0 0
17 99
0.17 68%
2 7 4 5 2 2 0 0 1.00 0.29 0.00 0.00
0.05 20%
2 0 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.03 12%
0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
11C
124
0.33 6 18
0.22 67%
0.11 33%
0.00 0%
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Oak Glen Oak Bluff Crescent Bluff (100-214) 0.19 4 21 2 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.00 0 15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.10 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
9E
Cedar Glen
Weighted Ratio: 4 Percent by Grade Group:
Wild Cherry Peak Lookout 0.50 6 12 1 0.08 1 1.00 1 1 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.08
0.15 26 50% 0%
0.08
0.00
0.08 50%
1 4 1.00 0.33
8G
Weighted Ratio: 7 Percent by Grade Group:
Agarita Rd 0.67 2 3 1 0.33
Cherry Mountain
0.54 13 14%
1
0.08
0.08 14%
0.33
0.38 71%
0 0.00
12A
Weighted Ratio: 2 Percent by Grade Group:
Bella Cima Dr Bella Riva Dr Bella Vista Cv 0.17 1 0.70 7 10 6 0.77 20 26 12 5 0
Commanders Point
0.67 3 1
0.33 50%
0.46 0.50 0.00
0.33 50%
4 1 0 0.15 0.10 0.00
0.00 0%
4 1 1 0.15 0.10 0.17
10A 10B
Weighted Ratio: 28 Percent by Grade Group:
Cypress Knee White Magnolia Cir Juniper Berry 0.75 0.73 0.38 10 38 8 26 51 11
Costa Bella
0.67
17 42
0.40 61%
6 14 3 0.23 0.27 0.27
0.12 18%
2 11 2 0.08 0.22 0.18
0.14 21%
2 13 3 0.08 0.25 0.27
6A
0.64 56
0.42 1.00 5 3
23 88
0.26 41%
12 3 2 0 0.17 0.00
15
0.17 27%
2 1 0.17 0.33
18
0.20 32%
1 2 0.08 0.67
1B
Weighted Ratio:
Crosswind
0.53 8 15
0.13 25%
0.20 38%
0.20 38%
125
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Destiny Cv Destiny Hills Dr 2.50 10 4 5 1.25 3 0.75 2 0.67 2 3 1 0.33 1 0.33 0 0.00 0.50 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
3D
Weighted Ratio: 12 Percent by Grade Group:
Timberline Dr Overlook Cir Edgewater Dr 0.08 1 13 1 0.08 0 0.29 2 7 0 0.00 2 0.00 0 4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.29 0.00
Destiny Hills
1.71 7 50% 33%
0 0 0
0.86
0.57
0.29 17%
0.00 0.00 0.00
1B
Edgewater Beach
Weighted Ratio: 3 Percent by Grade Group:
1.00 11 11 2 0.18
0.13 24 33%
0.04
0.08 67%
6 0.55
0.00 0%
3 0.27
6C
1.00 11 Percent by Grade Group:
Bat Hawk Circle Bat Falcon Dr Hookbilled Kite Spillman Ranch Loop 0.79 92 0.73 19 0.83 19 23 26 116 1.04 25 24 11 9 12 54
0.18 18%
0.46 0.39 0.46 0.47
0.55 55%
6 3 5 13 0.25 0.13 0.19 0.11
0.27 27%
8 7 2 25 0.33 0.30 0.08 0.22
8A
86
0.46 55%
8 16 6 7 9 1 4 2 1.13 0.06 0.67 0.29
27
0.14 17%
1 2 0 1 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.14
42
0.22 27%
0 6 1 1 0.00 0.38 0.17 0.14
8A
0.76 28 37
16
0.43 57%
0.27 4 15 4 0.27
0.11 14%
0 0.00
0.22 29%
0 0.00
8A
0.27 100%
0.00 0%
0.00 0%
126
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name American Kestrel Dr Coopers Hawk Cove 0.20 3 15 2 0.13 0 0.00 1 0.58 21 36 9 0.25 4 0.11 8 0.22 0.07 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
8A
Weighted Ratio: 24 Percent by Grade Group:
Broadwinged Hawk Dr (14300-14532) Broadwinged Hawk Cove (3700-3720) 0.29 2 7 2 0.29 0 0.96 27 28 12 0.43 8 0.29 0.00
11
0.22
0.08
0.18 38%
0.25 0.00
8A
Weighted Ratio: 29 Percent by Grade Group:
Vail Divide Swiss Alps Ct Mont Blanc Snowdonia Cv 0.71 10 14 5 0.66 37 56 17 0.14 1 7 1 0.14 0.30 0.36 0.72 38 53 23 0.43
Falconhead - St Andrews
0.83 35 48%
7 0 8 1
14
0.40
0.23 28%
0.13 0.00 0.14 0.07
0.20 24%
8 0 12 4 0.15 0.00 0.21 0.29
8C
Falconhead - West
Weighted Ratio: 86 Percent by Grade Group:
Henning Dr Shane Landon 0.00 0 0.00 0 4 1 0 0
0.66 130
46
0.35 53%
0.00 0.00
16
0.12 19%
0 0 0.00 0.00
24
0.18 28%
0 0 0.00 0.00
8E
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Highland Dr (3700-4029) Lago Vista Dr 0.08 0.36 1 4
Henning Heights
0.00 0
0 5
0.00 0%
13 11 0 3 0.00 0.27
0.00 0%
1 1 0.08 0.09
0.00 0%
0 0 0.00 0.00
11C
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Autumn Oaks Dr Stillmeadow Dr (1-75) Drifting Wind Run Falling Oaks Trl Hedgebrook Way
0.21 5
0.69 0.60 0.85 0.67 0.61 22 25 17 12 17
3 24
0.13 60%
32 42 20 18 28 8 7 9 5 8 0.25 0.17 0.45 0.28 0.29
0.08 40%
7 8 3 2 2 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.11 0.07
0.00 0%
7 10 5 5 7 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.28 0.25
8B
Hills of Lakeway
127
0.66 93 140
37
0.26 40%
22
0.16 24%
34
0.24 37%
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name 5220 Hudson Bend Road 0.06 6 104 2 0.02 2 0.02 2 0.02 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
Weighted Ratio: 6 Percent by Grade Group:
Lake Chandon 0.08 1 12 1 0.08 0 0.00
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
10C
0.06 104 33% 0.08 1 Percent by Grade Group:
Travis Vista Raynham Hill 0.00 0 4 0 0.00 0.43 3 7 2 0.29 1 0
0.02
0.02
0.02 33%
0.00
9C
Weighted Ratio: 12 100% 0%
0.14 0.00
Lake Chandon
1 0.08 0 0.00
0.00 0%
0 0 0.00 0.00
2E
Weighted Ratio: 3 Percent by Grade Group:
Pointe View Dr 1.19 51 43 37
0.18
0.09 33%
9 0.21
0.00 0%
5 0.12
5A
Weighted Ratio: 51 Percent by Grade Group:
Carlsbad Dr Fairfax Ridge Pl Loomis Dr 1.31 17 1.03 30 1.05 62 59 29 13 37 13 9
0.86 73%
0.63 0.45 0.69
0.21 18%
13 7 5 0.22 0.24 0.38
0.12 10%
12 10 3 0.20 0.34 0.23
5A
59
0.58 54%
12 37 7 16 0.58 0.43
25
0.25 23%
6 10 0.50 0.27
25
0.25 23%
0 5 0.00 0.14
5A
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Windswept Dr Lake Stone Dr (11900-12220) Nevada Dr
0.90 44
0.65 0.84 0.80 15 27 8
23 49
0.47 52%
23 32 10 6 20 7 0.26 0.63 0.70
16
0.33 36%
6 5 1 0.26 0.16 0.10
0.10 11%
3 2 0 0.13 0.06 0.00
5A
0.77 50 65
33
0.51 66%
12
0.18 24%
0.08 10%
128
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Emerald Falls Sundown Dr Cascade Falls Dr 1.00 36 36 17 0.47 4 0.11 15 0.65 11 17 5 0.29 5 0.29 1 0.64 27 42 18 0.43 6 0.14 3 0.07 0.06 0.42 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
5A
40
0.42
15
0.16
19
0.20 26%
10 4 9 0.45 0.15 0.23
5A
0.90 87 44%
0.08 0.21 0.17
34
0.39
21
0.24 27%
0 0 5 0.00 0.00 0.21
23
0.26 29%
0 0 2 0.00 0.00 0.08
7A 7B
Weighted Ratio: 16 Percent by Grade Group:
Lakeway Blvd Schooner Dr Tallstar Dr 0.47 0.96 26 9 1.39 61 44 27 19 21 16 5
Lakeway
0.25 63
0.14 56%
0.48 0.59 0.26
0.08 31%
18 6 2 0.41 0.22 0.11
0.03 13%
22 4 2 0.50 0.15 0.11
9A
Lakeway
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Eagle Dragon Mariner 0.79 0.94 0.22
1.07 96
33 17 8
42 90
0.47 44%
42 18 36 17 9 3 0.40 0.50 0.08
26
0.29 27%
9 2 1 0.21 0.11 0.03
28
0.31 29%
7 6 4 0.17 0.33 0.11
9B
Lakeway
Weighted Ratio:
0.60 58 96
29
0.30 50%
0.39 0.39 0.60 9 24 12 23 61 20 3 12 6 0.13 0.20 0.30
12
0.13 21%
1 3 2 0.04 0.05 0.10
17
0.18 29%
5 9 4 0.22 0.15 0.20
9C
Lakeway
129
0.43 45 104
21
0.20 47%
0.06 13%
18
0.17 40%
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Porpoise Bermuda Sunfish 2.00 28 14 14 1.00 4 0.29 10 0.30 7 23 3 0.13 1 0.04 3 0.52 12 23 6 0.26 3 0.13 3 0.13 0.13 0.71 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
9D
Lakeway
Weighted Ratio: 47 Percent by Grade Group:
Challenger (905-1240) Electra Snapper 0.71 12 17 2 0.12 4 0.32 13 41 3 0.07 2 0.24 21 87 6 0.07 6 0.07 0.05 0.24
23
0.38
0.13
16
0.27 34%
9 8 6 0.10 0.20 0.35
9E
Lakeway
Weighted Ratio: 46 Percent by Grade Group:
Lago Viento Laguna Grande 0.71 5 7 4 0.67 16 24 4
11
0.08
12
0.08 26%
3 0 0.13 0.00
23
0.16 50%
9 1 0.38 0.14
12A
Weighted Ratio: 21 Percent by Grade Group:
Ameno Dr Far Vela Ln 0.63 10 1.80 9 5 16 2 4
Lakewind Estates
0.68 31 8
0.26 38%
0.40 0.25
0.10 14%
2 4 0.40 0.25
10
0.32 48%
5 2 1.00 0.13
6D
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Casablanca Ln 0.00 0
Laws Addition
0.90 19
6 21
0.29 32%
3 0 0.00
0.29 32%
0 0.00
0.33 37%
0 0.00
9F
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Sailors Run Mooring Cir Deerhorn Ct
0.00 0
1.18 0.67 0.32 20 26 6
0 3
0.00 0%
17 39 19 7 12 1 0.41 0.31 0.05
0.00 0%
4 7 3 0.24 0.18 0.16
0.00 0%
9 7 2 0.53 0.18 0.11
7D
0.69 52 75
20
0.27 38%
14
0.19 27%
18
0.24 35%
130
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Kevin Pamela Ct Lariat Trl Sutton Dr 0.67 2 3 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.44 11 25 1 0.04 4 0.16 6 0.15 2 13 2 0.15 0 0.00 0 0.26 5 19 2 0.11 1 0.05 2 0.11 0.00 0.24 0.67 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
11A
Maravilla
Weighted Ratio: 20 Percent by Grade Group:
Cat Hollow Club Dr (600-1309) 0.11 4 36 2 0.06 1
5 25%
0.03
0.08
0.08
10
0.17 50%
1 0.03
1A
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Lone Rider Trl (13700-13951)
0.03 25%
0.67
0.03 25%
4 0.67
3G
Weighted Ratio: 13 Percent by Grade Group:
Debba Dr (15700-15816) 0.25 2 8 1
Meadowfox Estates
2.17 6 5
0.83 38%
0.13
0.67 31%
1 0.13
0.67 31%
0 0.00
10A
Weighted Ratio: 2 Percent by Grade Group:
Lambardia Bellagio Lake Como Montalcino 0.20 0.14 0.73 0.00 0 11 1 1 4 15 7 5
Mountain Acres
0.25 8
0.13 50%
0 6 1 0 0.00 0.40 0.14 0.00
0.13 50%
0 3 0 1 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20
0.00 0%
0 2 0 0 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00
7E
0.42 13
5 0 2
7 31
0.23 54%
17 13 23 1 0 0 0.06 0.00 0.00
0.13 31%
2 0 0 0.12 0.00 0.00
0.06 15%
2 0 2 0.12 0.00 0.09
1A
Old Ferry
Weighted Ratio:
0.13 7 53
0.02 14%
0.04 29%
0.08 57%
131
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Top of Texas Trl Texas Wildlife Trl Native Texas Trl 1.00 3 3 1 0.33 1 0.33 1 0.53 8 15 5 0.33 2 0.13 1 1.00 7 7 5 0.71 2 0.29 0 0.00 0.07 0.33 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
11
0.44
0.20
0.08 11%
5 1 0.16 0.20
10C 12B
Weighted Ratio: 40 Percent by Grade Group:
Retama 0.00 0 53 0 0.00
23
0.62
11
0.30 28%
0.00
0.16 15%
0 0.00
8B
Weighted Ratio: 0 Percent by Grade Group:
Sunrise Ridge 1.00 18 18 7
0.00 0%
0.39
0.00 0%
6 0.33
0.00 0%
5 0.28
0.39 39%
0 2 0.00 0.22
0.33 33%
0 0 0.00 0.00
0.28 28%
0 1 0.00 0.11
2C
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
0.40
2 3
2
0.18 11 67%
5 0 0.00
0.00 0%
1 0.20
0.09 33%
1 0.20
2C
0.40 2
0.00 0
0 5
0.00 0%
1 0 0.00
0.20 50%
0 0.00
0.20 50%
0 0.00
2C
0.00 0 1
0.00 0%
0.00 0%
0.00 0%
132
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Stone Shadow Cv Canyon Turn Trl Rought Hollow Cv 0.00 0 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.25 2 8 2 0.25 0 0.00 0 4.00 4 1 0 0.00 3 3.00 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
2C
0.18
0.27
0.09 17%
0 0 0.00 0.00
2C
Weighted Ratio: 0 Percent by Grade Group:
Saddlehorn (106-611) Winchester Dr (300-408) 0.87 13 15 8 0.72 34 47 15 0.32 0.53
0.00
0.00 0%
0.17 0.33
0.00 0%
11 0 0.23 0.00
3E
Weighted Ratio: 47 Percent by Grade Group:
Debco (900-1109) Windy Shores Loop Moon Dance 0.17 2 0.15 5 0.27 4 15 34 12 2 3 1
Saddletree Ranch
0.76 62 23
0.37 49%
0.13 0.09 0.08
13
0.21 28%
1 0 1 0.07 0.00 0.08
11
0.18 23%
1 2 0 0.07 0.06 0.00
1B
Siesta Shores
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Mountain Terrace Stone Terrace Green Terrace 0.33 0.43 0.21 2 6 3
0.18 11 61
0.10 55%
6 14 14 0 3 3 0.00 0.21 0.21
0.03 18%
0 1 0 0.00 0.07 0.00
0.05 27%
2 2 0 0.33 0.14 0.00
6A
0.32 11
1.25 5
6 34
0.18 55%
4 1 0.25
0.03 9%
1 0.25
0.12 36%
3 0.75
2A
Weighted Ratio:
Tiburon Hills
1.25 5 4
0.25 20%
0.25 20%
0.75 60%
133
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Arroyo Rd Lands End Rainbow One 0.17 5 30 2 0.07 2 0.07 1 0.06 2 36 1 0.03 1 0.03 0 0.17 4 24 1 0.04 2 0.08 1 0.04 0.00 0.03 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
12A
Travis Landing
Weighted Ratio: 11 Percent by Grade Group:
Mettle Dr Parker Bend Strader Circle 0.55 6 11 2 0.18 1 0.00 0 12 0 0.00 0 0.10 2 21 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.09
0.04
0.06
0.02 18%
2 0 3 0.10 0.00 0.27
6A
0.18 44 25%
0.21 0.00 0.22
0.05
0.02 13%
4 0 1 0.14 0.00 0.06
0.11 63%
3 0 3 0.10 0.00 0.17
10B
Vineyard Bay
Weighted Ratio: 21 Percent by Grade Group:
Vista Estates Dr Vista Estates Ct 0.43 3 0.50 2 4 7
0.40 53
10
0.19 48%
1 1 0.25 0.14
0.09 24%
0 1 0.00 0.14
0.11 29%
1 1 0.25 0.14
2A
Weighted Ratio: Percent by Grade Group:
Pescado Conejo Culebra Gavilan 0.14 0.00 0.33 0.00 1 0 1 0
Vista Estates
0.45
2 5 11
0.18 40%
7 3 3 3 0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00
0.09 20%
1 0 0 0 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.18 40%
0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10C
Vista Grande
Weighted Ratio:
0.13 2 16
0.06 50%
0.27 0.83 0.00 0.38 7 19 0 3 26 23 2 8 2 9 0 0 0.08 0.39 0.00 0.00
0.06 50%
1 5 0 1 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.13
0.00 0%
4 5 0 2 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.25
1B
134
0.49 29 59
11
0.19 38%
0.12 24%
11
0.19 38%
Lake Travis I.S.D.: Ratio of Students per Single Family Home by Subdivision
Street Name Rose Grass Ln Cypress Ranch Texas Blue Bell Rock Wren 0.18 2 11 2 0.18 0 0.00 0 1.02 42 41 23 0.56 12 0.29 7 0.54 14 26 6 0.23 4 0.15 4 0.86 12 14 3 0.21 3 0.21 6 0.43 0.15 0.17 0.00 Ratio Students Homes Students Ratio Students Ratio Students Ratio Total # of # of
Planning
Unit
Subdivision
PK-5th
6th-8th
9th-12th
3A
34
0.37
19
0.21
17
0.18 24%
3 5 0 0.33 0.38 0.00
11C
0.65 26 35%
0.67
0.23
0.12 18%
1 0.33
0.31 47%
0 0.00
2A
Weighted Ratio: 3 Percent by Grade Group: 3 1.00 2
0.67 67%
0.33 33%
0.00 0%
TOTAL:
1,973
3,487
0.57
135
Map Layers
District Boundary
dR
Subdivision Ratios
0.00 - 0.13 0.14 - 0.27 0.28 - 0.49 0.50 - 0.68
Reserve at Hudson Bend 12B 1.08
Pace Be n
1A
Marina Club Villas 0.11
Be
C re ek
Th urm
an
wa y
dD
r.
