Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAPS
Lower Murray Local Action Planning Groups
Kjartan Tumi Bjornsson
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... i
LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................... iii
LIST OF MAPS ........................................................................................................................... iii
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ iii
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1
Section 1.01 Environmental, Social and Cultural Significance of wetland ............................. 1
(a) History of Swanport wetland ........................................................................................ 1
Section 1.02 Why does Swanport wetland need a management plan? ................................. 2
(a) Mission Statement ....................................................................................................... 2
(b) Vision Statement ......................................................................................................... 2
(c) Broad Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2
(d) Current Achievements ................................................................................................. 2
Chapter 2. SITE DESCRIPTION OF SWANPORT WETLAND .................................................. 4
Section 2.01 Wetland Location and description .................................................................... 4
Section 2.02 Survey Sites, Dates & Locations ...................................................................... 5
Section 2.03 PHYSICAL FEATURES ................................................................................... 6
(a) Swanport wetland in Current State .............................................................................. 6
(b) Geomorphology, Geology And Soils ............................................................................ 8
(c) Climate ........................................................................................................................ 8
(d) Wetland Volumes and Water Requirements for various filling stages .......................... 8
(e) Surface and Groundwater Features ............................................................................. 8
Section 2.04 ECOLOGICAL FEATURES ............................................................................ 11
(a) Flora .......................................................................................................................... 11
(b) Fauna ........................................................................................................................ 12
Chapter 3. SOCIAL ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL VALUES .................................................. 17
Chapter 4. LAND TENURE, JURISDICTION AND MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS ......... 18
Section 4.01 LAND TENURE .............................................................................................. 18
Section 4.02 LAND AND WATER USE ............................................................................... 19
Section 4.03 JURISDICTION AND MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ...................................... 20
Chapter 5. THREATS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS TO SWANPORT WETLAND .............. 21
Chapter 6. MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES .............................................................................. 24
Chapter 7. IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN (ON GROUND ACTION AND TIMETABLE) .......... 28
Chapter 8. MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 31
Chapter 9. EVALUATION, REVIEW AND REPORTING .......................................................... 33
Section 9.01 Evaluation and Review ................................................................................... 33
Section 9.02 Reporting ....................................................................................................... 33
Chapter 10. REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 34
Appendix A. Wetlands Atlas Data for Wetland Main Body .......................................................... 35
i
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Appendix B. Surface Water Archive Graph ................................................................................ 36
Appendix C. Baseline Survey Locations (Source SKM (2004)) .................................................. 37
Appendix D. Baseline Survey DEM (Source SKM (2004)) .......................................................... 38
Appendix E. Baseline Survey Groundwater (Source SKM (2004)) ............................................. 39
Appendix F. Baseline Survey Vegetation Zones (Source SKM (2004)) ...................................... 44
Appendix G. Species List for Swanport wetland ..................................................................... 45
Section G.01 FLORA ........................................................................................................... 45
Section G.02 WETLAND AND FLOODPLAIN FAUNA ......................................................... 49
(a) Birds of Swanport Surrounds and Lower Lakes ......................................................... 49
(b) Frogs ......................................................................................................................... 51
(c) Fish ........................................................................................................................... 52
(d) Macroinvertebrates .................................................................................................... 53
ii
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Open water 17/03/06 (TB) ................................................................................................ 6
Figure 2: Herbland 17/03/06 (TB) .................................................................................................... 6
Figure 3: North channel into north lagoon 13/02/06 (AF) ................................................................. 6
Figure 4: Small open water area of north lagoon 13/02/06 (AF) ...................................................... 6
Figure 5: Bird hide 17/03/06 (TB) .................................................................................................... 7
Figure 6: Boardwalk 17/03/06 (TB) ................................................................................................. 7
Figure 7: Jetty 17/03/06 (TB) .......................................................................................................... 7
Figure 8: Old boardwalk through herbland 17/03/06 (TB) ................................................................ 7
Figure 9: Broadshell tortoise (JH) .................................................................................................. 15
Figure 10: Broadshell tortoise (JH) ................................................................................................ 15
Figure 11: Murray Bridge No.1 Pump Station Daily Read (5 year period) (Department of Water
Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2005) ............................................................................ 36
LIST OF MAPS
Map 1: Swanport wetland location .................................................................................................. 4
Map 2: Map of Wetland (map courtesy of Barbara Martin, hetta designs) ....................................... 5
Map 3: Current water movement within Swanport wetland ............................................................ 10
Map 4: Fish sampling locations ..................................................................................................... 14
Map 5: Cadastral boundaries covering Swanport wetland and surrounds. .................................... 18
Map 6: Swanport wetland existing fences ..................................................................................... 19
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Baseline survey monitoring of following parameters .......................................................... 5
Table 2: Water quality (SKM 2004) ................................................................................................. 8
Table 3: Groundwater monitoring locations (SKM 2004) ............................................................... 10
Table 4: Groundwater salinity EC (mS/cm) ................................................................................... 11
Table 5: Habitat features identified in Swanport wetland table adapted from (SKM 2004). ............ 13
Table 6: Dominant macroinvertebrates at Swanport wetland (table adapted from (SKM 2004)) .... 15
Table 7: Swanport wetland responsible positions contact details .................................................. 20
Table 8: Existing and prospective threats to Swanport wetland ..................................................... 22
Table 9: Benefit and threats of willow removal .............................................................................. 24
Table 10: Management objectives for Swanport wetland. ............................................................. 25
Table 11: Implementation plan for Swanport wetland land based activities. .................................. 29
Table 12: Monitoring plan for Swanport wetland. .......................................................................... 32
Table 13: Swanport wetland, Wetland atlas data (Jensen et al. 1996) .......................................... 35
Table 14: Plant Associations at Swanport wetland (adapted from River Murray Wetlands Baseline
Survey (SKM 2004)) .............................................................................................................. 45
iii
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Table 15: Swanport wetland plant ID list from ‟99 (obtained from community group) ..................... 46
Table 16: Bird species identified at Swanport wetland .................................................................. 49
Table 17: Birds identified at Swanport wetland by community member Peter Koch....................... 49
Table 18: Frogs at Morgan‟s Lagoon, date identified and significant aspects. ............................... 51
Table 19: Native fisha ................................................................................................................... 52
Table 20: Introduced fish............................................................................................................... 52
Table 21: Macroinvertebrate taxa and abundance (SKM 2004)..................................................... 53
iv
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
This management plan was written by Kjartan Tumi Bjornsson for the Mannum to Wellington
Local Action Planning Committee Inc., and reviewed and endorsed by the SA River Murray
Wetland Technical Group.
Funding was provided by the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality, the Natural
Heritage Trust, and the River Murray Catchment Water Management Board.
