Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Correlation Structure of International Equity Markets During Extremely Volatile Periods

Correlation Structure of International Equity Markets During Extremely Volatile Periods

Ratings: (0)|Views: 169|Likes:
Published by api-3715003

More info:

Published by: api-3715003 on Oct 18, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/18/2014

pdf

text

original

CORRELATION STRUCTURE
OF INTERNATIONAL EQUITY MARKETS
DURING EXTREMELY VOLATILE PERIODS1
Fran\u00e7ois Longin2 and Bruno Solnik3
Abstract

Recent studies in international finance have shown that correlation of international equity returns increases during volatile periods. However, correlation should be used with great care. For example, assuming a multivariate normal distribution with constant correlation, conditional correlation during volatile periods (large absolute returns) is higher than conditional correlation during tranquil periods (small absolute returns) even though the correlation of all returns remains constant over time. In order to test whether correlation increases during volatile periods, the distribution of the conditional correlation under the null hypothesis must then be clearly specified. In this paper we focus on the correlation conditional on large returns and study the dependence structure of international equity markets during extremely volatile bear and bull periods. We use \u201cextreme value theory\u201d to model the multivariate distribution of large returns. This theory allows one to specify the distribution of correlation conditional on large negative or positive returns under the null hypothesis of multivariate normality with constant correlation. Empirically, using monthly data from January 1959 to December 1996 for the five largest stock markets, we find that the correlation of large positive returns is not inconsistent with multivariate normality, while the correlation of large negative returns is much greater than expected.

First version: May 1996 This version: July 2, 1999
Keywords: international equity markets, volatility, correlation and extreme value theory.
JEL classification numbers: G15, F3.

1 We would like to thank David Bates, Michael Brandt, Bernard Dumas, Paul Embrechts, Jacques

Olivier and the participants at the Bachelier seminar (Paris, October 1997) and the American Finance Association meetings (New York, January 1999) and the French Finance Association (Aix-en- Provence, June 1999) for their comments. Jonathan Tawn provided many useful suggestions. We also would like to thank Ren\u00e9 Stulz (the editor) and an anonymous referee whose comments and suggestions helped to greatly improve the quality of the paper. Longin benefited from the financial support of the CERESSEC research fund, and Solnik from the support of the Fondation HEC.

2 Department of Finance, ESSEC Graduate Business School, Avenue Bernard Hirsch, B.P. 105, 95021
Cergy-Pontoise Cedex, France. Affiliated with the CEPR. Tel: (+33) 1 34 43 30 40. Fax: (+33) 1 34 43
30 01. E-mail: longin@essec.fr.
3 Department of Finance and Economics, HEC School of Management, 78351 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex,
France. Tel: (+33) 1 39 67 72 84. Fax: (+33) 1 39 67 70 85. E-mail: solnik@hec.fr.
1

International stock market correlation has been widely studied. Previous studies4 suggest that correlation is larger when we focus on large absolute-value returns, and that this seems more important in bear markets. The conclusion that international correlation is much higher in periods of volatile markets (large absolute returns) has indeed become part of the accepted wisdom among practitioners and the financial press. However, one should exert great care in testing such a proposition. The usual approach is to condition the estimated correlation on the observed (orex

post) realization of market returns. For example, the total sample is split in two subsets depending on

whether the realized return on one series is "large" (volatile period) or "small" (tranquil period) in absolute value. Unfortunately correlation is a complex function of returns and such tests can lead to wrong conclusions, unless the null hypothesis and its statistics are clearly specified.

To illustrate our point, let us consider a simple example where the distribution of returns on two markets (say U.S and U.K.) is multivariate normal with zero mean, unit standard deviation and a constant correlation of 0.50. Let us split the sample in two fractiles (50%) based on absolute values of U.S. returns. The first fractile consists of "small" returns (absolute returns lower than 0.674), the second fractile consists of "large" returns (absolute returns higher than 0.674). Under the assumption of normality with constant correlation, the conditional correlation5 of small returns is 0.21 and the conditional correlation of large returns is 0.62. It would be wrong to infer from this large difference in conditional correlation that correlation differs between volatile and tranquil periods, as correlation is constant by assumption. Another approach would be to condition correlation on the signed value of U.S. returns, not on the absolute value. Then, the conditional correlation of multivariate normal returns will always be less than the true correlation of 0.50. For example, considering positive returns, the semi-correlation is equal to 0.33, it drops to 0.25 when conditioning on returns larger than one standard deviation and 0.19 when conditioning on returns larger than two standard deviations. Of course, similar results obtain when conditioning on negative U.S. returns. Still the true correlation is constant and equal to 0.50. Boyer, Gibson and Loretan (1999) further show that

4See Lin, Engle and Ito (1994), Erb, Harvey and Viskanta (1994), Longin and Solnik (1995), Karolyi
and Stulz (1996), Solnik, Bourcrelle and Le Fur (1996), De Santis and G\u00e9rard (1997), Ramchmand and
Susmel (1998), Ang and Bekaert (1999) and Das and Uppal (1999).
5Our results are obtained from simulations of a multivariate normal distribution and can be easily
replicated. Forbes and Rigobon (1998) and Boyer, Gibson and Loretan (1999) provide some analytical
derivations.
2

conditional correlation is highly non-linear in the level of return on which it is conditioned. They also indicate that a similar problem exists when the true data-generating process is not multivariate normal but follows a GARCH model.

An obvious implication is that one cannot conclude that the "true" correlation is changing over time by simply comparing estimated correlations conditional on different values of one return variable. First the distribution of the conditional correlation that is expected under the null hypothesis (e.g. a multivariate normal distribution with constant correlation) must be clearly specified in order to test whether correlation increases in periods of volatile markets. This has not be done so far.

In this paper we study the correlation structure of international equity returns and derive a formal statistical method, based on extreme value theory, to test whether the correlation of large returns is higher than expected under the assumption of multivariate normality. We focus on extreme price movements and can derive the asymptotic distribution of conditional tail correlation. An attractive feature of the methodology is that the asymptotic tail distribution is characterized by very few parameters regardless of the actual conditional distribution. The motivation for focusing on extreme returns is twofold. First, correlation breakdowns, if they occur for large returns, can be more easily observed on extreme returns. Second, and more importantly, we can derive the asymptotic distribution of conditional tail correlation, which is not possible for other parts of the distribution of the conditional correlation.

The first contribution of this paper is to provide a test of multivariate normality by focusing on the correlation of extreme returns. Not surprisingly, the hypothesis of multivariate-normality is rejected. However, this rejection comes mostly during bear markets. There is little evidence of a breakdown in correlation during volatile bull markets. A second contribution is that our formulation provides a description of the distribution of extreme returns and, hence, a better understanding of the risk characteristics of a global portfolio.

The paper is organized as follows: The first section presents some theoretical results about the extremes of univariate and multivariate random processes. It summarizes the main results of extreme value theory and draws the implications for the correlation of extreme returns. The second section presents the econometric methodology and the third section the empirical results.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->