ContractingAuthorityResponseLetter:
19th
August,
2011
AdlairAviation
(1983)
Ltd.Appea
I
Letter:BoardHearings:
26th
August,
201112th
September,
201111th
October,
2011
InreviewingthistlrnellnetheNNIContractingAppealsBoardfoundthatalltherelevantpartiesfollowedtheNNIPolicywithregardtothevarioustimedeadlinesthathadtobemetinaccordancewiththeNNIPolicy,inanyappeal'tothisBoard.ThereforetheBoardfoundthatwerenodefectsin
the
appeal.withregardtothetimelimitationscontainedintheNNIPolicy.Decision:Section
18.14
ofthe
NNI
Policystates:"WheretheappealfiledwiththeBoarddoesnotfallwithinthejurisdictionoftheBoardtheappealmaybedismissedbyorderoftheBoardwithoutholdingahearing."TheBoardreviewedtheAppealLetterfromAdlairAviation
(1983)
Ltd.datedthe
26th
ofAugust,
2011
forthereasonsgivenforAdlairAviation(1983)Ltd.appeal.TheBoardfoundthatAdlairAviation(1983)Ltd.gaveintheopeningparagraphofthatlettersufficientindicationthatitwasappealingthemannerinwhichN'NIadjustmentswerenotgiventoitselfandweregiventoAqsaqniqAirwaysLtd.tofallwithinthejurisdictionoftheNNIAppealsBoard.TheBoard,therefore,fe.ltthattheappealshouldnotbedismissedwithoutahearingand
a
hearingwasheld.AtthesittingoftheBoardheldonthe
11th
dayofOctober,
2011,
theBoardheardsubmissionsfromAdlalrAviation(1983)Ltd.,AqsaqniqAirwaysLtd.andtheContractingAuthority.Aswell,theBoardallowedMr.PaulLaserichofAdlairAviation(1983)topresenttotheBoardandtheotherpartiesabinderwhichcontainedvariousdocuments.TheBoardalsoallowedMr.LaserichtoreviewthesedocumentswiththeBoard,ashefelttheymighthelptheBoardinitsdeliberations.TheBoardhasfoundwithregardtothisbinderand.Mr.Laserich'sreviewthatanythingrelatingtothetimeperiodaftertheclosingoftheRFPonthe8
th
ofApril,
2011
couldnotbeconsideredbytheBoardinitsdeliberationsasbeingoutsidethejurisdictionoftheBoard.TheBoardcouldnotacceptnewevidencenorcouldPage3of5