There was a problem sending you an sms. Check your phone number or try again later.
We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OFHOMELANDSECURITY,
THE U.S. COASTGUARD, THET SA , THEB AT F E , AND
40 OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
Having endured 4 years, 8 months of obstruction of justice by the federal judiciary and by the U.S. Department of Justice by every dirty trick of the federal bench and bar to deny my Second Amendment case from proceeding to trial when the subject matter and the merits of my case demand a jury trial, in an act of Constitutional self-defense and in defiance of the United States Government\u2019s attempt to take Tenth Amendment powers Reserved to the People by unjust and abusive means of the political, legislative, and regulatory process, and by belligerently denying all available statutory, regulatory, and judicial remedies guaranteed to me under the right to petition clause of the First Amendment, and by the consequences of Government Action and Inaction, having rendered me a citizen without effective rights, relegating me to the status equivalent to that of a slave in violation of Abraham Lincoln\u2019s Emancipation Proclamation, and the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment, though I be a white male of age 51, and having been harassed by the U.S. Government with criminal investigations for acting in defense of my rights under the Bill of Rights, and by authority of the U.S. Supreme Court case law inMassachusetts andGoldstei n, I, being a Citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment, and as a Member of \u201cthe People\u201d under the Tenth Amendment, and acting as a \u201cPrivate Attorney General\u201d with a Civil RICO Act case for the Second Amendment as established in my previous pleadings, do hereby proclaim that I now reclaim, and take back my status as a free citizen of the United States, and further taking back certain powers reserved to The People under the Tenth Amendment.
I, under the aforesaid status as a free citizen of the United States, do proclaim and declare that I now have a GREATER STANDING to\u201c FORCE federal agencies of the United States Government [NOT by armed or physical force but by Force of their Oath of Office, demanding
compulsive obedience to their allegiance to defending the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights against all enemies, foreign and domestic under threat of Citizen\u2019s Arrest for offenses against my constitutional rights, duties, and powers with attending assistance of any federal law enforcement agent as is appropriate and affirmed by a federal judge through a Warrant of Citizen\u2019s Arrest as the procedures may or may not require, as a means of last resort when all available remedies of criminal procedure have been exhausted and/or denied by federal law enforcement agencies to the neglect, degradation, or obstruction of justice.] the U.S. Marshals Service, the BATFE, the U.S.
Coast Guard, the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the TSA, and 40 other federal agencies through this civil litigation to develop policies and procedures and to force said federal agencies to adequately train and supervise their subordinates to fulfill their constitutional obligations in regard to \u201cThe People\u2019s\u201d Second Amendment rights underParker, andEmerson, and under the U.S. Department of Justice August 24, 2004
global warming has restorative applications for Second Amendment policies and procedures for the U.S. Department of Justice, The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, The U.S. Coast Guard, the TSA, the BATFE, and 40 Other Federal Agencies
\u201cMassachusetts v.EPA, 05-1120, was filed in order toforce the EPA to limit emissions from new cars and trucks by 12 states and 13 environmental groups, including California and Massachusetts.\u201dSee, http://www.tothecenter.com/news.php?readmore=1453
information regarding jailhouse informants was shared among prosecutors in their office. See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154 (1972). For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we hold that they are not, and we therefore affirm the opinion of the district court.\u201d1
burden of demonstrating that the allegations against them are so \u201cintimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process\u201d that absolute immunity is warranted.Imbler, 424 U.S. at 430. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.\u201d
I am not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV! I am, however, a U.S. merchant seaman with a civil RICO Act case for Second Amendment against the United States (and recently adding the United Nations as lead defendant) languishing in the federal courts for the last 4 years, 8 months because I don\u2019t back down from a fight.
Now bringing you back...
Does that email address look wrong? Try again with a different email.