Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Purpura, et al. v Sebelius, et al. - Motion to Expedite - Rule21

Purpura, et al. v Sebelius, et al. - Motion to Expedite - Rule21

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
Motion to Expedite - Per Rule 21
Motion to Expedite - Per Rule 21

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Nov 15, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/16/2011

pdf

text

original

 
In
theSupremeCourtoftheUnitedStatesTERM,2011NICHOLASE.PURPURA,andDONALDR.LASTERJr.,ETAL.,PETITIONERSV.UNITEDSTATESDEPARTMENTOFHEALTHANDHUMANSERVICES;KATHLEENSEBELIUS,inherofficialcapacityindividually
&
intheirOfficialCapacityastheSecretaryoftheUnitedStates,DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices;UNITEDSTATESDEPARTMENTOFTHETREASURY;TIMOTHYF.GEITHNER,inhisofficialcapacityastheSecretaryoftheUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheTreasury;UNITEDSTATESDEPARTMENTOFLABOR;andHILDAL.SOLIS,inherofficialcapacityasSecretaryoftheUnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor,MOTIONTOEXPEDITE
INFORMAPAUPERIS
PETITIONFORWRITOFCERTIORARIEXTRODINARYCIRCUMSTANCESREQUIRINGEMERGENCYRELIEF
InCompliancewithRule21
NICHOLASE.PURPURA1802RueDeLaPortWall,NewJersey07719(732)449-0856DANAKAERSVANGALISAB.KLEIN,MARKB.STERNTONYWESTETHANP.DAVISDONALDR.LASTER25HeidlAvenueWestLongBranch,NewJersey.07764(732)263-9235
CouncilforAppellee/DefendantsProse[s]forthePetitioners
 
1.PetitionersubmitsthismotionpursuanttoRule21toeachindividualjusticeoftheSupremeCourtrequestingthefollowingrelieftoexpeditethisactionduetoextraordinarycircumstances.2.PetitionerareoftheunderstandingnumerouspetitionsrequestingarulingbytheSupremeCourtonthe
"PatientProtectionandAffordableCareAct"
"H.R.3590"aJklaObama-CareweredistributedtotheJustices'chambersonOctober27,2011.3.IthascornetoPetitionersattentiontheHonorableJusticeswillrevieweachPetitionandthenconveneinaclosed-doorsessiononNovember10,2011todecidewhichcaseswillbeheard,whichwillbeconsolidated(ifany),andwhateverothercoursesofactiontheymightconsider.ItisalmostcertaintheHighCourtwillacceptoneormorecasesinvolvingObama-Care.TruemanyifnotallthePetitionsbeforetheCourtaremeritoriousanddeservetobeheard.4.Thatbeingsaid,noPetitionnowpendingbeforethisHonorableCourthaspresented19Constitutionalviolationstoinclude4-legislativelawswithspecificityandparticularityasdoestheWritofCertiorarisubmittedbyPetitioners,
Purpurav.Sebelius
combinedwiththisMotionforExtraordinaryRelief.5.Intheinterestofsubstantialjustice,toforgoanyimmediateandimminentdangerposedbythe"Act"aJkJaObama-CarenotpresentlybeingarguedintheWritsnowpendingotherthantheConstitutionalvalidityofthe"Act"inrelationshiptotheCommerceClauseandtheusurpationofAmendment10,PetitionersWritcontainsthosesametwoargument,inadditionto17-additionalviolationsoftheConstitutionandusurpationof4-specificlegislativelaws,notpresentedbythoseotherpendingaction.Itwouldagrossmiscarriageofjusticetoproceedbaseduponthelimitedargumentsnowbeingconsideredconcerningthe
"PatientProtectionandAffordableCareAct"
"H.R.3590"aJklaObama-Care7.Petitioners'Writhasbeenreviewedbynumerousscholarsandbeentoutedasthemostcomprehensiveargumentagainstthe"Act"nowpending.Thereasoningissimple;the"Act"aswrittencontainsprovisionsthattotallyshredstheUnitedStatesConstitution.ThereforefortheprotectionofallthecitizensoftheseUnitedStatesitisincumbentuponthisHonorableCourtto
 
ruleoneachofthe17-additionalviolationsnotlistedinthecurrentcasesnowbeingconsideredandtosetaprecedentforfutureusurpationofspecificArticlesandAmendmentsviolated.
SpecificViolationsnotpresentinotherpending
Actions:
Count1.
Article1,Section7,Clause1;Evidencepresentedthatthe"Act"illegallyoriginatedintheSenatenottheHouseofRepresentatives,voteduponinfraudulentmannerinviolatingproperLegislativeprocedure.[Defendantsfailedtodispute,below,seeFRCP8(b)].
Count
2.Article1,Section8,Clause3;BeforetheCourtinotherpendingWrit's.Petitionershavenoargumentwithothersarguingthispoint.ButmustbringtothisCourt'sattentionthatmatteris
"StareDecisis"
notarguedinpendingWrits.The"Act"mandates
"specificwelfare"
whichtheSupremeCourtfoundunconstitutionalin1936
seeButler
v.
UnitedStates.
[Defendantsfailedtodisputebelow,seeFRCP8(b)].
Count
3.Article1,Section8,Clause12,the"Act"appropriatesmoniesfor4-yearsnot2asmandatedbytheConstitution.Alsoviolatesthe
PosseComitatus
Act.Petitionersciteprovisionsin"Act".[Defendantsfailedtodisputebelow,seeFRCP8(b)].
Count
4.Article1,Section9,Clause4;AsfarasPetitionerknownoother"Writ"notesthatthe"Act"violatesthe"Capitation"withoutapportionment.[Defendantsfailedtodisputebelow].
Count
5.Article1,Section9,Clauses4,5,and6;billsofattainder...taxesandduties...regulationofcommerce.AlsointerrelatestoviolationofAmendment5,byexcludingalljudicialreviewallowingpunishmentwithoutproper"dueprocess";[Defendantsfailedtodisputebelow,orevenputforthageneraldenialthatbylaw,requiredforfeituresee,FRCP8(b)(d)].
Count
6.Article2,Section1,Paragraph5;Thisissueiseither
StareDecisis
oranissueoffirstimpression.ThefactremainsnootherWritprovesbeyondashadowofadoubtthatMr.Obamawasunauthorizedtosignthe"Act"intolaw![Defendantsfailedtodisputebelow,orevenputforthageneraldenialthatbylaw,requiredforfeiture
see,
FRCP8(b)(d)].

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->