Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Claim #2: John says the rollers will spin as they orbit the stator.
As we can see in the mock up, that is also true. The rollers spin on
their centripetal axis as they orbit the stator. In the past, scientists
told John that the rollers must spin the opposite direction to the
direction they travel. Or that every other roller would spin CW, CCW,
CW, CCW. But simple observation proves that's not the case.
Claim #2 is proved to be true. The Rollers indeed spin together as
they orbit and in the same direction as travel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2YRy_Og6ME
Claim #3: The rollers will have no sound, won't touch and will float as
they spin around the stator. Its obvious that the rollers will spin as
they orbit the stator as seen in the previous link. But how could they
spin around if they are pushed away from the stator from eddy
currents?
To demonstrate this, it required building an entirely different set-up
(which took thousands of dollars in itself and a couple months work.)
And rather than having the stator stationary and the rollers spin, we
have the roller stationary and the stator spin.
That mimics the same relative motion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbpEwRsMj4w
With just a copper ring, we can see that as the roller makes its way
around the stator, its lifted up by the eddy currents. The roller is
prevented from touching the surface of the plate (stator) just as
John said.
Claim #3 proved to be true. That after sufficient RPM, the magnets
won't touch, won't vibrate, no friction, no sound, etc.
That makes for a device with moving parts that dont touch. A
machine like that wouldnt need the same maintenance as a
conventional motor or generator with oil, bearings, shafts, etc.
Claim #4: John says the rollers will Spin AND levitate.
Normally you can get a magnet to Spin OR levitate.
Take a Diametrical Magnet or Axial Magnet and put it next to a
spinning copper ring. You will feel a repulsion preventing the magnet
from touching the ring.
(Much like how all atoms of matter repel at 10^-8 centimeters.
Nothing actually touches on the quantum scale)
If you were to sit that magnet on top of the spinning copper ring, the
magnet would hover, but not spin. If you change the magnets
orientation 90 degrees, the magnet will spin but not hover. How to
make it hover and spin? A Bloch Wall is normally a flat line/ 2D
plane separating N from S.
Visualize the Bloch Wall acting as a wave rather than a "flat plane".
So, by simulating a wave on the Bloch Wall, it makes the cylinder
levitate And spin.
Claim #5: The rollers will remain equidistant, self align and stay on
track. This claim is self-evident. The rollers self organize from the
magnetic repulsion interactions, stay level around the stator, etc.
http://www.searlsolution.com/RotatingWire-Ver2.wmv
The SEG consists of three fixed stator rings that are uniquely
magnetized with patterns setup to generate continual motion of
similarly magnetized cylindrical rotors. The magnetic rotors or rollers
consist of eight segmented components made of the same four
layers of concentric materials that make up the stators. The rollers
have both freedom of spin and rotation around the stator which
generates both mechanical and electrical power.
The SEG is an 'open system' of energy conversion that is in
accordance with known thermodynamic laws; particularly as it may
apply at the quantum level. The open energy cycle of the SEG
enables it to function both as a prime mover of mechanical rotors,
but more so as an electrical generator that continuously interacts
and processes energy from the natural environment.
Incidental effects includes a halo of negative air ionization or plasma,
vacuum by extreme electrical charge, cooling temperatures of both
device and the local environment; also gravitational and inertial
anomalies under specific conditions.
The inner most Plate typically has 12 rollers. There are 22 rollers on
the second stage and 32 on the final Plate. Surrounding the outer
most rollers are conventional electromagnets, which by way of
magnetic induction, taps energy out of the rapid passing of
magnetized rollers. These inductive pickup coils are connected in
various configurations to supply AC power at a variety of desired
voltage and current levels to suit residential or industrial
applications.
The SEG is defined as a device constructed of 2,124 component
parts that make up 3 plates and 66 roller sets. 12 of the 2,124
components make the 3 plates that act as reaction components.
2,112 components are employed to create 66 roller sets that also
act as active components. Each roller set consists of 8 segments
constructed from 32 components.
Each segment cannot be less than 34 grams in weight, as the Law of
Squares mathematical matrix defines the value of 34 as the lowest
suitable for the reasonable generation of electricity. Therefore the
smallest roller set must weigh 272 grams, making a grand total of
2,244 grams per roller set for the smallest surface bound SEG.
The SEG is a step up rotary transformer.
In fact its a 'three rotary transformer' operational system, within the
whole unit. The inner transformer output is fed in to the input of the
second plate which increases the output of the second unit
additively. The output of the second unit, in turn, feeds as an input
to the final unit, thereby increasing the final output to a very high
voltage. The electromagnet pick-up windings can be designed to
step down the output to a standard 240 volts at the rate of about 15
Kilowatts for a home unit.
From 1946 to 1968, and in Johns early newsletters, The Searl Effect
was referred to as magnetic bubbles in motion. In 1968, it became
clear that these magnetic bubbles contained particles in a set
manner, and that there was a set pattern to how many bubbles were
present in the material. Because of this finding, Searl dropped the
term magnetic bubbles and replaced it with the term magnetic
quantum material.
Look into how a butterfly wing (ridges) interacts with light (photons)
and entertain the notion that a magnetic standing wave (ridges)
and electricity (electrons) might interact in a similar way. In the
regard that "electron" behavior of varying wavelengths around
normal generators can be compared the random motion of photons
from an incandescent white light; Whereas, the behavior of
"electrons" in the SEG act more like the photons in a specifically
colored laser beam. But these laser-like paths of bosons (coherent
currents) are only generated within the atomic lattice of the mass
making up the unit. Planar. And in the case of the SEG, radial.
The SEG is an absorber. Just as a butterfly wing absorbs all
wavelengths of light but only reflects the one its structure is made of.
Also look into the term "coherence" in relation to physics
The electric fields of the SEG are "coherent".
coherence
A property holding for two or more waves or fields when each
individual wave or field is in phase with every other one. Lasers, for
example, emit almost perfectly coherent light; all the photons emitted
by a laser have the same frequency and are in phase. Since quantum
states can be described by a wave equation, coherence can hold for
quantum states in general, though only among bosons. Coherence is
generally possible in physical systems that may undergo
superposition.
See also Bose-Einstein condensate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoseEinstein_condensate
Cooper Pairs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair
Claim #7: The SEG "looses weight" after a certain energy draw.
Technically, the unit doesn't actually loose weight or loose mass.
The Earth's magnetic field competes with the superconducting
electrostatic field generated by the SEG; therefore, there is an
upward repulsion effect. (But only in specific cases)
The unit still "weighs" the same regardless, but electrostatic forces
prevent it from touching the ground once in an overloaded/
superconductive state. Youll have to listen to Paul Murads interview
and see their technical data in their paper linked below.
Does a magnet levitating above a cooled superconductor loose
weight/ mass? Or is the magnetic field just pushing upward?
(There is 0 loss or gain of mass of either superconductor or magnet)
Meissner Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect
Meissner Effect vs. Flux Pinning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyN8cSB7BWs
John says the coherent electric fields of the SEG are laser like and
the SEG compress electrons" (transforms). The kinetic energy of
electrons is harnessed, cycled and recycled by the SEG much like
how the kinetic energy of water is cycled and recycled through a
hydroelectric dam. We can compare water to electricity in a number
of analogies, but major work has to be done to change the current
perception of what is thought to take place on the quantum scale.
Coherent electricity deals with bosons (pairs of electrons
traveling/propagating as One in 1 direction); whereas, incoherent
electricity deals with fermions (single and traveling in varying
directions. Clashing with turbulence and loosing internal kinetic
energy.) Bosons only occur at low temperatures and in coherent
states. Also only occur in a planar field. (ordered/ uniform/ in phase
on 1 plane. 2D.) Particles in phase cant interfere with each other
and dont loose internal kinetic energy.
I liken the process of Cooper Pairs & Phonon resonance to a bolus
during paristalsis. A radial and symmetrical propagation in a wavelike manner.
What mainstream tries to do is force coherence of quantum
particles by cooling a conductor until it becomes a superconductor.
By lowering existing incoherence to a tolerable low. Then you have a
simulated state of coherence between particles which leads to the
Meissner Effect (the lifting). If force cooling causes coherence of a
magnetic field and atomic lattice, and for every action there is an
equal and opposite the inverse would be that the cold is a biproduct of the superconductivity. Rather than the superconductivity
being a bi-product of the cold.
