those who
can’t get admitted to more rigorous studies start out in education from
day one.
This doesn’t mean that all educators are uneducated but the majority certainly are
.They set the tone for the whole endeavor making any improvement virtuallyimpossible as has been proven over decades. An example of critiques of theeducation schools and their graduates is Gary Lyons article in Texas Magazine,Sept. 1979. Lyons reported that half of the teacher applicants to the HoustonIndependent School District scored lower in math and a third of them lower in
English than the average high school junior and he blamed the state’s sixty
-threeaccredited teacher-training institutions
for turning out “teachers who cannot read as
well as the average sixteen-year old, write notes free of barbarisms to parents, orhandle arithmetic well enough to keep track of the field-
trip money.” He accused
the teacher colleges of coddling ignorance an
d, “backed by hometown legislators,”of turning out “hordes of certified ignoramuses whose incompetence in turn
becomes evidence that the teacher colleges and the educators need yet more money
and more power.”
Arthur Levine, then president of Columbia Teachers College (when he wrote hisreports) in his three part critique of education schools starting with Educating
School Leaders in 2005 reinforced Lyons’ criticisms of
26 years earlier. Hepointed out the low SAT and GRE scores but also that administrators as a group
had lower SAT and GRE scores than the teachers they were “leading.” He also
bemoaned the lack of rigor as being related to universities, even those with goodreputations, using education schools as a low quality diploma mill with loweringstandards and admission requirements to support the levels of income needed tofund more important career majors at the universities.Back to the new research: They found that when teachers and other workers arecompared by cognitive ability, Richwine added, "the wage penalty has essentiallydisappeared." Also, their research showed that when teachers left teaching to takeprivate sector jobs their pay declined by 3%. Of course, the party line of theteachers unions is that teachers are constantly tempted by higher pay in the privatesector, which is perhaps true for some teachers but not for the average teacher.