Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Flak Magazine | Christopher Hitchens, 01.08.08

Flak Magazine | Christopher Hitchens, 01.08.08

Ratings:

5.0

(2)
|Views: 91|Likes:
Published by noirthis

More info:

Published by: noirthis on Oct 21, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/09/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Subscribe to the Flak feedOpinion
The Dismemberment Man: ChristopherHitchens
by Neil FitzgeraldChristopher Hitchens describes himself with increasing frequencyas a porpoise, the roots of which comefrom the Latin words for "pig" and "fish." The casual viewer of his TV punditry, however, might find theimage of a common toad more fitting. His eyes possess that amphibian's protuberant quality and his tongueis just as elastic in debate. This particular toad is unusual, however: it comes fitted with tobacco-stainedgnashers and whiskey on its breath.Struggling for a metaphor for the man was recently not quite so tricky. Back in 2006, when his jowls stillsported dense shrubbery, a grizzly bear would have perfectly captured the iconoclast, red-eyed from acontinual cocktail hour and spoiling for an intellectual ruckus.George Galloway, the querulous Scot and Respect MP, memorably anthropomorphised The Hitch during adebate at Baruch College in New York in 2005. Galloway was marvelling at his opponent's politicalvolte-face from left to right when he sneered: "What Mr. Hitchens has done is unique in natural history; thefirst-ever metamorphosis from a butterfly back into a slug."It was a debate that Hitchens lost on points if you a) were a bitter leftie (Gary Younge in The Guardian) andb) could consider Galloway's series of vaguely vulgar, vaguely witty ad hominem attacks to be a cogentargument.The original Young Contrarian is still a redoubtable foe at 58. As a self-styled oppositionist, Hitchens is aheavyweight hitter when it comes to verbal pugilism, combining the lyrical fluidity of a rapper with theerudite language of an academic. He is often encountered sitting in a studio, facing the camera, squat butwith open-collared dapperness. Hearing out his opponent, be they a religious "nutbag," bleeding-heartanti-war Democrat or Fox anchor bully-boy, his bulbous eyes become two menacingly hypnotic gyres, as heattempts to out-stare the camera lens. He bides his time, sucking in his top lip, drawing breath and failingto suppress snorts of indignation or derision. A cartoon bull, he claws the earth with his hooves as thetoreador waves a red flag in his face. And then, customarily, he makes one or two habitual hand-dashesthrough what remains of this aging lion's mane, sizes up his opponent's weak spots and prepares to put theverbal boot in. There's a kind of Hitchens's Greatest Wits on Youtubefrom his appearances Fox, CNN's
 Anderson Cooper 360 
et al. posted by devotees.This nuanced repositioning of the hair is mere sleight of hand, for that tar-lined larynx is already letting flywith a verbal shoeing in its smoky baritone. The performance is quite mesmerising, employing the samedynamics as a Beethoven symphony and Nirvana grunge anthem: quiet-loud-quiet and fast-slow-fast, closingwith a final crescendo in which the sustained rhetorical brilliance gives way to a more voluminous volley of negative epithets, either pleasingly archaic: huckster, charlatan, guttersnipe; or pleasingly comic: littletoad.There is certainly something that warms one to this careerist commentator.Initially, there is the appeal of the contrarian poseur. Such defiance continues in his louche lifestyle of cigarettes and cocktails. His dinner parties are capable of becoming the subject of national debate viadiscursive New Yorker articleson what The Hitch said.
Opinion
Archives Submissions Andrew Wahl cartoons The Dismemberment Man: Christopher Hitchensby Neil FitzgeraldNorman Mailer, In Memoriamby Matt HansonWhy You Should Care About The Writer's Strikeby Caroline EdmundsThe Unmitigated Gall of John Robertsby Stephen HimesJohn Roberts and the Supreme Strike Zoneby Stephen HimesHow We Know George W. Bush To Be a Hipsterby John FlowersMaster of the Misspeakby Eric Hananoki9/11 in 2007by Cary Jackson BroderStranger Than Factby Aemilia ScottMeet the Snowmanby J. Daniel Janzen
more
search flakmag.com search the web
Crystal Reports Viewer 
Loaded with Features, Great Price! Try Easy View todayon a Free Trial
www.EasyStreetSoftware.net
PDF Solution for .NET
PDF reporting toolkit. Pure C#. Create reports in C#,VB.NET or XML
www.siberix.com
Crystal Reports Viewer 
Refresh data, schedule, e-mail Download Free &Supported Versions
www.logicitysuite.com
BOXI Tools
Batch scheduling, administration and report bursting.
www.zoom-software.com
Revelation 17 Reveals
Identity of Next Pope. He Will be The Last Pope.Learn Bible Prophecy
www.worldslastchance.com
Catholic Religious and
he truth about the Catholic Church after Vatican II,prophecy, videos
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com
search with Google
submit
Flak Magazine | Christopher Hitchens, 01.08.08le:///Users/neiltzgerald/Documents/Published%20Web%20...1 of 516/10/08 14:45
 