The management plan has been prepared according to the Guidelines for developing wetland
management plans for the River Murray in South Australia 2003 (River Murray Catchment Water
Management Board and Department of Water Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2003) and as
such fulfils obligations under the Water Allocation Plan for the River Murray Prescribed
Watercourse.
Disclaimer:
The Mannum to Wellington Local Action Planning Committee Inc. do not guarantee that the
publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and
therefore disclaim all liability for any error, loss or other consequences, which may arise from you
relying on any information in this publication.
Cite as:
Bjornsson, K. T. (2006). Swanport Wetland Management Plan. Mannum to Wellington Local
Action Planning Committee Inc., Murray Bridge.
Acknowledgements:
This wetland management plan has been developed with the support of a number of organisations,
community groups and individuals. Special thanks go to Kathryn Rothe, Adrienne Frears and Jem
Tesoriero for assistance with the draft.
Thanks also go to those that contributed their knowledge including; Marshall F. Carter and Steven
Walker of the Ngarrindjeri nation (traditional landowner cultural values), Peter Koch (birds), the
Swanport wetland community group the South Australian Murray Darling Basin Natural Resources
Management Board and the members of the South Australian River Murray Wetland Technical
Group.
For further details contact:
Mannum to Wellington LAP
PO Box 2056
Murray Bridge, SA 5253
Phone: (08) 8531 3222
Fax: (08) 8532 5300
Photographs:
Cover photograph: South lagoon, open water (TB),
Bottom: North lagoon, herbland (TB)
Photographs in document by Tumi Bjornsson (TB), Adrienne Frears (AF), or Jason Higham (JH).
v
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION
This wetland management plan is structured in accordance with the criteria set out in the Guidelines
for developing wetland management plans for the River Murray in South Australia (River Murray
Catchment Water Management Board and Department of Water Land and Biodiversity
Conservation 2003).
3
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
4
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Site physical Y 4
Vegetation Y 11
Fish Y 16/11/03 23/3/04 13
Birds Y Spring Summer 12
Frogs Y 3/12/03 29/1/04 12/3/04 2/9/04 13
Macroinvertebrates Y 4/12/03 10/3/04 14
Water Quality Y 4/12/03 30/1/04 10/3/04 9/6/04 8
Groundwater Y 10
NR = Not Recorded; BLS = baseline survey (SKM 2004); SARDI = South Australian Research and
Development Institute
5
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
SECTION 2.03 PHYSICAL FEATURES
(a) SWANPORT WETLAND IN CURRENT STATE
Swanport was grazed for a prolonged period ending in 1990. The past land use would account for
the degradation of the vegetation in the wetland and therefore weed infestation. In the recent past
revegetation of the area has restored a large part of the vegetation community, although many
weeds remain including willows. Figure 1 through to Figure 8, show the wetland and its fringing
vegetation in its current state. Figure 1 shows the relatively large area of open water in the wetland,
the channel connecting to the River Murray being slightly to the left of the centre of the photograph
(not clearly seen). This open water section is used both by water birds and recreational boating.
Both these uses can under circumstances clash. One possible solution in resolving the conflict
between the impact on birds and the uses by recreational craft is discussed in this wetland
management plan (see Chapter 5). Figure 2 shows a significant section of the north lagoon of
Swanport wetland, which contains important herbland communities. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the
north channel and the small open water section of the north lagoon identified in Map 3. Figure 5
shows one of the bird hides available at the wetland. Figure 6 shows the boardwalk over the open
water section of the south lagoon. Figure 7 shows the historic jetty on the River Murray and Figure
8 shows the old timber boardwalk along the riverside of the herb community of the north lagoon.
Below the boardwalk is the seeping south channel into the wetland identified in Map 3.
Figure 3: North channel into north lagoon Figure 4: Small open water area of north
13/02/06 (AF) lagoon 13/02/06 (AF)
6
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
7
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
(b) GEOMORPHOLOGY, GEOLOGY AND SOILS
The soil for most of the wetland was sand with some silt present, the area to the east close to the
upland area was made up of clay. The soil salinity (determined as EC 1:5) were below 1 mS/cm.
The sandy areas had a decreasing salinity with depth and the clay area increasing salinity with depth
(SKM 2004). Copies of the soil logs from the baseline survey can be found in Appendix E.
Locations are presented in Section 2.03(e)(ii).
(c) CLIMATE
The following climatic conditions are taken from the Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) Murray
Bridge station (number 024521) (Latitude (deg S): -35.1234; Longitude (deg E): 139.2592) (BOM
2005). The recording of data commenced at Murray Bridge in 1885; the latest records used in the
assessment of the climatic condition of the area stemming from 2004.
Swanport wetland has a Mediterranean climate with warm dry summers and cool wet winters. The
median (5th decile) annual rainfall is 341.5 mm. The mean monthly maximum rainfall is in June and
August (37.1 mm), the minimum in January (16.3 mm). The expected mean daily maximum
temperature is highest in February at 29.2 C, lowest in July at 16.2 C, and has an annual mean of
22.7 C. The minimum daily temperature is at its maximum in February at 14.6 C and its minimum
in July at 5.4 C. The annual mean daily minimum temperature is 9.8 C.
(d) WETLAND VOLUMES AND WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIOUS FILLING STAGES
The wetland volume was not calculated in the baseline survey, although a DEM was developed for
this area by the baseline survey (see Appendix D). As the wetland will not have hydrological
management and will therefore not be seeking a water allocation this lack of data will not be a
detriment to this wetland management plan.
(e) SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER FEATURES
8
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Max. 109 108 485 145
Water Temperature C Mean 19.3 ± 0.2 23.8 ± 0.7 28.4 ± 1.0 18.7 ±0.1
Min. 18.7 22.0 26.7 18.6
Max. 19.7 25.1 31.2 18.9
n 4 4 4 4
n = sample size
The slightly higher salinity within the wetland compared to the river can be attributed to
evapoconcentration partly driven by the shallow nature of the wetland (SKM 2004). However, the
EC is well below that of seawater (which is at ~50 mS/cm), and is simular to that of the River
Murray indicating a good connection between the two. As a comparison the River Murray EC,
obtained from the DWLBC Surface Water Archive (Department of Water Land and Biodiversity
Conservation 2005), was 378 μS/cm on the 4th December 2003 compared to a mean of 483 μS/cm
in the wetland, 479 μS/cm on the 30th January 2004 compared to 542 μS/cm in the wetland, 484
μS/cm on the 10th March 2004 compared to 704 μS/cm in the wetland and 446 μS/cm on the 9th
June 2004 compared to the wetland monitored at 528 μS/cm. The monitoring location from which
the DWLBC Surface Water Archive is derived is at the Murray Bridge Number 1 Pump station on
the River Murray (Zone 54, 344059 E and 6114654 N).
