Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: :
HENG Seiha Khun naykieng Huot dany Chea Chanthearith Iv Chakriya SAY Vortana
2011-2012
The recognition of Israel as an independent state on 15 May 1948 in Tel Aviv after WWII fueled anger and hatred from Palestinian population and Arab community while there were still thousands of Palestinian refugees fled and evicted from their land and never allowed to return. Over the 60 years since Israels founding on May 14, 1948, this profound injustice has continued. Palestinian refugees are the largest remaining refugee population in the world (Al Nakba, 2009). The day after the state of Israel was declared five Arab armies from Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq immediately invaded Israel but were repulsed, and the Israeli army crushed pockets of resistance. Armistices established Israel's borders on the frontier of most of the earlier British Mandate Palestine (BBC, Establishment of Israel State, 2011). And this is considered as alternative root causes of Israeli and Palestinian conflict. On March 10, 1948, According to the journal article written by Ilan Pappe on The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, stated that 11 superior Israeli leaders with their armed officers conducted final ethnic cleansing plan what is called Plan D by expelling over 750,000 Palestinian men, women and children out of their residents, demolishing their homes and planting mines around their lands to prevent them return back (Ilan Pappe, 2006). In short, the root causes of this conflict, the following parts of this paper will focus on trend dynamic analysis within timeframe since 2008 up to 2011, which includes actors, interests, and issues. More significantly, this paper try to examine the existing mechanisms and evaluate effectiveness of those mechanisms as well as try to figure out, and propose some feasible solutions and mechanisms to help minimizing cost of conflicts or even if possible to end this ongoing conflicts.
Even though a ceasefire was negotiated in the mid-2008, it was not written down, so it will be untruthful for Palestinian as it used to experience in 2005 in which Israel withdrew from Gaza just wanted to ease the blockade while the Palestinians reducing rocket fire into Israel. Therefore, Hamas, who has the authority to control over the militant in Palestine does not recognize Israels right to exist and seeks to reclaim any land in Palestine, started the firing the rockets into Israel after the cease fire, and for the Israel, it needed to defend itself and also wanted to teach Hamas with the harsh lesson, but this offensive leave many civilian casualties, which push the international community; the west that support Israels overall objective to put pressure on Israel to prevent or reduce the civilian toll and humanitarian crisis. Thus, on December 27, 2008, Israel begin an attacking, 22 day military offensive in the Gaza Strip in order to stop the rocket attack on southern Israel and to disrupt terrorist infrastructure and weapons smuggling by using a major air attack on Hamas political and military targets in Gaza, and for the force respond to this attack, Hamas using more Qassem rocket attacks, with some newer, longer-range rockets reaching the Israeli cities of Ashkelon and Ashdod. This invasion or offensive result much damage in Gaza, and tens thousands of people were homeless, and most of them cannot access to the water, particularly, it resulted in 13000 civilians, 4000 children died in Palestine, and the other 5000 were injured including 1800 children and 8000 women. Also, 13 Israelis were killed including 3 civilians, when the dispute was ended on January 17, 2009 after there were the separate ceasefires announced from both Hamas and Israel.
