Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Anne Frank's Diary - A Hoax

Anne Frank's Diary - A Hoax

Ratings: (0)|Views: 420 |Likes:
It is with mixed feelings that we present here the first real expose ever undertaken on The Diary of Anne Frank. From having been positive to the diary our standpoint gradually changed to the negative until we finally had to dismiss the whole thing as a forgery. This study gives our reasons for believing so. In all honesty we must admit that our previous positive stand was not based on a serious study of the diary itself. Like most other people we neither had the inclination to search into a young girl's miseries and tragedies nor did we have the time to give the diary a detailed study. Any negative statement we viewed as most others likely have done: coming from anti Semites, Jew haters, former Nazis or Fascists. The issue was then dropped. Recently our interest got rekindled partly by our attempt to rebut Richard Harwood's book Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last. The book threw us completely out of our senses for we felt surely it must be a well established fact that more than six million Jews had been exterminated and that there were gas chambers all over Hitler's Germany. We immediately recognized the danger if this sort of distortion should spread and so we decided to find errors in the book and in this way counteract it. We felt the task would be simple seeing the facts of the "Holocaust" are so thoroughly documented. Perhaps this was our mistake for in doing so we could not help but get intrigued and involved with an issue we would never have dreamed to get involved with only a few years ago. Have we been fooled? If so, by whom and how could they so easily have fooled us? Were we not trained researchers? What is the purpose of those trying to fool us? While reasoning these matters out we necessarily also stumbled on Anne Frank. After all, she is the pinnacle of the Holocaust theory. Harwood mentions in the first edition of his book that the diary is a forgery. Unfortunately for Harwood, he seems to have been misled as the court case concerning Meyer Levin apparently did not concern the diary but a play built on the diary. (Compare Meyer Levin, The Obsession, Simon & Schuster, NY, 1973). However this discovery proved to be even more unfortunate for us, for while we found this out, checking up pertinent material we could not help but discover numerous peculiarities, some so grave we wondered how it was that no one had aired these problems before. Harwood had recognized the patient was sick but he had apparently given the wrong diagnosis. The question now came up: Should we keep silent or tell the world about our discoveries? Perhaps the lie after all did some good? Did it not expose Hitler and his Nazi Germany? Was it not useful in giving Jews their own homeland in Palestine? Did not her case give us the feeling Jews had the right to evict the Palestinians? Did not Anne symbolize the persecuted Jewish child? Was not in fact the whole Holocaust propaganda built up on the diary? These and other questions kept circulating in our minds, disturbing us with many sleepless nights. However, truth prevailed. We have found no other choice but to give to the world that which we have found. Truth and propriety must stand above everything else. If truth is destroyed our earth is on the brink of collapse. The environment is built on truth. Truth should have nothing to fear. And so we present our study to the readers. The colossal hoax surrounding the Anne Frank diary is so immense, the implications so profound that mankind must find out about it. It is our solemn wish that mankind, through our exposure will be inspired to keep fighting for truth no matter whom it might hurt. Our intention to expose the racket is further prompted by the callous spirit of those people defending it without the least consideration whether it is a genuine document or not. Numerous people who in one way or another have been involved with the diary have pleaded with us to keep the matter quiet. They feel that the "intentions" were well meant. Howev
It is with mixed feelings that we present here the first real expose ever undertaken on The Diary of Anne Frank. From having been positive to the diary our standpoint gradually changed to the negative until we finally had to dismiss the whole thing as a forgery. This study gives our reasons for believing so. In all honesty we must admit that our previous positive stand was not based on a serious study of the diary itself. Like most other people we neither had the inclination to search into a young girl's miseries and tragedies nor did we have the time to give the diary a detailed study. Any negative statement we viewed as most others likely have done: coming from anti Semites, Jew haters, former Nazis or Fascists. The issue was then dropped. Recently our interest got rekindled partly by our attempt to rebut Richard Harwood's book Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last. The book threw us completely out of our senses for we felt surely it must be a well established fact that more than six million Jews had been exterminated and that there were gas chambers all over Hitler's Germany. We immediately recognized the danger if this sort of distortion should spread and so we decided to find errors in the book and in this way counteract it. We felt the task would be simple seeing the facts of the "Holocaust" are so thoroughly documented. Perhaps this was our mistake for in doing so we could not help but get intrigued and involved with an issue we would never have dreamed to get involved with only a few years ago. Have we been fooled? If so, by whom and how could they so easily have fooled us? Were we not trained researchers? What is the purpose of those trying to fool us? While reasoning these matters out we necessarily also stumbled on Anne Frank. After all, she is the pinnacle of the Holocaust theory. Harwood mentions in the first edition of his book that the diary is a forgery. Unfortunately for Harwood, he seems to have been misled as the court case concerning Meyer Levin apparently did not concern the diary but a play built on the diary. (Compare Meyer Levin, The Obsession, Simon & Schuster, NY, 1973). However this discovery proved to be even more unfortunate for us, for while we found this out, checking up pertinent material we could not help but discover numerous peculiarities, some so grave we wondered how it was that no one had aired these problems before. Harwood had recognized the patient was sick but he had apparently given the wrong diagnosis. The question now came up: Should we keep silent or tell the world about our discoveries? Perhaps the lie after all did some good? Did it not expose Hitler and his Nazi Germany? Was it not useful in giving Jews their own homeland in Palestine? Did not her case give us the feeling Jews had the right to evict the Palestinians? Did not Anne symbolize the persecuted Jewish child? Was not in fact the whole Holocaust propaganda built up on the diary? These and other questions kept circulating in our minds, disturbing us with many sleepless nights. However, truth prevailed. We have found no other choice but to give to the world that which we have found. Truth and propriety must stand above everything else. If truth is destroyed our earth is on the brink of collapse. The environment is built on truth. Truth should have nothing to fear. And so we present our study to the readers. The colossal hoax surrounding the Anne Frank diary is so immense, the implications so profound that mankind must find out about it. It is our solemn wish that mankind, through our exposure will be inspired to keep fighting for truth no matter whom it might hurt. Our intention to expose the racket is further prompted by the callous spirit of those people defending it without the least consideration whether it is a genuine document or not. Numerous people who in one way or another have been involved with the diary have pleaded with us to keep the matter quiet. They feel that the "intentions" were well meant. Howev

