will be a Civil RICO Act Complaint (18 U.S.C. 1964(c)) Extortion of Filing Fee (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 872) In Violation of Seaman\u2019s Exemption (28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1916), as a Predicate Act of Racketeering under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1961(1)(A)
prosecutors, \u2018private attorneys general,\u2019 dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity.\u201dR o te ll a -v-W o o d, 528 U.S. 549, 557 (2000); Cited in David F. Herr, ANNOTATED MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION, Fourth Ed., 2006, Chapter 35.1, p. 792, pub. Thomson-West.
representing himself to be or assuming to act as such, under color or pretense of office or employment commits or attempts an act of extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; but if the amount so extorted or demanded does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.\u201d
\u201cIn all courts of the United States, seamen may institute and prosecute suits and appeals in their own names and for their own benefit for wages or salvage or the enforcement of laws enacted for their health or safety without prepaying fees or costs or furnishing security therefor.\u201d
Complaint of Extortion Against Judge George Howard U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in Hamrick -v- United Nations, Case No. 1:06-cv-0044
I am an unrepresented civil plaintiff with a Civil RICO Act case against the U.S. Government (and now against the United Nations) then the federal judicial system and the agencies of the U.S. Government should be treating my case with dignity and respect to the rule of law than what I have suffered this past four years.
Claim No. 8 in Volume 4 Amended Complaint of my Civil RICO Act Complaint will force Judge Howard to recuse himself because Claim No. 8 includes him as an extortionist of exempted filing fees in violation of 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 1916. It was a case of using a righteous dirty trick as a PRIVATE ATTORNEY
This Unrepresented civil Plaintiff with a potential
case of first impression is treated as a second class
citizen with no First Amendment right to petitition
the government for redress of grievances.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?