In this case, there are two main sources of conflict. The first source of conflict is related to human nature and violence. Because of the hostility of the Palestines government, Hamas, who has the authority to control over the militant in Palestine, using the direct violence to put pressure to the Israeli people by firing the rockets into Israel because he does not recognize Israels right to exist and seeks to reclaim any land in Palestine. Furthermore, because of the aggressive offensive of the Israel, which supported by the most western state, and its neighbor, Egypt, blockaded the Gaza Strip, and cut off the fuel energy to put pressure to the Palestinians people. In doing so, it shows the nature of the human that going to war because of fear, and survival. Similarly, Israel and Egypt decided to block the Gaza Strip because they feel of insecurity as most of the western view that Hamas is a militant or the terrorist organization, not a political party, so it will threat the world security as well as its safety. And, the same in order to survive and avoid from the sanction, Palestine has to do so. Second source of conflict is identity formation. Being a Christian state among the Islamic state, Israels culture is difference from those Islamic states, so they always view each other as threats. War between Palestine and Israel lasting for hundred years and there is no positive peace existing yet between those two countries since the conflicts still continues happen under the form of terrorist attack, conflict of resources, and territory dispute. As in 2010, the Palestinians aim to establish a state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as it capital while those areas are captured by Israel government since 1967 war. Israel government would not accept the Palestines independence and according to the pass experience there is only negative peace happen between them because both government focuses only the absence of direct violence, potentially reduce the disarmament in the future aim struggle and prevention the outbreaks of warfare. The resolutions done through negotiation or mediation rather than seek to root course of the conflict or restructuring the physical force. Even it received the involvement from international community like League of Nations, United Nations to impose the peace mechanism or used collective force to maintain the peace but the dispute would not carried-out. In this issue, United State and Some other countries in Arab states is the most important actor because we can Israel usually concurred by neighboring countries since from the past because they want to wipe-out Israel from the world map and when there is a problem happen we would see the involvement of United State as the main mediator or help to impose the peace mechanism. By participate in this issue United State see a lot of benefit and it also shapes the US foreign policy. For
5
example, at the first stage of Palestine demand for independence, US support Palestine by declare US support the process of independence in Palestine on order to gain the popularity or good image in the international stage and also got good relation with Arab states because they are the main oil supply to US. However, it change when there is a strong reaction from the Israel government to US. Israeli people also influential in shaping the USs decision because they are the most important actor in providing the financial support to US, so then US change to not support Palestine to become a member of UNGA to favor Israel; that is the interest of US inter into this issue while the other actors, there main gold is to protect their sovereignty, national security and maximize their national benefit. And 21 September 2011, Obama insists at the UN General Assembly that only negotiations can lead to a Palestinian state. The Obama administration has pledged to veto any Palestinian statehood bid, arguing that only direct peace negotiations with Israel, not a UN vote, would allow the Palestinians to achieve the benefits of statehood. It is however wants to avoid using its veto at the Security Council while many other states support Palestinian become a member of UNGA. However, when we have a state accepted as a member of the United Nations, this is not the end of the conflict. A peace negotiation for the contemporary peace resolution before all of the parties could reach the agreement for long term peace otherwise the situation would goes even more serious because all of the parties try to strengthen their military capability.
After examine the conflict within these two main periods, we have analyzed the sources of conflict, and the existing mechanisms that have been suggested and done so far. In the next section, we will propose alternative routes to a solution of the problem.
Reference
Al Nakba, The Catastrophe: How Palestine Became Israel, 2009. Accessed date on 1 Dec 2011. Retrived from: http://www.ifamericaknew.org/history/ref-nakba.html Anneinpt, Netanyahus speech to the UN, 24 September 2011. Articlesbase, Causes of Israel Palestine Conflict. Accessed date on 1 Dec 2011. Retrived from: http://www.articlesbase.com/destinations-articles/causes-of-israel-
palestine-conflict-431016.html BBC, UN partition of Palestine. Accessed date on 1 Dec 2011. Retrived from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/03/v3_ip_timeline/html/1947.stm BBC, Establishment of Israel State. Accessed date on 1 Dec 2011. Retrived from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/03/v3_ip_timeline/html/1948.stm If America Knew, History. Accessed date on 19 Nov 2011. Retrived from: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ If America Knew, History of Origin. Accessed date on 19 Nov 2011. Retrived from: http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/origin.html Ilan Pappe, The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Vol. 36, No. 1, Autumn 2006. Accessed date on 19 Nov 2011. Retrived from:
http://www.jstor.org/pss/10.1525/jps.2006.36.1.6 James L. Gelvin, The Israel-Palestine Conflict One Hundred Years of War, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2007. 209 pp. John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, March 2006. James L. Gelvin, The Israel-Palestine Conflict One Hundred Years of War, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2007. 209 pp.
John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, March 2006.
RAMALLAH,
West
Bank,
Sun
May
9,
2010
Retrived
from:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/05/09/us-palestiniansisraelidUSTRE6471AL20100509
-
Seham, As talks resume, two-thirds of Israelis support settlement building, September 2, 2010. Retrived from:
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/09/as-talks-resume-two-thirds-of-israelis-support-settlement-building.html