Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Credit River Money Opinion

The Credit River Money Opinion

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15 |Likes:
Published by attorneyinfact

More info:

Published by: attorneyinfact on Dec 10, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





The Credit River Money OpinionRead both the internal and attached. I believe Mahoney is the one who ended up deadshortly after his decision. JimScotsman wrote: The Credit River Decision - Jerome Daly's LettersFrom: John PrukopTo Whom it may concern: Posted below here are two letters giving a brief synopsis byMinnesota Attorney Jerome Daly, concerning his "Credit River Decision" fromDecember 7, 1968. I have a complete transcript of this case, including the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, as well as Jerome Daly's scathing letter to the members of the Bar, to whom Jerome refers to as "The Boys in the Back Room." The letter isaddressed to Patrick Foley, U.S. Attorney for Minnesota on December 27, 1968, andfollows below here, in addition to Jerome's "Introduction" letter. Further below my e-mailsignature line is a letter from Bill Drexler, who was an associate Justice in the JeromeDaly case in Minnesota, which you should find VERY interesting. I had a chance to meetand confer with Jerome Daly in 1991, when he assisted me with an unlawful foreclosureon my home in Puyallup. That case is not over yet.At that time he was living out in California. He drafted some of the legal documents onmy behalf. The brief he prepared in support of my position will knock your socks off.One of these days I'll post it with attachments, because it does take a "picture" to explainthe fraud. If any of you still have Federal Reserve Notes, circa 1920's through the 1960's,you know what I'm talking about. And if you research and read Public Law 90-269 of March 18, 1968 followed by the Legislative History of Public Law 94-564, and thecontents of Public Law 95-147 on October 28, 1977, you will begin to understand theFRAUD that has been perpetrated by the Congress of the United States upon the Peopleof this Nation. Public Officials need to be held STRICTLY accountable to their Oath of Office and the Law of the Land. In my case, a certain Court Commissioner and aSuperior Court Judge are yet to be prosecuted for their fraudulent perpetrations.Sometimes the wheels of "Justice" move slowly - but they will ONLY move when forcedto do so by the Citizenry -- "We the People" -- who hold ALL the power over our ordained and established Constitution, Bill of Rights, and proper Organs of Governmentthrough Delegated Powers and Authority to Act on OUR behalf.Perhaps after reading this you'll begin to understand why those who are enlightened tothe fraud try to deal in Coin, as it is the ONLY medium of exchange specificallyauthorized under the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 & 6, and Article I,Section 10, as well as the Coinage Act of 1792, neither of which has ever been repealed,notwithstanding the fraudulent assertions otherwise by the totally compromised andcorrupted Congress and Legislatures. As the Maxim of Law states, "Fraud and Justicenever dwell together." And it should be remarked here that thanks to Congressman PhilipM. Crane, you NOW have Gold and Silver Coin pursuant to Public Law 99-61 (July 9,1985) and Public Law 99-185 (December 17, 1985). These two Public Laws made it
 possible for the minting and distribution of American Gold Eagles and Silver Eagles,available at your local Coin shop. Everyone should have some real "money" in their  possession; but you need to know that your PAPER Federal Reserve Note with $1 printedon it won't buy a One Dollar Silver Eagle -- you'll have to give about $8.00 to $9.00FRN's for the REAL "Dollar". Read Public Law 90-269 and you'll understand why. The paper FRN and the Silver dollar should be at "parity". By the way, "FRAUD" stands notonly for the crime, but "Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Device".Mr. Daly passed away a couple of years ago . . . but his Credit River Decision lives on,even though the members of the Bar have sought to suppress this case from public view.It is probably fitting to insert here Jerome's "Introduction" letter of February 7, 1969, aswell as a copy of the letter to the US Attorney on December 27, 1968, so you have someidea of the gravity of what occurred, and before you read what Bill Drexler, a friend of Jerome, wrote below my signature line. I quote herein the two letters, as follows:Jerome DalyAttorney at Law28 East Minnesota StreetSavage, Minnesota 55378February 7, 1969INTRODUCTIONOn May 8, 1964 the writer executed a Note and Mortgage to the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, which is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Both Banks are private owned and are a part of the Federal ReserveBanking System.In the Spring of 1967 the writer was in arrears $476.00 in the payments on this Note andMortgage. The Note was secured by a Mortgage on real property in Spring LakeTownship in Scott County, Minnesota. The Bank foreclosed by advertisement and boughtthe property at a Sheriff's Sale held on June 26, 1967 and did not redeem with the 12month period of time allotted by law after the Sheriff's Sale.The Bank brought the Action to recover the possession to the property in the Justice of the Peace Court at Savage, Minnesota. The first 2 Justices were disqualified by Affidavitof Prejudice. The first by the writer and the Second by the Bank. A third one refused tohandle the case. It was then sent, pursuant to law, to Martin V. Mahoney, Justice of thePeace, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, who presided at a Jury trial onDecember 7, 1968. The Jury found the Note and Mortgage to be void for failure of alawful consideration and refused to give any validity to the Sheriff's Sale. Verdict was for the writer with costs in the amount of $75.00.The president of the Bank admitted that the Bank created the money and credit upon itsown books by which it acquired or gave as consideration for the Note; that this wasstandard banking practice, that the credit first came into existence when they created it;
that he knew of no United States Statutes which gave them the right to do this. This is theuniversal practice of these Banks. The Justice who heard the case handed down theopinion attached and included herein. Its reasoning is sound. It will withstand the test of time. This is the first time the question has been passed upon in the United States. I predict that this decision will go into the History Books as one of the great Documents of American History. It is a huge cornerstone wrenched from the temple of Imperialism and planted as one of the solid foundation stones of Liberty./s/ JEROME DALYSAVAGE, MINNESOTA ____________________ [From] Jerome DalyAttorney At Law28 East Savage StreetSavage, Minnesota 55378December 27, 1968[To] Mr. Patrick FoleyUnited states Attorney for MinnesotaUnited States Court House Bldg.Minneapolis, MinnesotaRe: First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome DalySir:As you are on my mailing list, at your request, attached kindly find 2 copies of a decisionrendered at Credit River Twp. Justice of the Peace court on December 9, 1968 by JusticeMartin V. Mahoney, who by occupation is not dependent upon the fraudulent FederalReserve Mob for his sustenance; thus he was able to view the whole fraud, which isGlobal in scope, with a mind in the settled calmness of impartiality, disinterestedness,and fairness, in keeping with his Oath and with a completely friendly feeling toward theConstitution of the United States of America.In truth and in fact the Justice of the Peace Court is the highest Court in the land as it isthe closest to the People. Every Judge who is dependent upon this fraudulent FederalReserve, National and State Banking System for his sole support is DISQUALIFIED because of self interest and had no jurisdiction to sit in review of this Judgment. If anyAppellate Court, including the Supreme Court of the United States, in review of thisJudgment, perpetrates a fraud upon the People by defying the Constitutional Law of theUnited States, Mahoney has resolved that he will convene another Jury in Credit River Township to try the issue of the Fraud on the part of any State or Federal Judge, and in anaction on my part to recover the possession if the Jury decides in my favor, the Constableand the Citizens Militia of Credit River Township will, pursuant to the Law, deliver me back into possession. So you see, this Justice of the Peace can keep the peace in Scott

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->