Mainstream superconductive research force freezes materials to
simulate the effect of coherence. which costs a lot of money and
energy to maintain at a constant. John Searl discovered a process to
actually magnetize a material to reap the effect at a constant as a biproduct of producing electricity. Seems to be a mirror image of the
current processes by mainstream attempts at the oxy-moron called
room temperature superconductivity.
Force Freezing a material to simulate particles in phase and actually
being in phase are 2 different things. Imagine how much it would cost
and how much energy would be wasted from futilely trying to
Russian Validations
http://www.rexresearch.com/roschin/roschin.htm
The Russians proved a proportional temperature drop more so than
Morningstar Energy Box has been able to achieve so far.
To isolate that claim would require a lot more funding; As well as, the
magnetic repulsion (lift effect) with increased load/ RPM.
There is more than enough validations and curiosity to justify
funding John Searl to rebuild a fully working 3 ringed prototype.
(But why fund some 3rd party without the info attempting to COPY
John Searl when you can support the man John Searl directly?)
Claim #8: The rollers speed up as an electric current is drawn.
What happens to a motor as you draw more current?
It speeds up. And indeed that's the case with the SEG. As more load
is drawn, more current flows.
But the SEG is a motor AND generator. (Though, it doesn't become
active as a generator until the unique waves are imprinted onto the
materials.)
The SEG Prototype inverses the roll of the Mock Up.
The Mock up delivers power to the coils from an isolated power
source from the outside in. The prototype guides electrons in
laser-like paths radially through the layers of the unit.
Quantum Tunneling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling
The electric current goes from the center outward with Collimated
energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collimated
Regardless of direction of radial current, the fact is that the rollers
move faster around the stator with increased load.
The next stage and claim to prove is that the SEG generates
"electron emissions." But to test that means we need to make a large
stator ring, magnetize it to the specs, make the smaller components
to the specs and then have them move in relation to each other.
Only then will the SEG produce more measurable and impressive
phenomenon. To achieve that.... requires almost 2 years full time
work, being full funded with 3 to 6 million dollars and hiring a small
team of professional engineers. (Thats really nothing compared to
other scientific research projects.)
INCOHERENT
COHERENT
Also look into the brilliant work of Johann Goethe, who 100 years
after Newton, discovered more detailed properties of prisms, light and
dark spectrums. Visit these sites:
http://www.rainengineering.com/ether/Light&Electricity/light_and_elec
tricity.html
Goethe vs Newton:
http://aetherforce.com/the-tao-of-colours-by-doug-marsh
Light Dark & Color:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID0BSlfZyHU
This process strips kinetic energy from the electrons before they exit
the atomic lattice making up the SEG. In principle, it is the same as a
hydroelectric dam, yet energy was harnessed into mechanical motion
by passing the current flow. Like water in and out of the dam, the
electrons move in and out of the SEG. Both systems utilize the
ambient energy currents as part of an open energy cycle. Both
systems tap onto sustainable energy sources from the outside
environment cleanly and effectively. However, the Searl Effect
Generator operates at the quantum level, making it far more effective
and not dependant on location nor weather conditions.
The reservoir in the case of the SEG is the outer shell of each
neodymium atom making up the core. The valence electrons fill the
shell like water fills a basin.
Dielectric materials and insulators act as a dam for electricity like the
water analogy.
The hole in a dam forces the water out in a coherent flow which
focuses the kinetic energy of the water in a beam to turn a turbine.
The turbines generate electricity. The holes/ slits in the case of the
SEG are the spaces between atoms making up the dielectric layer.
The pressure compresses the electrons and they tunnel through as a
Bose-Einstein Condensate. (They are also additionally accelerated
by the impelling force from the magnetic fields permeating through
the mass of the other materials.)
The premise is like someone grabbing the front of your shirt and
pulling you forward at the same time someone else pushes your
forward from behind. Lots of kinetic energy there from the
simultaneous impelling on the front side & positive pressure pushing
on the back of electrons migrating radially through the system.
The turbines in the case of the SEG are the orbiting rollers.
Likewise, the electrons in the SEG are emitted back out into the
atmosphere where they recharge and migrate back to the reservoir.
A complete cycle. Openly.
Water evaporates much like how the bosons emitted by the SEG decouple after being harnessed in the pickup coils. The single fermions
quickly charge up in the incoherent environment (outside the
boundary of mass making up the unit) and are then attracted to the
positively charged neodymium core once again. Then the cycle
repeats in a dual toroidal circuit. Radial emissions outward at the
equator and converging vortices at the poles. Nothing created or
destroyed. Only already existing energy cycled and recycled.
If you had your own hydroelectric dam to power your home, you
wouldn't have to pay for the energy it reaped once it was set up. In
that regard, the energy would be free, and perpetually sustained by
the natural environment.
Imagine the source of water in the next four images below coming
from a giant dam. How would this break the 2nd Law of
thermodynamics? As long as there is water pressure, you could spin
the generator. How would you possibly halt the totality of pressure
exerted on a dam wall short of breaking the dam itself?
Just as rain replenishes the water level in a reservoir for a dam, if you
used energy in the SEG, the environment naturally replenishes the
valence of neodymium atoms making up the cores.
You are using energy which is being depleted, but AS you use
energy, its generating another field that attracts more energy to influx
the system at the same time. You don't say that the dam provides
"more energy than required to run it".
The density of the rare-earth used as the core will determine how
much is in the reservoir. (Like increasing the depth of a basin)
So you know the total output of a given unit by its density and mass.
If the density of the Teflon isn't right, then it would be like having a
paper thin wall for a large dam. The wall of the dam will break and the
system will be compromised and flood with too much energy.
If the wall of a dam is too thick, the water will loose kinetic energy by
the time is makes its way out the hole. If theres just a trickle of water,
it wont have enough force to spin a turbine.
The kinetic energy from the "electron streams" turns the rollers with
so much force, the amount of resistance caused by drawing a load is
The magnetic fields imprinted on the SEG are what make it active as
a generator. Its also what creates spin And lift when the eddy current
effects take place. (If the waves were not imprinted, you couldnt draw
any energy. The magnets would hover but not spin.)
You need relative motion to generate electricity. If the magnets didnt
hover, there would be major friction. The speed of the relative motion
between roller/ stator would be severely restricted and the system
would break.
Again, it will take one top grade engineer with top grade software to
map the complex interaction of magnetic and dielectric fields.
Without the proper densities, the system will do nothing at all. Or itll
immediately overflow with energy and be compromised with any load.
Without the imprinted magnetic waves, the unit would just be a very
expensive paperweight. Or a very expensive homopolar motor that
needed a conventional battery or power source to make it spin.
If you connected pick-up coils to a conventional homopolar motor, it
would meet so much resistance as you tapped energy that it would
stop.
ALL known magnets are made with the same sloppy process of
hammering a metal with DC and high capacitive discharge.
The Only man known to ever imprint a waveform on a magnetic
material is Professor John Searl.
Just as all known electric generators dont account for the density of
the materials making up the unit. And certainly dont account for the
density of a system in relation to the amount of output.
Can Man create something that doesn't exist in Nature? Yes!
Laser Beams do Not occur in Nature.
It takes the conscious action of Man putting together components and
utilizing Scientific Rules to create a scenario Nature itself cannot
generate.
Combining a hydroelectric dam with an industrial atmospheric water
generator and tapping the natural energy cycle of water to harness
electricity doesnt exist in nature either.
100 years ago, a laser pointer was impossible. All people knew was
the randomness of incandescent light. (Incoherence)
10 years ago, a beam of sound was impossible, or never conceived.
All people knew was the randomness of acoustic waves.
Most people have still never heard of Woody Norris and his
Hypersonic Sound Laser Panel. People know of his LRAD system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF9G9M0cR0E
Today, coherent electricity or magnetism is "impossible."
All people know are the conventional electric currents reaped by all
commonly made magnets.
The magnetization process imprints a material with a modulated and
tuned wave which manifests as a type of interference pattern.
When you spin it (in relation to another like magnet of equal imprint),
more interactions manifest. Just as a music box won't manifest the
song until it's spun. All the info on it means nothing until motion is
added relative to something else.
Are there different equations for the motion of "particles" emitted from
an incandescent source verses a laser beam? Yes.
All known magnets are made the same sloppy way, not accounting
for the resistance of the current in the magnet and a lot more. All
known magnets have fields that are always on. Even binary code,
the most basic premise, requires On and Off. 1 and 0.
A magnets strength goes to zero as it approaches the Bloch Wall.