9A
6 20
3A
2D 3B
ew
s ro s
ay
2B
w in
O ld
er
F
ry
2A
Ro ad
d Rd.
Edgewater Beach 0.13 Beby's Ranch 0.18 Lakewind Estates 0.68 Commanders Point Vista Grande 0.67 0.13 11C Highland Club Village 0.21 Cardinal Hills Estates 2 0.33 Windmill Bluff Estates Maravilla 0.65 0.33
Be e
1B 10B 9F
Brooks Hollow 0.42 Cedar Glen 0.15 Vineyard Bay 0.4 Costa Bella 0.67
o ad
0.29
11A
11E 11D
Apache Shores 0.66
9E
Marina Village Lakeway 0.78 0.03 Vistas @ Lake Travis Big Bee Creek 0.49 Crosswind 0.53
9B
Lakeway 0.43
7D North Lakeway Village 9D Lohmans Crossing Estates 0.42 0.69 Lakeway 7E 0.32 7G
Lakeway 7C 1.07 Lakeway Lake Chandon RM 0.6 7B 9C 0.08 Lakeway Blv d . Courtyard at the Preserve 0.25 0.64 Terrace at the Preserve M L ak 7A urfi 0.32 nR 8B Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills d. 0.25 Hills of Lakeway 0.66 6A 7F Travis Oak Trails 0.18
11B
La k
Dr.
6C
Koll meyer
D r.
2C
6B
8G
2E 8E 8D 3C
Cherry Mountain 0.54 Falconhead - The Links 0.47 8C Falconhead - St. Andrews 8A Falconhead - West 0.83 Falconhead - The Legends 0.66 Falconhead - The Champions 0.27 SH 71 0.82 Falconhead - The Heights 0.76 Bee Cave West 0.23 Meadowfox Estates 2.17
5B 5A
Lake Pointe - Vista Pointe 0.9 Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista 1.19 Lake Pointe - The Preserve 0.77 Lake Pointe - The Landing 5C 0.9 Lake Pointe - The Setting SH 71 Lake Pointe - The Estates 0.78 1.08
RM
Ha
3D
8F
620
n Pool Rd milto
Belvedere 0.79
3J
Preserve at Barton Creek 0.72
3G
Ro Ham ilton Pool ad
3H
3E
Cru m ley R
3F
an
ch
Road
4 Miles
136
LakeTravisI.S.D.: RatioofStudentsPerApartmentUnit
6th-8th
Students Ratio
9th-12th
Students Ratio
PU
12601 Bee Caves Pkwy 13401 Galleria Circle 3400 Ranch Road 620 S 3400 FM 620 S Marina Village Cove 100% 1 40 33 82% 14% 7 248 226 91% 46% 19% 0.00 1 14% 0.03 0 0% 37 309 294 95%
Apartment Complex
Street Address
Total Students
Total Units
EE-5th Occupied % Students per Students Ratio Units Occupied Occ Unit
5C
17 0.06 7
Alexan Galleria
0.13 0.03
1
0.02
0.04
8A
Falconhead
0.02
9D
1
0.03
0.00
7A
Summit
8G
12531 W HWY 71 46 293 278 95%
Tuscan
3H
0.17 0.11
26 57%
0.09
8 17%
0.03
12 26%
0.04
91
890
831
93%
45 49%
0.05
16 18%
0.02
30 33%
0.04
137
ce
Be
10C 1A
d s on Bend R d.
Pa
Th ur m
an
Be
nd R d .
12A
1B
H
9F 10B
R M 620
11C
Ro a d
Rd.
H ur s t Cree k
wa y
La ke
Fla
Dr.
l oB mi n g
C lu
ive R.O. Dr
. vd
9C
7G
bh
ou
in d
sw
Cro
2B
La
2C
ke w a y B
B lv
Highl a n
ek Bee Cre
3C
10A
Oa
kG
r ov eB
11E
9E 2A
Ste war
7E
lvd .
11A 11D
t Rd
Running
.
De e
rT rl.
. Dr
9D
Loh m
9B
7D
r. se D
6C
11B
ng s si R d. Cro ans
ck Du
7B
Koll meyer
7C
D r.
La k
9A
eD
lvd.
r. L a k ew
20 M6
ay
d.
7A
Mu rfi
6A
6B
ds B lv d
nR d.
7F 8B
2D
6D 3B 2E 8G 5B
Map Layers
8E
Falconhead 0.03
RM
0 62
8A 5A
8D 8C
Apartment Ratios
0.03 0.13 0.17
3D
SH 71
8F
SH 71
FM 2 2 44
4
3J
3F 3E
Cr umley
Ra nch
Road
[
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
138
LakeTravisI.S.D.:TrendsinRatiosofStudentsperHousehold
Planning Unit 5B 11B, 11D, 11E 7E 12A 3D 2B 2A 10A 3D 1B 1B 9E 10A 6A 6A 6C 11A 11C 9E 8A 12A 10A & 10B 6A 9E 1B 3D 1B 6C 5B 5B 8G 8A 8A 8A 8A 8A 8C 8B 8D 2D 7A 3C 8B 11A 11C 8D 3E 3G 12B 10C 10C 9C 2D 6C 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 7E Subdivision Alta Vista - The Ridge Apache Shores Arbolago Beby's Ranch Bee Cave West Bee Creek Esates Bee Creek Ranchettes Bella Strada Belvedere Big Bee Creek Briarcliff Brooks Hollow Buffalo Gap Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Estates Cardinal Hill Estates II Cedar Glen Cherry Mountain Commanders Point Costa Bella Courtyard at the Preserve Cove at Lakeway Crosswind Destiny Hills Edgewater Beach The Enclave at Kollmeyer Springs Enclave North Enclave South Estates at Flintrock Falconhead - Saint Andrews Falconhead - The Champions Falconhead - The Heights Falconhead - The Legends Falconhead - The Links Falconhead - West Flint Rock at Hurst Creek - Flint Rock Falls Flint Rock at Hurst Creek - Villas at Flintrock Flint Rock Estates Glen Heather Hamilton Hills Henning Heights Highland Club Village Highland Club Village Hills of Lakeway Hilltop Manor, Twin Lake Hills, Valley Lake Hills The Homestead Hudson Bend Colony La Hacienda Estates La Hacienda Estates RV Park Lake Chandon Lake Country Estates Lake Oak Estates Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista Lake Point - The Estates Lake Pointe - The Landing Lake Pointe - The Preserve Lake Pointe - The Setting Lake Pointe - Vista Pointe Lakeside at North Lakeway October 2006 0.91 0.61 July 2008 0.34 0.38 November 2009 January 2011 0.66 0.61 0.18 0.23 3.00 0.17 0.79 0.29 0.42 0.00 0.25
0.60
0.45 0.20 0.42 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.15 0.54 0.67 0.67 0.64 0.53 1.71 0.13 1.00
0.13 0.59 0.33 0.49 0.88 0.08 0.42 0.44 0.04 1.50 0.56 0.67 0.00 0.22 0.18 0.29 0.61 0.33 0.49 0.88 0.08 0.42 0.44 0.04 0.44 0.69 0.83 0.75 0.40 0.48 0.83 0.82 0.76 0.27 0.47 0.66
0.00 0.15 0.47 0.61 0.14 0.83 0.47 0.13 0.06 0.08 0.27 1.19 1.08 0.90 0.77 0.78 0.90 0.21 0.66
"Green" subdivisions indicate continued increases in the number of students per home. "Yellow" subdivisions show areas where ratios are declining.
139
LakeTravisI.S.D.:TrendsinRatiosofStudentsperHousehold
Planning Unit 5B 7A 7B 7C 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 12A 1C 6D 3A 7D 2D 11A 1A 3G 10A 7E 1A 7E 2A 4 10C, 12B 8B 5B 2C 2C 2C 2C 2C 2C 3F 1C 3H 6A 2A 12A 6A 2B 4 3E 8G 8B 10B 2A 11C 1B 3E 3A 8G 11A 2A 12B 8B Subdivision Alta Vista - The Ridge Lakeway Lakeway Lakeway Lakeway Lakeway Lakeway Lakeway Lakeway Lakewind Estates Lakewood Estates Laws Addition Lick Creek Ranch Lohmans Crossing Estates Majestic Hills Ranchettes Maravilla Marina Club Villas Meadow Fox Estates Mountain Acres North Lakeway Village Old Ferry Overlook at North Lakeway Pale Face Ranch Preserve at Barton Creek Reserve at Hudson Bend Retama Garden Homes Ridge at Alta Vista Rough Hollow Rough Hollow - East Rim Rough Hollow - The Bluffs Rough Hollow - The Overlook Rough Hollow - Water's Edge Rough Hollow - The Woodlands Saddletree Ranch Siesta Shores Spanish Oaks Terrace at the Preserve Tiburon Hills Travis Landing Travis Oak Trails Travis Settlement The Uplands Twin Lake Hills Villas at Flintrock Villas at the Hills Vineyard Bay Vista Estates Vista Grande Vistas at Lake Travis West Cave Estates West Cypress Hills Wild Cherry Windmill Bluff Estates Windy Walk Estates Woods of Lake Travis Yaupon Creek October 2006 0.91 0.33 0.19 0.36 0.43 0.19 0.25 0.25 1.07 0.60 0.43 0.78 0.32 0.68 0.90 0.30 0.63 0.10 0.00 0.44 0.35 2.33 0.33 0.11 2.17 0.25 0.42 0.13 0.30 0.69 July 2008 November 2009 January 2011
0.82
0.82
0.72 1.08 0.00 1.00 0.27 0.40 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.76 0.18 0.32 1.25 0.12 0.18
0.89 0.21
0.21 0.64
0.02 0.10 0.19 0.38 0.56 0.59 0.19 0.10 0.40 0.45 0.13 0.49 0.76 0.65 1.00
0.59 1.00
0.06
Districtwide Ratio:
0.48
0.45
0.44
0.57
"Green" subdivisions indicate continued increases in the number of students per home. "Yellow" subdivisions show areas where ratios are declining.
140
Current Students
ThefirststepinprojectingfuturestudentpopulationislocatingeachcurrentLakeTravisI.S.D. studentonacomputergeneratedmap.PASAhasgeocodedeachstudentusingalatitude longitudecoordinatecorrespondingtohisorheraddress.Thedatafileusedforthisanalysiswas downloadedfromtheDistrictsdatabaseinJanuary,2011andcontained7,012EE12thgrade students. PASAalsoneededtounderstandwhereareasofgrowthanddeclinehaverecentlyoccurred withintheDistrictboundaries.TheredistributionofstudentswithinexistinghomesinL.T.I.S.D. isonedrivingforceofenrollmentchangeinthisDistrict,soitisimportantthatPASAunderstands whichneighborhoodsaregainingandlosingstudents.Toaccomplishthistask,adatasetfrom September2009wasgeocodedandcomparedtothemappedcurrentstudents.
Enrollment Trends
ResidentStudentsbyPlanningUnit Thefirstsetofmapsinthischaptershowsthetotalnumberofstudentscurrentlylivingineach PlanningUnit.Alsoshownarethepercentandabsolutechangeinstudentslivingineach PlanningUnitbetweenSeptember,2009andJanuary,2011. ThelargestincreaseinstudentpopulationovertheyearoccurredinPU8C,whichcontains Falconhead,adevelopingsubdivision.ThesecondgreatestincreaseoccurredinPU8B,whichis almostentirelymadeupoftheHillsofLakeway.Thisisastable,builtoutmunicipality,but increasedinstudentpopulationduetoincreasesinstudentsashomeswereboughtbyyounger headsofhouseholdswithschoolagedchildren. ResidentStudentsbySubdivisionandApartmentComplex Thisyear,51%ofnewstudentsaddedtoLakeTravisI.S.D.movedintoactivelybuilding subdivisions,while35%movedintoexistinghomesinbuiltoutareas.Thebalanceofnew studentsmovedintotownhomes/condos,mobilehomeparks,orapartments,withthenext largestgainsintownhomes/condominiums.Thistrendofstudentsmovingintobuiltoutareasis atrendoccurringthroughoutthestate.Thischaracteristiccouldbeexplainedbyanumberof hypotheses:(1)theglutofexistinghomesreturningtothemarketduetoforeclosureoreconomic hardshipallowedfamilieswithchildrentobuyaffordablehomesinadesirableschooldistrict,or (2)economichardshipdrovemanyfamiliestomoveinwithgrandparentsorotherfamily
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011 141
Type of development Apartments Condos - built-out Condos - developing MHP Subdivisions - built-out Subdivisions - actively building
Added Students Resident Resident 2009 to 2010 Percent Students in Students Actual 2009 in 2010 Change Change 143 156 13 9% 160 189 29 18% 10 26 16 160% 10 16 6 60% 4,106 4,274 168 4% 1,604 1,847 243 15% Percent of Growth 2009 to 2010 3% 6% 3% 1% 35% 51%
Apartments Condos - built-out Condos - developing MHP Subdivisions - built-out Subdivisions - actively building
TheactivelygrowingsubdivisionsthataddedthemoststudentsthisyearincludedFalconhead West(68students),RidgeatAltaVista(26students),FalconheadTheChampions(24students), WestCypressHills(24students)andPalefaceRanch(21students).Ofthe243studentsaddedto activelybuildingsubdivisions,about116ofthem(48%)wereelementarystudents,suggesting thatthegrowthintheseactiveneighborhoodsisevenlydistributedbetweenyoungerandolder students. Theolder,builtoutsubdivisionsbothaddedandloststudentswithanetgainof168students. Someareasgainedsignificantnumbersofstudents(LakePointeTheEstates:21students, TravisLanding2:14students),whileothersubdivisionsloststudents(TheUplands:11students andTravisLanding:8students).Justover51%ofthegaininthesesubdivisionswasinthe elementarygrades. ResidentStudentsbyAttendanceZone Finally,thedataregardingtrendsinstudentresidencesoverthepastyearhasbeenaggregated intoattendancezonesinordertoassessmoreglobaltrends.BeeCaveElementarygainedthe mostresidentstudents(74),followedbyLakeway(60)andLakeTravis(58).LakePointe
Population & Survey Analysts - Demographic Update Feb 2011 142
143
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
C u r r e n t G e o - c o d e d E E - 1 2 t h G r a d e S t u d e n t s , J a n u a r y 2 0 11
265
lin Hi
104
123
62 0
19 0 140
102 13
19 358
RM
20
RM
d Pe
eR
4
Tr av is
er
Co u nt y
d.
al es Ri v
O ld
Fe
146
ad
er
7 SH 1
136
rry
Ro
135
Be eC
0 62
re
151 372
22
57 55
48
O R.