The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations were variable throughout the wetland, SKM (2004)
attributed this to time of day the measurements were taken, DO consumed during night time, and
the season, high DO content during warm seasons increases plant growth. Other factors influencing
the DO content could be wind direction and exposure leading to surface mixing (SKM 2004). SKM
(2004) associated the high monitored pH levels during the March monitoring date to the abundance
of algae within the wetland. The high temperatures may have stimulated the photosynthesis of algae
to the extent that the CO2 levels within the wetland dropped significantly. CO2 can act as carbonic
acid in water, its removal would therefore raise the pH within the wetland (SKM 2004).
The turbidity of the wetland was variable both between monitoring dates as well as from site to site,
this can potentially be contributed to the shallow nature of the wetland and therefore the likelihood
of resuspension of sediment as a consequence of wind action. The clarity of the wetland was at its
best during the December and January survey dates, with the mean turbidity values likely to have a
minimum impact of light penetration into the water column. The highest turbidity was recorded
during the March monitoring date. The water temperature of the wetland reflected the seasonal air
temperatures (SKM 2004). For a description of the implications of water quality in wetlands refer to
Your Wetland: Supporting Information (Tucker et al. 2003).
The Flood Inundation Model (FIM III) does not extend downstream beyond Mannum and is
therefore unavailable for this region. No simulations were therefore performed for Swanport
wetland based on the Flood Inundation Model. However, to provide some understanding of the
current flow within Swanport wetland Map 3 shows the flow direction of water currently at the
wetland.
9
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
(ii) Groundwater
The baseline survey installed 4 groundwater wells within Swanport wetland; two existing wells
were within the wetland area. These wells were monitored 4 times during the survey period (21 st
January, 10th March, 9th June and 2nd September 2004). The locations of the wells are presented in
Table 3 and a map of the groundwater flow direction in Appendix E.
Table 3: Groundwater monitoring locations (SKM 2004)
As seen in Appendix E groundwater seems to flow from the river through the wetland as well as
from the higher land in the north of the wetland area. The groundwater flowed from the wetland to
10
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
depression basins in the west and east of the wetland (SKM 2004). These depression basins
probably have a high water loss through evaporation due to the shallow water table (0.21 and 0.61
m bgl). The groundwater salinity was found to be relatively high in the depression basin and
otherwise low in all other areas, see Table 4. The high groundwater salinity of both wells within the
depression basins supports the assessment of groundwater flow to these areas. SW2 was excluded
from analysis as it was believed to have been vandalised (SKM 2004). The ground water levels
were found to fluctuate with the seasonal climatic fluctuation, with the depth increasing towards
March and then decreasing with the onset of winter (SKM 2004) (see Appendix E). The salinity in
the wetland was more comparable to River Murray levels indicating that the main influence stems
from the Murray (SKM 2004).
Table 4: Groundwater salinity EC (mS/cm)
NAME 21/1/04 9/6/04
MOB03104 43.30
MOB03105 4.46
SW1 3.89 7.51
SW2 7.53
SW4 9.94 12.50
SW5 1.78 2.01
11
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Eleocharis acuta and Triglochin procerum Sedgeland over *Paspalum distichum;
Eleocharis sphacelate Closed Sedgeland; and
Halosarcia pergranulata ssp. pergranulata Low Open Shrubland
The vegetation survey found seven species of conservation significance; these are included in the
detailed list of species found within the plant associations that can be found in Appendix G. For a
description of the function of vegetation in wetlands refer to Your Wetland: Supporting Information
(Tucker et al. 2003).
(i) Birds
The bird assessment of the River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004) was conducted at
three locations around the wetland (see Appendix C). One site (site 1) overlooked the open water,
one (site 3) the herbland and one (site 2) was a transect through the centre of the wetland. Eleven
species of waterbird were observed in the wetland with only 26 individuals in total (SKM 2004).
Two of these species were EPBC (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999)
listed, the black-winged stilt and the great egret both migratory species (SKM 2004). Table 16 in
Appendix G Section G.02(a) contains a list of the birds observed at the Swanport wetland.
Thompson (1986) identified the wetland as being a habitat for waterbirds, he recorded black swans
Cygnus atratus on the wetland and Australian pelicans Pelecanus conspicillatus. There were also
100 bird species identified at Swanport wetland by community member Peter Koch, a keen and
well-recognised amateur ornithologist, with 10 of them breeding at the wetland. The species can be
seen in Appendix G Section G.02(a). The survey by Peter Koch commenced in 1993 and is
ongoing.
The habitat availability was considered to have influenced the abundance of bird populations in
Swanport wetland. The habitat availability identified by the baseline survey (SKM 2004) are listed
in Table 5. However, according to community group members the frequent use of the open water
through recreational boating is causing disturbance to birds using the wetland. This may account for
the low numbers of birds observed at the wetland during the baseline survey.
12
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Table 5: Habitat features identified in Swanport wetland table adapted from (SKM 2004).
Habitat features Spring Summer
Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Shoreline Complex Complex Complex Complex Complex Complex
Mix of tall Mix of tall Mix of tall Mix of tall Mix of tall Mix of tall
Fringing vegetation dense dense dense dense dense dense
vegetation vegetation vegetation vegetation vegetation vegetation
Reeds Occasional Occasional Absent Occasional Absent Absent
Sedges Extensive Extensive Extensive Extensive Extensive Extensive
Herbs Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Extensive
Wet mud Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Occasional
Dry mud Absent Absent Absent Absent Occasional Absent
Hollow bearing trees Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional
Perching trees Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional
In/above In/above In/above In/above >100m from In/above
Water‟s edge veg veg veg veg veg veg
Fringing River Red Gums Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional Occasional
Water depth (m) 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3
Water level Stable Stable Stable Stable Falling Stable
(ii) Frogs
Five frog species were recorded at Swanport. The brown tree frog Litoria ewingi, common froglet
Crinia signifera eastern banjo frog Limnodynastes dumerilii, long thumbed frog Limnodynastes
fletcheri and Peron‟s tree frog Litoria peroni. The survey sites of the frog survey were based at the
western end of the lagoon. Further monitoring is recommended to identify the habitat used by frogs
in Swanport wetland so that this habitat can be maintained as part of adaptive management. Table
18 lists the frogs identified during the baseline survey as well as some breeding information. Some
boxes have been installed to improve the shelter available for frogs.
(iii) Fish
The South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) conducted the fish survey at
Swanport wetland. The fish species and relative abundance are presented in Table 19 and Table 20
in Section G.02(c) (tables were adapted from Leigh, Ye et al. (2004)). The sampling points for
Swanport wetland can be seen in Map 4, with the sampling dates being November 2003 and March
2004.
