Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The best way to describe the conversation around the states retirement system is Smoke and Mirrors. Over the last several years, the private sector cleverly shifted employees from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans. To justify the shift and reduction in benefits, corporate executives used the guise of uncontrollable economic forces an aging workforce, volatile stock markets, and a costly pension system that crippled their ability to compete. In reality, corporate sponsored pension plans had such massive surpluses that the companies could have fully paid their current and future retirees pensions, even if all of them lived to be 99 and the companies never contributed another dime. The masterminds behind the elaborate and well-orchestrated schemes were comprised of the corporations top executives and their accomplices benefit consultants, investment brokers, insurance companies and giant banks including Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. Retirement Heist by Ellen Schultz details the tactics that were successfully employed to cipher off hundreds of billions of dollars in employee pension benefits and effectively divert those funds to corporate coffers, stakeholders, and the masterminds own pockets. By exploiting loopholes, ambiguous regulations, and new accounting rules, hundreds of companies essentially turned pension plans into piggy banks. The truth behind the so-called retirement crisis and movement afoot to dismantle employee pensions pure and simple GREED. Nationwide, millions of employees fell for the elaborate deception. The result those employees are increasingly relying on 401k plans which have already proven to be a failure. Employees save too little, too late, spend the money before retiring, and see their savings erased when the market nosedives. The truth is 401(k) plans are designed to ensure the plans will never benefit the majority of employees. The plans are supposed to provide a level playing field, the do-it-yourself retirement vehicle perfect for an ownership society. But the game has been rigged from the beginning. Companies in fact use these plans as part of a strategy to borrow money cheaply or as part of still ongoing schemes to siphon assets from pension funds. What we have here is a similar Smoke and Mirrors movement with regard to the SCRS. Reforming if not overhauling the retirement system is among Governor Nikki Haleys top three legislative priorities. Outdated data, overstated financial challenges, and faulty assumptions have spurred a heightened sense of urgency and panic that has led to the establishment of special committees in both chambers to develop a proposal in advance of the upcoming legislative session. From the beginning of this process, the influx of misinformation, conflicting facts and even competing reports have precluded the formation of valid recommendations. Working through each component and separating fact from fiction has been an evolving process. Determining the plans actual unfunded liability has been one of the biggest challenges. A number of figures have been thrown around ranging anywhere from $13 billion to as high as $40 billion.
Page | 1
Page | 3
Page | 5
3. 28 Year Retirement and TERI In 2005 and 2008 the General Assembly instituted significant reform measures that outside of the extraordinary economic downturn in 2008-2009 would have reversed the growing unfunded liability trend. Most significant among those measures - requiring retired members who return to covered employment including TERI participants - to make the same employee contribution as an active member. In addition, TERI benefits remain in the system until the end of the employees TERI period establishing what has been referred to as a cash cow for the system. For instance, in FY2010, TERI assets generated $2.6 million in investment income. Consequently, the revised provision relating to TERI participants and rehired retirees has not only neutralized the cost to the system, the added provision has created a new window of investment income. Pension benefits are based on the total years of service. For example, the average final compensation for a state retiree is $19,000. Retirement at 28 years would net an annual pension of approximately $9,700. However, retirement at 30 years would net an annual pension of approximately $10,400. The difference, $700, represents an average savings of almost 1% every year over the term of the pension. State agencies have been encouraged to develop succession plans and knowledge transfer approaches to prepare for impending departures. According to the Office of Human Resources Workforce Planning Report, agencies report compensation related issues have presented significant obstacles in their attempt to recruit qualified candidates. There are about 25,000 rehired retirees and 4,000 TERI participants in full time positions. By returning to work, they
Page | 6