e ri v .D
127
ek
Ro
ad
63 177 37 375 5
SH 71
SH 7 1
793 37
F M 22 4
88
lR ton Po o
183
oa
d
2 94 132
Hamil
Ha y
229
Co un ty
2
Barton Cree k
144
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
Absolute and Percent Change in Geo-coded EE-12th Grade S t u d e n t s , S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 9 t o J a n u a r y 2 0 11
al es Ri v
15 6%
Ro
ad
-14 -12% 18 14% 0 0% 0 R 3 0% 0 1 6% 1 30 1 11 0% 2% 2% 20% 3% 3% 5 21 3% 40% 10 3 7 9% 3% -3 3 10 2% 31 5 3 -3% 4% 26% 6% 0 4% 6% Mu -4 rfin 9 Rd 0% 58 -5% 6 . -3 45% 0 4% 12% -75% 0% -4 2 3 -17% -3 3% 12% 34 0 -19% 13% RM 31 0% 66 20 89% SH 71 9% 0 23 11 3% SH 7 0% 1 4 42% -11 5% -6% -1 ad Ro -33% 3 -9 Po o l Hamilton 2% -9% 15 11% 2 1% 0 0%
Barton Cree k
M
16 15%
1 33%
Tr av is Co u nt y
d Pe er
n
O ld
Fe
er
7 SH 1
23 20%
rry
O. R.
0 0%
Ha y
Be eC
i ve Dr
0 62
-5 -4%
re
ek
Ro
ad
Co un ty
145
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Alexan Galleria Angel Bay Annie Stewart Addition Apache Shores Arbolago Barton Creek Preserve Beby's Ranch Bee Cave West Bee Creek Estates Bee Creek Ranchettes Bella Montagna Estates Bella Strada Belvedere Big Bee Creek Briarcliff Brooks Hollow Buffalo Gap Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills Canyons at Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Estates Cardinal Hills Estates 2 Casa Verde Cedar Glen Cherry Mountain Commanders Point Costa Bella Courtyard at the Preserve Cove at Lakeway Coves at Lake Travis Creekside Crosswind Destiny Hills Edgewater Beach Enclave Enclave North
Class Apartment Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes
Phase Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2008 26 19 37 17 11 42% -2 -11% 2005 0 0 1 0 1 100% 0 0% 1982 21 10 22 10 1 5% 0 0% 1995 545 277 589 304 44 8% 27 10% 2004 16 9 20 11 4 25% 2 22% 2001 6 2 6 3 0 0% 1 50% 1984 8 5 8 6 0 0% 1 20% 1989 10 1 6 1 -4 -40% 0 0% 2008 6 2 11 5 5 83% 3 150% 1999 6 2 7 2 1 17% 0 0% 2006 15 5 17 6 2 13% 1 20% 2008 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 2005 21 11 32 22 11 52% 11 100% 1976 9 2 6 2 -3 -33% 0 0% 1997 197 101 210 104 13 7% 3 3% 1989 21 5 16 4 -5 -24% -1 -20% 1989 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 2005 54 32 51 29 -3 -6% -3 -9% 1999 64 38 81 39 17 27% 1 3% 2000 19 8 16 12 -3 -16% 4 50% 2005 7 5 10 6 3 43% 1 20% 6 4 15 7 9 150% 3 75% 1994 13 4 6 2 -7 -54% -2 -50% 2001 9 2 7 1 -2 -22% -1 -50% 1992 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 2002 28 16 35 20 7 25% 4 25% 56 20 58 24 2 4% 4 20% 2002 7 4 8 4 1 14% 0 0% 2003 9 7 8 6 -1 -11% -1 -14% 1994 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 1992 15 7 19 12 4 27% 5 71% 2003 11 6 12 6 1 9% 0 0% 1978 5 1 8 1 3 60% 0 0% 2000 0 0 8 3 8 100% 3 100% 8 2 11 4 3 38% 2 100%
146
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Enclave South Falconhead Falconhead - St. Andrews Falconhead - The Champions Falconhead - The Heights Falconhead - The Legends Falconhead - The Links Falconhead - West Flint Rock Estates Flintrock at Hurst Creek Glen Heather Greens Condos Hamilton Hills Hazy Hill Ranchettes Highland Club Village Highland Creek Lakes Hill Top Manor Hills of Lakeway Hudson Bend Colony La Hacienda Estates La Hacienda RV Park La Isla at Angel Bay Lake Chandon Lake Country Estates Lake Oak Estates Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista Lake Pointe - The Estates Lake Pointe - The Landing Lake Pointe - The Preserve Lake Pointe - The Setting Lake Pointe - Vista Pointe Subdivision Existing 1988 1,058 22 437 10 1,096 22 451 11 38 0 4% 0%
Class Townhomes Apartment Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision MHP Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision
Phase Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 16 5 23 8 7 44% 3 60% 2003 74 25 70 25 -4 -5% 0 0% 2006 24 14 29 14 5 21% 0 0% 2006 169 81 193 103 24 14% 22 27% 2006 26 15 30 18 4 15% 3 20% 2004 5 5 5 4 0 0% -1 -20% 2005 24 10 26 12 2 8% 2 20% 2009 72 37 140 73 68 94% 36 97% 1999 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 2006 89 37 93 42 4 4% 5 14% 1978 4 1 1 0 -3 -75% -1 -100% 1999 1 0 1 0 0 0% 0 0% 1998 2 1 1 0 -1 -50% -1 -100% 1989 11 2 7 1 -4 -36% -1 -50% 1988 7 6 5 3 -2 -29% -3 -50% 2000 10 4 11 5 1 10% 1 25% 2002 4 2 4 2 0 0% 0 0% 1997 432 203 482 227 50 12% 24 12% 1983 34 12 31 12 -3 -9% 0 0% 1991 41 20 45 23 4 10% 3 15% 2008 0 0 6 2 6 100% 2 100% 2005 3 2 3 2 0 0% 0 0% 2006 0 0 2 2 2 100% 2 100% 2000 6 2 4 2 -2 -33% 0 0% 1999 40 27 52 27 12 30% 0 0% 2003 46 32 51 37 5 11% 5 16% 1999 373 215 394 219 21 6% 4 2% 2000 44 29 45 24 1 2% -5 -17% 2000 83 54 85 53 2 2% -1 -2% 1999 87 46 93 52 6 7% 6 13% 2004 130 62 125 52 -5 -4% -10 -16% 14 1 3% 10%
PU 5B 8A 8A 8A 8A 8A 8A 8C 2E 8G/8E 7F 8B 3C 2A 11C 3E 3E 8B 12B 10C 10C 1B 9C 2E 6C 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 5A 7A/7B/7C 7G/9A/9B 9C/9D/9E 9C Townhomes Existing
Lakeway
147
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Lakewood Estates Lakewind Estates Las Entradas on Lake Travis Laws Addition Lick Creek Ranch Lohmans Crossing Estates Madrone Ranch Majestic Hills Ranchettes Maravilla Marina Club Villas Marina Village Masters at the Hills Meadowfox Estates Mountain Acres Mountain Creek Lakes North Lakeway Village North Lakeway Village Old Ferry Paleface Ranch Perdenales Canyon Pinnacle at North Lakeway Preserve at Barton Creek Ranches at Hamilton Pool Reserve at Hudson Bend Reserve at Lake Travis Retama Ridge at Alta Vista Rough Hollow - East Rim Rough Hollow - The Bluffs Rough Hollow - The Enclave Rough Hollow - Water's Edge Saddletree Ranch Sadik Santorini Villas Siesta Shores
Class Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision MHP Townhomes Subdivision
Phase Existing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 1984 13 5 17 8 4 31% 3 60% 2002 31 12 25 9 -6 -19% -3 -25% 2002 3 0 3 1 0 0% 1 100% 2005 14 6 16 6 2 14% 0 0% 1996 15 4 15 7 0 0% 3 75% 1990 197 92 202 96 5 3% 4 4% 1999 8 2 6 1 -2 -25% -1 -50% 1999 24 9 22 7 -2 -8% -2 -22% 2004 28 10 33 8 5 18% -2 -20% 1981 5 3 4 2 -1 -20% -1 -33% 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 2 1 3 0 1 50% -1 -100% 2000 15 7 13 5 -2 -13% -2 -29% 1995 4 0 2 1 -2 -50% 1 100% 1999 14 8 13 7 -1 -7% -1 -13% 2009 1 0 3 1 2 200% 1 100% 2009 3 3 11 9 8 267% 6 200% 1983 23 13 23 8 0 0% -5 -38% 2003 0 0 21 8 21 100% 8 100% 1996 4 0 2 0 -2 -50% 0 0% 1 0 6 1 5 500% 1 100% 2004 26 16 28 16 2 8% 0 0% 2008 0 0 3 2 3 100% 2 100% 2004 36 22 40 23 4 11% 1 5% 2009 0 0 1 1 1 100% 1 100% 12 6 16 5 4 33% -1 -17% 2007 241 125 267 134 26 11% 9 7% 2007 4 2 3 2 -1 -25% 0 0% 2009 0 0 2 0 2 100% 0 0% 2007 11 9 17 13 6 55% 4 44% 2008 3 1 6 2 3 100% 1 100% 2001 61 30 58 25 -3 -5% -5 -17% 10 7 10 6 0 0% -1 -14% 2 2 2 2 0 0% 0 0% 1987 21 7 18 7 -3 -14% 0 0%
148
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentSortedAlphabetically,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Spanish Oaks Stoney Creek Terrace at the Preserve The Enclave @ Kollmeyer Sprgs The Homestead The Uplands Thurman Bend Estates Tiburon Hills Travis Landing Travis Landing 2 Travis Oak Trails Travis Settlement Twin Lake Hills Valley Lake Hills Villas at Flintrock Villas at the Hills Vineyard Bay Vista Estates Vista Grande Vista Grande Amend Vistas @ Lake Travis Vistas at Lakeway West Cave Estates West Cypress Hills Whitecliff Windmill Bluff Estates Windmill Bluff Estates Windsor at Bee Cave Windy Walk Estates Woods of Lake Travis World of Tennis Townhomess Yaupon Creek
Class Subdivision Townhomes Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Apartment Subdivision Subdivision Townhomes Subdivision
Phase Developing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Developing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing Existing Existing Developing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2006 70 38 71 34 1 1% -4 -11% 1975 4 4 6 5 2 50% 1 25% 6 3 13 8 7 117% 5 167% 2005 7 1 9 2 2 29% 1 100% 1997 88 25 81 29 -7 -8% 4 16% 2000 162 69 151 63 -11 -7% -6 -9% 2002 2 0 6 4 4 200% 4 100% 2003 3 0 5 1 2 67% 1 100% 1988 51 22 43 16 -8 -16% -6 -27% 1988 90 44 104 60 14 16% 16 36% 1992 19 7 21 11 2 11% 4 57% 2002 110 51 102 49 -8 -7% -2 -4% 2002 39 21 37 19 -2 -5% -2 -10% 2003 29 14 38 18 9 31% 4 29% 1 1 1 1 0 0% 0 0% 3 0 2 0 -1 -33% 0 0% 1998 35 18 33 16 -2 -6% -2 -11% 2005 5 2 6 2 1 20% 0 0% 1993 14 9 13 7 -1 -7% -2 -22% 1987 2 1 1 1 -1 -50% 0 0% 1988 33 11 32 11 -1 -3% 0 0% 3 0 4 0 1 33% 0 0% 2000 67 36 66 33 -1 -1% -3 -8% 2007 58 30 82 39 24 41% 9 30% 1982 1 0 2 1 1 100% 1 100% 1999 12 3 12 2 0 0% -1 -33% 1998 19 5 17 6 -2 -11% 1 20% 1991 43 21 49 27 6 14% 6 29% 2007 0 0 3 2 3 100% 2 100% 1994 37 10 35 10 -2 -5% 0 0% 27 7 29 10 2 7% 3 43% 2006 3 2 1 0 -2 -67% -2 -100%
Total:
6,033
2,860
6,508
3,092
475
8%
232
8%
149
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 4 1B/2B 12A 9E 3G 12A 9E 5A 3D 2A 6A 11A 7F 1B 12B 3E 1B 8G 2E 3D 3A 3E 8B 11C 2E 3G 10A 10B 11C 10C/12B 1B 3C 3E 2C
Name The Uplands Travis Settlement Travis Landing Cedar Glen The Homestead Lakewind Estates Brooks Hollow Lake Pointe - Vista Pointe Bee Cave West Hazy Hill Ranchettes Canyonlands at Cardinal Hills Cardinal Hills Estates Glen Heather Big Bee Creek Hudson Bend Colony Saddletree Ranch Siesta Shores Cherry Mountain Lake Country Estates Madrone Ranch Perdenales Canyon Twin Lake Hills Yaupon Creek Highland Club Village Majestic Hills Ranchettes Meadowfox Estates Mountain Acres Vineyard Bay Windmill Bluff Estates Woods of Lake Travis Coves at Lake Travis Hamilton Hills Mountain Creek Lakes Rough Hollow - East Rim
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Existing 2000 Developing 2002 Existing 1988 Developing 1994 Existing 1997 Existing 2002 Existing 1989 Existing 2004 Existing 1989 Existing 1989 Developing 2005 Developing 2000 Developing 1978 Existing 1976 Existing 1983 Existing 2001 Existing 1987 Developing 2001 Developing 2000 Developing 1999 Developing 1996 Developing 2002 Developing 2006 Existing 1988 Existing 1999 Existing 2000 Existing 1995 Existing 1998 Existing 1998 Existing 1994 Developing 2003 Developing 1998 Developing 1999 Developing 2007
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. -11 -7% -6 -9% -8 -7% -2 -4% -8 -16% -6 -27% -7 -54% -2 -50% -7 -8% 4 16% -6 -19% -3 -25% -5 -24% -1 -20% -5 -4% -10 -16% -4 -40% 0 0% -4 -36% -1 -50% -3 -6% -3 -9% -3 -16% 4 50% -3 -75% -1 -100% -3 -33% 0 0% -3 -9% 0 0% -3 -5% -5 -17% -3 -14% 0 0% -2 -22% -1 -50% -2 -33% 0 0% -2 -25% -1 -50% -2 -50% 0 0% -2 -5% -2 -10% -2 -67% -2 -100% -2 -29% -3 -50% -2 -8% -2 -22% -2 -13% -2 -29% -2 -50% 1 100% -2 -6% -2 -11% -2 -11% 1 20% -2 -5% 0 0% -1 -11% -1 -14% -1 -50% -1 -100% -1 -7% -1 -13% -1 -25% 0 0%
150
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Vista Grande Amend Vistas @ Lake Travis West Cave Estates Marina Club Villas Vista Grande Bella Strada Creekside Falconhead - The Legends Hill Top Manor La Isla at Angel Bay Las Entradas on Lake Travis Windmill Bluff Estates Barton Creek Preserve Beby's Ranch Flint Rock Estates Lick Creek Ranch Old Ferry Angel Bay Bee Creek Ranchettes Highland Creek Lakes Reserve at Lake Travis Spanish Oaks Annie Stewart Addition Buffalo Gap Commanders Point Cove at Lakeway Destiny Hills Lake Pointe - The Landing Vista Estates Whitecliff Bella Montagna Estates North Lakeway Village Rough Hollow - The Bluffs The Enclave @ Kollmeyer Sprgs
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Developing 1987 Developing 1988 Developing 2000 Existing 1981 Existing 1993 Developing 2008 Developing 1994 Developing 2004 Developing 2002 Developing 2005 Developing 2002 Developing 1999 Existing 2001 Existing 1984 Existing 1999 Existing 1996 Existing 1983 Developing 2005 Developing 1999 Developing 2000 Developing 2009 Developing 2006 Existing 1982 Existing 1989 Existing 1992 Existing 2002 Existing 2003 Existing 2000 Existing 2005 Existing 1982 Developing 2006 Developing 2009 Developing 2009 Developing 2005
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. -1 -50% 0 0% -1 -3% 0 0% -1 -1% -3 -8% -1 -20% -1 -33% -1 -7% -2 -22% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% -1 -20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% -1 -33% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 75% 0 0% -5 -38% 1 100% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% 1 10% 1 25% 1 100% 1 100% 1 1% -4 -11% 1 5% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100% 1 100% 1 100% 1 14% 0 0% 1 9% 0 0% 1 2% -5 -17% 1 20% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100% 2 13% 1 20% 2 200% 1 100% 2 100% 0 0% 2 29% 1 100%
151
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Falconhead - The Links Lake Pointe - The Preserve Laws Addition Preserve at Barton Creek Tiburon Hills Travis Oak Trails Cardinal Hills Estates 2 Ranches at Hamilton Pool Rough Hollow - Water's Edge Windy Walk Estates Edgewater Beach Falconhead - The Heights Flintrock at Hurst Creek Thurman Bend Estates Arbolago Crosswind La Hacienda Estates Lakewood Estates Reserve at Hudson Bend Bee Creek Estates Maravilla Falconhead - St. Andrews Lake Pointe - Canyon Vista Lohmans Crossing Estates Rough Hollow - The Enclave Lake Pointe - The Setting Costa Bella North Lakeway Village Enclave Valley Lake Hills Belvedere Lake Oak Estates Briarcliff Travis Landing 2
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Existing 2005 Existing 2000 Existing 2005 Existing 2004 Existing 2003 Existing 1992 Developing 2005 Developing 2008 Developing 2008 Developing 2007 Existing 1978 Developing 2006 Developing 2006 Developing 2002 Existing 2004 Existing 1992 Existing 1991 Existing 1984 Existing 2004 Developing 2008 Developing 2004 Existing 2006 Existing 2003 Existing 1990 Developing 2007 Existing 1999 Existing 2002 Developing 2009 Existing 2000 Developing 2003 Developing 2005 Developing 1999 Developing 1997 Existing 1988
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2 8% 2 20% 2 2% -1 -2% 2 14% 0 0% 2 8% 0 0% 2 67% 1 100% 2 11% 4 57% 3 43% 1 20% 3 100% 2 100% 3 100% 1 100% 3 100% 2 100% 3 60% 0 0% 4 15% 3 20% 4 4% 5 14% 4 200% 4 100% 4 25% 2 22% 4 27% 5 71% 4 10% 3 15% 4 31% 3 60% 4 11% 1 5% 5 83% 3 150% 5 18% -2 -20% 5 21% 0 0% 5 11% 5 16% 5 3% 4 4% 6 55% 4 44% 6 7% 6 13% 7 25% 4 25% 8 267% 6 200% 8 100% 3 100% 9 31% 4 29% 11 52% 11 100% 12 30% 0 0% 13 7% 3 3% 14 16% 16 36%
152
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforSubdivisionsSortedbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
Name Canyons at Cardinal Hills Paleface Ranch Lake Pointe - The Estates Falconhead - The Champions West Cypress Hills Ridge at Alta Vista Existing Existing Existing Developing 1995 1997 2009 545 432 72 277 203 37 589 482 140 304 227 73 1988 1,058 437 1,096 451 38 44 50 68 4% 8% 12% 94%
Phase Avg. Yr. Blt. Developing 1999 Developing 2003 Existing 1999 Developing 2006 Developing 2007 Developing 2007
Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th 81 39 21 8 394 219 193 103 82 39 267 134
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 17 27% 1 3% 21 100% 8 100% 21 6% 4 2% 24 14% 22 27% 24 41% 9 30% 26 11% 9 7% 14 27 24 36 3% 10% 12% 97%
Lakeway
Total
5,710
2,723
6,121
2,926
411
7%
203
3%
153
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmenforApartmentsbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 8A 3H 5C
Fall 09 to Fall 10 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 EE-12th EE-5th Yr. Blt. EE-12th EE-5th EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 2003 74 25 70 25 -4 -5% 0 0% 1991 43 21 49 27 6 14% 6 29% 2008 26 19 37 17 11 42% -2 -11%
Total
143
65
156
69
13
9%
3%
154
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforTownhomesbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 8B 8B 9C 9C 8G 9D 6A 8B 9C 6A 9C 9A 5B 8B 7E 6A 5B 9E
Name Villas at the Hills Greens Condos Lakeway Patio Homes Santorini Villas Villas at Flintrock Marina Village Vistas at Lakeway Masters at the Hills Lake Chandon Courtyard at the Preserve Stoney Creek World of Tennis Condos Enclave North Retama Pinnacle at North Lakeway Terrace at the Preserve Enclave South Casa Verde
Phase Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Developing Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Developing Developing Existing Existing
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. -1 -33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 10% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 1 100% 1 33% 0 0% 1 50% -1 -100% 2 100% 2 100% 2 4% 4 20% 2 50% 1 25% 2 7% 3 43% 3 38% 2 100% 4 33% -1 -17% 5 500% 1 100% 7 117% 5 167% 7 44% 3 60% 9 150% 3 75%
Total
170
65
215
89
45
26%
24
11%
155
StudentTrendsbyDevelopmentforMobileHomeCommunitiesbyGainandLoss,LakeTravisISD
Gain: Existing Subdivisions - 53%; Active Subdivisions - 35%; Existing THs - 6%; Active THs - 3%; Apartments - 3%, Mobile Home Communities - 1%
PU 2B 10C 2008
Yr. Blt.
