Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
11-16577 #26

11-16577 #26

Ratings: (0)|Views: 892|Likes:
Published by Equality Case Files
Doc #26 - Plaintiffs' Response to Motion to Consolidate
Doc #26 - Plaintiffs' Response to Motion to Consolidate

More info:

Published by: Equality Case Files on Nov 19, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/19/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
Nos. 10-16696, 11-16577
 
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
_________________________KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
,v.EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
 Defendants
,andDENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al.,
 Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants
.
 
_________________________On Appeal From The United States District CourtFor The Northern District Of CaliforniaNo. CV-09-02292 JW (Honorable James Ware)____________________________________________________
PLAINTIFFS-
APPELLEES’ RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
 
____________________________________________________D
AVID
B
OIES
 J
EREMY
M.
 
G
OLDMAN
 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP333 Main StreetArmonk, New York 10504(914) 749-8200T
HEODORE
B.
 
O
LSON
 
Counsel of Record 
M
ATTHEW
D.
 
M
C
G
ILL
 A
MIR
C.
 
T
AYRANI
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036(202) 955-8500T
HEODORE
J.
 
B
OUTROUS
,
 
J
R
.C
HRISTOPHER
D.
 
D
USSEAULT
 T
HEANE
E
VANGELIS
K
APUR
 E
NRIQUE
A.
 
M
ONAGAS
 J
OSHUA
S.
 
L
IPSHUTZ
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP333 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071(213) 229-7804
 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-AppelleesKristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo
Case: 11-16577 11/18/2011 ID: 7972799 DktEntry: 26 Page: 1 of 4
 
 Proponents assert that consolidation of this appeal with the appeal incase 10-
16696, the pending appeal of the district court’s decision invalidating
Proposi
tion 8, will not “result in any
undue
delay in the resolution of eitherap
 peal.” Mot. 5 (emphasis added). Plaintiffs oppose
any measure that will result
in any further delay of Proponents’ appeal of the district court’s decision on the
merits. Further delay is inconsistent with the commitment to expedited treatment
that the Court made when it overturned the district court’s d
ecision denying a stayof its judgment pending appeal.Accordingly, consolidation should be ordered only if it may beaccomplished without further delaying the prompt resolution of the earlier-filedappeal. To avoid such delay, the Court may wish to schedule oral argument in thisappeal on December 8, 2011, when the panel is scheduled to hear oral argumentsin Pro
 ponents’ related appeal of the district court’s order to unseal the video
recording of the trial proceedings below.Dated: November 18, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Theodore B. OlsonD
AVID
B
OIES
 J
EREMY
M.
 
G
OLDMAN
 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP333 Main StreetArmonk, NY 10504T
HEODORE
B.
 
O
LSON
 
Counsel of Record 
M
ATTHEW
D.
 
M
C
G
ILL
 A
MIR
C.
 
T
AYRANI
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036
Case: 11-16577 11/18/2011 ID: 7972799 DktEntry: 26 Page: 2 of 4
 
 T
HEODORE
J.
 
B
OUTROUS
,
 
J
R
.C
HRISTOPHER
D.
 
D
USSEAULT
 T
HEANE
E
VANGELIS
K
APUR
 E
NRIQUE
A.
 
M
ONAGAS
 J
OSHUA
S.
 
L
IPSHUTZ
 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP333 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071Attorneys for Plaintiffs-AppelleesKristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier,Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo
Case: 11-16577 11/18/2011 ID: 7972799 DktEntry: 26 Page: 3 of 4

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->