Then if flips. What if you can have full power and then off Full
power and then off? The intensity of the field wont drop off the same
if you account for the modulation and pulses at specific frequencies.
People need to look into the difference between an Open System and
Closed (Isolated) System and when the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
actually applies. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to Closed/
Isolated Systems. Not Open Systems. Just as superposition doesnt
apply to non-linear systems.
It even plainly states in the very Wikipedia link naysayers used to
post in a blindly bias attempt to invalidate the physics. But its They
who didnt read their own links! And the info indeed Does validate it.
2nd Law Definition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics
The 2nd law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an
isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems
always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, a state with
maximum entropy. (this is all dealing with INCOHERENT WAVES)
Closed System:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_System
Isolated System:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolated_system
Open System (in Same wiki link as 2nd Law)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(thermodynamics)#Open_s
ystem
Open System (Systems Theory)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_system_(systems_theory)
Syntropy (Negentropy):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntropy
From BlazeLabs.com
http://www.blazelabs.com/n-perpetual.asp
On the quantum scale, all electrons and atoms and parts are in a
perpetual state of transition motion.
Some people say perpetual motion doesnt exist. But they are
referring to relative motion between 2 bodies.
Not necessarily the motion of 1 body in space by itself. But that 1
body is made up of a bunch of other bodies.
And the smaller you zoom in, the more Brownian motion you get. Like
the white noise (static snow) on a TV.
Anything in nature above Absolute Zero (0 Kelvin) is in chaotic
motion. And theres no where in the universe at 0 Kelvin. The coldest
part and deepest parts of space are calculated to be about 4 Kelvin
because of the influence from cosmic radiation and other forces.
So in that regard, all things made of atoms are constantly moving
regardless where its location is in the universe.
And that motion is random and chaotic like the static on a TV.
Constant resistance, turbulence, loss of energy and generating heat.
The outer most electrons on the outer most shell are called
Valence electrons. The valence of atoms is how they react with
other atoms, and those electrons are sometimes easily stripped off.
After they shoot through the dielectric layer, they are accelerated by
the coherently imprinted flux lines of the rotating rollers. Then blasted
to the copper layer where they are emitted to the atmosphere.
(And/or coils which tap the energy at the periphery.)
(But how can you machine the other layers unless you know the
density of the magnetic material?)
You can do it for practice. So you know the steps to take when you
Do get the final densities. Cant just jump into manufacturing an SEG
on the first try. Youve got to do your homework on how to go about
handling the needed tolerances regardless of what they are. And
practice on materials before doing the real thing.
Notice the magnetic ring is in 12 sections though. It SHOULD be a
solid ring. But alas no one in the entire world of manufacturing
makes solid rings of magnetic materials that large. And this is the
Smallest inner most stator for the smallest possible version of the
SEG (using these materials).
Cant farm out this kind of work or outsource it. Have to do it inhouse. Would be a logistical and communications nightmare to try
and have others manufacture these parts at this point.
Its not reasonable to impose the level of tolerances we need on other
shops. Just imagine trying to press a solid magnetic ring for a unit 6
feet in diameter. Or 60 feet. Or 600 feet. Or 6000 feet. It can be
scaled up as long as you have the capability of machining it.
The larger units would obviously have to be in sections
Took John Searl about 8 months of full time work WITH unlimited
resources, megawatts of power and access to a multi-million dollar
infrastructure for free. He was provided with teams of machinists and
factory workers at his availability each time he developed an SEG. He
didnt have to pay rent, labor, utilities, medical benefits, insurance,
legal fees, materials, shipping, etc. etc.
Working with very limited resources today with 4 people on a shoe
string budget and not even a fraction of what John had originally its
going to take a lot longer.
If it took John about 8 months with unlimited resources and all the
help he needed before what will it take to purchase everything with
modern prices while going against the grain? Its been like this for
quite a while. People have some silly misconception that John has
been working on the SEG non-stop for 60 years. He was only able to
work on it when the funding allowed.
If people have more questions, they can go through the links below:
FAQs:
http://searlsolution.com/contact2.html
Searl Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF9EBB4FBBA29759B
Pdf of Lecture on John Searl:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/134608782/John-Searl-and-the-SEGPresentation
Professor John Searl Album (Facebook):
https://www.facebook.com/verbelli/media_set?set=a.409237198301.1
84888.683583301&type=3
John Searl album (Photobucket):
http://108.photobucket.com/user/Therealverbz/library/John%20Searl
Paul Murad & Morningstar Energy Box Audio Interview:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/paul-murads-searleffect-generator.html
Gyroscopes:
Fran McCabe:
http://www.franmccabe.com/#!gyroscopics
McCabe Compilation (Read Description):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xYhrFgcyWQ
A 2.5 in lb 12/24 V rated DC motor spinning a1.5 lb, 6" D. Gyro
wheel can systemically output 31.5 in lb thru gyroscopic natural
and powered precession.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c74C2iTSIzI
Centripetal Force:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC5ZiJNZssk
Eric Laithwaite on Gyroscopes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpCEJxO6V9g
Laithwaite on Gyroscopic Propulsion:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9wTAL5KoU
Sandy Kidd:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt9wTAL5KoU
Gyro Says "No" to Newton:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTEVC22qAZg
Gyro Experiments Galore:
http://relmachine.blogspot.com/
Self Rotation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYK2-7kdtcY
The behavior of a single spinning wheel in gimbals is a welldocumented subject; however, the interaction between multiple
spinning wheels is less fully explored. Some researchers have
hypothesized that spinning wheels could be mathematically
modeled after electrical inductors, suggesting that the
interaction between multiple spinning wheels might mirror that
of multiple inductors in proximity with each other. The goal of
the current set of experiments was to examine the interaction
between two gimbaled spinning wheels with six degrees of
freedom embedded in one scaffolding and observe their
behavioral similarity to electrical inductors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=camtPxBL-YM
Working Together:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IPtlYipB4w
Levers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdM2jWg2uEE
Pulleys:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMx7nIIH9ik
Inclined Planes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_ErI0QjNos
Wheels and Axles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7xu9O0miEc
To make just the inner most neodymium stator ring will cost about
$15,000. (conservatively)
$10,000 in materials for solid steel to make the mold, then the labor
for a weeks work to make a 3D CAD for the mold on SolidWorks,
then CNC the mold. And any alterations later, etc.
All so the metal powders can be smashed into the needed size rings.
But no telling the mold will be right the first try, or won't crack under
the pressure of the 100 ton press.
Then it would require another 2 weeks full time work to make
another mold and another $15,000.
Machinists don't work for free. Costs about $45 an hour. Plus
machine and floor time, tool changes, utilities, oil, maintenance, etc.
Realistically looking at about $85+ an hour. 10 full work days. 8
hours a day. That's just for labor for 1 mold.
Might need 2 molds for Each stator set. And 2 molds for the smaller
components. That's 8 molds. Each one bigger than the next.
Need a mold for each neodymium ring and a mold for each magnetic
ring. 3 stator sets. Then the actual materials to mix and smash into
solid rings. Both big and small.
(This is for pressing powders. Pouring molten ingots into molds is an
entirely different process which is equally difficult and expensive. Yet
slightly more dangerous because of the volatility of rare earth
materials)
No telling youll get the right density with a given proportion of
powders. No telling youll use the right binder so it wont crumble
apart. No telling that even if you hit the right density and it doesnt
crumble or crack that it will retain the needed gauss.
If the gauss is off, you need to change the percentages of
proportions which might alter the size of the mold.
Which means youd need to make another mold until you get all the
numbers you want.
And then you need a CNC lathe that can handle the diameters of the
larger pieces to machine them into molds!
Do You, the reader, have the capability of pressing a 30 inch
diameter solid ring from ferrous metal powders? I doubt it.
Or the capability of smelting a solid 30 inch neodymium ring in an
argon environment?
Most of you will not.
Not even major Chinese manufacturers can press the large rings.
They can only do many small segments put together to make 1 ring.
And they only deal with ordinary epoxies with ordinary metal powders
in ordinary proportions. Their magnets are made with ordinary DC.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
And sometimes acquiring extraordinary proof requires extraordinary
funding. Especially if youre using extraordinary methods with
extraordinary precision. Nothing is ordinary about the SEG and its
construction.
Even Nikola Tesla was provided with the means to make his
discoveries. His methods were extraordinary compared to Edisons.
Without the means to experiment through trial and error how would
an experimenter acquire the info? (How much has CERN spent to
date? And how close are they to powering your home, car or LED?)
