UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUITWILEY S. DRAKE, et al.,)NO. 09-56827)Plaintiffs/Appellants,)D.C. No. 8:09-CV-00082-DOC)Central District of Californiav.)Santa Ana)BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, et al.,))Defendants/Appellees. ))PAMELA BARNETT, Captain, et al.,)NO. 10-55084)Plaintiffs/Appellants,)D.C. No. 8:09-CV-00082-DOC)Central District of Californiav.)Santa Ana)BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, et al.,))Defendants/Appellees. )
APPELLEES’ OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS’ SECOND “EMERGENCY
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS”
APPEAL FROM THETHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THECENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA ANASA CV 09-00082 DOCANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.United States AttorneyLEON W. WEIDMANAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Civil DivisionROGER E. WESTAssistant United States AttorneyFirst Assistant Chief, Civil DivisionDAVID A. DeJUTEAssistant United States AttorneyRoom 7516 Federal Building300 North Los Angeles StreetLos Angeles, CA 90012Telephone: (213) 894-2461/2574Facsimile: (213) 894-7819Attorneys for Defendants/Appellees
Case: 10-55084 11/08/2011 ID: 7959100 DktEntry: 55-1 Page: 1 of 2
(1 of 3)
APPELLEES’ OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS’ SECOND “EMERGENCYPETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS”
Appellees, by and through their undersigned counsel, herewith submit theirOpposition to Appellants’ second “Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus.”At the outset, Appellees incorporate by reference, as though set forth in fullherein, their Opposition to Appellants’ “Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” filed with this Court on November 7, 2011.As that document and its appendices demonstrate, neither of Appellants’Petitions have any merit, and should be denied forthwith. The fundamentalpremise underlying Appellants’ arguments in their Petitions is that this case cannotbe decided absent their examination of President Obama’s birth certificate.Nothing could be further from the truth. This Court can, and should, decide thiscase on the grounds set forth in Appellees’ Answering Brief, filed herein onOctober 13, 2010, and the oral arguments made by Appellees’ counsel, neither of which concerned the authenticity of President Obama’s birth certificate.DATED: November 8, 2011.Respectfully submitted,ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.United States AttorneyLEON W. WEIDMANAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Civil Division /s/ ROGER E. WESTAssistant United States AttorneyFirst Assistant Chief, Civil Division/s/ DAVID A. DeJUTEAssistant United States AttorneyAttorneys for Defendants/Appellees
1
Case: 10-55084 11/08/2011 ID: 7959100 DktEntry: 55-1 Page: 2 of 2
(2 of 3)
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
BARNETT|KEYES v OBAMA (APPEAL - 9th CIRCUIT) - 55 - Filed (ECF) Appellees - TransportRoom.55.0
11/08/2011 55 Filed (ECF) Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M. Gates, Barack Hussein Obama and Michelle L.R. Obama in 09-56827, 10-55084 response opposing motion (,motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 11/08/2011. [7959100] [09-56827, 10-55084] (REW)
258
Reads
5
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
More From This User
Notes
Load more