Fall 09 to Fall 10 EE-12th EE-5th Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. Abs.Chg. Pct.Chg. 0 0% -1 -14% 6 100% 2 100%
Total
10
16
60%
6%
156
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
Ab s o l u t e a n d P e r c e n t C h a n g e i n G e o - c o d e d E E - 5 t h Gr a d e S t u d e n t s , S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 9 t o J a n u a r y 2 0 11
Hi lin
62
RM
D O. R.
e ri v
Serene Hills 21 4%
Lake Travis 58 8%
Mu rf in R d.
SH
71
Lakeway 60 10%
SH 7 1
Ha ys
Co
un ty
ol
Po Hami lton
Ro
ad
Tr av is
Co
un ty
Bart on Cree k
d Pe
eR
er
na l
d.
Ol dF
ry er
Ri ve
es
r
SH 71
Ro
ad
Be eC
62
re
ek
Ro
ad
157
Ch a n g e i n G e o - c o d e d 6 t h - 8 t h G r a d e S t u d e n t s , S e p t e m b e r 2 00 9 t o J a n u a r y 2 0 11
Hi lin
O. R.
Dr
i ve
Lake Travis 39 6%
SH 71
wa ke La
62 0
yB
l v d.
in R
ee k
d.
H o n ey C r
RM
20
6
Ha ys
Co
SH 7 1
d Pe
eR
er
na l
d.
Ol dF
ry er
Ri ve
es
r
SH 71
Ro
ad
Be eC
62
re
ek
Ro
ad
F M 22 4
4
reek nC
Po Hami lton
ol
Ro
ad
Tr av is
Co
un ty
Bart on Cree k
Ba rt
un ty
158
Lake Tr av is I.S. D.
A b s o l u t e a n d P e r c e n t C h a n g e i n G e o - c o d e d F r e e a n d R e du c e d L u n c h E E - 5 t hG r a d e S t u d e n t s , S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 9 t o J a n u a r y 2 0 11
Hi lin
62
RM
D O. R.
e ri v
Serene Hills 3 4%
Lake Travis 27 9%
Mu rf in R d.
SH
71
Lakeway 1 5%
SH 7 1
Ha ys
Co
un ty
ol
Po Hami lton
Ro
ad
Lake Pointe 1 4%
Tr av is
Co
un ty
Bart on Cree k
d Pe
eR
er
na l
d.
Ol dF
ry er
Ri ve
es
r
SH 71
Ro
ad
Be eC
62
re
ek
Ro
ad
159
Student Projections
161
I.S.D.TAKSscoresinL.T.I.S.D.arebecomingcomparabletoEanesI.S.D.,whichthisyearhada 96%passagerate,forexample,comparedtothe94%passagerateinL.T.I.S.D. Whilenewsubdivisionsarehousingjustoverhalfofallnewstudents,builtoutsubdivisionsare continuingtoseegains,with35%ofallnewstudentsmovingtotheseolderhomes.Thistrend shouldcontinueandaccelerate,duetotheageofthehousingunits,andduetothehightest scoresandotherperceivedqualityoflifefactorsintheDistrict.Also,theagesofmanyofthe LakewayandHillsofLakewayhousingunitsisreaching34yearsorgreater,theageatwhichthey maylikelyberesoldtoyoungerheadsofhouseholdswithschoolagedchildren. TheModerateGrowthScenarioassumesthefollowing: Thedemandforexisting,olderhomesandfornewhomeswillremainsimilartotodays market,butwithaslightaccelerationeachyearduetothecreepingrecoveryoftheeconomy; Studentpopulationcontinuestogrowatthisschoolyearsgrowthratesbygradegroup, acknowledgingthatthereislessavailabilityofhomemortgagesforyoungerhouseholds,i.e., entrylevelbuyers,whoalsohaveyoungerstudents; Unemploymentratesremainat7%intheAustinareaoverthenextyear,butslowlyreturnto 4.5%overthenext4years; Employmentgrowthwillbereflectiveofincreasesinspecificeconomicsectors,andnew employmentcenters,impactingmedical/healthrelatedjobs,forexample; TherewillbeaslightincreaseinthepercentofimmigrantsenteringtheAustinregion (relativeto20082009rates),spawningsomeincreaseindemandforL.T.I.S.D.housingdue totheimmigrantsdemandforhousinginsidetheurbancoredrivingurbancoreresidentsto suburbanlocations; Interestratesdonotincreasebymorethan2%overcurrentlevelsforthenextfiveyears;and Iranian,Afghan,NorthKorean,andotherglobalconcernsdonotaccelerate. HighGrowthScenarioUndertheHighGrowthScenario,theDistrictcouldgain2,902students inthefirstfiveyears,andanadditional3,849studentswouldbeexpectedinthelastfiveyearsof theprojectionperiod.Thus,underthesehighgrowthassumptions,LakeTravisI.S.D.could contain9,842studentsby2015and13,692studentsby2020. TheHighGrowthScenarioassumesthefollowing: ThecontinueddemandforhousingintheDistrictduetoincreasedemploymentcentersand continuedshortertraveltimestowork;
162
ThedemandforhousinginL.T.I.S.D.continuestoaccelerate,duetocontinuedpositive perceptionoftheDistrictsschools; Studentpopulationcontinuestosignificantlyincreaseduetoaccelerateddemandforboth newhomesandforexisting,olderhomes,aswellasforapartments; TheAustinareaunemploymentratesbegintoretreatannuallystartingin2011andreturn to4.5%within23years; Immigrationratesrisesignificantly,furtherencouragingpurchasesofhomesinsuburban Austinarealocations; Interestratesdonotrisemorethan2%inthenext5years; TheU.S.hasshorttermdeploymentinIraq,Afghanistan,andNorthKorea,andnoother globalwars,andnoincreaseinterroristactivitywithinthecountry.
163
Low Growth Scenario by Grade and Grade Group: 2011-2020 Projected Enrollment at PEIMS Snapshot Date
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Added Students 2010-2015
GRADE: 7 97 506 507 514 515 539 561 541 521 551 573 542 519 1.09026 1.06300 1.05086 1.07982 1.04144 1.04615 1.04766 1.06237 1.13062 0.99118 0.96446 0.93981 7,247 4.43 7,564 4.37 7,898 4.41 8,270 4.71 8,681 4.97 485 487 506 547 551 598 9,121 5.07 646 9,552 4.73 642 9,995 4.63 447 6,940 6.04 395 651 10,412 4.17 7 103 529 547 534 535 551 556 583 563 550 619 564 520 8 109 552 572 577 557 574 569 580 609 597 620 612 543 8 115 578 597 603 601 596 592 591 603 642 669 610 586 8 121 608 626 630 630 644 617 616 616 637 722 660 585 9 127 639 660 663 660 677 669 646 647 656 722 717 638 9 134 673 695 700 695 711 703 698 676 686 740 714 690 10 141 709 730 735 732 746 736 733 729 715 772 731 686 10 149 748 769 772 769 786 774 767 765 772 806 763 702 11 156 783 805 807 801 819 808 799 794 802 861 788 726 11 164 823 846 848 841 857 846 838 830 836 899 846 754 676
2007
2008
2009
2010
Added Students 2015-2020 2 30 133 153 149 145 138 108 105 126 105 149 175 119 104 3 37 183 186 185 181 180 177 192 183 180 178 129 116 126
EE PK KN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 32 410 435 474 457 437 474 463 460 476 505 449 426
0 27 458 472 471 505 486 453 483 471 471 535 486 441
16 49 481 488 497 495 549 518 487 510 510 539 538 460
12
373
393
408
2,234
307
3,363 1,697 2,188 3.60% 5.19% 5.14% 4.61% 5.24% 3.34% 4.91% 2.85% 4.86% 5.27% 1.82% 6.09% 3,518 1,786 2,261 3,690 1,837 2,371 3,885 1,870 2,515
317
333
372
411
4,106 1,949 2,627 5.68% 4.20% 4.45%
440
4,320 2,060 2,742 5.22% 5.70% 4.37%
431
4,540 2,177 2,835
442
4,778 2,304 2,913
417
4,991 2,395 3,026
504
5,236 2,504 3,175
EE-5th
46.3%
46.7%
47.3%
6th-8th
23.8%
23.2%
23.0%
9th-12th
29.9%
30.2%
29.7%
% Students in Each Grade Group 47.0% 47.3% 47.4% 47.5% 22.6% 22.4% 22.6% 22.8% 30.4% 30.3% 30.1% 29.7% Added Students by Grade Group
194 34 144 52.2% 9.0% 38.8% 221 78 112 53.7% 19.1% 27.2% 214 111 115 48.7% 25.2% 26.1% 220 118 94
126 86 81
153 26 102
221 82 90
164
Moderate Growth Scenario by Grade and Grade Group: 2011-2020 Projected Enrollment at PEIMS Snapshot Date
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Added Students 2010-2015
GRADE: 7 97 506 507 514 515 539 561 541 521 551 573 542 519 1.09026 1.06300 1.05086 1.07982 1.04144 1.04615 1.04766 1.06237 1.13062 0.99118 0.96446 0.93981 7,350 5.91 7,774 5.76 8,219 5.73 8,715 6.04 9,263 6.29 492 500 527 577 588 646 9,850 6.34 705 10,425 5.84 708 11,015 5.65 447 6,940 6.04 395 730 11,672 5.97 7 105 536 554 542 543 559 564 592 571 558 628 572 527 8 112 567 588 593 572 589 585 596 626 613 637 629 558 8 120 602 621 628 625 620 616 615 628 668 697 635 609 9 128 641 660 664 663 679 650 650 649 672 761 696 617 9 136 682 705 708 704 723 714 690 690 700 770 765 680 10 145 727 751 756 750 767 760 754 730 740 799 771 745 11 154 774 797 802 799 815 804 800 796 781 843 797 749 11 164 824 848 851 847 867 853 846 843 850 888 841 774 12 175 878 902 905 898 919 906 896 890 899 965 884 814 13 186 930 957 959 951 969 957 948 938 945 1017 957 852 765
2007
2008
2009
2010
Added Students 2015-2020 2 39 176 198 194 189 184 153 149 169 149 197 223 161 141 3 49 248 252 251 247 247 243 259 248 245 247 191 172 177
EE PK KN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 32 410 435 474 457 437 474 463 460 476 505 449 426
0 27 458 472 471 505 486 453 483 471 471 535 486 441
16 49 481 488 497 495 549 518 487 510 510 539 538 460
12
373
393
408
3,080
410
3,411 1,721 2,219 5.07% 6.68% 6.63% 5.99% 6.64% 4.71% 6.24% 4.15% 6.18% 6.60% 3.11% 7.43% 3,615 1,835 2,324 3,841 1,911 2,467 4,094 1,971 2,651
423
445
496
548
4,381 2,079 2,803 7.01% 5.50% 5.76%
587
4,665 2,224 2,961 6.49% 6.97% 5.63%
575
4,955 2,376 3,095
589
5,265 2,539 3,210
657
5,594 2,685 3,393
672
5,922 2,831 3,591
EE-5th
46.3%
46.7%
47.3%
6th-8th
23.8%
23.2%
23.0%
9th-12th
29.9%
30.2%
29.7%
% Students in Each Grade Group 47.0% 47.3% 47.4% 47.5% 22.6% 22.4% 22.6% 22.8% 30.4% 30.3% 30.1% 29.7% Added Students by Grade Group
253 60 183 51.1% 12.0% 36.9% 287 108 153 52.4% 19.8% 27.9% 284 145 158 48.4% 24.7% 26.9% 289 152 134
126 86 81
153 26 102
221 82 90
165
High Growth Scenario by Grade and Grade Group: 2011-2020 Projected Enrollment at PEIMS Snapshot Date
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Added Students 2010-2015
GRADE: 7 97 506 507 514 515 539 561 541 521 551 573 542 519 1.09026 1.06300 1.05086 1.07982 1.04144 1.04615 1.04766 1.06237 1.13062 0.99118 0.96446 0.93981 7,453 7.39 7,981 7.09 8,537 6.97 9,157 7.27 9,842 7.48 499 513 547 606 624 693 10,576 7.45 764 11,294 6.79 773 12,030 6.52 447 6,940 6.04 395 804 12,851 6.82 8 106 544 562 549 550 567 572 600 579 566 637 580 534 8 115 583 604 608 588 605 601 612 643 629 654 645 573 9 125 625 645 652 649 644 640 639 652 694 724 659 633 9 134 673 693 698 697 714 683 683 682 706 800 731 648 10 145 725 749 752 748 768 758 733 733 743 818 813 723 11 156 780 806 812 806 824 815 810 783 795 858 828 800 12 167 838 863 869 865 883 871 867 862 846 913 864 811 12 179 900 926 929 925 947 931 924 921 929 970 918 845 13 193 966 993 996 989 1011 998 986 979 990 1063 973 896 14 206 1032 1061 1064 1055 1075 1061 1052 1041 1048 1128 1061 945 848
2007
2008
2009
2010
Added Students 2015-2020 3 48 219 242 238 233 229 197 192 212 192 245 271 204 177 4 61 307 313 312 306 307 303 319 308 305 310 248 222 224
EE PK KN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0 32 410 435 474 457 437 474 463 460 476 505 449 426
0 27 458 472 471 505 486 453 483 471 471 535 486 441
16 49 481 488 497 495 549 518 487 510 510 539 538 460
12
373
393
408
3,849
513
3,458 1,745 2,250 6.53% 8.17% 8.12% 7.33% 7.98% 6.03% 7.48% 5.37% 7.43% 7.83% 4.31% 8.67% 3,711 1,884 2,386 3,989 1,985 2,563 4,302 2,071 2,785
528
556
620
685
4,655 2,209 2,978 8.21% 6.69% 6.95%
733
5,009 2,388 3,179 7.61% 8.09% 6.74%
718
5,367 2,574 3,352
736
5,751 2,773 3,506
821
6,160 2,956 3,736
840
6,568 3,141 3,983
EE-5th
46.3%
46.7%
47.3%
6th-8th
23.8%
23.2%
23.0%
9th-12th
29.9%
30.2%
29.7%
% Students in Each Grade Group 47.0% 47.3% 47.4% 47.5% 22.6% 22.4% 22.6% 22.8% 30.4% 30.3% 30.1% 29.7% Added Students by Grade Group
313 86 222 50.4% 13.8% 35.8% 353 138 193 51.5% 20.2% 28.2% 354 179 201 48.3% 24.4% 27.4% 359 186 173
126 86 81
153 26 102
221 82 90
166
Hudson Bend R d
10C 70 56 59
Bend
Road
12B 36 38 41
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 73 68 71
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 57 81 108
1B 61 79 119
3A 66 152 314
R
Hwy
2B 64 71 84
71
3B 0 0 0
3C 3 12 47
3D 51 143 356
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 27 10B 9F 43 27 8 55 11E 10A 21 11A 9 11D 18 9E 22 23 25 9 104 16 102 41 11 125 16 103 54 9D 11 125 103 11B 46 7E 7D 201 29 38 101 7G 6C 194 29 120 42 7C 86 74 194 9C 120 35 32 109 95 62 35 36 6B 7B 100 72 0 19 7A 36 73 4 19 31 7F 6A Mur 8B fin 86 19 25 0 Ro 9 244 ad 28 0 96 271 102 7 274 6D 8G 4 52 1 5B 82 8E 159 1 4 121 188 8A FM 8C 16 209 192 62 5A 108 45 0 226 8F 427 150 263 5C 0 401 161 20 19 402 68 Hwy 71 25 22 4 4 FM 25 4 3J 74 0 60 10 3H 3G 60 21 76 36 110 41 134 69