The point of this section of diatribe is to give people some perspective
on reality. Reality of what it takes to manufacture an SEG part by part
and the machining hurdles and costs to do so.
The reality that you cant just give blueprints or schematics because
building something according to density doesnt have the same
schematics as building a box or Anything using only outer
dimensions.
You can 3D print any object you want as long as the 3D CAD has the
algorithm or outer dimensions right? It takes time, money and effort to
develop the CAD first of all.
But what if you told the 3D programmer to add the dimension of
DENSITY to the CAD?
And better use a process that doesnt alter the chemical structure to
much. And now the 3D printer has to have the capability to print the
same size object in different weights. Not just shapes and size.
How much more circuitry and capability would that require? A Lot.
To add another dimension of density to any building process takes
additional time, money and effort. 3D printers arent capable yet.
Then adding magnetics to the process is even more technical!
Were going to go over the Higgs Model and why the explanation as its
presented is absurd and backwards. Phenomenon is real, but the
terminology and diagrams are sorely lacking.
In the Higgs diagram below, they show massive particles being generated
at the bottom by a massless particle on top. The arrow starts at the top of
the hill indicating that a massless particle somehow creates a hill by
curving space and then magically gains mass as it travels a straight path
down the hill following the vertical line.
In Searl's diagram, it shows the inverse. The rollers orbiting the stator IS
the mass at the bottom in the trough. But the trough of what?
Certainly not some non-existent curvature of space.
The blue lines in Searls diagram (which are cut off at the equator in the
Higgs diagram) are representative of magnetic field lines. Something real,
accepted, measurable, observable by anyone with iron shavings,
compasses, ferrofluid, etc.
There are satellite magnets orbiting a stator ring like planetary gears. With
unique magnetization resulting in high frequency waveforms. That when in
rotation at critical speeds generate a spiraling flux cone (frustum) for the
path of "electrons" 90 degrees to the tangential field lines propagating Up
the cone. Which causes them to converge and condense, accumulating
negative energy. (compressed electrons)
Part of the problem here is the model for the electron. Its commonly taught
that an electron has mass. And a negative charge. So, if a bunch of mass
is converging and condensing, it should form a solid ball. But for every
positive theres a negative. So, if theres positive mass, then there must be
negative mass.
If positive mass is said to curve space and make a well. then an
accumulation of electrons should make a well. Not a hill.
Therefore, the model of the electron is backward. (at the very least)
It should be thought of as negative mass with a negative charge. (The
math for a negative mass and positive charge works out the same as a
positive mass with a negative charge.) Look it up.
http://www.diracwasright.com
First a well with straight lines and now a "hill" with straight lines on 1
plane that aren't even connected to anything. Magnetic field lines loop
around in 3 dimensions. The erroneous grid in the Higgs diagram
represents nothing in reality.
Nature is all about Spirals:
If positive mass generates a well, then why would zero mass generate a
hill?
Wouldn't "negative mass" generate the opposite of positive mass? If a
proton is positive, aren't "electrons" supposed to be negative?
Wouldn't zero mass just be "flat" according to their own model?
Once you get to zero, that's it according to them.
No negative inertia. No negative mass.
So why then isn't the rest of their graphs just a bunch of gopher hills
randomly placed? Hey, there's no mass over there... let's arbitrarily put a
hill! Does that make Any sense people?!
O_o
Wait... let's look at that model for space curvature again...
How come the graph (with what's supposed to represent the magnetic field
lines) just stops at the lip around the hill? Where does it go?
How can the graph represent space curving if they say space is empty?
O_o
uummm Dont the points on CERNs graph fall BELOW the 0 line of the
X axis? Thats negative territory.
If No Mass means (0,0) then what would (5,-2) be?
According to their own diagram, that means Negative Mass.
You might say to me that negative mass electrons have never been
seen. But those many dimensions you believe in have never been
seen either. And is it not true that we physicists for decades have
used negative mass electrons in our theories in order to reach
agreement with experiment? And wasn't the positron discovered
because Dirac invoked the existence of negative mass electrons -approximately 80 years ago?
Perhaps it is true that we physicists have not yet observed negative
mass electrons, but does that mean they do not exist?
Now let me ask you this: Have you ever examined even one of the
devices that you tell investors cannot work? I suspect you haven't.
There are in fact inventions that produce energy without having any
kind of conventional fuel. You may see one work in a web page of
mine linked to below. But perhaps you think you don't even need to
look. Could that be the case, Dr. Kaku?
Perhaps you simply "know" these devices can't work. Might you not
also have said many years ago that airplanes could never fly? Before
the Wright brothers were flying airplanes, renowned scientists said it
was impossible. So, I ask that you examine the video linked to
below and I ask that you examine other such videos.
http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Steven%20Mark/Step
hen_Mark_video2.mp4
(Please give the video time to load -- as the file is large. The small
black device shown in the video is producing the power. Then a
larger unit is shown.)
Here is the link to another web page of mine that has links to more
such TPU videos. I can assure you the TPU device works, sir. For
the sake of our nation and the world, I ask that you take the small
amount of time needed to examine these videos.
http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Steven%20Mark/Steve
n_Mark.htm
Please don't say that the above demonstrations were faked, Dr.
Kaku. There are many engineers who examined the device. And
some demonstrations were made outdoors, far from any possible
sources of energy.
even be the case that Tesla was using electromagnetic theory that
included the very gauge transformations that physicists of this era do
not include? Is that not possible, sir, and if not, why not?
Therefore, if I may speak freely, I would say that while millions or
even billions of people live in desperate poverty, and while millions
of Americans lose their jobs because we don't have this kind of
technology -- you tell people that such technology is impossible,
when it isn't.
Is everyone who disagrees with you and other leading theorists a
crackpot, Dr. Kaku? Was Nikola Tesla a crackpot? I would
strongly suggest that he wasn't at all a crackpot but was one of the
greatest inventors in the history of the world -- and I believe you
have also said as much. So why then would you dismiss Tesla's
ideas about free energy?
I must say that I have seen many smirks in association with
production of free energy -- Smirks -- while millions of Americans
lose their jobs and the United States falls into a terrible economic
decline. Smirks. Is that appropriate, sir? I would say not.
But the matter does not end with the above TPU units. There is also
the work of Thomas Henry Moray who was able to produce an
estimated 50 kilowatts of power from a tabletop unit that my analysis
indicates involved employment of negative mass electrons which Dr.
Moray apparently captured in very special circuits he built -- many,
many decades ago.
Here is a link to what I have written about Dr. Moray's work. There
are many more links on the Internet: Please do take the time to
investigate. A world desperate for energy waits.
http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Energy/index.htm
Robert W. Koontz, Ph.D. Experimental Nuclear Physicist
The URL of my web site is given below.
There is a link on the main page to my bio:
http://www.DoctorKoontz.com/
But theres a major difference between a very tight conical frustum and a
closed cone. ABSOLUTE FAILURE!!!! Why call it a black hole and then
give a diagram for a closed well as if bending the meniscus of water?
Thats like saying the Pupil of your eye is compacted dark matter that
generates the iris and scalera and holds the rest of your eye together
FAIL!
An open frustum cone is not a closed well. Sort of defeats the entire notion
of a singularity/ infinite densities/ dark matter/ curved space/ empty
space, etc. Should look more like a bundt cake mold.
And they say the well is generated by the mass of the Earth
But they just said a hill is generated by a massless particle
2 sides of the same meniscus...
Why isnt the Mass of the Earth generated by Massless particles by pulling
the fabric of space from the other side then?
Massless particles bend space now.. so why not state that all matter is just
the result of massless particles combining on the other side of the
meniscus of nonexistent curved space?
See how laughable this is?!
If 1 side of space sinks, then the other side must raise by my simple mind.
Sorta the whole idea behind looking at a parabolic dish from both sides. 1
side is convex, the other side is concave. 2 sides same bowl.
If you state 1 thing you have to account for the scenario in the inverse.
Cant just have a well on 1 side of a meniscus without making a hill on the
other side by default. Is there only 1 side to a coin now too CERN?! Only 1
side to the bundt cake mold? Only 1 side to a sombrero?
If you make a divot on 1 side of a coin. Then whats on the other side of
the coin? A HILL
If you have a divot on 1 side of a bundt cake mold whats on the other
side? A HILL
So, by Einsteins logic, there should be 2 worlds. 1 on either side of his
non-existent meniscus of the fabic of space.
