Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
20090406 Inquirer Bonusgate records contradict DeWeese

20090406 Inquirer Bonusgate records contradict DeWeese

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5|Likes:
Published by Rock Quarry

More info:

Published by: Rock Quarry on Dec 11, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC or read online from Scribd
See more
See less


Bonusgate records contradict DeWeese
By Mario F. Cattabiani and Angela CouloumbisInquirer Staff Writers
HARRISBURG - Since the Bonusgate corruption probe was launched two years ago, Rep. Bill DeWeese hasadamantly and repeatedly denied knowing that taxpayer money secretly had been used to underwrite politicalcampaigns.But records turned over to defendants in the case by Attorney General Tom Corbett appear to paint a different pictureof the onetime House Democratic leader, who has not been charged in the ongoing investigation.Documents show that in 2006, facing a stiff challenge in an election that DeWeese nearly lost, his campaign tapped astate-paid computer consultant - a key figure in the Bonusgate probe - to perform a long list of political tasks.Among other duties, that consultant crafted fund-raising invitations and sent out blast e-mails to constituents inDeWeese's district in the southwestern corner of Pennsylvania.The documents, provided to The Inquirer by a defendant, also indicate that the Greene County Democrat exchangedcampaign-related messages with his legislative staffers on state e-mail accounts."I love it," DeWeese responded in September 2006 to a legislative aide of his who had just drafted a letter for aconstituent to send to the local newspaper supporting the representative's campaign."Great work," DeWeese wrote with 44 exclamation points when told by campaign operatives in April that partycanvassers had knocked on nearly 600 doors.State law prohibits public money from being used for campaign-related purposes.DeWeese, who has served in the House for three decades and is now majority whip, declined to be interviewed. In astatement, he said it would be inappropriate to comment on individual documents.He called the e-mails "a desperate attempt by the criminal defendants to try their case in the media by cherry-pickingdocuments they received in discovery and leaking them."The documents - more than 100 in all - were given to The Inquirer by Brett Cott, a former top aide to HouseDemocrats who faces 42 corruption counts. As required by law, state prosecutors provided the documents to Cottand the other defendants as part of the discovery phase of the case.Cott was among a dozen caucus insiders charged in July in the first wave of Bonusgate indictments. The 12 areaccused of carrying out a conspiracy to use millions in state resources and staff to further the campaigns of HouseDemocrats.His attorney, Bryan Walk, said the documents "speak for themselves."Asked to elaborate, Walk said: "We're disappointed that Brett is charged for allegedly doing political work on statetime when it appears that there were other people who did the same - or more things - on state time who weren'tcharged."DeWeese, in his prepared statement, said prosecutors had decided not to charge him "based on the totality of theevidence over a two-year period, which included thousands of e-mails and other documents that we turned over tothem and the sworn testimony of hundreds of witnesses whom we urged to cooperate."Corbett has said that the fact that DeWeese was not charged does not indicate he is in the clear and that theinvestigation continues. Corbett spokesman Kevin Harley reiterated that last week, but declined to comment further.
Democratic push
Fall 2006 was a critical period for Democrats who had been toiling for a decade to reclaim the majority in the stateHouse.The Bonusgate indictment alleges that they pulled out all the stops, even paying a computer consultant, Eric Buxtonand his Harrisburg company, Govercom Strategies, hundreds of thousands in taxpayer dollars for political work.Prosecutors have argued that Buxton, son of a longtime state representative from Harrisburg, was paid with taxdollars for government services while in reality he only worked on campaigns.Cott and three others were charged with theft stemming from the Govercom arrangement.DeWeese was mentioned in the indictment, but only in passing. It noted that virtually all dealings with Buxton amongHouse Democrats were done through the state e-mail system. DeWeese was one of the few exceptions, because heused his campaign account to correspond with Buxton.But his legislative aides who worked on his campaign did not.The documents Cott provided show that several of those aides were in regular contact with Buxton, using their statee-mail accounts to task the consultant with campaign work.Staffers Tom Andrews and Kevin Sidella had Buxton send fund-raising e-mails and news releases, update thecampaign Web site, and help solve computer glitches.On Oct. 31, 2006, Andrews sent Buxton an e-mail telling him to drop everything and create a document with a photoof DeWeese receiving the NRA's defender of freedom award."It will go to all 50th District MALES," Andrews, DeWeese's legislative press secretary, instructed Buxton.In some cases, such blast campaign e-mails backfired."Do not send any more e-mails," constituent Karen Zgela wrote DeWeese, demanding a month before the November 2006 election that he take her off the e-mail list. "It is just a waste of taxpayers money."Sidella and Buxton are cooperating with prosecutors under grants of immunity.Sidella left the state House to open a private consulting business in 2007 and was immediately hired to help guideDeWeese's campaign.In an interview last week, Andrews said he took time off from his state job to help DeWeese's campaign. Asked toprovide documentation, however, Andrews did not respond.He also said he didn't know how Buxton was being paid.State records show the DeWeese reelection campaign paid Buxton's firm only $530 in 2006 - $500 to buy a databaseand $30 for a domain name - even though the e-mails suggest he did a lot more work than that.For most of 2006, Buxton was paid $16,875 monthly under a state contract with House Democrats.Buxton's attorney, Ed Spreha, declined to comment.Nick Rodriguez-Cayro, Sidella's attorney, said his client had cooperated fully with the probe."Let me make it clear: He was an employee - not a manager - who followed the directions he was given by hissupervisors," he said of Sidella. Asked who those supervisors were, Rodriguez-Cayro said DeWeese and his former chief of staff.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->