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3F 2 4 4
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
167
Hudson Bend R d
1A 61 66 76
Ro
ur
10C 36 45 46
Bend
Road
12B 28 26 28
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 24 30 31
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 25 30 44
1B 34 48 67
3A 32 59 138
R
Hwy
2B 30 34 40
71
9B 41 9A 37 47 37 39 39 2C 11 34 74 2D 4 4 9 2E 6 5 8D 14 0 11 50
3B 0 0 0
3C 2 5 21
3D 19 47 151
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 8 10B 9F 14 15 5 20 11E 10A 18 11A 5 11D 9 9E 13 19 18 5 34 12 104 13 18 37 12 83 20 9D 18 37 83 11B 10 7E 7D 81 30 25 45 7G 6C 89 30 41 27 7C 34 42 90 9C 41 31 12 45 40 36 31 13 6B 7B 43 36 1 10 7A 13 36 1 11 18 7F 6A Mur 8B fin Ro 4 27 11 22 0 147 ad 24 0 34 125 36 3 127 6D 8E 8G 6 19 1 7 5B 33 4 72 7 53 18 80 8A FM 8C 90 62 73 5A 53 0 92 8F 215 70 5C 111 0 233 76 5 6 233 30 Hwy 71 5 22 4 4 FM 5 4 3J 45 0 48 3 3H 3G 48 9 31 18 36 22 48 36
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3E 66 82 127
3F 0 0 0
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
168
Hudson Bend R d
1A 84 86 96
Ro
ur
10C 41 44 45
Bend
Road
12B 38 41 42
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 41 42 43
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 54 64 77
1B 54 66 86
3A 44 91 170
R
Hwy
2B 38 42 49
71
9B 41 9A 41 57 41 62 62 2C 10 53 92 2D 4 10 14 2E 6 11 8D 20 0 22 61
3B 0 0 0
3C 0 7 24
3D 28 77 181
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 16 10B 9F 26 15 8 31 11E 10A 18 11A 7 11D 10 9E 17 19 24 7 56 11 157 30 19 54 11 156 37 9D 19 54 156 11B 29 7E 7D 103 27 30 63 7G 6C 106 27 65 23 7C 57 43 106 9C 65 24 35 68 53 36 24 32 6B 7B 55 41 3 19 7A 32 41 5 18 20 7F 6A Mur 8B fin Ro 8 46 18 22 0 159 ad 23 1 48 166 51 4 168 6D 8E 8G 8 38 7 8 5B 52 13 95 8 71 27 108 8A FM 8C 118 117 62 5A 63 0 128 8F 179 83 146 5C 0 200 88 14 11 200 35 Hwy 71 14 22 4 4 FM 14 4 3J 57 2 59 7 3H 3G 59 12 43 39 52 42 64 56
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3E 73 104 148
3F 1 1 1
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
169
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Low Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2011 6th-8th 9th-12th 61 34 25 30 11 4 6 32 0 2 19 66 0 18 31 0 45 215 72 5 27 1 42 6 18 10 12 45 25 0 27 73 147 53 0 1 0 19 47 41 36 10 104 5 13 15 36 18 81 8 34 9 24 28 1,697 84 54 54 38 10 4 6 44 0 0 28 73 1 39 43 2 57 179 95 14 46 3 43 8 20 19 35 63 30 0 23 117 159 63 0 7 0 38 57 41 36 29 157 8 17 15 41 24 103 16 56 10 41 38 2,188 2012 6th-8th 9th-12th 66 34 23 26 15 2 4 39 0 3 23 70 0 22 33 1 48 239 77 4 33 1 44 7 23 11 16 44 23 0 25 76 141 66 1 0 1 20 45 37 39 19 87 4 14 18 42 16 82 11 42 11 29 26 1,786 81 55 54 38 14 6 8 51 0 1 32 76 1 38 42 1 58 198 98 13 46 3 45 8 21 18 32 64 37 0 24 115 164 76 1 7 1 38 62 41 38 26 154 7 18 18 42 25 105 17 54 10 41 37 2,260
EE-5th 135 61 57 64 24 2 6 66 0 3 51 110 2 36 76 0 74 427 159 20 86 0 74 4 31 19 32 101 38 0 42 192 244 108 0 4 0 52 74 66 62 46 102 8 22 27 70 25 201 27 104 18 73 36 3,362
EE-12th 280 150 136 133 46 11 19 142 0 5 98 249 3 93 150 2 176 821 327 39 159 4 160 18 70 48 79 210 94 0 92 383 550 224 0 12 0 109 179 148 134 84 363 21 52 57 147 68 384 50 194 38 138 102 7,247
EE-5th 143 66 64 69 40 4 5 82 0 2 65 122 3 35 86 1 65 404 164 23 89 0 79 0 27 20 31 109 56 0 43 202 257 138 3 6 2 61 71 69 64 38 105 8 18 21 62 29 201 29 117 16 68 35 3,517
EE-12th 290 156 141 133 69 12 17 172 0 6 119 269 4 95 161 3 170 840 338 41 168 5 168 16 71 49 78 217 116 0 91 394 562 280 5 13 3 119 177 148 141 84 346 20 49 57 147 70 388 57 212 37 139 98 7,563
170
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Low Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2013 6th-8th 9th-12th 65 44 27 33 22 3 4 46 0 2 31 73 0 20 33 1 48 232 77 5 33 0 38 7 22 11 13 41 29 0 31 88 125 69 3 2 2 28 39 37 35 30 83 5 18 18 45 12 89 11 37 12 30 25 1,836 83 58 57 40 25 7 9 62 0 2 42 84 1 39 44 3 59 199 102 14 47 3 48 8 21 18 32 65 45 0 24 119 165 79 4 8 2 42 62 41 39 27 155 7 18 18 43 27 106 20 54 11 41 38 2,370 2014 6th-8th 9th-12th 65 45 28 33 26 4 4 50 0 3 35 76 0 20 34 2 48 232 78 5 33 1 39 7 22 11 13 41 31 0 31 90 125 69 5 3 3 30 39 37 35 30 83 5 18 18 45 13 89 12 37 12 30 25 1,870 85 63 61 41 41 9 11 78 0 5 60 96 1 40 49 5 59 199 105 14 48 4 51 8 21 18 32 65 53 0 24 124 165 81 14 11 7 48 62 41 40 27 156 7 19 18 44 29 106 23 54 11 42 39 2,514
EE-5th 150 67 71 67 58 7 6 104 0 4 86 134 4 35 98 3 60 400 178 24 94 1 87 1 25 19 36 120 67 0 35 211 269 143 9 9 5 65 72 68 70 29 102 9 11 21 54 35 194 33 125 15 68 34 3,690
EE-12th 298 169 156 140 105 18 19 211 0 8 159 292 5 94 175 7 166 832 357 43 175 5 172 16 68 48 81 226 142 0 90 418 559 291 16 19 9 136 173 146 144 86 340 22 47 57 142 74 389 64 217 38 139 97 7,896
EE-5th 152 73 76 69 80 10 8 126 0 7 109 149 4 37 104 6 60 400 183 25 95 2 91 1 25 19 36 120 78 0 35 218 270 147 21 12 11 74 72 68 71 29 103 9 11 21 55 38 194 38 125 15 68 36 3,885
EE-12th 302 181 166 143 148 22 23 254 0 15 204 321 5 98 187 13 166 832 366 43 176 7 180 16 68 48 81 226 162 0 90 432 560 297 41 25 21 151 173 146 147 86 341 22 47 57 144 80 389 73 217 38 139 100 8,268
171
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Low Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2015 6th-8th 9th-12th 66 48 30 34 34 4 5 59 0 5 47 82 0 22 36 3 48 233 80 5 34 1 40 7 22 11 13 41 34 0 31 92 125 70 11 4 6 33 39 37 36 30 83 5 18 18 45 13 89 14 37 12 30 26 1,948 86 66 64 42 53 10 11 91 0 7 77 104 1 42 52 7 59 200 108 14 48 5 53 8 22 18 32 65 57 1 24 128 166 83 22 13 11 52 62 41 41 27 156 7 19 18 44 30 106 26 54 11 42 41 2,626 2016 6th-8th 9th-12th 68 51 33 35 43 5 6 73 0 8 65 91 0 24 39 5 48 233 83 5 34 1 41 7 22 11 13 41 37 1 31 96 126 72 19 7 10 37 39 37 36 30 83 5 18 18 45 15 89 16 37 12 31 27 2,059 88 70 67 43 62 11 13 105 0 10 95 114 1 45 55 9 59 200 111 14 48 5 54 8 22 18 32 65 60 1 24 132 167 84 30 16 15 57 62 41 41 27 156 7 19 19 44 32 106 28 54 11 42 42 2,741
EE-5th 155 79 81 71 104 12 9 152 0 12 143 166 4 41 110 10 60 401 188 25 96 4 95 1 25 19 36 120 86 0 35 226 271 150 36 16 19 82 72 68 72 29 103 9 11 21 56 41 194 43 125 16 68 38 4,105
EE-12th 307 193 175 147 191 26 26 302 0 24 267 353 5 104 198 19 166 833 375 44 178 10 188 16 69 48 81 226 178 1 90 446 562 303 69 34 35 168 173 146 149 86 341 22 47 58 145 84 389 83 217 38 140 105 8,679
EE-5th 158 87 87 73 121 14 12 178 0 18 177 183 4 46 115 14 60 401 194 25 97 4 97 1 26 19 36 120 92 1 35 234 272 152 51 21 27 91 72 68 73 29 103 9 11 21 57 43 194 47 125 16 69 40 4,320
EE-12th 313 208 188 152 227 30 31 357 0 36 336 388 5 115 208 28 166 833 388 44 179 11 193 16 70 48 81 226 189 3 90 462 565 308 99 44 52 186 173 146 150 86 341 22 48 58 146 89 389 91 217 38 142 109 9,120
172
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Low Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2017 6th-8th 9th-12th 70 55 36 36 52 7 8 90 0 11 84 101 0 27 41 7 48 233 86 5 35 2 42 7 23 11 13 41 40 1 31 100 127 73 26 10 15 43 39 37 36 30 83 5 18 18 46 16 89 17 37 12 31 28 2,177 89 73 69 44 69 12 14 119 0 13 110 122 1 47 57 10 59 200 113 14 49 6 55 8 22 18 32 65 62 1 24 135 167 85 35 18 19 61 62 41 41 27 156 7 19 19 45 33 106 29 54 11 42 42 2,835 2018 6th-8th 9th-12th 72 60 39 38 61 7 10 109 0 15 109 112 0 30 44 8 48 233 88 5 35 2 43 7 23 11 13 41 42 2 31 104 127 75 35 13 20 48 39 37 36 30 83 5 18 19 46 18 89 19 37 12 31 28 2,304 90 76 71 45 75 12 15 131 0 16 125 128 1 49 58 11 59 200 115 14 49 6 55 8 22 18 32 65 63 2 24 137 167 86 41 20 23 64 62 41 41 27 156 7 19 19 45 34 106 30 54 11 43 42 2,912
EE-5th 161 94 92 75 138 16 15 211 0 25 213 202 4 51 120 17 60 401 200 25 98 5 99 1 26 19 36 120 97 2 35 241 273 155 65 26 36 101 72 68 73 29 103 9 11 22 57 46 194 50 125 16 70 41 4,540
EE-12th 320 223 196 156 259 35 37 420 0 50 408 425 5 125 218 34 166 833 399 44 181 12 196 16 71 48 81 226 198 5 90 477 567 314 125 54 71 205 173 146 150 86 342 22 48 59 148 94 389 97 217 38 143 110 9,552
EE-5th 165 102 98 78 154 17 18 246 0 33 259 222 4 57 125 20 60 401 203 25 99 6 100 1 27 19 36 120 101 4 35 249 274 158 82 32 47 110 72 68 73 29 103 9 11 22 57 49 194 53 125 16 70 41 4,778
EE-12th 327 238 208 161 289 37 43 485 0 64 494 462 5 136 227 39 166 834 405 44 183 14 198 16 72 48 81 226 205 8 90 491 568 319 158 65 90 222 173 146 150 86 342 22 48 59 148 100 389 101 217 38 143 111 9,993
173
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Low Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2019 6th-8th 9th-12th 73 63 41 39 67 8 11 122 0 18 128 120 0 33 46 9 48 233 89 5 36 3 43 7 23 11 13 41 43 3 31 107 127 76 42 15 25 51 39 37 36 30 83 5 18 19 46 18 89 19 37 12 31 28 2,394 93 80 73 47 82 13 17 148 0 19 149 138 1 52 61 11 59 200 116 14 50 7 55 8 23 18 32 65 65 3 24 141 167 88 49 23 28 68 62 41 41 27 156 7 19 19 45 35 106 31 54 11 43 42 3,025 2020 6th-8th 9th-12th 76 67 44 40 74 9 14 138 0 21 151 127 0 36 48 9 48 233 90 5 36 4 43 7 24 11 13 41 45 3 31 111 127 76 50 18 30 53 39 37 36 30 83 5 18 19 46 20 90 20 37 12 31 28 2,503 96 86 77 49 92 14 20 170 0 24 181 148 1 56 64 12 59 200 118 14 51 8 55 8 23 18 32 65 68 4 24 146 168 88 61 27 35 71 62 41 41 27 156 7 19 19 45 37 106 31 54 11 43 42 3,174
EE-5th 169 110 103 81 168 19 22 277 0 39 303 241 4 63 129 20 60 401 205 25 100 7 100 1 28 19 36 120 104 5 35 256 274 161 98 38 56 117 72 68 73 29 103 9 11 22 58 50 194 54 125 16 70 41 4,991
EE-12th 335 253 217 167 316 40 51 547 0 76 580 499 5 147 236 41 166 834 410 44 185 17 198 16 74 48 81 226 213 11 90 504 568 325 189 76 109 235 173 146 151 86 342 22 48 60 149 103 389 104 217 38 144 111 10,411
EE-5th 174 119 108 84 185 20 27 314 0 47 356 258 4 69 134 21 60 402 209 25 102 9 100 1 28 19 36 120 109 7 35 263 274 161 117 45 68 121 72 68 73 29 103 9 11 23 59 54 194 55 125 16 71 41 5,236
EE-12th 346 272 229 173 351 43 61 622 0 92 688 533 5 161 247 41 166 836 418 44 189 20 198 16 75 48 81 227 222 14 90 520 569 325 228 90 132 245 173 146 151 86 342 22 49 61 151 110 390 106 217 38 145 112 10,914
174
Hudson Bend R d
10C 70 61 71
Bend
Road
12B 37 42 52
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 74 73 82
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 57 86 122
1B 62 85 135
3A 67 160 339
R
Hwy
2B 64 75 95
71
3B 0 0 0
3C 3 13 49
3D 51 150 382
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 27 10B 9F 47 27 8 64 11E 10A 24 11A 11 11D 18 9E 22 31 25 15 110 18 105 44 14 141 22 115 63 9D 19 150 129 11B 47 7E 7D 201 34 40 102 7G 6C 200 40 127 43 7C 93 74 213 9C 136 38 32 122 99 63 44 39 6B 7B 112 78 0 19 7A 45 86 4 22 31 7F 6A Mur 8B fin 87 26 28 0 Ro 10 252 ad 37 0 101 293 115 7 314 6D 8G 4 52 3 5B 87 8E 161 7 4 135 196 8A FM 8C 18 230 193 62 5A 113 53 0 235 8F 431 160 287 5C 0 422 179 20 20 448 72 Hwy 71 27 22 4 4 FM 32 4 3J 75 0 65 10 3H 3G 74 22 76 36 114 45 147 81
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3F 2 4 4
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
175
Hudson Bend R d
1A 61 68 84
Ro
ur
10C 37 47 52
Bend
Road
12B 28 28 33
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 24 32 36
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 25 32 50
1B 35 51 75
3A 32 64 152
R
Hwy
2B 31 35 45
71
9B 42 9A 39 48 42 42 46 2C 12 39 83 2D 4 5 11 2E 6 6 8D 17 0 13 54
3B 0 0 0
3C 2 5 23
3D 19 53 166
