Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Daniel Slayter's Motion to Quash RE: Davenport v Slayter

Daniel Slayter's Motion to Quash RE: Davenport v Slayter

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,776|Likes:
Published by wst
a motion to quash subpoena duces tecum, protective order and other relief
a motion to quash subpoena duces tecum, protective order and other relief

More info:

Published by: wst on Nov 01, 2011
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/08/2015

pdf

text

original

 
CIVILSUITNUMBER:120116
DANIELRAYSLAYTER
ZOIIOCT
!
7
rtf'
10:
:2
ALEXANDRIACITYCOU::..¥-I17
*_.~
Cltl,,\
J,-
'1h~~+.:
PARISHOFRAPIDES~STATEOFLOUISIANATHEDAVENPORTFIRM,APLCandTHOMASD.DAVENPORT,
JR.
VERSUSMOTIONTOQUASH,FORPROTECTIVEORDER,ANDTODISQUALIFYATTORNEYNOWINTOCOURTcomesDaniel
R.
Slayter,aresidentanddomiciliaryoftheCityofAlexandria,RapidesParish,Louisianawhomovesasfollows:
1.
TheabovecaptionedsuitwasfiledbythePlaintiffsonAugust22,2011,butservicehasbeenwithheld.
It
isunknownwhyservicehasbeenwithheldandthispleadinginnotananswernorawaiverofservice.2.Despitelackofservice,TewannaSarpyandBrittanyKier,neitherofwhomarepartiestothissuitorlicensedtopracticelaw,haveissuedsubpoenasinthismatter[Exhibit"A"]onbehalfof"TheDavenportFirm".
3.
ItispresumedthatTewannaSarpyand
Brittany
KierareactingontheinstructionsofTommyDavenport,theloneattorneyfor"TheDavenportFirm".
Mr.
Davenportfailstorealizethatheand"TheDavenportFirm"arebothpartiesinthissuitandthereforeheisinherentlydisqualifiedfromrepresenting"TheDavenportFirm".
In
fact,Mr.Davenportshouldneverhavefiledasuitonbehalfofacorporationwhenheisapartytotheactionhimself.
Page10/5
----I..
 
4.
Thisisnotmerely"tipfortap"litigation,Mr.DavenporthasalreadyinanothersuitinvolvingMr.Slayterattemptedtoinvoke"attorney-clientprivilege"betweenhimselfand"TheDavenport
Firm".
IfMr.DavenportisallowedtorepresenthisowncorporationthendiscoverywouldbecomeimpossibleasMr.Davenporthasalreadydemonstratedhewillattempttoinvokeprivilegeonvirtuallyanything.This
MotiontoQuash
isfilednowtopreventsettingaprecedenceinthismatter.5.Mr.Davenportisofcoursewelcometoissuesubpoenas
in
a
prose
capacitybuthecannotissuesubpoenasonbehalfof"TheDavenportFinn"norcanthenon-attorneystaffof"TheDavenport
Finn"
issuesubpoenas,norcan
Mr.
Davenportrepresenttheotherpartyinthissuit,"TheDavenportFinn".6.Asaresultoftheseimpropersubpoenas,Mr.SlaytermovesthatthesubpoenasissuedinthismatterbequashedandthatThomasD.Davenport,Jr.bedisqualifiedastheattorneyfor"TheDavenportFinn".7.Further,sinceMr.Davenporthasdeliberatelywithheldserviceandisattemptingtoissue"secretsubpoenas",
Mr.
SlaytermovesforaprotectiveorderpreventingtheissuanceofsubpoenasuntilsuchtimethatMr.Davenportand"TheDavenportFirm",throughanattorney,requestserviceuponMr.Slayter.
Page
2
0/5
_._
..
]
..
 
WHEREFORE,
DanielR.Slayterprays:1.thatallsubpoenasissued
in
thismatterbequashedpendingahearingandthatthepartiesbeenjoinedfromissuingsubpoenaspendingahearing;2.thataruleissuedirectingThomasD.Davenport,Jr.and"TheDavenportFirm"toshowcausewhy:a.thesubpoenasissuedinthismattershouldnotbequashedandwhyaprotectiveordershouldnotissueenjoiningThomasD.Davenport,
Jr.
and"TheDavenportFirm"fromissuinganysubpoenasuntilserviceisrequested;b.ThomasD.DavenportJr.shouldnotbedisqualifiedastheattorneyfor"TheDavenportFinn";2.forfull,generalandequitablerelief.Respectfullysubmitted:
---"1
age
3
0/5

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
cenlabriarpatch liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->