13
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
(iv) Macroinvertebrates
The River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004) monitored macroinvertebrates at
Swanport on two dates (4 December 2003 and 10 March 2004). There was a high diversity of
macroinvertebrates with 34 taxa amounting to a total of 5,757 macroinvertebrates collected at
Swanport wetland. Table 6 lists the most abundant macroinvertebrates and Table 21 in Appendix G
Section G.02(d) lists all the macroinvertebrates collected at Swanport wetland. The dominant
macroinvertebrates are tolerant to pollution and disturbance. There was an increase in the more
dominant tolerant species on the second sampling date. (SKM 2004). Thompson (1986) noted the
14
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
wetland as having diverse macroinvertebrate fauna with the presence of chironomids, copepods,
odonates, notonectids and prawns. For a description of the function of macroinvertebrates in
wetlands refer to Your Wetland: Supporting Information (Tucker et al. 2003).
Table 6: Dominant macroinvertebrates at Swanport wetland (table adapted from (SKM 2004))
Taxa (family level unless indicated otherwise) Abundance Tolerance
Nematoda (Phylum) 2124 Pollution, disturbance
Oligochaeta (Class) 1226 Pollution, disturbance
Chironominae (Subfamily) 1137 Pollution, disturbance, some
species saline tolerant
Corixidae 372 Pollution, disturbance,
ubiquitous in still and slow
flowing water
Tanypodinae (Subfamily) 264 Pollution, disturbance, some
species saline tolerant
Total abundance 5757
Total number of taxa 34
(v) Tortoise
A broad-shell turtle Chelodina expansa was caught during the fish survey (Jason Higham pers.
com.) and shows the wetland to provide some habitat for these tortoises (see Figure 9 and Figure
10). Records should be kept of future tortoise sightings and possible nest locations to identify any
habitat provided by Swanport wetland for this species.
15
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
works at the wetland and control of the wetland hydrology it will not be possible to manage the
exotic species. The wetland is an important habitat for the local native fish, it is therefore important
that the connection and passage between the wetland and the river should be kept open (Leigh et al.
2004). The increase in the number of snags (large woody debris) may provide some of the habitat
missing due to the lack of submerged macrophytes. The high dominance of tolerant
macroinvertebrates species suggests either high levels of pollution of the wetland or a disturbance.
This information is however not conclusive as information on macroinvertebrates and the
SIGNAL2 score is not sufficient for the Lower River Murray. However, the reduction in fish may
perhaps have influenced the increase in macroinvertebrates from the first to the second sampling
dates.
Based on the information collected the bird habitat should be maintained and in the long term
increased. The revegetation with suitable native tree species along the levee bank will assist in
future provision of hollow bearing trees and perching trees. In the mean time alternate options could
be explored such as instillation of bird boxes and perching stands. The control of access or access
times to the open water could also contribute to the habitat quality for the water birds using the
wetland. This option should be explored with all stakeholders using the wetland. Fish not impacted
on through any current management of the wetland; the only avenue to having control of fish access
to the wetland is through the construction of screened culverts. Future monitoring of frogs should
assist in monitoring any impacts that the management or current use of the wetland may have.
16
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
17
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
18
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
19
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
20
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
21
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Table 8: Existing and prospective threats to Swanport wetland
THREATS SYMPTOM CAUSE IMPACT CATEGORY EXTENT POTENTIAL SOLUTION
Altered hydrology in Permanently Constant river levels barge Copy from ML & SS Regional & Local Wetland proper and Addressed in this management plan
river system inundated wetland construction (Regional cause river Local management fringing low lying Introduce “natural” water regime
and lake regulation, Local cause response areas Lowering of sill level of overflow channels
Existing
Blockage of flow path Slow flow into Expansion of willows Increased sedimentation in wetland Local Wetland Addressed in this management plan
wetland Aggradation Removal of willows and replacement with
Spread of Typha native species (partially completed)
Saline groundwater Saltpan in Lack of wetland inundation Rising of saline groundwater Regional & Local Wetland area Don‟t dry wetland
Potential
Poor water quality: Turbid wetland, Wind resuspension of Blocking of light penetration and Local Wetland body Restoration of open flow path to minimise the
Existing (minor threat)
turbidity restricting sediment therefore reducing macrophyte growth sedimentation within the wetland.
growth/loss of Lack of macrophytes – less nutrient
macrophytes and uptake which become available to algae
therefore potential which are not as impacted on by high
algal bloom turbidity
Algal blooms
Degradation of habitat quality for
fauna (e.g. macroinvertebrates, native
fish and birds)
Loss of submerged Their Lack of variable water Loss of habitat availability and Local Wetland Introduce alternate wetland hydrology - dry
aquatic vegetation absence/low regime with wet and dry phases diversity lagoons/regional then inundate wetland (potential gain does not
numbers Mismanagement of wetland (will impact on bird weigh up against the threat to existing herb and
hydrology habitat) wetland flora communities)
Permanent inundation and
therefore no regeneration
Woody weeds Large number of Clearing Loss of habitat/breeding hollows Local Surrounding area. Active removal and/or poisoning
willows Grazing (birds) Extensive Revegetate
Establishment of willows Loss of snags in water body
Weed infestation Competition with native vegetation
Past mismanagement of Loss of ecological function of native
wetland species lost
Weeds Their presence Degradation of native Exotic species Local Higher ground of Active removal – poisoning
BIOTIC
Existing
Reed expansion into Expansion of Suitable environment for Loss of herb area Local Herb area Active removal
herb area Typha Typha Loss of vulnerable plants and
dependent species
Lack of habitat (birds) Low abundance Low habitat variability Low abundance of birds Local and Regional Wetland and Revegetate with native species
of bird species Loss of bird habitat wetland Increase habitat availability (instillation of bird
during survey surrounding area perches and boxes)
22
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
THREATS SYMPTOM CAUSE IMPACT CATEGORY EXTENT POTENTIAL SOLUTION
Invasive fish species Turbid wetlands Well known environmental Competition for habitat (domination Regional and local Wetland water Monitor abundance of invasive species with
(carp, gambusia, Reduction in problem in region (large pest of available habitat) body comparative monitoring of abundance of native
goldfish and redfin) native fish diversity population) Predation/aggressive interaction species consider management if future research
and abundance Rapid breeding cycles (carp on/with small and young native fish provides potential strategies.