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 8 10B 9F 16 16 5 24 11E 10A 19 11A 6 11D 9 9E 13 22 18 8 38 12 106 15 19 45 15 88 24 9D 22 49 95 11B 10 7E 7D 81 32 26 46 7G 6C 91 34 44 27 7C 38 42 98 9C 48 33 12 52 42 37 36 14 6B 7B 49 39 1 10 7A 17 42 1 12 19 7F 6A Mur 8B fin Ro 4 28 14 23 0 151 ad 27 0 36 135 42 4 146 6D 8E 8G 6 19 1 7 5B 35 6 73 9 59 22 83 8A FM 8C 100 74 62 5A 54 0 96 8F 218 75 122 5C 0 241 84 5 7 254 32 Hwy 71 6 22 4 4 FM 8 4 3J 45 0 50 4 3H 3G 54 10 31 19 38 23 55 41
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3E 66 87 139
3F 0 0 0
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
176
Hudson Bend R d
1A 84 90 106
Ro
ur
10C 41 47 53
Bend
Road
12B 38 43 48
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 42 45 50
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 54 67 85
1B 54 70 96
3A 44 97 188
R
Hwy
2B 38 45 55
71
9B 42 9A 45 58 49 66 71 2C 10 58 104 2D 4 11 18 2E 6 13 8D 25 0 23 66
3B 0 0 0
3C 0 8 26
3D 28 82 201
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 16 10B 9F 28 15 8 37 11E 10A 20 11A 9 11D 10 9E 17 24 24 11 61 12 159 32 20 64 14 163 42 9D 23 68 170 11B 30 7E 7D 103 30 30 64 7G 6C 110 33 69 23 7C 62 43 117 9C 74 26 35 77 56 37 30 34 6B 7B 63 45 3 19 7A 37 49 5 20 21 7F 6A Mur 8B fin Ro 8 46 23 24 0 164 ad 28 1 51 180 58 4 190 6D 8E 8G 8 38 7 10 5B 55 14 96 12 79 32 113 8A FM 8C 130 118 62 5A 65 0 133 8F 183 89 160 5C 0 213 99 14 12 226 38 Hwy 71 15 22 4 4 FM 18 4 3J 58 2 62 7 3H 3G 66 13 43 39 55 44 72 63
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3E 74 110 164
3F 1 1 1
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
177
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Moderate Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2011 6th-8th 9th-12th 61 35 25 31 12 4 6 32 0 2 19 66 0 19 31 0 45 218 73 5 28 1 42 6 19 10 12 46 26 0 27 74 151 54 0 1 0 19 48 42 37 10 106 5 13 16 37 18 81 8 38 9 24 28 1,721 84 54 54 38 10 4 6 44 0 0 28 74 1 39 43 2 58 183 96 14 46 3 43 8 21 19 35 64 30 0 23 118 164 65 0 7 0 38 58 42 37 30 159 8 17 15 41 24 103 16 61 10 42 38 2,218 2012 6th-8th 9th-12th 66 35 24 27 15 2 5 40 0 3 23 71 0 22 34 1 49 244 78 4 34 1 44 8 23 12 16 45 24 0 26 77 149 69 1 0 1 20 46 39 41 20 91 4 14 18 43 16 82 12 48 11 30 27 1,835 82 56 54 38 16 6 8 52 0 1 33 78 1 39 42 2 59 204 99 13 47 3 45 8 21 18 32 66 39 0 24 117 172 80 1 7 1 39 63 42 39 27 158 7 18 18 43 25 105 17 61 10 42 37 2,322
EE-5th 136 62 57 64 25 2 6 67 0 3 51 111 2 36 76 0 75 431 161 20 87 0 74 4 31 19 32 102 40 0 43 193 252 113 0 4 0 52 76 67 63 47 105 8 22 27 70 25 201 27 110 18 74 37 3,411
EE-12th 280 151 137 133 47 11 19 144 0 5 99 251 3 94 150 2 178 832 329 39 161 4 160 18 70 48 79 213 96 0 93 385 566 232 0 12 0 110 182 150 137 86 370 21 52 58 148 68 384 51 208 38 140 103 7,350
EE-5th 143 68 65 69 41 4 5 84 0 3 66 124 3 36 87 1 67 414 166 23 91 0 80 1 28 21 32 112 58 0 44 204 272 145 3 6 2 62 73 71 67 41 111 9 18 22 64 30 201 29 129 16 70 36 3,615
EE-12th 291 159 142 134 72 12 18 176 0 7 122 273 4 97 163 3 174 862 342 41 172 5 170 17 72 51 80 223 122 0 94 398 593 293 6 13 4 121 183 152 147 88 360 21 51 58 150 71 388 58 238 37 142 100 7,772
178
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Moderate Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2013 6th-8th 9th-12th 66 46 28 33 24 4 4 48 0 2 33 76 0 21 34 2 49 239 79 5 35 0 39 7 23 11 13 43 32 0 32 90 133 72 4 3 2 29 41 38 37 31 87 6 18 19 46 13 90 12 44 12 31 26 1,910 84 60 59 41 28 8 10 65 0 2 45 88 1 40 46 3 60 207 104 14 49 4 49 9 22 19 33 67 48 0 25 121 175 84 5 9 3 43 65 43 41 28 160 8 19 19 45 28 107 21 62 11 43 39 2,467 2014 6th-8th 9th-12th 66 48 30 34 30 4 5 54 0 3 39 80 0 21 36 2 50 240 81 5 35 1 40 7 23 11 14 43 34 0 32 92 134 73 7 4 3 32 41 38 38 31 87 6 19 19 46 13 90 13 44 12 31 27 1,969 87 66 63 43 44 10 12 82 0 5 63 100 1 42 51 5 61 210 109 15 50 4 53 9 23 20 33 68 56 0 26 128 177 87 14 12 7 50 66 44 43 29 162 8 20 20 46 30 109 25 63 12 44 41 2,650
EE-5th 152 70 73 68 62 8 6 108 0 4 89 138 4 37 100 4 62 413 182 25 97 1 88 2 26 20 37 124 72 0 37 215 285 151 9 9 5 67 75 71 73 32 110 10 12 22 57 36 195 35 139 16 70 36 3,841
EE-12th 301 176 160 143 114 19 20 221 0 9 167 301 5 98 179 8 172 858 365 44 180 5 176 18 71 50 84 234 152 0 94 426 593 306 18 21 10 140 180 153 152 91 357 24 49 60 147 77 392 67 245 39 143 101 8,217
EE-5th 155 77 80 71 85 11 9 132 0 8 114 155 4 40 107 6 64 417 189 26 99 2 94 2 27 21 38 125 83 0 37 224 289 155 22 13 11 77 77 72 76 33 113 11 13 23 59 40 198 40 140 17 71 39 4,094
EE-12th 309 190 173 148 159 25 26 268 0 16 216 335 5 103 194 14 175 867 379 46 184 8 187 19 73 52 85 237 174 0 96 445 600 315 43 28 22 158 183 155 157 93 362 25 51 62 151 84 397 78 248 40 146 107 8,713
179
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Moderate Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2015 6th-8th 9th-12th 68 51 32 35 39 5 6 64 0 5 53 87 0 23 38 4 50 241 83 6 36 1 42 7 23 12 14 44 38 0 33 96 135 75 13 6 7 35 42 39 39 32 88 6 19 19 47 15 91 16 45 12 32 28 2,077 90 70 67 45 58 11 13 97 0 8 82 110 1 44 55 7 62 213 113 15 51 5 56 10 24 20 34 69 62 1 26 133 180 89 23 14 12 55 66 45 45 30 163 9 20 20 47 32 110 28 64 12 45 43 2,803 2016 6th-8th 9th-12th 71 55 36 37 49 7 8 79 0 8 71 97 0 26 42 6 51 244 88 6 37 2 44 8 24 12 14 45 41 1 33 102 138 77 21 8 11 41 42 40 39 32 89 7 19 20 48 16 93 18 46 13 33 30 2,222 92 75 71 47 68 13 15 113 0 11 102 121 1 48 59 9 63 216 118 16 52 5 58 10 24 20 34 70 65 1 27 139 182 92 31 18 16 61 67 45 45 30 165 9 21 21 48 34 111 31 65 12 46 45 2,961
EE-5th 160 85 86 75 110 14 12 160 0 13 150 175 4 45 114 10 65 422 196 27 101 4 99 3 28 22 39 127 93 0 38 235 293 160 38 18 20 87 78 74 78 34 115 11 14 24 61 44 200 47 141 18 73 42 4,381
EE-12th 318 206 184 155 207 31 31 321 0 26 284 372 5 112 208 21 177 876 392 48 188 11 197 20 75 53 87 240 193 1 98 465 608 324 73 38 38 178 186 157 161 95 367 26 53 64 155 91 401 90 250 42 149 114 9,262
EE-5th 165 94 94 78 129 16 15 188 0 19 186 194 4 51 121 15 67 427 204 28 103 4 103 4 30 22 40 128 100 1 39 246 298 164 53 24 28 97 79 75 80 35 118 12 15 25 63 47 202 52 143 18 75 45 4,665
EE-12th 328 224 201 162 245 36 37 380 0 38 359 412 5 125 221 30 180 887 410 50 193 11 206 21 78 55 89 243 206 3 100 487 618 332 105 50 56 198 189 160 165 97 372 27 55 66 159 97 407 101 253 44 154 120 9,848
180
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Moderate Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2017 6th-8th 9th-12th 74 60 39 39 58 8 10 98 0 12 92 108 0 30 45 8 52 246 92 7 38 2 46 8 25 13 15 45 45 1 34 107 140 79 28 12 16 47 43 40 40 33 91 7 20 20 49 18 94 20 46 13 34 30 2,375 95 79 74 48 76 14 16 130 0 14 120 131 1 51 61 11 63 217 121 16 53 6 60 10 25 21 35 71 68 2 27 144 184 94 38 20 21 66 68 46 46 31 166 9 21 21 49 36 112 33 65 13 47 46 3,094 2018 6th-8th 9th-12th 77 65 43 41 67 9 12 118 0 17 118 120 0 34 48 9 52 249 95 7 39 3 47 8 25 13 15 46 47 2 34 112 142 81 38 15 22 52 44 41 41 33 92 7 20 21 50 20 95 22 47 13 34 31 2,538 97 83 77 50 83 15 18 144 0 18 139 140 1 54 64 12 64 219 123 16 54 6 60 11 26 21 35 71 70 2 28 148 185 95 45 23 25 70 68 46 46 31 167 10 22 22 50 37 113 34 66 13 47 46 3,210
EE-5th 171 103 99 82 147 19 19 224 0 26 226 216 4 58 127 18 68 431 212 29 106 5 106 4 31 23 41 130 106 3 40 255 302 168 68 30 38 108 81 76 81 36 120 12 15 26 65 51 205 56 144 19 77 47 4,955
EE-12th 339 242 212 169 281 42 45 451 0 53 438 455 5 139 233 37 183 895 426 51 197 13 212 23 81 56 91 246 218 5 101 506 626 340 134 62 75 221 191 162 167 99 377 29 57 68 163 105 411 109 256 45 157 123 10,424
EE-5th 177 113 107 86 165 21 23 262 0 35 276 239 4 65 134 21 70 436 218 29 108 6 108 5 33 24 42 131 111 4 41 266 306 172 86 37 49 119 82 77 83 37 123 13 16 28 66 54 207 59 146 20 78 48 5,266
EE-12th 351 261 227 177 315 45 53 524 0 69 533 499 5 152 246 42 186 904 436 53 202 15 216 24 84 58 92 249 228 8 103 526 633 349 169 75 96 242 194 165 170 101 381 30 58 70 166 112 416 115 259 46 160 126 11,013
181
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 Moderate Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2019 6th-8th 9th-12th 80 70 47 43 75 10 14 135 0 20 141 131 0 37 51 9 53 251 97 7 41 3 48 9 26 14 16 47 50 3 35 117 144 83 46 19 27 56 45 42 42 34 93 8 21 22 51 22 96 23 48 14 35 32 2,683 101 89 80 53 93 16 21 165 0 22 168 153 1 58 68 12 65 222 127 17 56 7 61 11 27 22 36 72 73 3 29 154 188 98 55 27 31 75 69 47 48 32 168 10 22 23 51 39 115 35 67 14 48 47 3,393 2020 6th-8th 9th-12th 84 75 50 45 83 11 17 152 0 23 166 139 0 41 55 10 54 254 100 8 42 4 49 9 27 14 17 48 52 4 36 122 146 84 54 22 32 59 46 42 42 34 95 8 22 22 52 24 98 24 49 15 36 33 2,830 106 96 85 55 104 18 25 188 0 26 201 164 1 63 72 13 66 226 130 18 58 8 63 12 28 23 37 74 77 4 30 160 190 99 66 32 38 79 71 49 49 33 170 11 23 24 53 42 117 37 68 14 50 48 3,591
EE-5th 184 124 114 91 182 24 28 300 0 42 328 262 4 73 141 22 72 442 224 31 111 8 110 6 35 25 43 134 116 6 43 277 310 177 105 44 60 128 84 79 84 38 126 14 18 29 69 58 210 62 148 21 80 50 5,595
EE-12th 365 283 241 187 349 51 63 600 0 83 637 546 5 168 260 44 190 915 448 55 208 18 220 26 88 60 95 253 239 12 106 548 641 358 205 90 119 260 198 168 174 104 388 32 61 74 171 119 422 120 263 49 164 129 11,671
EE-5th 192 135 122 95 200 26 35 339 0 49 382 281 4 81 147 22 74 448 230 32 115 10 112 7 37 26 45 136 122 7 44 287 314 179 123 53 72 135 86 81 86 40 129 15 19 31 71 63 213 64 150 22 82 52 5,922
EE-12th 381 305 256 196 387 56 76 678 0 98 748 585 5 184 274 44 194 928 460 58 215 22 223 28 92 63 98 258 251 15 109 569 650 362 244 107 142 273 202 172 177 107 394 34 64 77 176 129 429 125 267 51 168 133 12,343
182
Hudson Bend R d
10C 71 65 77
Bend
Road
12B 37 46 55
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 75 76 87
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 58 91 130
1B 63 91 146
3A 68 169 366
R
2B 65 79 101 3B 0 0 0
3C 3 14 54
3D 52 175 503
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 28 10B 9F 50 27 9 66 11E 10A 26 11A 12 11D 19 9E 22 31 26 13 111 19 107 46 15 146 21 124 65 9D 19 156 146 11B 47 7E 7D 202 36 42 103 7G 6C 209 41 132 43 7C 99 76 231 9C 143 41 33 129 104 64 46 41 6B 7B 119 82 0 19 7A 46 90 5 23 31 7F 6A Mur 8B fin 88 26 30 0 Ro 11 254 ad 38 1 105 305 121 8 340 6D 8G 5 53 4 5B 92 8E 162 5 4 144 204 8A FM 8C 20 247 195 62 5A 118 54 0 246 8F 435 168 310 5C 0 441 190 20 21 488 78 Hwy 71 28 22 4 4 FM 31 4 3J 76 0 70 11 3H 3G 80 24 77 37 120 47 156 86
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3F 2 4 4
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
183
Hudson Bend R d
1A 62 71 90
Ro
ur
10C 37 49 54
Bend
Road
12B 28 30 34
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 24 33 38
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 26 35 54
1B 35 53 80
3A 33 70 166
R
Hwy
2B 31 37 48
71
9B 42 9A 40 48 45 43 48 2C 12 50 133 2D 4 6 11 2E 6 7 8D 17 0 17 74
3B 0 0 0
3C 2 6 25
3D 20 64 224
ad
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
11C 8 10B 9F 17 16 5 25 11E 10A 20 11A 7 11D 9 9E 14 22 18 7 38 13 107 16 20 47 14 92 25 9D 22 52 103 11B 10 7E 7D 82 33 27 46 7G 6C 95 35 46 27 7C 41 43 106 9C 52 34 13 56 45 37 6B 7B 36 15 52 40 1 11 7A 17 44 2 12 19 7F 6A Mur 8B fin Ro 5 28 14 24 0 152 ad 28 0 38 141 45 4 158 6D 8E 8G 6 20 1 8 5B 38 6 74 8 64 23 88 8A FM 8C 108 75 62 5A 56 0 101 8F 220 79 133 5C 0 250 89 5 8 272 35 Hwy 71 6 22 4 4 FM 7 4 3J 46 0 52 4 3H 3G 57 11 32 19 41 25 59 43
oa
d
N
Ped
Roa
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3E 67 94 165
3F 0 0 0
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
184
Hudson Bend R d
1A 85 94 114
Ro
ur
10C 42 50 56
Bend
Road
12B 39 45 51
Ben d
Th
an
ce
Pa
ry er
ad
12A 42 47 52
Be
eC
ree
al es
2A 55 70 91
3A 45 104 207
R
Hwy
2B 39 47 59
71
