Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Ga. SOS Challenge - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Ga. SOS Challenge - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot

Ratings: (0)|Views: 19,388|Likes:
Ga. SOS Challenge - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot - http://www.BirtherReport.com
Ga. SOS Challenge - Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot - http://www.BirtherReport.com

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: ObamaRelease YourRecords on Nov 28, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/19/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Nov. 28, 2011Notice:
Official Challenge to Barack Obama being placed on the Georgia Primary Ballot
To:Georgia Secretary of StateBrian P. KempFrom:Carl A. Swensson6553 Pleasant Valley Dr.Morrow, Ga. 30260Attn: Mr. Brian KempIt has come to my attention your office has posted Barack Obama as the sole Democrat candidate forPresident on the Ga. Primary Ballot. This notice is my challenge and request he be removed from ourballot as he does not meet the minimum qualifications as set forth in Article II Section I Clause Vconcerning the Natural Born Citizen status.Jurisdiction falls squarely on the shoulders of your office as head of the Georgia Board of Elections andit is your sworn duty as a man of honor and Public Servant to protect and defend the Constitution. Thevery U.S. Constitution that is now under attack and assault by the DNC for having failed in theirresponsibility to submit an eligible candidate for inclusion on our ballot.
I have voiced this concern to you many times over the past year, citing Minor V Happersett
88U.S. 162 (1875)
but it would now appear as if those words of caution are going unheeded.Supporting SCOTUS cases have been scrubbed but are now re-surfacing thanks to the work of Leo Donofrio. Esq. and I would ask you and your research staff do your homework and look closely at
,154 U.S. 116 (1894) (aka
 In Re Lockwood 
 at Justia), is essentially the holy grail of support for Minor v. Happersett, as it states:
“In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162,
 this court held 
 
that the word „citizen‟ is often used to
convey the idea of membership in a nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parentswithin the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution assince
…”
(Emphasis added) and also the
City of Mobile v. Bolden
, 446 U.S. 55 (1980)I must bring these supporting cases for Minor V Happersett since your office has installed, as thechief arbiter, Former Central District U.S. Atty. Max Woods who has personally told me (see
sworn affidavit attached) that even an “Anchor Baby” is eligible to hold the highest office in the

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->