~2/year), live bearing (redfin/gambusia)
(gambusia), unpalatable eggs Damage to aquatic vegetation
(redfin) Decrease in water quality (Turbidity
Existing
increase)
Predation on native fish (redfin)
Rabbits Warrens Rabbits Degradation of vegetation Regional and local Wetland area Baiting and shooting
BIOTIC
Foxes Dug up turtle Foxes Large detriment and threat to turtle Regional and local Wetland area Fox baiting and shooting
nest eggs breeding Destruction of fox holes
Fox holes Impact on native fauna
Undermining of bank Banks failure Loss of binding capacity of Opening up of wetland to main rive r Regional and local Wetland water Leave Willows in situ (poison only, do not
stability following willow existing vegetation channel body remove
Potential
removal Changing the wetland type and Planting of native species (red gums) to
significantly altering the ecology and replace function of maintaining bank stability as
habitat structure within the wetland willows are removed/decay
Remove no more than 10% of willows on
bank per year
Disturbance/ Noise Inappropriate recreational Disturbance to water birds and other Local Wetland area Educate all stakeholders and users
inappropriate use/ Unsettled birds use (canoeing during low water native animals Restrict access/ access type (ban houseboats
Low abundance levels, frequent use by canoes, Resuspending sediment increasing entering open water, ban jet skis, restrict access
overuse
and reduced potential inappropriate access turbidity leading to degradation of water by canoes to times when the water level is high
diversity of birds by other recreational craft) quality and associated impacts (entry during low water level causes undue
Turbid wetland Uncontrolled use (access to Access to sensitive areas/ disturbance))
Degradation of sensitive areas, access of the degradation of vegetation (new tracks) Complete circuit boardwalk to allow easy and
herbland (new tracks and bord walk) potential spread of weeds minimal impact access to the area
tracks) Poor control of visitors
Spread of weeds
Damage to herb area Obvious damage New boat access to herb Disturbance to water birds and other Regional and local Wetland area Installation of hardwood pylons blocking boat
Existing
area
Lack of regeneration No regeneration Possibly rabbits Long term viability of revegetation in Local Wetland area Deal with Rabbits
of vegetation Possibly competition by question Remove weeds
weeds Research for cause
Toileting in wetland Faeces and toilet Poor access to toilets in a Unhygienic wetland environment Local Wetland area Installation of good quality composting toilet
area (bush) by paper found in heavily used recreational area Damage to revegetation (access to
surrounding sheltered spot)
visitors vegetation
(unhygienic)
Strength of bird hides Old and Age Safety concerns Local Wetland area Rebuild bird hides
degrading Rot
structures
Vandalism Damaged Vandalism Degradation of wetland Local Wetland area Education of public
infrastructure Lack of „ownership‟ by wider Damage to infrastructure leading to
Potential
23
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
24
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Table 10: Management objectives for Swanport wetland.
MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES SOLUTIONS ACTIONS (Management (M) or QUANTIFIABLE MONITOR LEGISLATION PRIORITY
Engineering or structural (ES)) /MEASURE OF ACHIEVEMENT (TIMING)*
Maintain diverse plant Maintain plant diversity including Map the vegetation in more detail No loss of species diversity Photo point (Q) High
community with seven the seven threatened species of (need expert input) Vegetation
species with regional regional significance. Monitor and map vegetation survey (Y)
conservation status Maintain (and probably enhance) changes over 2 to 5 years
Native
introduction of native species such bank Survival of more than 50% of survey (Y)
as river red gums, lignum and river Poison another 10% leave standing revegetation
coobah Revegetate with native species
such as river red gums, lignum and
VEGETATION
river coobah
Removal of weeds from Establish weed removal projects Weed control as per revegetation Reduction of 50% of identified Vegetation High
wetland area in the wetland area plan weeds/year and no net increase survey (Y)
Invasive
Control/remove reeds/willows
herb meadow habitats) around flow path (as part of the first sedimentation
10%) Identify source of sediment and
Maintain existing area of wet method of reducing it.
herb meadow habitats Active removal of Typha from herb
Control or stop the spread of areas (need expert recommendation).
Typha into herb areas and open
water
Ease movement of fish Clear flow channels between Clear willows blocking channel as Visible migration during flow Opportunistic Medium
Nativ
between wetland and wetland and the river part of 10% per annum Monitoring of fish
e
goldfish in Nov-03) the best option given the wetland is Increase snags in wetland
FISH
25
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES SOLUTIONS ACTIONS (Management (M) or QUANTIFIABLE MONITOR LEGISLATION PRIORITY
Engineering or structural (ES)) /MEASURE OF ACHIEVEMENT (TIMING)*
Maintain > 5 breeding Improved frog habitat through Restore riparian vegetation No net decrease in frog diversity and Frog survey (Q) Low
frog species in summer improved and more diverse Monitor frog populations abundance
(interim target) ecological niches (habitat) Identify the areas they inhabit.
Maintain native frog Revegetate with native riparian
FROGS
Native
habitat species
Maintain herb area
Fish and frogs, need to identify
the area they occupy. Include in
monitoring.
Improved habitat for Provide bird perches and Revegetate with native riparian Increase in bird abundance using Bird survey Medium
water birds (waterfowl, breeding boxes species. wetland (At least double current levels) (1/2Y)
Native/Migratory
waders and shorebirds, Revegetate surrounding area Build bird perches and breeding Increase in habitat diversity in long Vegetation
etc.) with native vegetation (long term boxes term survey (Y)
BIRDS
production of tree hollows) Restoration of wetland habitat and Existence of perches and hollows Observation
Leave 50% of dead willows conditions for native fish species, (boxes)
standing (act as perches) migratory water birds, native water
birds and fringing species, and
aquatic and riparian plant species
Reduce groundwater Maintain freshwater lens under Maintain current inundation Monitor wetland salinity (no net Monitor water Low
impact on wetland wetland increase over time) quality (M)
Monitor soil salinity (no net increase Monitor soil
GW
Salinity (Reasonable Maintain surface water salinity at Increase water exchange by Long term decrease of water salinity Monitor water Medium
surface water EC but <1000 EC 100% of the time removing 10% of willows per year, not quality (M)
WQ
potential groundwater Maintain flow into (and out of) more otherwise we may impact on
gradient from the north wetland in the upper (open water) levee bank stability. Start with willows
towards the wetland) section above the causeway in flow channel.
Turbidity (Turbidity 369 Open/improve connection with Identify sources of turbidity (take Visibly clear water Monitor water High
WQ
NTU in Mar-04) river appropriate response). Maintain turbidity at <150 NTU 100% quality (M)
of the time Observation
Improve connectivity of Restore/maintain flow paths into Increase water exchange by Clear distinct channel Photopoint (Q) High
MANAGEMENT
Structural
wetland with River Murray wetland removing 10% of willows per year, not Observation
more otherwise we may impact on
levee bank stability. Start with willows
in flow channel.