3B 0 0 0
3C 1 8 29
11C 16 10B 9F 30 16 8 39 11E 10A 21 11A 9 11D 10 9E 17 24 25 10 61 13 160 34 21 67 14 169 44 9D 23 73 181 11B 30 7E 9B 7D 104 31 31 42 65 7G 6C 115 34 9A 47 72 24 7C 66 44 127 9C 59 51 78 28 35 82 59 37 69 6B 7B 31 35 67 47 74 3 19 7A 38 51 6 21 21 7F 6A Mur 2C 2D 8B fin Ro 9 47 22 25 0 11 4 166 ad 29 1 54 71 12 188 62 5 161 17 206 6D 2E 8G 8 6 39 10 5B 14 59 8E 97 11 8D 25 7 85 118 0 8A 15 FM 8C 141 28 120 62 5A 69 33 90 0 140 8F 185 96 174 5C 3D 0 224 107 14 29 13 250 97 43 Hwy 71 16 22 4 4 FM 17 269 4 3J 58 2 65 ad l Ro 8 3H 3G 70 P oo n ilt o 14 44 39 H am 59 46 78 66 1B 55 74 103 3E 75 120 196
Roa
oa
d
N
Ped
an ch
mle yR
Cru
er
y on an
3F 1 1 1
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
185
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 High Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2011 6th-8th 9th-12th 62 35 26 31 12 4 6 33 0 2 20 67 0 19 32 0 46 220 74 5 28 1 43 6 19 11 13 46 27 0 27 75 152 56 0 1 0 20 48 42 37 10 107 5 14 16 37 18 82 8 38 9 24 28 1,745 85 55 55 39 11 4 6 45 0 1 29 75 1 39 44 2 58 185 97 14 47 3 44 8 21 19 35 65 31 0 24 120 166 69 0 7 0 39 59 42 37 30 160 8 17 16 42 25 104 16 61 10 42 39 2,250 2012 6th-8th 9th-12th 68 36 25 28 16 3 5 41 0 3 24 73 0 23 35 1 50 248 80 5 35 1 46 8 24 12 16 46 25 0 26 79 151 72 1 1 1 21 47 39 42 21 92 5 14 19 44 17 84 12 49 12 31 28 1,883 84 58 56 39 17 6 9 54 0 1 34 80 1 40 43 2 60 209 101 13 48 3 47 9 22 19 33 68 41 0 25 119 176 85 1 7 1 40 65 43 41 28 161 8 19 19 45 26 108 18 63 11 43 38 2,387
EE-5th 137 63 58 65 26 2 7 68 0 3 52 113 2 37 77 0 76 435 162 20 88 0 76 5 31 19 33 103 42 0 43 195 254 118 0 4 0 53 77 68 64 47 107 9 22 27 71 26 202 28 111 19 75 37 3,458
EE-12th 284 153 139 135 49 11 19 147 0 6 100 255 3 95 153 2 180 841 333 39 163 4 162 19 71 49 80 215 99 0 94 390 572 243 0 12 0 112 184 152 138 87 374 22 53 59 150 69 389 52 210 38 141 104 7,453
EE-5th 146 70 67 71 42 4 6 86 0 3 67 127 3 37 89 1 69 422 169 24 93 0 82 1 29 22 33 114 60 0 46 209 277 150 3 7 2 63 75 73 69 42 115 10 20 23 66 31 205 30 131 17 72 37 3,711
EE-12th 298 164 147 138 75 13 20 181 0 7 126 280 4 100 167 4 179 879 350 43 176 5 174 18 75 53 82 228 127 0 97 407 604 307 6 14 4 125 187 156 151 91 369 22 53 60 155 74 397 61 243 39 145 104 7,981
186
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 High Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2013 6th-8th 9th-12th 68 47 30 35 26 4 5 51 0 3 35 79 0 22 36 2 51 245 82 6 36 1 41 7 23 12 14 45 34 0 33 94 137 75 4 3 2 31 42 39 38 32 89 6 19 19 47 14 93 13 45 12 32 27 1,984 87 63 61 43 30 8 10 68 0 2 47 91 1 41 48 3 62 215 108 15 50 4 51 9 23 20 34 69 51 0 26 125 180 89 5 9 3 45 66 45 43 29 164 8 20 20 46 29 111 22 65 12 44 41 2,564 2014 6th-8th 9th-12th 69 50 32 36 33 5 6 58 0 4 43 84 0 23 38 3 51 247 84 6 37 1 42 8 24 12 15 45 37 0 33 97 139 77 8 4 4 34 43 40 39 32 91 7 20 20 48 15 94 15 46 13 33 28 2,070 91 69 66 45 48 11 13 87 0 5 67 106 1 44 54 5 64 220 114 16 53 5 56 10 24 21 35 71 60 0 27 134 185 93 16 13 8 53 68 46 46 31 167 9 21 21 48 32 114 27 66 12 46 43 2,786
EE-5th 156 73 76 71 65 9 7 112 0 4 92 144 4 39 103 4 66 426 188 26 100 1 92 3 28 21 39 127 75 0 38 222 294 158 10 10 5 70 78 74 76 34 117 11 13 24 60 38 201 36 142 17 72 38 3,989
EE-12th 312 183 167 149 120 21 22 231 0 9 175 313 5 102 186 9 179 885 378 47 187 6 184 19 74 53 87 242 159 0 98 441 611 322 19 23 10 146 187 158 157 95 370 25 52 63 153 81 405 71 252 41 149 106 8,537
EE-5th 162 82 84 75 90 12 11 139 0 8 120 164 4 43 112 7 68 433 197 28 103 3 99 4 29 23 41 130 88 0 40 234 300 163 24 15 12 81 81 76 80 35 121 12 15 25 63 43 206 43 144 18 75 42 4,302
EE-12th 322 200 183 156 171 28 29 285 0 17 231 353 5 109 204 15 183 900 395 49 192 8 197 21 77 55 90 246 185 0 101 464 623 334 48 32 24 168 192 162 164 98 379 27 55 66 159 89 413 84 256 43 153 113 9,157
187
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 High Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2015 6th-8th 9th-12th 71 53 35 37 50 6 7 70 0 6 64 94 0 25 41 4 52 250 88 6 38 2 45 8 24 12 15 46 41 0 34 101 141 79 17 6 8 38 43 40 40 33 92 7 20 20 49 16 95 17 47 13 33 30 2,208 94 74 70 47 71 12 14 104 0 8 97 120 1 46 59 8 65 224 118 16 54 6 59 10 25 21 35 72 66 1 28 140 188 96 28 15 13 59 69 47 47 31 169 9 21 21 50 34 115 30 67 13 47 45 2,979 2016 6th-8th 9th-12th 75 58 39 39 67 7 8 86 0 9 92 108 0 28 44 7 53 254 93 7 39 2 47 8 25 13 15 47 45 1 34 108 144 81 28 9 12 44 44 41 41 33 94 7 20 20 50 18 97 20 48 13 35 31 2,387 97 79 75 49 91 13 15 122 0 12 128 135 1 50 62 10 66 229 124 16 55 6 62 10 26 21 36 73 70 1 28 147 192 98 40 19 18 65 70 48 48 32 171 9 22 22 51 36 118 33 68 13 48 47 3,180
EE-5th 167 91 91 79 133 15 13 169 0 14 175 190 4 47 120 11 70 441 204 28 105 5 104 4 30 23 41 132 99 1 41 246 305 168 46 20 21 92 82 77 82 36 124 12 15 26 65 46 209 50 146 19 76 46 4,655
EE-12th 333 218 195 163 254 33 33 343 0 28 336 405 5 118 219 23 186 915 410 51 197 12 209 22 79 56 91 250 206 1 102 487 634 343 91 42 42 189 195 165 169 100 385 28 56 67 163 96 420 97 259 44 156 120 9,843
EE-5th 173 100 99 82 168 17 16 201 0 21 229 217 4 54 126 16 72 449 215 29 108 5 109 4 32 23 42 134 106 1 42 258 312 173 68 26 31 103 84 79 84 37 128 12 16 27 67 49 213 55 147 19 79 49 5,009
EE-12th 345 238 213 171 326 38 40 409 0 42 449 460 5 132 233 33 190 932 432 52 202 13 217 22 82 57 93 254 220 3 104 514 648 352 136 53 61 212 198 168 173 102 393 28 58 69 168 103 427 107 263 45 162 127 10,576
188
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 High Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2017 6th-8th 9th-12th 78 64 42 41 85 9 10 106 0 14 122 123 0 32 48 9 54 257 98 7 40 2 49 8 25 13 16 48 48 1 35 114 147 84 38 13 18 50 45 42 42 33 96 7 20 21 51 20 99 22 48 13 35 32 2,574 101 84 78 51 108 15 17 141 0 16 156 149 1 54 66 12 67 232 129 17 56 6 64 10 26 21 36 74 73 2 29 153 194 101 50 22 23 71 71 48 49 32 173 9 22 22 52 38 119 35 69 13 49 48 3,353 2018 6th-8th 9th-12th 82 69 47 44 103 9 12 128 0 18 159 139 0 36 52 10 55 262 101 7 42 3 50 8 26 13 16 49 51 2 35 120 150 86 52 16 24 56 46 43 43 34 98 7 21 21 52 22 101 23 49 13 36 33 2,773 104 89 81 53 122 15 19 158 0 20 184 162 1 57 69 13 67 236 132 17 57 7 64 10 27 22 36 75 75 2 29 158 197 103 61 24 28 76 71 49 49 32 174 9 22 23 52 39 121 36 69 13 50 48 3,507
EE-5th 180 110 106 86 202 20 19 241 0 29 288 246 4 62 133 20 73 456 224 29 110 6 112 4 33 24 43 135 112 3 42 270 318 177 89 32 42 115 85 80 85 38 131 12 17 28 69 53 216 59 149 19 80 50 5,368
EE-12th 358 258 226 179 395 43 47 488 0 59 566 518 5 147 247 41 193 946 451 53 207 14 224 22 84 58 94 258 233 6 106 537 660 361 178 66 83 236 201 170 175 103 400 29 59 71 172 111 434 115 266 46 165 130 11,295
EE-5th 187 121 115 91 237 22 24 282 0 38 358 277 4 69 141 23 75 464 231 30 113 7 114 4 34 24 43 137 117 5 43 282 324 182 114 39 54 127 87 81 86 39 135 13 17 29 71 57 220 62 151 20 82 52 5,751
EE-12th 372 279 243 187 461 46 55 568 0 76 701 578 5 162 261 46 197 961 463 53 212 17 229 23 87 59 96 261 243 9 107 560 671 371 227 79 106 259 205 173 178 105 407 29 60 72 175 118 441 121 269 47 168 133 12,031
189
Projected Students by Grade Group 2011 through 2020 High Growth Scenario Planning Unit 1A 1B 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3J 4 5A 5B 5C 6A 6B 6C 6D 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 10A 10B 10C 11A 11B 11C 11D 11E 12A 12B Total 2019 6th-8th 9th-12th 86 75 50 46 118 10 14 147 0 22 191 153 0 39 55 11 56 267 105 7 43 4 51 8 27 13 16 50 53 3 36 127 154 88 63 19 30 61 47 44 43 34 100 7 21 22 53 23 103 24 50 14 37 34 2,955 108 95 86 56 140 16 22 181 0 24 224 180 1 61 73 14 69 242 136 17 60 8 66 11 28 22 37 77 78 4 30 166 201 106 75 29 35 81 73 50 50 33 177 10 23 23 54 41 124 38 71 14 51 49 3,737 2020 6th-8th 9th-12th 90 80 54 48 133 11 17 166 0 25 224 165 0 43 59 11 57 272 108 7 45 5 52 8 28 14 17 52 56 4 36 133 158 89 74 23 35 64 48 45 44 35 103 7 22 22 54 25 106 25 52 14 38 34 3,140 114 103 91 59 161 17 25 207 0 29 269 196 1 66 78 14 70 250 141 17 62 9 67 11 29 22 38 78 82 5 31 174 206 107 90 33 43 85 74 51 51 34 181 10 23 24 56 44 127 39 73 14 52 51 3,984
EE-5th 196 134 122 96 270 23 29 324 0 46 429 308 4 78 148 24 78 475 239 30 117 9 117 5 36 25 45 140 123 6 45 296 332 187 139 46 66 137 90 83 88 40 141 13 18 30 74 60 225 64 153 20 84 54 6,160
EE-12th 390 303 258 198 527 50 65 651 0 92 844 641 5 178 277 48 202 984 479 54 219 20 234 23 91 61 98 267 254 13 110 589 687 381 277 94 131 279 210 177 182 107 418 30 62 75 181 125 452 126 274 48 173 137 12,852
EE-5th 206 146 130 101 303 25 35 366 0 54 503 335 4 86 156 24 80 488 247 31 121 11 119 5 38 26 46 143 129 8 46 310 340 190 165 54 78 144 92 86 90 41 146 13 19 31 77 65 231 66 156 21 87 55 6,569
EE-12th 410 329 275 208 597 54 77 738 0 109 996 696 6 196 292 49 208 1,010 496 56 228 24 238 24 95 62 100 274 267 17 113 616 703 386 330 110 157 292 215 181 186 110 430 30 64 78 187 134 464 129 280 49 178 141 13,693
190
Transfers
ThedatathatPASAgeneratesforlongrangeplanningpurposesrepresentsthenumberof studentsprojectedtolivewithineachattendancezone(residentstudentsorgeocodedstudents) anddoesntnecessarilyindicatethenumberofstudentsprojectedtoattendeachschooldueto interandintraDistricttransfers.Forthesepurposes,transfersaredefinedasanystudent attendingaschoolotherthanhis/herschoolofresidenceforanyreason(voluntarytransfer requests,childrenofdistrictemployees,programmatictransfers,etc.).Thetransferpatternsof thecurrentstudentsinthe201011schoolyearareincludedinthefirsttablesinthischapterand canbeusedinconjunctionwiththeresidentstudentprojectionsforshorttermplanning purposes.However,PASAdoesnottypicallyusethesetransfersinlongrangefacilitiesplans,due tothefactthatthetransferpatternsinanydistrictcanchangemarkedlyoverashortperiodof time.
UndertheModerateGrowthScenario,L.T.I.S.D.overallisprojectedtogainover2,600new ElementarystudentsbetweenOctober2010andOctober202o.Importantly,almost50%ofthis growthisprojectedtooccurinthecurrentBeeCaveattendancezone,andBeeCaveElementary isprojectedtoexceeditspracticalcapacityof850studentsbythe201314schoolyear.Thus,the DistrictwouldbebestservedtoplanforElementary#6inalocationthatcanpullstudentsfrom thecurrentBeeCaveattendancezone. MiddleSchoolandHighSchoolPlanning Thelastmapsandspreadsheetsinthischapteraredevotedtocomparingprojected6th12thgrade population(underLow,ModerateandHighGrowthScenarios)tothecapacitiesattheMiddleand HighSchools.UndertheModerateGrowthScenario,theDistrictasawholeisprojectedto increasebyabout1,200MiddleSchoolstudentsand1,900HighSchoolstudentsoverthenext decade. ThemostpressingovercrowdingissueisdevelopingattheMiddleSchoollevel,withbothMiddle Schoolsprojectedtoreachtheirpracticalcapacities(900studentseach)bythe201314school yearundertheModerateGrowthScenario.Likewise,LakeTravisHighSchoolisprojectedto exceedits2,500studentcapacitybythe201415schoolyearundertheModerateGrowth Scenario. Onepossibilitycurrentlyunderdiscussionforaccommodatingthisprojectedpopulationgrowth involvestheexpansionofLakeTravisHighSchoolintotheLakeTravisMiddleSchoolfacility. Underthisscenario,theDistrictwouldrenovatetheLTMSfacilitytoaddcapacityof1,000 studentstoLTHS,buildanew,largerLTMSfacilityonadifferentsite,andwouldalsoexpandthe currentHudsonBendMiddleSchool.ByexpandingtheLTHScapacityto3,500andthetwo MiddleSchoolscapacitiesto1,200studentseach,theDistrictcouldpostponetheneedforathird MiddleSchoolandasecondHighSchoolconsiderably.Tablesoutliningthedetailsofthis AlternativeFacilityUtilizationplanareincludedinthischapter.
