OK-SAFE, Inc. Reporting
–
Health Insurance Exchange Meeting 12-8-11 Page 2
Exchanges
–
“G
oal is to lower prices. No disputing the cost data from the last 20 years. Gottafigure out how to lower their premiums. Exchanges allow people to pool their needs.
”
“
You
’ve
got four plans and they all have to provide certain requirements
–
all gotta be the
same.” Could be s
ame benefits, with different prices or same prices and different benefits.
“
Easier for consumer to compare one plan with another.
”
Requirement for an essential benefitsplan - called a QHP
–
a qualified health plan.
Plan language requirement.
“It’s online, but it’s not just a website. This is a di
fferent thing. What the exchange needs to beable to do is access both public coverage and private coverage. As life changes occur, you needto be able to go online and make those changes.
”
Should be able to pay online and receiverefundable tax credit online. It will have a very sophisticated back office system.
24-hour online support to help people buy coverage.
For a state run exchange to be compliant it must be federally compliant.
Compared Utah stats to Oklahoma stats
–
Utah healthier. (Did not elaborate on source of statsor mechanism for rating).
Utah is working to make their state compliant with the federal law.
Question from attendee on the governance of exchange.
Richey - No opinion on which form is best. Wait until the state moves forward with legislation.Each model has their pros and cons.
“
We need to take action and move forward.
”
On Feb. 29, 2011 the federal government issued some answer in the form of Q & A on StateExchanges. Is OK ready to run an exchange by Jan. 2013? The exchanges have to launch by2014, so has to be
“
beta ready
”
by Oct. 2013.
Regarding states not being ready
–
“the
feds are willing to meet you where you are and walkwith you through the exchange. If we turn down establishment grants, there is money still outthere. If we miss the deadlines will the funds will still be available.
Question about grants - Yes, they will be available on a rolling schedule through 2014.
Check offs1.
background research
–
know the markets2.
How many insurers can they handle the requirements3.
Stakeholder consultation
Question - Where is the advocate in Oklahoma for the exchanges? Seems like we got derailed
by the Tea Party they just didn’t want
the state to comply.
“We’re working on the governance structure.”
Not sure why the money was returned. Will have to reapply for another establishment grant
Comment from attendee - NAHU (National Association of Health Underwriters) are behind(advocate) it. The OHCA working groups are active. We were sad to see those funds return.The Tea Party blocked it.
There were groups there at the beginning, various advocates.
Feds will set up exchange if they need to, but they
don’t want to run it for long run.
Willeventually turn it back over to the states for most of the functions. (Except data hub?)
Grant agreements come with benchmarks that must be achieved.
“
Even if we miss the deadlineson these grants the money will still be available until 2014.
”
As far as Richey knows no one has
Add a Comment