Finding myself charmed by the charisma, erudition and lyrical flow of his primetime punditry, the whimsygrows of what it would be like to attend a Hitchens soiree: of being let in on the lengthy prurient jokes,chowing down on controversy and comestibles, sinking Scotch with thedeipnosophist, as he lights up aMontecristo and deftly weaves quotations from Camus or Byron into the dialogue. From my armchair, Iwould perceive a man living an enviable life — one with time to read and thoroughly digest what is read;one that's free-ranging, discursive and boozy, where shoulders are rubbed with the world's movers andshakers: martinis with Wolfowicz, dinner with Rushdie or Greenspan.Today's world is one of projection. The ghetto-fabulous 50 Cent bigs up the bubbly-swillin', Cuban-puffin'lifestyle in his demotic parlance ("Teachin' the hoodrats what Cristal taste like"); the Hitch gets on withliving it — bling-free, no-nonsense and unapologetic.Such adolescent admiration also arises because what he most resembles is a dying breed: a HemingwayMan, known once upon a time as "a Man's Man." As hard-boiled as Chandler's Phillip Marlowe, he hascharisma and insouciance, and an anachronistic lexicon — perhaps academically demotic describes it best,with hints of the great British essayists: George Orwell and William Hazlitt.These days, the Old School machismo duellists are bowing out one by one, with, it has to be said, more of asenescent whimper than a defiant howl. Take wife-maulerMailer, the life-long deity-mocker who, when theblinds were coming down on his own long and tumultuous life, seems to have quaked at the knees andfound God. It's hard to imagine Hardman Hitchens going the same way.Along with his wingman — fellow neophyte hawk Martin Amis — he is something of a welcome rarity amongtoday's wibbling liberal punditry, those who take stances that seek to offend no one by remaining within theever-shifting domain of what is PC. What Hitchens offers audiences is a pair of cojones: bellicosity, yes, butwith the brains to back up his thunder.The Hitch, who prefers to be called an anti-theist than an atheist, seems to be becoming increasinglyantithetical to the nanny state and PC status quo — drinking Johnny Walker Black neat, chaining his belovedRothmans Blue smokes in the face of encroaching bans on smoking in public and still capable of anastonishing U-turn when it comes to his political posturing.Hitchens' Trotskyite roots have receded with his hairline, and from having once been the Left's most faithfulcomrade, post-9/11 Hitchens now has at least nine of his ten toes in the neo-conservative camp.Interestingly, several neocon leading lights including Stephen Schwartz and Max Kampelman also possess aTrotskyite past — there's something about "perpetual global revolution" that naturally seems to lead to"perpetual war to promote democracy." And although he himself eschews the sobriquet "Neo-Con," hispro-war propaganda has impressed the eye of the Bush scriptwriters so much so that they've begunemploying Hitchens' phraseology ("Islamo-fascism") in Dubya's speeches. His idea, of "fascism with an Islamicface" or "theocratic fascism," has been labelled as unhelpful by many commentators,including Britishhistorian Niall Ferguson: "...what we see at the moment is an attempt to interpret our present predicamentin a rather caricatured World War II idiom. 'Islamo-fascism' illustrates the point well, because it's acompletely misleading concept. In fact, there's virtually no overlap between the ideology of al Qaeda andfascism."Given the proximity of evangelical religion to America's Grand Old Party, this recent love-in will becomemore problematic given the bestseller-list status of Hitchens' latest polemic:
God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
. Hiscommentsabout Moral Majority co-founder and Southern Baptisttelevangelist Jerry Falwell caused consternation, especially as the man was still lukewarm on the mortuaryslab. Here's a free sample: "The empty life of this ugly little charlatan proves only one thing, that you canget away with the most extraordinary offenses to morality and to truth in this country if you will just getyourself called reverend."Falwell was not alone in having his coffin rattled by a Hitchens broadside. Another daisy-pusher who feltthe acerbic tongue and splenetic nib of this firebrand was Mother Teresa, one of Catholicism's best-knownmodern-day contenders for sainthood. Hitchens was asked by the Vatican to play the part formerly knownas "Devil's Advocate" during the Mother Theresa canonisation process. He was always happy to undercut anyveneration of the supposed Angel of Calcutta by referring to her as "the ghoul of Calcutta" or, moreconcisely, "that bitch." And when the pious hound him with adjectives like merciless and uncharitable,heathen that he is, The Hitch remains wholly unrepentant.With a seemingly uncanny knack of skewering off-the-cuff — "If you gave Falwell an enema, he could beburied in a matchbox" — he portrays himself as Washington's very own Rent-a-Wit, a Wilde for the WarMachine. How often, then, are his bitchings mere posture, hack-work to pay the bills?
Flak Magazine | Christopher Hitchens, 01.08.08le:///Users/neiltzgerald/Documents/Published%20Web%20...2 of 516/10/08 14:45
 