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, History
Published by: Василь Петренко on Nov 13, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/25/2013

pdf

text

original

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR 
DITLIEB FELDERER is one of four refugee children who were all born in different Europeancountries. His younger sister was born in Sweden; his elder sister in Italy. His brother was born inGermany and he himself was born in Innsbruck, Austria on 23 April 1942. The family sufferedsevere deprivations because of the war, and ended up fleeing first to Italy and then to Sweden,where they became citizens. In 1959 Mr. Felderer became converted to the Jehovah's Witnessesand went on extensive evangelizing tours, including one to north east America, stopping at NewYork, Buffalo, Niagara Falls, Hamilton, Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal. During all this time hewas a vigorous supporter of the Holocaust legend. Around 1968, he began to notice certaindiscrepancies in the Exterminationists' descriptions. In the early 1970s, while writing a researchthesis on the Nazi persecution of the Jehovah's Witnesses, he began to accumulate and study awide range of Exterminationist and Revisionist literature. After weighing up the two views, he wasconvinced that the Revisionist view was correct.Since then, Mr. Felderer has founded his own excellent magazine and publishing house, bothcalled Bible Researcher. He also organizes study tours of the various concentration camps inPoland each year, and has gathered together a unique collection of slides which illustrate thefraudulent nature of the "gas chambers." Mr. Felderer is married to a Philippino, and lives inStockholm.
 
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AB -
 Aftonbladet 
, Stockholm, Sweden, (newspaper)AFF -
 Anne Frank Foundation
, Amsterdam, Holland, n.d., (leaflet)AFFA -
 Anne Frank Foundation Amsterdam
, Holland, n.d., 5th editionBE -
 Brockhaus Enzyklopadie
, Wiesbaden, Germany, 1966-1974BER - Anne Frank,
 Berättelser 
, Stockholm, Sweden, 1960BG -
 Brief Guide To The Anne Frank House
, n.d., (leaflet) Fig. 18BR-RH -
 Bible Researcher-Revisionist Historia
Card. ed. - Anne Frank,
 Anne Frank: The Diary Of A Young Girl 
, Cardinal edition, New York,USA, 1963, 36th printingDGD -
 Das Grosse Duden-Lexikon
, Mannheim, Germany, 1964-1969DN -
 Dagens Nyheter 
, Stockholm, Sweden (newspaper)EBM -
The New Encyclopedia Britannica
, Mieropaedia, 1975EI -
 Encyclopedia International 
, Grolier Inc., USA, 1963-1964EJ -
 Encyclopedia Judaica
, Jerusalem, Israel, 1971-1972ENE -
 Eesti Noukogude Entsuklopeedia
, Tallinn, 1970GSO -
Gyldendals store Opslagsbog 
, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1967-1970McWD -
McGraw Hill Encyclopedia of World Drama
, USA, 1972MEY -
Meyers Enzyklopadisches Lexikon
, Mannheim, Germany, 1971-1977MWD - Myron Matlaw, Modern
World Drama, An Encyclopedia
, England, 1972
 