192
ElementarySchoolTransfers LakeTravisI.S.D.
Transferring Into: 104 101 102 Lake Pointe Lake Travis Lakeway Total Transfers Out: Net Transfers
103 Bee Cave Transferring From: Bee Cave Lake Pointe Lake Travis Lakeway Serene Hills Unknown Total Transfers In:
6 1 3 1 0 32 37 2 5 0 5 18
20 5 10 26 27 88
3 2 6 6 13 30
2 0 8 9 3 22
31 8 19 25 32 80 195
6 10 69 5 -10 ---
193
MiddleSchoolTransfers LakeTravisI.S.D.
Transferring Into: 042 041 Hudson Bend Lake Travis
Transferring From: Total Transfers Out: Net Transfers
12 8 9 17 14 26
12 8 23 43
5 18
194
Ro
Ben d
Th
ur
ce
Pa
an
ad
Bend
al es
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
ad
Re s
F M 22 44
Cru
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
mle yR
an ch
Roa
aca
Hudson Bend R d
ry er
Be
eC
ree
oa
d
Ped
er
y on an
Lake Travis I.S.D. Elementary Long Range Planning Projected Resident EE-5th Grade Students by Elementary Attendance Zone Low Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bee Cave Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Pointe Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Travis Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lakeway Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Serene Hills Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Total Practical Capacity Students Projected Student Margin 4,250 3,361 889 4,250 3,517 733 4,250 3,692 558 4,250 3,886 364 4,250 4,106 144 4,250 4,320 -70 4,250 4,541 -291 4,250 4,779 -529 4,250 4,989 -739 4,250 5,234 -984 850 693 82% 157 850 597 70% 253 850 801 94% 49 850 686 81% 164 850 584 69% 266 850 790 93% 60 850 580 68% 270 850 820 96% 30 850 717 84% 133 850 610 72% 240 850 868 102% -18 850 587 69% 263 850 839 99% 11 850 758 89% 92 850 640 75% 210 850 955 112% -105 850 600 71% 250 850 867 102% -17 850 783 92% 67 850 681 80% 169 850 1,064 125% -214 850 615 72% 235 850 894 105% -44 850 809 95% 41 850 724 85% 126 850 1,177 138% -327 850 628 74% 222 850 914 108% -64 850 839 99% 11 850 762 90% 88 850 1,300 153% -450 850 642 76% 208 850 933 110% -83 850 868 102% -18 850 798 94% 52 850 1,442 170% -592 850 658 77% 192 850 948 112% -98 850 896 105% -46 850 835 98% 15 850 1,571 185% -721 850 671 79% 179 850 957 113% -107 850 919 108% -69 850 871 102% -21 850 1,715 202% -865 850 689 81% 161 850 976 115% -126 850 941 111% -91 850 913 107% -63
196
Ro
Ben d
Th
ur
ce
Pa
an
ad
Bend
al es
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
ad
Re s
F M 22 44
Cru
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
mle yR
an ch
Roa
aca
Hudson Bend R d
ry er
Be
eC
ree
oa
d
Ped
er
y on an
Lake Travis I.S.D. Elementary Long Range Planning Projected Resident EE-5th Grade Students by Elementary Attendance Zone Moderate Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bee Cave Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Pointe Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Travis Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lakeway Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Serene Hills Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Total Practical Capacity Students Projected Student Margin 4,250 3,408 842 4,250 3,617 633 4,250 3,839 411 4,250 4,091 159 4,250 4,382 -132 4,250 4,663 -413 4,250 4,954 -704 4,250 4,250 4,250 5,266 5,596 5,922 -1,016 -1,346 -1,672 850 702 83% 148 850 602 71% 248 850 812 96% 38 850 697 82% 153 850 595 70% 255 850 807 95% 43 850 593 70% 257 850 844 99% 6 850 739 87% 111 850 634 75% 216 850 898 106% -48 850 605 71% 245 850 876 103% -26 850 786 92% 64 850 674 79% 176 850 997 117% -147 850 625 74% 225 850 918 108% -68 850 821 97% 29 850 730 86% 120 850 1,123 132% -273 850 648 76% 202 850 961 113% -111 850 860 101% -10 850 790 93% 60 850 1,252 147% -402 850 671 79% 179 850 996 117% -146 850 903 106% -53 850 841 99% 9 850 1,395 164% -545 850 693 82% 157 850 1,031 121% -181 850 942 111% -92 850 893 105% -43 850 1,557 183% -707 850 718 84% 132 850 1,059 125% -209 850 984 116% -134 850 948 112% -98 850 1,721 202% -871 850 746 88% 104 850 1,096 129% -246 850 1,024 120% -174 850 1,009 119% -159 850 1,881 221% -1031 850 773 91% 77 850 1,133 133% -283 850 1,063 125% -213 850 1,072 126% -222
198
Ro
Ben d
Th
ur
ce
Pa
an
ad
Bend
al es
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
ad
Re s
F M 22 44
Cru
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
mle yR
an ch
Roa
aca
Hudson Bend R d
ry er
Be
eC
ree
oa
d
Ped
er
y on an
Lake Travis I.S.D. Elementary Long Range Planning Projected Resident EE-5th Grade Students by Elementary Attendance Zone High Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bee Cave Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Pointe Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Travis Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lakeway Elementary Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Serene Hills Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Total Practical Capacity Students Projected Student Margin 4,250 3,457 793 4,250 3,710 540 4,250 3,989 261 4,250 4,307 -57 4,250 4,656 -406 4,250 5,010 -760 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 5,366 5,754 6,161 6,569 -1,116 -1,504 -1,911 -2,319 850 716 84% 134 850 608 72% 242 850 824 97% 26 850 704 83% 146 850 605 71% 245 850 828 97% 22 850 606 71% 244 850 867 102% -17 850 755 89% 95 850 654 77% 196 850 933 110% -83 850 626 74% 224 850 909 107% -59 850 815 96% 35 850 706 83% 144 850 1,051 124% -201 850 653 77% 197 850 967 114% -117 850 860 101% -10 850 776 91% 74 850 1,206 142% -356 850 680 80% 170 850 1,012 119% -162 850 901 106% -51 850 857 101% -7 850 1,369 161% -519 850 707 83% 143 850 1,050 124% -200 850 950 112% -100 850 934 110% -84 850 1,549 182% -699 850 733 86% 117 850 1,083 127% -233 850 996 117% -146 850 1,005 118% -155 850 1,747 206% -897 850 764 90% 86 850 1,117 131% -267 850 1,041 122% -191 850 1,085 128% -235 850 1,948 229% -1098 850 797 94% 53 850 1,154 136% -304 850 1,091 128% -241 850 1,171 138% -321 850 2,145 252% -1295 850 833 98% 17 850 1,196 141% -346 850 1,138 134% -288 850 1,257 148% -407
200
Ro
Ben d
Th
ur
ce
an
ad
Bend
Pa
Ge ne
ra l
Hudson Bend R d
ry er
Be
eC
ree
oa
d
illi a
T he H
l ls
Hwy 71
244 FM 2
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
ad
Cru
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
mle yR
an ch
Roa
Resa
Ca v
Fa
ca
lc
Ped
al es
so n
er
y on an
ad he on
d Blv FM
62
Be e
eP
y kw
Lake Travis I.S.D. Middle School Long Range Planning Projected Resident 6th-8th Grade Students by Middle School Attendance Zone Low Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hudson Bend Middle School Practical Capacity 900 Students Projected 884 Percent Utilization 98% 16 Student Margin Lake Travis Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Total Practical Capacity 1,800 Students Projected 1,691 Student Margin 109 1,800 1,783 17 1,800 1,834 -34 1,800 1,870 -70 1,800 1,948 -148 1,800 2,059 -259 1,800 2,179 -379 1,800 2,307 -507 1,800 2,397 -597 1,800 2,504 -704 900 807 90% 93 900 905 101% -5 900 878 98% 22 900 901 100% -1 900 933 104% -33 900 914 102% -14 900 956 106% -56 900 938 104% -38 900 1,010 112% -110 900 969 108% -69 900 1,090 121% -190 900 1,001 111% -101 900 1,178 131% -278 900 1,030 114% -130 900 1,277 142% -377 900 1,049 117% -149 900 1,348 150% -448 900 1,076 120% -176 900 1,428 159% -528
202
Lake Travis I.S.D. Middle School Long Range Planning Projected Resident 6th-8th Grade Students Low Growth Scenario Alternate Facility Utilization: New LTMS and Renovated HBMS Each Have 1,200 Student Capacity
Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hudson Bend Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 1,200 901 75% 299 1,200 914 76% 286 1,200 956 80% 244 2,400 1,870 530 1,200 938 78% 262 1,200 1,010 84% 190 2,400 1,948 452 1,200 969 81% 231 1,200 1,090 91% 110 2,400 2,059 341 1,200 1,001 83% 199 1,200 1,178 98% 22 2,400 2,179 221 1,200 1,030 86% 170 1,200 1,277 106% -77 2,400 2,307 93 1,200 1,049 87% 151 1,200 1,348 112% -148 2,400 2,397 3 1,200 1,076 90% 124 1,200 1,428 119% -228 2,400 2,504 -104
Lake Travis Middle School Practical Capacity 1,200 Students Projected 933 Percent Utilization 78% Student Margin 267 Total Practical Capacity 2,400 Students Projected 1,834 Student Margin 566
203
Ro
Ben d
Th
ur
ce
an
ad
Bend
Pa
Ge ne
ra l
Hudson Bend R d
ry er
Be
eC
ree
oa
d
illi a
T he H
l ls
Hwy 71
244 FM 2
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
ad
Cru
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
mle yR
an ch
Roa
Resa
Ca v
Fa
ca
lc
Ped
al es
so n
er
y on an
ad he on
d Blv FM
62
Be e
eP
y kw
Lake Travis I.S.D. Middle School Long Range Planning Projected Resident 6th-8th Grade Students by Middle School Attendance Zone Moderate Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hudson Bend Middle School Practical Capacity 900 Students Projected 904 Percent Utilization 100% -4 Student Margin Lake Travis Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Total Practical Capacity 1,800 Students Projected 1,720 80 Student Margin 1,800 1,835 -35 1,800 1,912 -112 1,800 1,968 -168 1,800 2,077 -277 1,800 2,225 -425 1,800 2,377 -577 1,800 2,533 -733 1,800 1,800 2,683 2,830 -883 -1,030 900 816 91% 84 900 939 104% -39 900 896 100% 4 900 948 105% -48 900 964 107% -64 900 968 108% -68 900 1,000 111% -100 900 1,011 112% -111 900 1,066 118% -166 900 1,061 118% -161 900 1,164 129% -264 900 1,106 123% -206 900 1,271 141% -371 900 1,150 128% -250 900 1,383 154% -483 900 1,200 133% -300 900 1,483 165% -583 900 1,246 138% -346 900 1,584 176% -684
205
Lake Travis I.S.D. Middle School Long Range Planning Projected Resident 6th-8th Grade Students Moderate Growth Scenario Alternate Facility Utilization: New LTMS and Renovated HBMS Each Have 1,200 Student Capacity
Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hudson Bend Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 1,200 948 79% 252 1,200 968 81% 232 1,200 1,000 83% 200 2,400 1,968 432 1,200 1,011 84% 189 1,200 1,066 89% 134 2,400 2,077 323 1,200 1,061 88% 139 1,200 1,164 97% 36 2,400 2,225 175 1,200 1,106 92% 94 1,200 1,271 106% -71 2,400 2,377 23 1,200 1,150 96% 50 1,200 1,383 115% -183 2,400 2,533 -133 1,200 1,200 100% 0 1,200 1,483 124% -283 2,400 2,683 -283 1,200 1,246 104% -46 1,200 1,584 132% -384 2,400 2,830 -430
Lake Travis Middle School Practical Capacity 1,200 Students Projected 964 Percent Utilization 80% Student Margin 236 Total Practical Capacity 2,400 Students Projected 1,912 Student Margin 488
206
Ro
Ben d
Th
ur
ce
an
ad
Bend
Pa
Ge ne
ra l
Hudson Bend R d
ry er
Be
eC
ree
oa
d
illi a
T he H
l ls
Hwy 71
244 FM 2
ilt o H am
Ro ool nP
ad
Cru
[
Miles 0 0.5 1 2
mle yR
an ch
Roa
Resa
Ca v
Fa
ca
lc
Ped
al es
so n
er
y on an
ad he on
d Blv FM
62
Be e
eP
y kw
Lake Travis I.S.D. Middle School Long Range Planning Projected Resident 6th-8th Grade Students by Middle School Attendance Zone High Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hudson Bend Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Lake Travis Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin Total Practical Capacity 1,800 Students Projected 1,742 58 Student Margin 1,800 1,885 -85 1,800 1,986 -186 1,800 2,073 -273 1,800 2,209 -409 1,800 2,388 -588 1,800 2,574 -774 1,800 1,800 1,800 2,774 2,954 3,137 -974 -1,154 -1,337 900 912 101% -12 900 830 92% 70 900 963 107% -63 900 922 102% -22 900 982 109% -82 900 1,004 112% -104 900 1,021 113% -121 900 1,052 117% -152 900 1,073 119% -173 900 1,136 126% -236 900 1,134 126% -234 900 1,254 139% -354 900 1,192 132% -292 900 1,382 154% -482 900 1,255 139% -355 900 1,519 169% -619 900 1,311 146% -411 900 1,643 183% -743 900 1,376 153% -476 900 1,761 196% -861
208
Lake Travis I.S.D. Middle School Long Range Planning Projected Resident 6th-8th Grade Students High Growth Scenario Alternate Facility Utilization: New LTMS and Renovated HBMS Each Have 1,200 Student Capacity
Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Hudson Bend Middle School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 1,200 982 82% 218 1,200 1,021 85% 179 1,200 1,052 88% 148 2,400 2,073 327 1,200 1,073 89% 127 1,200 1,136 95% 64 2,400 2,209 191 1,200 1,134 95% 66 1,200 1,254 105% -54 2,400 2,388 12 1,200 1,192 99% 8 1,200 1,382 115% -182 2,400 2,574 -174 1,200 1,255 105% -55 1,200 1,519 127% -319 2,400 2,774 -374 1,200 1,311 109% -111 1,200 1,643 137% -443 2,400 2,954 -554 1,200 1,376 115% -176 1,200 1,761 147% -561 2,400 3,137 -737
Lake Travis Middle School Practical Capacity 1,200 Students Projected 1,004 Percent Utilization 84% Student Margin 196 Total Practical Capacity 2,400 Students Projected 1,986 Student Margin 414
209
Lake Travis I.S.D. High School Long Range Planning Projected 9th-12th Grade Students
Low Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Lake Travis High School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 2,500 2,188 88% 312 2,500 2,261 90% 239 2,500 2,371 95% 129 2,500 2,515 101% -15 2,500 2,627 105% -127 2,500 2,742 110% -242 2,500 2,835 113% -335 2,500 2,913 117% -413 2,500 3,026 121% -526 2,500 3,175 127% -675
Moderate Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Lake Travis High School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 2,500 2,219 89% 281 2,500 2,324 93% 176 2,500 2,467 99% 33 2,500 2,651 106% -151 2,500 2,803 112% -303 2,500 2,961 118% -461 2,500 3,095 124% -595 2,500 3,210 128% -710 2,500 3,393 136% -893 2,500 3,591 144% -1,091
High Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Lake Travis High School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 2,500 2,250 90% 250 2,500 2,386 95% 114 2,500 2,563 103% -63 2,500 2,785 111% -285 2,500 2,978 119% -478 2,500 3,179 127% -679 2,500 3,352 134% -852 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,506 3,736 3,983 140% 149% 159% -1,006 -1,236 -1,483
210
Lake Travis I.S.D. High School Long Range Planning Projected 9th-12th Grade Students Alternate Facility Utilization: Expansion of LTHS into the LTMS Facility
Low Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Lake Travis High School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 3,500 2,627 75% 873 3,500 2,742 78% 758 3,500 2,835 81% 665 3,500 2,913 83% 587 3,500 3,026 86% 474 3,500 3,175 91% 325
Moderate Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Lake Travis High School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 3,500 2,803 80% 697 3,500 2,961 85% 539 3,500 3,095 88% 405 3,500 3,210 92% 290 3,500 3,393 97% 107 3,500 3,591 103% -91
High Growth Scenario Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall Fall 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Lake Travis High School Practical Capacity Students Projected Percent Utilization Student Margin 3,500 2,978 85% 522 3,500 3,179 91% 321 3,500 3,352 96% 148 3,500 3,506 100% -6 3,500 3,736 107% -236 3,500 3,983 114% -483
211