Control access to wetland Complete present ring loop trail Construction of boardwalk Presence of boardwalk. Photopoint (Q) Medium
Miscellane
areas over herb area. Construction of Indigenous clearance No new paths in wetland area Observation
boardwalk. Boardwalk needs to
ous
ou
ne
ce
M
is
wetland vegetation above 56 flood level. Indigenous clearance in wetland vegetation Observation River Murray Act
No further trails/ Maintain and maximise use of Improve educational signage Medium
laneou
Miscel
wetland (particularly herb wetland entrance (flow paths) that boats Observation
eous
26
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
27
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
28
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Table 11: Implementation plan for Swanport wetland land based activities.
ACTIVITY PRIORITY RESOURCES TIMETABLE RESPONSIBILITY
Remove Typha from herb area at 346133 E High Volunteers As soon as possible LAP, Community group
6109213 N GDA 94 zone 54
Install barriers to boat access across lagoon High Funding (Hardwood As soon as possible LAP, Community group
inlets (both lagoons) (Subject to council pylons)
approval)
Install signs explaining boat access restriction High Funding As soon as possible LAP, Community group
Install Gauge Board Low 2 persons 1 hrs Ongoing LAP, SA MDB NRM
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
Maintain clear flow path (no new willow Medium As appropriate As required LAP, Community group
growth, no future blocking of channel by Funding
Typha)
Remove exotic fish Low Volunteers As appropriate LAP, Community group
APPROPRIA
Seine net
Identify sources of turbidity Medium Monitoring As appropriate LAP, SA MDB NRM
(research)/funding Board
Identify frog habitat Medium Monitoring frogs Ongoing/future LAP, Community group
AS
TE
Research/funding
29
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
ACTIVITY PRIORITY RESOURCES TIMETABLE RESPONSIBILITY
Identify weeds and locations for weed Medium Monitoring As appropriate LAP, SA MDB NRM
management (research)/funding Board
Botanist
Install additional permanent photopoints Low 2 persons 1 hrs If necessary LAP, SA MDB NRM
Materials and tools Board
(available)
Weed removal Medium Funding As appropriate following LAP, Community group
Volunteers weed identification
Increase snags in wetland for native fish Medium Funding As appropriate LAP, Community group
habitat Volunteers
Construction of frog shelter (homes) Low Volunteers As appropriate LAP, Community group
30
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Chapter 8. MONITORING
For the development of a wetland management plan, Swanport wetland was included in the River
Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004). The data collected during this survey provided a
basis by which objectives for the wetland management could be refined, initial hydrology
guidelines could be developed and review procedures scheduled. However this data did not cover
all the issues related to managing the Swanport wetland. Partly as a consequence, but also as part of
adaptive management and best practise wetland management, monitoring of the wetland has been
devised to answer some of the unknowns. That is, ongoing monitoring during wetland management
plays a role in adaptive management by providing managers with information on how the wetland is
responding to management strategies, whether the objectives are being met, whether there are off-
target implications (wetland in regional context) or (as per Your Wetland: Monitoring Manual
(Tucker 2004)) whether the Golden Rules are being broken. The Golden Rules being:
Don‟t salinise your wetland.
Don‟t kill long lived vegetation.
Don‟t destroy threatened communities or habitats of threatened species.
The maintenance of a restored wetland, fulfilling the functions described above and without an
adverse impact on adjacent farming operations, wetland and lake salinity or fish habitat
requirements would involve regular monitoring and adequate timely response. This would include
the regular monitoring of water quality, bird life and aquatic dependent species (particular interest
to Swanport wetland is frog habitat) as well as aquatic and fringing vegetation. Identification of
weeds within the wetland area falls within the sphere of monitoring and will lead to the further
development of an appropriate weed management strategy.
To ensure that monitored data is available for evaluation, review and reporting, a log of all
activities, monitoring and site description should be maintained at an accessible and convenient
location. The data will ultimately be stored in the appropriate state government databases. See
report by Hydro Tasmania (2003).
The purpose of such a log is to maintain a record of management steps undertaken, their
justification and observed impacts/implications. The maintenance of a log is both good management
practice allowing future reference to potential impacts of management and the assessment of the
impact of past practices, Refer to Your Wetland: Monitoring Manual (Tucker 2004) for examples of
data log sheets and further description of monitoring methods.
Some of the ongoing monitoring necessary for Swanport wetland includes:
Identification of turbidity source
Map vegetation in more detail (weeds)
Monitor and map vegetation change (2 – 5 years)
Monitor fish populations and habitats
Monitor frog populations and habitat
Monitor macrophytes (spread) using photo points.
Monitor bird populations using area and identify habitat.
Continued monitoring of the groundwater is necessary for a potential timely response to
potential increasing salinity levels.
31
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Table 12: Monitoring plan for Swanport wetland.
Time
Parameter Method Priority SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG Required Responsible
SA MDB NRM
Groundwater Level and MODERATE Board/community
Conductivity Quarterly half day group
Water quality SA MDB NRM
Surface Water monitoring (cond, MODERATE Board/community
turb, temp) Quarterly half day group
Photopoint LOW Only if current photopoints deemed inadequate for monitoring reed encroachment LAP/SA MDB NRM
Installation into open water 1 hour Board
32
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
33
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Department of Water Land and Biodiversity Conservation (2005). Surface Water Archive.
Accessed 3 August 2005,
http://www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au/subs/surface_water_archive/a1pgs/mapindex.htm.
Hydro Tasmania (2003). River Murray Wetlands Data Management Project Final Report. River
Murray Catchment Water Management Board.
Jensen, A., F. Marsh, et al. (2000). Moorundi Wetland Complex Management Plan. Swanport
Wetland Management Plan. Berri
Jensen, A., P. Paton, et al. (1996). Wetlands Atlas of the South Australian Murray Valley. South
Australian River Murray Wetlands Management Committee. South Australian Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. ADELAIDE
Leigh, S., Q. Ye, et al. (2004). Swanport Wetland Fish Survey November 2003 and March 2004.
SARDI Aquatic Sciences.
River Murray Catchment Water Management Board and Department of Water Land and
Biodiversity Conservation (2003). Guidelines for Development of Wetland Management Plans for
the River Murray in South Australia.
SKM (2004). River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey. South Australian Murray Darling Basin
Natural Resources Management Board.
Tucker, P. (2004). Your Wetland: Monitoring Manual - Data Collection. River Murray Catchment
Water Management Board, Australian Landscape Trust. Renmark SA
Tucker, P., S. Dominelli, et al. (2003). Your Wetland: Supporting Information. Australian
Landscape Trust. Renmark SA
34
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
35
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Figure 11: Murray Bridge No.1 Pump Station Daily Read (5 year period) (Department of Water Land and
Biodiversity Conservation 2005)
36
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
37
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
38
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
39
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
40
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
41
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
42
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
43
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
44
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Introduced
1 2 3 4
AUS
MU
SA
Apium prostratum ssp. Native celery X
K
prostratum var.
