Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,012|Likes:
Published by Loren Steffy

More info:

Published by: Loren Steffy on Dec 15, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less





© 2011 GMI1
+1 212-949-1313
Table of Contents
GMI’s 2011 CEO Pay Survey
By Greg Ruel and Michelle Lamb, Research Associatesand Paul Hodgson, Senior Research Associate and Chief Communicaons OcerDecember 2011
Execuve Summary
1Methodology2Aggregate Change Analysis2Changes by S&P and Russell Indices3Most Highly PaidTop 10 Highest-Paid CEOs of 20103
Changing Equity Compensaon Pracces
7Perks in the S&P 5007Conclusion9
List of Tables and Appendices
Table 1: Summary Increases 2008-2010
2Table 2: Median Pay Changes by S&P and Russell Indices 2009-20103Table 3: Top 10 Highest-Paid CEOs of 20104
Table 4: Noteworthy Shareholder Dissasfacon
Table 5: Changing Equity Compensaon Pracces 2009-2010
7Table 6: Change in Equity Award Values 2009-20107Table 7: S&P 500 Perquisite Changes 2009-20107
Top 5 Lists of Pay Components8, 9Appendix I: Complete Compensaon Figures for the 10 Highest-Paid CEOs of 2010
10Appendix II: Index Median Values 2009-201011Appendix III: Case Studies12
Execuve Summary
GMI’s CEO Pay Survey 2011
, one of the largest surveys of CEO compensaon in NorthAmerica, is based on analysis of the Russell 3000 and S&P 500 companies. Only 2,132CEOs were in the job for the whole of the last two scal years, so it is on this smallersample that changes in CEO compensaon were calculated. This is a survey of annual andrealized compensaon paid to CEOs in 2011 for scal year 2010.Key ndings of the survey include:Total Realized Compensaon in the S&P 500 rose by about 36 percent.Total Realized Compensaon in the Russell 1000 rose by more than 38 percent.Total Realized Compensaon in the Russell 3000 rose by 27 percent.Total Annual Compensaon in the Russell 3000 increased by 13 percent.Three of the 10 highest-paid CEOs of 2010 are from the Health Care Providers &Services industry, including the top two.Four of the 10 highest-paid CEOs of 2010 were rered or terminated execuvesreceiving exit packages.Perks in the S&P 500 rose 11 percent from 2009 to 2010.Three of the ve highest-paid CEOs of 2010 received single-year pension and deferredcompensaon increases of roughly $14 million.
Total Annual
Compensaon Includes:
base salary• bonusnon-equity incenvecompensaonall other compensaon
Total Realized
Compensaon Includes:
total annual compensaonchange in pension andnon-qualied deferredcompensaon (NQDC)value realized on exerciseof oponsvalue realized on vesng of other equityany payments from a vestedrerement benet plan
© 2011 GMI2
+1 212-949-1313
Source Data
Compensaon data for the Russell 3000 was examined for purposes of this survey. Datawas drawn from proxy statements led between the start of September 2010 and theend of July 2011. Excluding those companies with CEOs who had not served for the full12 months of the latest scal year because of promoons, appointments, or resignaonsreduced this number to 2,647 companies. The 2010 compensaon-level analysis is basedon this reduced sample. Increase calculaons (the change from 2009 to 2010) are basedon a matched sample of 2,132 CEOs who had been in that posion for the whole of the lasttwo most recent scal years. For this matched sample, instances where a CEO returned toreceiving compensaon following a period of pro bono or near pro bono work have beenexcluded from the analysis.
Denions of Compensaon
For the survey,
total realized compensaon
connues to represent compensaon thathas been received by the CEO, rather than any noonal esmates, accounng costs, orother uncertaines. For this reason, GMI’s gures will dier from those of many othercommentators and pay survey producers. Our gures also dier from the
total summary 
gures provided by companies in the proxy’s Summary CompensaonTable, which represents an accounng cost, rather than realized compensaon receivedor receivable. While such other gures have value for certain purposes, GMI connuesto be more interested in outcomes rather than inputs, real compensaon rather thanesmated compensaon.
Aggregate Change Analysis
Total annual compensaon rose by more than 13 percent in the Russell 3000 for 2010.Indeed, pay elements were up across the board, including base salary increases across alllevels of the S&P and Russell indices. Increases in xed forms of pay, such as salary andperquisites, contributed to the rise in total annual compensaon, as did the ability formore companies to hit pre-determined performance metrics than in the two years prior.Total realized compensaon rose roughly 27 percent in the Russell 3000 in 2010. Thesurge represents a considerable increase following consecuve years of pay declines in2008 and 2009. In addion to annual pay elements contribung to this rise, CEOs sawgreater prots in stock opon exercises and vested stock during 2010. The median valueof stock opon prots rose from $950,400 in 2009 to more than $1.3 million in 2010.Likewise, the median value of restricted stock prots climbed from $480,000 in 2009 to$794,042 in 2010.
