TABLEOFCONTENTS
LINTRODUCTION1II.THECOMMISSIONPLAYSACRITICALROLEASGATEKEEPERAGAINSTUNFAIRIMPORTS3III.REPLYTOGOOGLE'SSUBMISSION
.4
A.
Google'sSubmissionAskstheCommissionToBroadenItsAnalysisofthePublicInterestBeyondtheBoundariesofSection337
.4
B.
Android'sPurported"OpenPlatform"StatusDoesNotJustifyIgnoringthePatentLaws8I.AndroidIsNotan"OpenPlatform"9a.AndroidHoneycomb'sSourceCodeIsClosed9b.Android"CompatibilityRequirements".102.OpenSourceIsSubjecttotheSamePatentLawsasAllOthers
in
theMarketplace12C.TheInterest
in
ProtectingPatentRightsOutweighsAnyConceivableHarmtoCompetitiveConditionsandthePublicHealthandWelfare.l41.GoogleFocusesontheHarmResultingfromUndefined"InjunctiveRelief'NottheHarmthatWouldResultFromtheSpecificScopeofanExclusionOrder152.AnExclusionOrderWouldNotHarmCompetitionintheSmartphoneMarket153.AnExclusionOrderWouldNotHarmthePublicHealthandWelfare.....17IV.REPLYTOHTC'SSUBMISSION.18
A.
HTC'sClaimthatIts4GMobileProductsAreIrreplaceableIsFaulty181.HTC'sClaimthat
It
Manufactures50%ofAll4GHandsetsIsMisleading,as40HandsetsRepresentaNewMarketandThereIsMuchDebateastoWheretheDividingLineBetween"3G"and"4G"Stands.182.Evenasthe40MarketCurrentlyStands,HTCImproperlyAssertsthatits40ProductsLackCompetitiveSubstitutes.19B.Like,orDirectlyCompetitiveAlternativestoHTC'sAndroidPhonesareReadilyAvailable19
11