Asperula gemella Twin-leaf Bedstraw X
Atriplex semibaccata Berry Saltbush X
*Berula erecta Water Parsnip X
Carex appressa Tall sedge K X X
Carex fascicularis Tassel Sedge K X
Centella asiatica Asian Centella Q X X
*Cotula coronopifolia Water Buttons X
Crassula helmsii Swamp Crassula X X
Einadia nutans ssp. nutans Climbing saltbush X
Eleocharis acuta Common spike-rush X X X
Eleocharis sphacelata Tall spike-rush V X X
Halosarcia pergranulata ssp. Black-seed Samphire X
pergranulata
Hydrocotyle verticillata Shield Pennywort X X X
*Juncus articulatus Jointed Rush X X
Lycopus australis Austral Gypsywort R X X
Mentha x piperita var. (Peppermint) X
Myriophyllum ?simulans X
*Paspalum ?distichum Water Couch X X
*Paspalum vaginatum Salt-water Couch X X
Persicaria decipiens Slender Knotweed X X
*Plantago major Greater Plantain X
Ranunculus amphitrichus Small river buttercup R X X X
*Rumex pulcher ssp. pulcher X X
*Salix ?babylonica X
Schoenoplectus validus River Club-rush X X
*Soncus ?asper ssp. X X
glaucescens
45
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
*Soncus oleraceus Common Sow-thistle X X
*Spergularia marina Salt Sand-spurrey X X
Suaeda australis Austral Seablite X
Triglochin procerum Water-ribbons X X X
Typha domingensis Narrow-leaf Bulrush X
Total species 32 9 11 8 17 11
% introduced 28 27 25 41 0
* R = rare conservation status, K uncertain conservation rating, V = vulnerable,
** Plant association:
1. Typha domingensis Sedgeland over Triglochin procerum;
2. Eleocharis acuta and Triglochin procerum Sedgeland over *Paspalum distichum;
3. Eleocharis sphacelate Closed Sedgeland; and
4. Halosarcia pergranulata ssp. pergranulata Low Open Shrubland
Table 15: Swanport wetland plant ID list from ’99 (obtained from community group)
Species Common Name Introduced Conservation
Rating
AUS
MU
SA
Alternanthera nodiflora Common joyweed
Apium annuum Annual celery K
*Arctotheca calendula Capeweed X
Asperula gemella Twin-leaf bedstraw
*Asphodelus fistulosus Onion weed X
*Aster subulatus Bushy starwort (Asterweed) X
Atriplex semibaccata Berry saltbush (Creeping saltbush)
*Avena barbata Bearded Oat
Azolla filiculoides Pacific azolla
*Berula erecta Water Parsnip X
Brachycome basaltica var. Swamp Daisy
R R
gracilis
*Brassica tournefortii Wild turnip X
*Bromus catharticus Prairie grass X
*Bromus rubens Red Brome X
Carex appressa Tall sedge K
Carex fascicularis Tassel Sedge K
Centella asiatica Asian Centella Q
*Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle (Scotch Thistle)
Cotula australis Common cotula
*Cotula coronopifolia Water Buttons X
Crassula helmsii Swamp crassula
46
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Crassula sieberiana ssp. Australian stonecrop
tetramera
*Critesion marinum Sea Barley-grass X
*Cynodon dactylon Green couch X
Cyperus gymnocaulos Spiny flat-sedge
Distichlis distichophylla Emu grass U
*Echium plantagineum Paterson's curse (Salvation Jane) X
Eclipta platyglossa Yellow twin-heads U
*Ehrharta longiflora Annual veldt-grass X
Einadia nutans ssp. nutans Climbing saltbush
Eleocharis acuta Common spike-rush
Eleocharis sphacelata Tall spike-rush V
*Elymus elongatus Tall wheat grass X
Enchylaena tomentosa var. Ruby salt bush
tomentosa
*Erodium moschatum X
Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. River red gum
camaldulensis
*Euphorbia terracina X
*Festuca arundinacea X
*Galenia secunda X
*Gynandriris setifolia X
Halosarcia pergranulata ssp. Black-seed Samphire
pergranulata
Hydrocotyle verticillata Shield Pennywort
Juncus holoschoenus Joint-leaf rush
Juncus usitatus Common rush
Lavatera plebeia Australian hollyhock
Lemna disperma Duckweed
*Lepidium africanum X
*Lupinus cosentinii X
*Lycium ferocissimum African boxthorn X
Lycopus australis Austral Gypsywort R
Maireana brevifolia
*Marrubium vulgare Horehound X
*Medicago polymorpha var. X
polymorpha
*Mesembryanthemum X
crystallinum
Montia australasica
Muehlenbeckia florulenta Lignum
*Myriophyllum aquaticum Parrots feather (milfoil) X
Myriophyllum papillosum Common watermilfoil K R
47
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
*Oxalis pes-caprae Soursob
*Paspalum distichum Water couch X?
*Paspalum vaginatum Salt-water Couch X
*Pennisetum clandestinum Kikuyu X
Persicaria decipiens Slender Knotweed
Phragmites australis Common reed
Pratia concolor R
Ranunculus amphitrichus Small river buttercup R
*Ranunculus trilobus X
*Rorippa nasturtium- Watercress X
aquaticum
*Rorippa palustris Watercress
Rumex bidens Mud dock
*Rumex conglomeratus Clustered dock X
Rumex sp.