Table 1: Summary Increases 2008-2010
(Source: GMI)
2008 Median
2009 Median2010 MedianIncrease/DecreaseIncrease/DecreaseIncrease/DecreaseBase Salary
Total Annual Compensaon
Total Realized Compensaon
ValuesValuesValuesBase Salary
$600,000 $631,299 $657,884
Total Annual Compensaon
$1,028,257 $1,133,087 $1,422,817
Total Realized Compensaon
$1,713,132 $1,877,956 $2,520,576
* Percentages are matched sample calculaons based on individual pay movements. Dierences in aggregate median pay amounts may not reect individualchanges in pay.
“CEOs saw greater 
 prots in stock opon
exercises and vested 
stock during 2010.” 
© 2011 GMI3
+1 212-949-1313
Table 2: Median Pay Changes by S&P andRussell Indices 2009-2010
(Source: GMI)
% Totalannual
increase% Totalrealized
increase% Basesalary
S&P 500
Changes by S&P and Russell Indices
The median percentage increases in base salaries in the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 were1.1 and 1.6 percent, respecvely, over the past year. Indeed, median base salaries roseacross all subsets of the Russell and S&P indices for the second all-over increase in asmany years. There were more remarkable increases in total annual and total realizedcompensaon, however. Compared to last year’s review of 2008-2009 pay levels whichhad seen modest single digit increases or slight decreases in these gures, this 2009-2010 assessment is showing double-digit increases in annual compensaon and jumpsnearly double in magnitude for total realized pay. Specically, for S&P 500 companies,annual compensaon increased at the median by about 16.6 percent and total realizedcompensaon rose by nearly 36.5 percent. In the Russell 1000, where most S&P 500companies are also indexed, total annual compensaon rose about 16.4 percent whiletotal realized compensaon climbed by 38.4 percent.S&P Midcap and Smallcap companies followed this trend. Midcap companies rose by14.5 percent in annual compensaon while realized pay jumped 40.2 percent. Similarly,Smallcaps’ percent increases at the median were 16.7 and 31.5 percent for annualcompensaon and realized pay, respecvely. In the Russell 2000, both annual and realizedpay rose, by 11.9 percent and 24.9 percent, respecvely. These increases in total realizedcompensaon seem due to the overall market rebound having resulted in cashing in of opons and restricted stock grants. There was also a median increase of 14.5 percent incash bonuses in the Russell 3000 sample which seems to have driven the increase in totalannual pay; we did not analyze the specic targets involved in these bonuses, however, sowe cannot opine as to whether this increase in payouts is due to a weakening of targets,market-wide rebounds in common metrics, or merit.Some of the larger companies saw larger increases in pay – the median increases in theRussell 2000’s total annual and total realized pay were overshadowed by those in the largermarket cap companies of the Russell 1000. The Russell 1000 increases were either on parwith or slightly higher than the larger companies in the S&P 500 (the S&P 500 medianpercentage increase having surpassed the Russell 1000 for total annual pay, but not forbase salary or total realized pay.) However, some smaller companies saw disproporonateincreases in xed pay. For example, the base salary median increase in the S&P Smallcapswas the largest of all indices analyzed, with the same holding true for total annual pay.Similarly, the median base salary increase in the Russell 2000 was larger than that of the Russell 1000. Interesngly, the S&P Midcaps’ median increase percentage reignedsupreme with respect to total realized compensaon, higher than those of the S&P 500and the Russell indices. So although absolute dollar amounts sll reect the trend of largermarket cap CEOs being awarded more pay (see Appendix II), the percentage increases thisyear showed some disproporonate gains in the smaller indices.
Most Highly Paid—Top 10 Highest-Paid CEOs of 2010
Three of the 10 highest-paid CEOs of 2010 are from the Health Care Providers & Servicesindustry, including the top two posions on the list. Real Estate Investment Trusts werealso represented twice among the year’s top earners. Deparng CEOs covered 40 percentof the top 10 list, prong from large exit packages required by employment agreements.
“There was also a
median increase of 14.5
 percent in cash bonuseswhich seems to havedriven the increase in
total annual pay.” “Deparng CEOs
covered 40 percent of the top 10 list,
 prong from largeexit packages required 
by employment 

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->