AS matter makes a divot on this side, then simultaneously a massless
particle would be making a hill from the other side. Ok by that logic,
which one generates the other?
Neither.. Why? Because the entire model is bullshit.
This is such a joke! Massless particles pulling the fabric of space into a hill
collecting matter NOT ONLY IN THE TROUGH OF THE SOMBRERO
BUT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MENISCUS
Absolutely Ridiculous.
CERN is trying to smash together 2 incoherent fermions in hopes of
coupling them together to make a coherent boson. (which they dont even
label in their erroneous diagram.)
O_o
Are they insane!?! (They must be since they're repeating their actions
expecting different results. It's like a pathetic gambler who needs just 1
more loan. They have the formula to win this year right? What a joke.)
Analogy:
That's like pointing 2 flashlights with white bulbs at each other in hopes
that it will someone isolate a particular bandwidth and make a laser beam.
So they spend more and more money on brighter white bulbs. Expecting
that by intensifying current failures with a more expensive set up will
somehow reap their results. O_o
If the square peg isn't fitting through the round hole.... you don't continue to
push harder. You try something else... (I learned that all by myself when I
was less than a year old!)
In order to even generate their higgs field, you need to have something in
an orbit first. Then it generates the frustum out of magnetic field lines which
then tighten like an iris. Might be so tight that you THINK its a closed
convex or concave shell, but theres a HOLE.
Not that theres a stationary massless ball particle that magically pulls
space to a hill to make a sombrero (while simultaneously mass is pushing
a well on the other side to fill the hat).
And then 1 ball particle of mass is generated in the trough of the sombrero.
Even in their diagram they show TWO divots but only 1 stationary ball
Which means that 1 ball would need to orbit on the Z axis around the Y
Axis while maintaining the same plane on the X axis at ( , -2). But always
staying 5 points away from the fulcrum/ shaft of the Y axis according to this
graph to make a circular orbit on 1 plane.
Cant have a stationary single ball make 2 divots in 2 points of space at the
same time. Nonsense!
At least grow a pair and have 2 balls for your 2D diagram cross section.
Whats the cross section of a torus look like?
That 1 diagram is from page 115 from just ONE of Searl's books. Here's a
picture of 25 of his books. The other 60 or so were on the shelves. Couldn't
fit them on the table... or the others in boxes...
Watch some leading University or CERN itself publish a new diagram soon
showing a "dynamic higgs field" with a swirling grid up the cone instead of
a "static higgs field" like in their current diagrams and understanding.
They'll probably try to attribute it to rotational frame-dragging and/or
LenseThirring Effect or a rotating Kerr "hill".
http://albert51.tripod.com/bhole.htm.
They would have to claim it's the result of a spinning massless particle.
Which is so laughable it's pathetic. At least call it negative mass.... or more
specifically, a rotation of an accumulation of "electrons". Condensed from
converging at the conical and tangential flux lines up the FRUSTUM.
(See why Im so frustrated!)
If they make a new sombrero model with a twist and claim credit, just look
back on this note and diagram and push to get Searl the support he needs.
Invest a fraction of the funding into Professor John Searl so we can
actually have a unit to Display these effects. Not just get a new diagram
with a twist and a claim they discovered it to justify their last billion dollar
budget.
LOTS more to discuss and share and show in context. Lots.
http://phys.org/news/2015-01-magic-quantum-revealed-coldatoms.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412084525.htm
But if you were to see it head on, it would look like ripples in a pond.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412084525.htm
That's why it's so confusing for people.
Because they ASSUME they are shooting ball particles, when really
they are sending expanding rings which look like waves from head
on. Because electrons have mass (negative). But mainstream says
all mass is positive. So they assume a ball particle and see a wave,
then make up a fantasy about how the ball becomes a wave as soon
as you look.
So you're not shooting 1 electron from a gun in the form of a ball.
You're shooting an electron at a specific energy density at which will
form ripples regardless. But the amplitude of the ripple will change
depending on how energy dense.
In the Poincare Conjecture, it's ASSUMED the ring shrinks down to a
"point." NOPE
A ring cannot become a point.
But at the Planck scale... when it WOULD become a point... you get a
"gravitational collapse" because the energy is converging at the
center of an iris. Has no where to go, then MUST do something else.
(phase transition)
Negative mass CANNOT form a sphere or point.
So it collapses like a cavitation bubble to form another ring.
But like how an "electron" jumps to a higher or lower energy state and
"jumps electron shells".
What happens is that the large ring become a more energy dense
smaller ring. Folds in on itself after reaching a critical compression
(condensation)
Or the inverse is a smaller ring expands to become a less energy
dense larger ring.
There are six shells for neodymium. Six concentric rings of varying
energy density. 2, 8, 18, 22, 8, 2
Not that there is actually 2 balls orbiting the nucleus in the inner shell,
8 balls orbiting in the second shell, 18 balls orbiting in the third shell,
22 balls orbiting in the fourth Shell, 8 balls orbiting in the fifth Shell, 2
balls orbiting in the valence sixth shell.
To me, it's more like the inner shell has the negative energy density
equivalent to two ball electrons but evenly distributed in one ring.
The 2nd shell has a negative energy density equivalent to eight ball
electrons but evenly distributed in 1 ring.
The 3rd shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 18 ball
electrons but evenly distributed in one ring.
The 4th shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 22 ball
electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring.
The 5th shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 8 ball
electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring.
The 6th shell has a negative energy density equivalent to 2 ball
electrons that are evenly distributed in one ring.
Not that ball electrons randomly pop into existence where ever you
happen to look. Lol
Still have to show Dan Winter's donut with the colored spiral.
Which is actually representative of what mainstream would call
"frame dragging". Which is a lag in a rotating magnetic field.
Which causes an inverse centripetal spin of negative mass UP and
AROUND the outside of a frustum cone that forms in the center of the
donut like an iris. (Not down the inside of a cone like ball particles in a
water vortex)
Then the energy converges and condenses around the ever
decreasing radii of the iris field which then collapses like a cavitation
bubble through the donut to form a toroid shape itself again. But
because of the tangential field lines converging, the collapse
manifests as a swirling donut. (dynamic)
Like a "Kerr Black Hole" (which is NOT a well resulting from a positive
mass sphere) More like the iris of a camera.
You cannot shrink a sphere of positive mass to make a ring.
Nor can you cannot form a sphere out of a negative mass ring.
They are 2 different shapes and states.
Einstein called that the equivalence principle which is why he thought
gravity and inertia were the same.
That's like saying a sphere and a ring are the same. FAIL!
Relativity is for linear moving Spheres and positive mass.
Absolutivity is for non-linear spinning Rings and negative mass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_time_and_space
Pink Line on the square grid in the upper left corner represents E Field.
Red Line in that grid Represents B field.
You can transpose a Square grid into a torus where we see the correct
orientation of electric to magnetic. The 3rd Vector is rotation.
The Pink Line and Red Line are 90 degrees to each other. Just as
magnetic and electric forces act on each other.
How to get them to interact?
What is half of 90 degrees? 45 degrees.
So you take the 45 degree angle of the square grid and when you
transpose it onto a torus, you get a swirl or wave if you trace the path.
Which means a dynamic motion of both electric and magnetic forces.
Moving in the SAME direction, which accelerates the system.
The numbers correlate with weights/ densities needed to make the unit.
Cannot deviate from certain numbers or the unit won't function. Like how a
tuning fork won't hit a desired pitch unless it's precise.
Podkletnov:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0108005
Dr. Podkletnov describes his force beam generator experiment and his
improvements to increase the experimental gravity-beam. The force beam
is generated by passing a high-voltage discharge from a Marx-generator
through a YBCO emitter suspended in a magnetic field. He described it as
being powerful enough to knock over objects in the lab as well as capable
to punch holes in solid materials. After careful testing, Podkletnov found
the speed of the impulse to be approx. 64 times the speed of light (64c),
which he indicates doesn't conflict with interpretations of Relativity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html
"Podkletnov claims the gravitational beam is generated by a 3 to 5
megavolt drop onto a 4-inch diameter superconductor, which is enclosed in
a wrapped-solenoid to create a magnetic field around the apparatus."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-ongravity-shielding.html
"The beam doesn't disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been
measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers and seems to penetrate all
materials without a decrease in force."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-onantigravity.html
"Someone in the laboratory was smoking and the smoke rose in a column
above the superconducting disc. We placed a ball-shaped magnet above
the disc. We found that any object above the disc lost some weight, and
we found that if we rotated the disc, the effect increased."