*Salix babylonica Weeping willow X
Salsola kali
*Schinus areira Pepper tree X
Schoenoplectus validus River Club-rush
Senecio lautus Variable groundsel
*Sonchus asper ssp. Rough sow thistle X
glaucescens
Sonchus hydrophilus Native sow-thistle
*Sonchus oleraceus Common Sow-thistle X
Spirodela punctata Duckweed
*Stellaria media Chickweed X
Suaeda australis Austral Seablite
Triglochin procerum Water-ribbons
Triglochin striatum Streaked arrow-grass
Typha domingensis Narrow-leaf bulrush (cumbungi)
Typha orientalis Broad-leaf bulrush (cumbungi)
Urtica incisa Stinging Nettle U
*Vulpia muralis Fescue X
*Zantedeschia aethiopica Arum Lily X
Total species 90 42
% introduced 46
48
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Black-winged Himantopus 2 2 EPBC
stilt himantopus Migratory
Clamorous reed- Acrocephalus 3 2 2 7
warbler stentoreus
Dusky Moorhen Gallinula 1 1 2
tenebrosa
Great egret Ardea alba 1 0 EPBC
Migratory
Hoary-headed Poliocephalus 1 0
grebe poliocephalus
Little black Phalacrocorax 1 1 2
cormorant sulcirostris
Little grassbird Megalurus 2 2
gramineus
Purple swamp- Porphyrio 2 2 4
hen porphyrio
Royal spoonbill Platalea regia 1 1
Spotless crake Porzana 3 3
tabuensis
White-faced Egretta 1 1
heron novaehollandiae
Total Individuals 5 9 6 6 0 0 26
Species 3 5 4 4 0 0 11
Table 17: Birds identified at Swanport wetland by community member Peter Koch
Common Name Breeding Common Name Breeding Common Name Breeding
Black swan Y Australian spotted Sacred kingfisher
crake
Australian shelduck Purple swamphen Y Superb fairy-wren
Australian wood Dusky moorhen Spotted Pardalote
duck
Pacific black duck Y Black-tailed native- Striated pardalote
hen
Grey teal Eurasian coot Weebill
49
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Common Name Breeding Common Name Breeding Common Name Breeding
Chestnut teal Latham‟s snipe Yellow-rumped
thornbill
Pink-eared duck Black-winged stilt Red wattlebird
Australasian grebe Red-necked Avocet Spiny-cheeked
honeyeater
Hoary-headed grebe Black-fronted Noisy Miner
dotterel
Darter Clamorous reed- Singing honeyeater
warbler
Little pied cormorant Little grassbird White –eared
honeyeater
Pied cormorant Silvereye White-plumed
honeyeater
Little black Common blackbird Brown-headed
cormorant honeyeater
Great cormorant Common starling New Holland
honeyeater
Australian pelican Spotless crake White-fronted chat
White-faced heron Y Baillon‟s crake Rufous whistler
White-necked heron Masked lapwing Grey shrike-thrush
Great egret Silver gull Magpie-lark Y
Nankeen night heron Caspian tern Grey fantail
Australian white ibis Crested tern Willie Wagtail
Straw-necked ibis Whiskered tern Black-faced
cuckoo-shrike
Royal spoonbill Rock dove Dusky woodswallow
Yellow-billed Spotted turtle-dove Australian magpie
spoonbill
Black-shouldered Crested pigeon Y Australian raven
kite
Black kite Peaceful dove Y Little raven
Whistling kite Y Galah Richard‟s pipit
Swamp harrier Y Little corella House sparrow
Collared Purple crowned Zebra finch
sparrowhawk lorikeet
Little eagle Red-rumped parrot European goldfinch
Brown falcon Pallid cuckoo Welcome swallow
Australian hobby Fan-tailed cuckoo Tree martin
Black falcon Horsfield‟s bronze- Fairy martin
cuckoo
Peregrine falcon Barn owl
Nankeen kestrel Y Laughing
kookaburra
50
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
(b) FROGS
Frogs identified at Swanport as part of the River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004) (table
adapted from River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004)).
Table 18: Frogs at Morgan’s Lagoon, date identified and significant aspects.
Name Scientific Date and numbers identified Significance/Breeding* Date
Name 3/12/03 2/11/04
identified
29/1/04 12/3/04
51
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
(c) FISH
Fish identified at Swanport as part of the River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004) (tables
adapted from River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004)). The number of fyke nets used
during the survey reduced from 5 to 3 due to a drop in the water depth. To be able to compare the fish
surveys from the two dates the representative numbers of fish caught were calculated to reflect the
number of fish for each net per night, i.e. catch per unit effort expressed as CPUE (SKM 2004).
Table 19: Native November 2003 March 2004 Status
of
fisha SA**
fish caught
Common Name Scientific Name CPUE* CPUE*
number
Total
Australian smelt Retropinna semoni 13 2.6 10 3.3 23
Bony herring Nematalosa erebi 57 11.4 16 5.3 73
Golden perch Macquaria ambiqua 7 1.4 0 0 7
(Callop)
Carp gudgeon Hypseleotris spp. 170 34 6 2 176
Common galaxias Galaxias maculatus 5 1 1 0.3 6
Dwarf flathead Philypnodon sp. 5 1 0 0 5 R (C)
gudgeon
Flathead gudgeon Philypnodon 9 1.8 2 0.7 11
grandiceps
Flyspecked Craterocephalus 44 8.8 9 3 53 R
hardyhead stercusmuscarum
fulvus
Murray River Melanotaenia 4 0.8 72 24 76 C
rainbow fish fluviatilis
Number of Species 9 7
* Catch Per Unit Effort (CPUE) fish/net/night
** R = Rare (taxon in decline or naturally limited presence), C = provisional State conservation concern under the draft
Threatened Species Schedule NPWSA
Table 20: Introduced fish
November 2003 March 2004
number of
fish caught
52
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
(d) MACROINVERTEBRATES
Macroinvertebrates collected at Swanport as part of the River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM
2004) (table adapted from River Murray Wetlands Baseline Survey (SKM 2004))
Table 21: Macroinvertebrate taxa and abundance (SKM 2004)
Taxa (family Spring Autumn
level unless
Abundance
indicated
otherwise) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4
Hydridae 1 1 2 4
Turbellaria (Class) 8 11
Nematoda 2 18 1 7 182 1640 240 34 2124
(Phylum)
Oligochaeta 39 50 144 46 109 410 180 248 1226
(Class)
Gastropoda 13 8 21 42
(Order)
Ancylidae 6 2 8 16
Lymnaeidae 13 13
Physidae 9 25 58 25 2 1 120
Planorbidae 2 38 40
Astigmata 1 1 5 3 10
Oribatida 1 2 3
Decapoda (Order) 8 7 15
Atydae 17 23 58 10 108
Parastacidae 1 1
Ceinidae 9 2 1 4 16
Sminthuridae 10 11
Baetidae 3 3
Odonata (Order) 3 6 2 11
Coenagrionidae 1 2 2 8 7 20
Lestidae 1 1 1 3
Ceratopogonidae 3 60 1 64
Corixidae 15 6 1 34 27 70 100 119 372
Mesoveliidae 2 2
Notonectidae 2 1 4 2 9
Veliidae 1 19 1 21
Chironominae 77 83 4 45 139 240 433 116 1137
(Subfamily)
Culicidae 6 6
Ephydridae 4 4
Orthocladiinae 35 11 1 2 1 10 60
(Subfamily)
53
Swanport Wetland Management Plan 2006
Tanypodinae 1 5 233 25 264
(Subfamily)
Hydroptilidae 1 3 4 1 9
Leptoceridae 7 7
Dytiscidae 4 4
Hydrophilidae 1 1
Total abundance 265 244 298 271 482 2450 1200 547 5757
Total number of 23 18 17 20 12 8 7 8 34
taxa
Signal2 2.9 2
54