OXAL - James D. Hart,
The Oxford Companion to American Literature
, 4th ed., New York, USA,Oxford University Press, 1965Pan. ed. - Anne Frank,
The Diary of Anne Frank 
, London, England, 1975RE - William Rose Benet,
The Reader's Encyclopedia
, Thomas Y. Crowell Co., USA, 2nd ed.,1965Rottenberg - Dan Rottenberg,
 Finding Our Fathers
, A Guidebook to Jewish Genealogy, RandomHouse, New York, USA, 1977ST -
Stockholms-Tidningen
, Stockholm, Sweden (newspaper)VJ -
Vecko-Journalen
, Sweden, (weekly magazine)Wiesenthal - Simon Wiesenthal,
Mördarna Mitt Ibland Oss (The Murderers Among Us
, NewYork, USA, 1967) Alb. Bonniers boktryckeri, Stockholm, Sweden, 1967
 
For the first part of our book we used the Swedish edition of Ernst Schnabel's
 Anne Frank Spur  Eines Kindes
.
Swedish Edition: Ernst Schnabel,
Vem Var Anne Frank?
 
En bok om flickan somblev en legend
, Lars Hokerbergs Bokforlag, Stockholm, Sweden, n.d., (1958?), 192 pages,translated by Ella Wilcke.Each chapter (except the "Introduction") - there are twelve of them - has received its ownreference. Schnabel 6:84 would therefore indicate, Chapter 6, page 84, of the Swedish edition.Readers should be aware of faulty translations both with Schnabel's book and the so called "diary"of Anne Frank. As far as the "diary" is concerned only the original Dutch version is theauthoritative version when it comes to printed matter. The use of an asterisk indicates probablesource. A colon indicates page number.
 
FOREWORD
It is with mixed feelings that we present here the first real expose ever undertaken on
The Diary of  Anne Frank 
. From having been positive to the diary our standpoint gradually changed to thenegative until we finally had to dismiss the whole thing as a forgery. This study gives our reasonsfor believing so. In all honesty we must admit that our previous positive stand was not based on aserious study of the diary itself. Like most other people we neither had the inclination to searchinto a young girl's miseries and tragedies nor did we have the time to give the diary a detailedstudy. Any negative statement we viewed as most others likely have done: coming from antiSemites, Jew haters, former Nazis or Fascists. The issue was then dropped. Recently our interestgot rekindled partly by our attempt to rebut Richard Harwood's book 
 Did Six Million Really Die?
The Truth At Last. The book threw us completely out of our senses for we felt surely it must be awell established fact that more than six million Jews had been exterminated and that there weregas chambers all over Hitler's Germany. We immediately recognized the danger if this sort of distortion should spread and so we decided to find errors in the book and in this way counteract it.We felt the task would be simple seeing the facts of the "Holocaust" are so thoroughlydocumented. Perhaps this was our mistake for in doing so we could not help but get intrigued andinvolved with an issue we would never have dreamed to get involved with only a few years ago.Have we been fooled? If so, by whom and how could they so easily have fooled us? Were we nottrained researchers? What is the purpose of those trying to fool us? While reasoning these mattersout we necessarily also stumbled on Anne Frank. After all, she is the pinnacle of the Holocausttheory. Harwood mentions in the first edition of his book that the diary is a forgery. Unfortunatelyfor Harwood, he seems to have been misled as the court case concerning Meyer Levin apparentlydid not concern the diary but a play built on the diary. (Compare Meyer Levin,
The Obsession
,

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->