In The New York Times Book Review, Michael Kinsleywroteof Christopher Hitchens: "The big strategicchallenge for a career like this is to remain interesting, and the easiest tactic for doing that is surprise."One senses always the presence of the provocateur, a theatrical mote, that of a player self-reflexivelyaware of the stage he resides on and the necessity of maintaining interest in himself, which he does with aNeocon standby: shock and awe.The risk comes with such a career choice, that of public-prosecutor-cum-Poet's-Corner-soapbox-orator, of ending up walking round with your foot stuck permanently in your cakehole. And Hitchens has managed thiswith spectacular aplomb over the year, with his description of 9/11 in an article for Boston.com on the firstanniversary of the World Trade Center attacks. He says he felt the general spectrum, from disgust to rage,and, unusually, another more socially unpalatable reaction:"And to my surprise (and pleasure), it was exhilaration. I am not particularly a war lover, and on theoccasions when I have seen warfare as a travelling writer, I have tended to shudder. But here was a direct,unmistakable confrontation between everything I loved and everything I hated."And the porpoise is not without his prurience: blow jobs, anal sex and that staid lad-mag novelty — the"back, sack and crack' — have all made an appearance in his Vanity Fair column. In interviews on
God Is NotGreat
he labors the point concerning the misogyny of religion, with its renunciation of menstrual blood andthe female reproductive organs. Something Hitchens is always quick to remind us is that he has no qualmswith a woman's genitalia — in fact, quite the contrary, ladeez... What should one call such RogerMoore-esque eyebrow-arching? A bonmotte?Facebook Groups abound, both for and against the arch-antagonist:Christians Praying For ChristopherHitchens;Christopher Hitchens Is The Balls; Christopher Hitchens Is Not Great. The Hitch even has his own dedicated ombudsman c/oHitchwatch, a blog which likes to highlight his shortcomings as a writer, while onYoutube, Hitchens devotees post clips of some of his finest primetime battles on the American newsnetworks.The Huffington Post— a liberal aggregated blog — is also a fan of pointing out discrepancies andhypocrisies in his columns, analysing every caustic comment and deconstructing every neologism that theNeoconoclast makes.Here in my armchair, I find myself entertained by this man. Nay, tickled, entertained and edified. And Iwonder, should I be alarmed by this? Is it just the articulate displays of erudition? Is it the rebel stance? Is itsimply his obsession with the cocktail hour, his cocked-middle-finger approach to modern attitudesconcerning booze intake and smoke inhalation? Perhaps it's the insouciance in the face of the Fox NewsSmackdown approach to debate: loaded questions, audible sneers, transparent vitriol, greeted by Hitchenswith: "Sir, if you will allow me to speak..."Where do you stand on the Hitchens issue? It's hardly a topic of mass debate sweeping the globe, but worthyof comment all the same. But if his phrases are being picked up by the man generally considered "Leader of the Free World," this man's words matter.As part of Generation Y-bother, politically apathetic, mistrustful of media, with snide cynicism being ouronly stance, it is nice to be reminded of what it means to fully occupy a position, to inhabit an ideology, toexpose oneself with what could be viewed as anachronistic, heart-on-sleeve impassioned beliefs.But I'm troubled when people refer to him asGeorge Orwell's heir.As someone who was awakened into politics by Orwell's prose, with its "windowpane" transparency, Irecognize similarities in their passion to engage with the political world with words. But the similaritiesstop there. Orwell was also a man of action, shouldering a rifle in Catalonia with the Spanish Left for hisanti-fascist beliefs.Hitchens' bellicose war cries are done from the safety of his desk, scotch in hand. On his travels, hebrandishes vitriol and a pen. Ultimately, for all his great intellectualism and wit, he reminds one of a HenryMiller quote concerning what it is to be a politician:"One has to be a lowbrow, a bit of a murderer, to be a politician, ready and willing to see people sacrificed,slaughtered, for the sake of an idea, whether a good one or a bad one."Perhaps he will be remembered thus: Great on thunder, short on lightning.
E-mail Neil Fitzgerald at ispistole at yahoo dot com.
Share and EnjoyEmail Article Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon
Flak Magazine | Christopher Hitchens, 01.08.08le:///Users/neiltzgerald/Documents/Published%20Web%20...3 of 516/10/08 14:45

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
tajkra liked this
Marx liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->