Where else can we find these little Higgs Field shapes in nature?
http://www.dailytech.com/Scientists+Solve+Greatest+Superconductor
+Puzzle+Yet/article12800.htm
Again, look at all that expensive equipment needed for this kind of
research. If that particular team working on researching
they would be able to explore what they are currently exploring?
A Counterintuitive Phenomenon:
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-counterintuitive-phenomenoncoexistence-superconductivity-dissipation.html
I kept wondering how the HELL John could fill in the squares so
quickly. I gave him 1 number in 1 box, and in 30 seconds, he would
fill in the rest. All the numbers will add to the same sum no matter
which way you add. There was obviously a pattern that I couldn't
see.
"Because the squares have structure, it's got DNA.! That means
every square has a mathematical value to connect to the next one.
And so on. As long as you know the DNA, then it's child's play." -John Searl
The Law of Squares is a numbered matrix. Like Sudoku. It's also
called "Magic Squares". Many people throughout history have
understood the same laws and patterns.
One man most known for the squares was named Lo Shu.
In this note, I'm only going to show the basic patterns I've learned,
and the relationships between the numbers. We have years of
research to do in order to find how all this relates to Walter Russell's
"Cubic Wave Field", Marko Rodin's "Vortex Based Math", Eric
Dollard's work regarding "counter-space", the function of DNA, and
a lot more.
At age 6, John Searl started having reoccurring dreams of Squares
and Hop Scotch.
When John Searl was working for the electric company as a 14 year
old, he saw a piece of paper with a little 2 next to a big 2.
He asked the foreman what it meant and the man answered it was
"2 squared".
John asked, "What is 2 squared?"
The man said, "You know, 2 squares on top of 2 squares. Equals 4
squares. 2^2 = 4. 2 x 2. Two by Two"
John asked, "But what is the value of the squares?" (meaning what
do the blank spots represent?)
The man said, "They don't represent anything, it's just a formula we
use to get the answer. Count the number of squares and you get
the answer."
John Searl knew something was missing. How can you have empty
squares? They have to have Some value in reality. He thought back
to his 6 years of reoccurring dreams and started coming up with
volumes of material to explain what the Value is of the squares
represents and more. He would develop his own unique way of
using an ancient concept of "Magic Squares" as a calculator.
This has huge implications.
John was looking at it literally.
2^2 = 4.
"Four what?" - J.S.
"Four Squares." -Boss
But you can't just have "a square" in reality. Those 4 squares are the
face of a cube.
"What is the value?" - J.S.
"Value" is the unit of measurement you assign. Whether it be grams
per cubic centimeter (g/cm^3), or grams per cubic meter (g/m^3),
or pounds per cubic meter (lbs/m^3), pounds per cubic foot
(lbs/ft^3), tons per cubic foot (ton/ft^3), etc etc etc.,
So, "Four what?" - J.S.
"Four Squares." - Boss
But in reality those squares represent 1 side of a cube.
Cube of what? What is the weight and volume of the cubes? Both
individually and as a whole.
Keep asking, "What is the value?" until you assign the desired units
and actually describe something in reality.
Even though each number represent blocks within a larger cube
(small composites in a total volume), we are only paying attention to
1 side of the cube. 1 face.
Just make sure you stick with any 1 given side and stick with the
same units when assigning each square a number. Those numbers
represent units whether grams, pounds, etc. Because it's part of a
cube, you know to assign a cubic measurement whether it be cm,
meters, inches, feet, miles, light years, etc. Thus, the /__^3. Fill the
space by assigning a unit.
The squares already tell you the equations in the right format. Just
need to assign what you're calculating by using Real examples.
So, let's assign some numbers.
We'll get to adding the sums up in a bit.
First we'll understand more about the mass and volume (space)
part.
The numbers are over a cube. What does that mean mathematically
if you were to write it out?
3/__^3, or 5/__^3, or 7/__^3
But you can't just have an exponent (the cube) by itself in reality.
"What is the value?"
What unit of measurement are you going to assign for the __? cm,
meters? feet?
And remember the numbers over the cube represent quantities in
reality. Assign the unit:
3 grams/cm^3, or 5 grams/cm^3, or 7 grams/cm^3.
And again, "What is the value?" 3 grams, 5 grams and 7 grams of
What?
Depends on what you're measuring. Assign a material to it or
compound or alloy.
Let's say copper.
3 grams of copper/cm^3. What does that mean in reality?
That means there is 3 grams of copper per every cubic centimeter
of space.
That right there tells you the equation to find the density.
D = m/v. Density equals mass divided by volume. Mass is the
weight. Volume is the amount of space or length x width x height.
If you know the weight of copper per a given amount of space (1
cubic centimeter)... what is 1 centimeter x 1 centimeter x 1
centimeter? 1 x 1 x 1 = 1.
So the volume is 1 in this case. The mass is the weight which is 3
grams.
m/v = D
3 divided by 1 = 3.
So the Law of Squares tells you how to calculate the density as well
as gives you the equations by translating the position of numbers in
a literal sense. And translating the ambiguous numbers on a 2D
square into a 3D reality using real materials You assign and knowing
their weights and volumes (by measuring).
All of that and more in John Searl's head as a child. In an
instantaneous avalanche of questions and logic. From seeing this:
O_o
Interesting phenomenon take place when coils are in resonance.
What phenomenon would take place from having the density of
mass in resonance between materials in a solid state system or
system of any kind?
How many electrical systems account for the DENSITY of materials
used in that system?
How many people account for Density when making a part?
Most only need outer dimensions. Ask how much more difficult 3D
printing would be if the printer had to account for density to make a
part. Add that to the CAD maker's program. He'll love that.
How can you arrange the numbers so that they all add to the same
sum no matter which way you calculate?
((I'm keeping the 1 - 9 in the square so you know how to place ANY
consecutive numbers in the squares))
Now let's try starting with the number 17 in Square 1 and follow the
rules:
Now start with the number 18 in Square 1 and follow the rules:
When you bump up the digit by one in a 4 by 4... the sum will go up
by 4. Just like the sum goes up by 3 in a 3 by 3 square!
The same will go for a 5 by 5 to infinity.
So I drew a line from square 1 to square 2 to square 3, etc.
This is the image I got. Perfectly symmetrical!
And if you draw a line through each column that adds up.. you get
this image:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Here are some switching methods to get from the regular order that
doesn't add up, to the "random" order that adds up to the same
sum.
13
27
16
21
24
10
22
11
14
25
17
19
18
20
23
12
15
26
Abstract ~
In the present paper the results of the experimental research of
Magnetic-Gravity Effects are presented. The abnormal magnetic and
thermal changes in the radius of 15 meters from the researched
device were measured as well. PACS: 41.20.-q; 44.60.+k; 76.50.+q
Introduction ~
There has been a great interest in examining nonlinear effects in the
system of rotating magnetic fields. Such effects have been observed
in the device called Searl's generator or SEG (SEG, Searl Effect
Generator) [1-4]. An SEG consists of a series of three rings and
rollers that go around those rings. All parts of SEG are based on the
Law of the Squares. The rollers revolve around the plates that form
the rings, but they do not touch them. There's a primary north and
south pole on the rollers and a primary north and south pole on the
plates. Obviously you will have the north pole of the roller attracted to
the south pole of the plate. The plate and the rollers have layered
structure. The external layer - Titan, then Iron, Nylon and last internal
layer was made from Neodymium. John R.R. Searl has supposed
that the electrons are given off from the central element (which is
neodymium), and they travel out through other elements. If nylon had
not been put there, the SEG would act like a laser and one pulse
would go out and it would stop, build up, and another pulse would go
out. But, with the nylon being, nylon acts as a control gate, and that
control gate gives you an even flow of electrons throughout the SEG
[4]. In [4] it was shown that in the process of magnetization of the
plate and rollers, the combination of constant and variable magnetic
fields for creating a special wave (sine wave) pattern on a plate
surface and rollers surface was used. The basic effects are the rollers
self-running around a ring plate and reduction of weight up to
occurrence of propulsion and flying up of all magnetic system. These
effects come about because of a special geometry of experimental
setup. It was shown that the work of the device in critical regime is
accompanied by biological and real physical phenomena.
Unfortunately except for the listed references we could not find other
information where similar effects are be mentioned. In this paper we
present the experimental device the results we have obtained.
The Description of the Experimental Installation ~
The basic difficulty is in a choosing the materials and maintaining the
necessary pattern imprinting on the plate and rollers surfaces. To
simplify the technology we decided to use a one-ring design with onering plate (stator) and one-ring of rollers (rotor). It is obvious, that it
was necessary to strengthen the rollers on a rotor by the bearings
and balance the rollers well. In the suggested design the air bearings
were used which provided the minimum losses due to friction. From
the available description [1-4] it was not clear how it is possible to
make and magnetize the stator with a diameter of about one meter. In
order to make the stator from separate magnetized segments
executed on the basis of rare earth magnets with the residual
induction 1T; the segments were magnetized in a usual way by
discharging capacitor battery through the coil. Afterwards the
segments were assembled and glued together in a special iron
armature, which reduced magnetic energy. To manufacture the stator
110 KGs of rare earth magnets were used, and to manufacture the
rotor 115 KGs of that material was used. High-frequency field under
magnetization was not applied. It was decided to replace an
Experimental Results ~
The magnetic-gravity converter was built in a laboratory room on
three concrete supports at a ground level. The ceiling height the lab
room was 3 meters. Besides the presence of the iron-concrete
ceiling, in immediate proximity from the magnetic system there was a
generator and electric motor, which contained some tens KGs of iron
and could potentially deform the field's pattern. The device was
started by the electric motor, which accelerated the rotation of the
rotor. The revolutions were smoothly increased up to the moment the
ammeter included in a circuit of the electric motor started to show
zero or lower value of a consumed current or even a presence of the
back current. The presence of the back current is detected at approx.
550 rpm. The magnetic moving sensor 14 starts to detect the change
in weight of the whole installation at 200 rpm. Afterwards the electric
motor is completely disconnected by the electromagnetic muff and
the ordinary electrodynamics generator is connected to the basic
shaft of the device through the same muff. The rotor of the converter
continues to self-accelerate and with the approach to the critical
mode of 550 rpm, the weight of the device quickly changes. In
addition to the change speed of rotation the weight depend of the
power, removed into active load, (the set of ten ordinary electrical
water heaters of 1 kW was used) and of the applied polarizing
voltage, as well. At the maximum output power equal to 6-7 kW the
change of weight G of the whole platform (total weight is about 350
KGs), reaches 35 % of the weight in an initial condition G?. A load of
more than 7 kW results in a gradual decrease of revolutions and exit
from the mode of self-generation with the subsequent complete stop
of the rotor. The weight of a platform can be controlled by applying of
a high voltage to cellular ring electrodes located at a distance of 10
mm from external surfaces of the rollers. Under the high 20 kV
voltage (electrodes negative pole) the increase of taped power in
circuit of the basic generator more than 6 kW does not influence G
while the revolutions per min is not decreased to 400 rpm.
"Tightening" of this effect is observed as well as the effect of
hysteresis on G (a kind of "residual induction"). The experimental
diagrams given on Fig.4 illustrate the modes of the converter
operations.
lab.). Above the second floor the measurements were not carried out.
The abnormal fall of the temperature in direct affinity from the
converter was also found. While the common temperature
background in laboratory was + 22? (2?) the fall of temperature equal
to 6-8? was noticed. The same phenomenon was observed in vertical
magnetic walls as well as. The measurements of temperature inside
the magnetic walls were carried out by the ordinary alcohol
thermometer with inertia of indication about 1,5 min. In the magnetic
walls the temperature changes can be distinctly observed even by
hand. The hand when placed into this magnetic wall feels real cold at
once. The similar picture was observed at the height above
installation, i.e. on the second floor of the laboratory as well as
despite the ferro-concrete blocking of ceiling.
Discussion ~
All the results we obtained are extremely unusual and require some
theoretical explanation. Unfortunately the interpretation of results
within the framework of the conventional physical theory cannot
explain all the observed phenomena and first of all the change of
weight. The change of weight is possible to interpret as a local
change of gravity force or as an occurrence of propulsion force by
repelling from its own field.
Direct experiment, confirming a presence of draft force was not
performed, but in any case both interpretations of the weight change
do not correspond to the modern physical paradigm and demand
reconsideration of the standard theory of gravitation or criticism of the
second law of Newton, both of which are only possible if we take into
consideration the now-advert physical media ether as understood by
Faraday-Maxwell-Mie. From the modern physics position
electrilization and luminescence of the converter's magnetic system
in the near zone is not completely clear. The phenomenon of the
magnetic and thermal "walls" may be connected with Alphen's
magnetic-sound waves raised in near zone in magnetized plasma
induced by a variable magnetic field of a rotating rotor [5].
At the present time we can not give an exact description of the
interactions mechanism with environment and transformation of
energy, but it is completely obvious, that without the use of the
concept of physical media --- the ether in a sense of FaradayMaxwell-Mie we are completely unable to give physically substantial
theory of these phenomena. In conclusion, we emphasize that the
issues of the biological influence effects and especially of the
variations of real time stream effects, which must be taking place in
an operative zone of the converter, were not considered at all. These
issues are extremely important and absolutely unexplored; though
there are some mentions of J.R.R.Searl about healing action of the
SEG's radiation. Our own experience allows to make only cautious
assumption that the short-term stay (dozen minutes) in a working
zone of the converter with the fixed output power of 6 kW remains for
the people without observed consequences. The present paper is
only a beginning.
References ~
1. Herbert Schneider, Dr. J.B. Koeppl, Hans-Joachim Ehlers:
"Begegnung mit John R.R. Searl"; Raum und Zeit, #39 (1989), pp.
75-80. 2. S. Gunnar Sandberg: "Was ist Dran am Searl-Effect; Raum
und Zeit, #40 (1989), pp. 67-75. 3. Herbert Schneider & Harry Watt:
"Dem Searl-Effect auf der Spur"; Raum und Zeit, # 42 (1989), pp.7581; #43, pp.73-77. 4. John A. Thomas, Jr.: "Anti-Gravity: The Dream
Made Reality"; Extraordinary Science, VI (2) 1994. 5. L.D.Landau,
E.M.Lifshits: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media; Moscow, Nauka,
1982. (in Russian)
Using this mounting stage, it was possible to glue the elements into
the common unit. The stable incorporated REMs with a total weight of
110 kg and the rollers contained 115 kg of the same REM material.
The magnetic system elements were assembled into a single
structure on a special platform made of non-magnetic structural
alloys. The platform construction was provided with springs and
shock absorbers and allowed the converter setup to move in the
vertical direction on three sides. The motion was monitored by an
inductive transducer. Which allowed changes ion the platform weight
to be determined in the course of the experiment. The total weight of
the platform with the magnetic system in the initial state was 350 kg.
Description of the Observed Effects ~
The converter was installed in a 2.5-meter high laboratory room using
three concrete supports on a ground level. In addition to the ordinary
steel-reinforced concrete ceiling blocks, the converter equipment
featured a usual electrodynamic generator and an electric motor, with
a total iron weight of several tens of kilograms (only these parts
could, in principle, introduce distortions into the electromagnetic field
pattern observed).
The converter was set to operate by over-speeding the rotor with the
aid of the electric motor. The motor speed was gradually increased
until the ammeter connected in the motor circuit showed zero
consumed current and the current direction reversal. This state
corresponded to a rotor speed of approximately 550 rpm, but the
motion transducer began to indicate a change in the platform weight
already at 200 rpm.
Then the electric motor was disconnected using an electromagnetic
overrunning clutch, and a usual electrodynamic generator was
connected instead to the main shaft of the converter via another
electromagnetic clutch. On attaining the critical regime (~550 rpm),
the rotor exhibited a sharp increase in the rotation speed; this was
accompanied by a slow-down in the rate of the current weight
reduction.
full stop. The platform weight could be controlled by applying a highvoltage signal to the cellular ring electrodes situated 10 mm above
the external roller surface. Upon applying a 20 kV signal (negative
polarity on the electrodes), an increase in the load power
consumption above 6 kW did not affect the Delta G value even when
the rotor speed decreased down to 400 rpm. This was equivalent to
"prolongation" of the effect and was accompanied by phenomena of
the remnant induction" type with respect to Delta G. The converter
operation in various experimental regimes is illustrated in the figure.
The effect of the system weight variation is reversible with respect to
the direction of rotor motion and exhibits certain hysteresis. For the
clockwise rotation, the critical regime is observed in the region of 550
rpm and is accompanied by development of the force acting against
the gravity vector. For the counter-clockwise rotation, the onset of the
critical regime is observed at approximately 600 rpm and the extra
force coincides in direction with the gravity vector. The onset of the
critical regime exhibited a scatter within 50-60 rpm. It should be noted
that, probably, some other critical resonance regimes may exist,
which correspond to higher rotor speeds and markedly greater useful
load levels. Proceeding from the general theoretical consideration,
the output mechanical energy must nonlinearly depend on the
internal parameters of the converter magnetic system and the rotor
speed, so that the observed effects are likely to be far from optimum.
Establishing of the maximum output power maximum weight
variation, and the converter energy resource is of considerable
theoretical and practical interest.
Besides the phenomena described above, a number of other
interesting effects were observed in the system studied. In particular,
the converter operation in the dark is accompanied by a corona
discharge with a pink-blue light emission and by the production of
ozone. The ionization cloud is formed around the stator and rotor,
acquiring a toroidal shape. The general corona discharge background
is superimposed with a wavy pattern corresponding to the surface of
the rollers: the zones of increased emission intensity are distributed
along the roller height in a manner similar to that observed for the
high-voltage microwave induction energy storage in the prebreakdown state.
Discussion of Results ~
All the experimental results described above are very unusual and
need some theoretical rationalization. Unfortunately, attempts at
interpreting the obtained results within the framework of the existing
physical theories showed that no one of these models can explain the
whole set of experimental data.
Recently, Dyatlov (2) attempted to combine the concepts of electricity
and gravity by introducing the so-called electronavigation and
magnetic-spin coefficients into the Heaviside gravity equations and
the Maxwell field equations. This provides for a relationship between
the gravitational and electrical components, as well as between the
magnetic and rotational components in a given medium. The
assumptions are built around a special model of inhomogenous
physical vacuum, called the vacuum domain model (2). It is
suggested that the extra relationships are absent outside the vacuum
domain. Although it is difficult to imagine a long-living vacuum
domain, the proposed model provides for a satisfactory explanation
(at least on a qualitative phenomenological level) for the appearance
of emission, the system weight variations, and the conversion of
energy taken from the surrounding medium into the rotational
mechanical moment of the rollers. Unfortunately, the theory cannot
provide a physical pattern of the observed phenomena.
Conclusion ~
At present, the work on a developed variant of the converter are in
progress at the Glushko "NPE Energomash" company (Moscow).
This setup would allow a deeper insight into the physics of observed
phenomena. Another aim is the creation of commercial samples for
various practical applications.
References ~
(1) Thomas, J.A.: Anti-Gravity: The Dream Made Reality ~ The Story
of John R.R. Searl; Direct International Science Consortium, London,
1994), Vol. 1, Issue 2. (2) Dyatlov, V.L.: Polarization Model
Heterogenous Physical Vacuum (Inst. Mat., Novosibirsk, 1998);
Translated by P. Pozdeev.
[ PDF ]
Publication date: 2000-08-27
Application Number: RU19990122275 19991027 ~ Priority
Number(s): RU19990122275 19991027
IPC Classification: H02N11/00; F03H5/00
Abstract ~
Power engineering and transport; miscellaneous industries.
UBSTANCE: Single-row power module has stator and rotor with
rollers combined by common separator. Stator and rotor are made of
permanent magnets or electromagnets based on composite
laminated magnetic, conducting, and insulating materials. Main shaft
of device is coupled via free-wheel clutches with starting motor that
brings device to automatic speed-maintaining mode of operation and
device loading system which is, essentially, electrodynamic generator
mechanically coupled with main shaft of device. Electromagnetic
transducers are radially arranged on device periphery. Propulsion
control is effected by adjusting mechanical energy taken off the
device and by producing radial electric polarization on its periphery by
means of annular electrodes separated from rotor rollers by air gap.
Electrodes are connected to high-voltage power supply. Generating
process includes electric power supply to starting gear, acceleration
of rotor shaft to working speed, take-off of generated energy, and
adjustment of mentioned energy and propulsion by varying rotor and
stator speed through varying load of generator connected to device
as well as by adjusting high voltage applied from external power
supply. EFFECT: Reduced energy consumption. 9 cl, 17 dwg.
Technical Description
Physically the Searl Effect Generator (SEG) consists of three
concentric rings each made of a composite of four different materials
which are also concentrically attached to each other. The three rings
are fixed to rotate around them, are rollers --- typically 10 on the first
ring, 25 on the next, and 35 on the outer ring. Surrounding the rollers
on the outer ring are coils which are connected in various
configurations to supply either AC or DC current at a variety of
voltages. Multiple magnetic poles are imprinted on the rings and
rollers to form frictionless magnetic bearings. These also arrange the
static charge into opposing charge clusters which cause the rollers to
rotate around the circumference of the ring (as shown in Figure 2)
Development
Prior to the production of complete 15 KW SEGs, a minimum of two
demonstration Ring and Roller prototypes are to be produced.
The Ring is typical of the innermost of the three rings required to
make a complete SEG. The 69-roller sets in a complete 3-ring SEG
are identical. Six roller sets will be made for the prototype inner rings
so that the Searl Effect can be demonstrated.
The production of a self-running Ring and Roller prototype will
establish the precise sequence and parameters of electrical,
magnetizing and material processes required for the SEG and will
demonstrate electrical power generation. An operating single inner
ring with 1-8 rollers will also determine if a particular material will
function correctly and at what level of power output
Open Source Energy network http://www.opensourceenergy.org
Video Link:
http://www.opensourceenergy.org/_layouts/apps/vplayer2.asp?v
ID=24 ( IFNE Conference, Denver CO, 1994 )
www.searleffect.com
NOTES
"The Searl Effect Generator (SEG) is a magnetic diode, and what one
may consider one of the original "Free Energy" Devices. The inventor
of the technology is Professor John Robert Roy Searl of England.
The SEG in essence is a composite ring made of an electron
reservoir (a rare earth like Neodymium), a magnetized accelerator
stage (Iron or Nickel), an electron flow regulator stage (Nylon 66 or
Teflon), and finally, a paramagnetic layer (Aluminum or Copper). The
design of the SEG is both beautifully simple and infuriatingly complex
at the same time..."
"Inside each of these IGVs there is a powerful 3-ring SEG which
provides levity to the craft through a combination of magnetic,
electrostatic and flywheel effects, many of which I freely admit are
beyond my comprehension.
"The iron element in the SEG "plate" (the big ring) is magnetized with
a combined DC and AC magnetizing sequence which causes many
poles to form all over the surface of the iron, in a wave like pattern
corresponding to the AC frequency used. The iron element is then
combined with the others (which are NOT involved in the magnetizing
process) in a process called sintering - pushing them together under
pressure. The same is done for the smaller magnets, or "rollers",
except that each roller consists of eight stacked segments held
together by the magnetic field. When you have twelve roller stacks
and a correctly magnetized plate, and place the rollers on the plate as
below, something truly amazing happens.
"There are only ten rollers in the picture for safety reasons, as in a full
set, the rollers will accelerate to 250km/h around the plate! This
incredible feat is due to the instability of having an AC sine imprint on
the plate and a cosine print on the rollers - instability created as the
fields conflict causes the rollers to orbit the plate. They are held down
by the magnetic field and thrown out by the centrifugal forces, so the
rollers do not actually touch the plate when in motion. Thus, friction is
virtually non-existent, and the high electrostatic charge accumulated
by the SEG soon ionizes all the nearby air and pushes it totally away
from the SEG, enveloping it in an intense vacuum. High voltage
flashover thus becomes impossible, and the potentials created by the
generator can reach monstrous levels.
"Someone in the laboratory was smoking and the smoke rose in a column
above the superconducting disc. We placed a ball-shaped magnet above
the disc attached to a balance. The balance behaved strangely. We
substituted silicon and still the balance was very strange. We found that
any object above the disc lost some weight, and we found that if we rotated
the disc, the effect increased."
Pulses are powerful enough to punch through brick, concrete, and deform
light-metals "like hitting it with a sledgehammer".
"The beam doesn't disappear rapidly with distance -- in fact, its been
measured at distances of up to 5 kilometers and seems to penetrate all
materials without a decrease in force."
http://www.americanantigravity.com/news/space/eugene-podkletnov-onantigravity.html
Article:
http://www.nano.org.uk/news/965
http://phys.org/news/2011-03-space-chessboard.html
http://gizmodo.com/pouring-saltwater-over-graphene-generateselectricity-1563379860