Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
51Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
AMENDED COMPLAINT

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Ratings: (0)|Views: 234|Likes:
Published by SLAVEFATHER
DEFENDING YOUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTY FROM LAWYERS-SHARKS
DEFENDING YOUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTY FROM LAWYERS-SHARKS

More info:

Published by: SLAVEFATHER on Dec 17, 2011
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/25/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 Michael Krichevsky v. Levoritz, et al 
Page 1 of 35
 
 Index No:24714/2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF KINGS_______________________________________________________MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,Plaintiff,-against-YONATAN LEVORITZ, ESQ, YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ,ELENA SVENSON,Defendants.JURY TRIAL DEMANDEDFiled:_____________INDEX NO. 24714/2010Plaintiff designates KingsCounty as the place of trial.
AMENDED VERIFIEDCOMPLAINT
 The basis of venue isthe County in which thecauses of action arousedPlaintiff, Pro Se and for his Verified Complaint, respectfully alleges, upon his firsthand knowledge
1
and upon information and belief:
23
1.
 
JURISDICTION
4
1.
 
This is civil action for declaratory relief, money damages and/or equitable relief in excess of 
5
 jurisdictional limits of all lower courts.
6
2.
 
This action is simultaneously a violation of civil rights matter since lawyers-defendants as officers of 
7
the court violated Plaintiff’s civil rights and due process during litigation in Kings county courts.
 
8
3.
 
All lawyers-defendants violated their oath of office to support and protect the Constitutions of United
9
States of America and the State of New York.
10
4.
 
The plaintiff, MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY, at all times herein mentioned was and still is a resident of 
11
the County of Kings and the State of New York.
12
5.
 
The defendant, YONATAN LEVORITZ, Esq., at all times herein mentioned was and still is a resident
13
of the County of Kings and the State of New York.
14
6.
 
The defendant, YONATAN LEVORITZ, Esq., at all times herein mentioned was and still is
15
conducting a business in the County of Kings and the State of New York.
16
 
 Michael Krichevsky v. Levoritz, et al 
Page 2 of 35
 
 Index No:24714/2010
7.
 
The defendant, YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, Esq. at all times herein mentioned was and still is a
1
resident of the County of Kings and the State of New York.
2
8.
 
The defendant, YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, Esq. at all times herein mentioned was and still is
3
conducting a business in the County of Kings and the State of New York.
4
9.
 
At all times herein mentioned lawyers-defendants derived substantial revenue from services rendered
5
in the County of Kings and the State of New York.
6
10.
 
The defendant, ELENA SVENSON, at all times herein mentioned was and still is a resident of the
7
County of Kings and the State of New York.
8
11.
 
The causes of action aroused out of 
created and/or assisted
controversies by lawyers-defendants
9
between defendant SVENSON against Plaintiff in numerous courts and actions in County of Kings
10
and the State of New York.
11
2.
 
PARTIES
12
12.
 
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY
 – 
victim, damaged and personally injured plaintiff.
13
13.
 
ELENA SVENSON
 – 
former girlfriend of plaintiff with whom plaintiff has son, DAVID SVENSON.
14
14.
 
YONATAN LEVORITZ, ESQ. - lawyer representing defendant SVENSON under secret supervision
15
of YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. in the Kings County Family Court action against plaintiff.
16
15.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ.
 – 
lawyer representing defendant SVENSON in Kings County
17
Family Court and Kings County Supreme Court action against plaintiff bearing index No 33343/2008
18
16.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ.
 – 
lawyer still secretly representing defendant SVENSON (as
19
landlady) and codefendants VICTORIA EDELSTEIN and BORIS KOTLYAR (as tenants) in Kings
20
County Supreme Court action against plaintiff bearing index No 33343/2008.
21
17.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ.
 – 
lawyer who in 2008 represented petitioner SVENSON (as
22
landlady) and respondents VICTORIA EDELSTEIN and BORIS KOTLYAR (as tenants) in Kings
23
County Landlord & Tenant Court against each other in eviction action.
24
 
 Michael Krichevsky v. Levoritz, et al 
Page 3 of 35
 
 Index No:24714/2010
18.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ.
 – 
lawyer who in 2009 represented co-defendants SVENSON (as
1
landlady) and VICTORIA EDELSTEIN and BORIS KOTLYAR (as tenants) against each other in
2
Kings County Civil Court action bearing index No 99601/2009.
3
3.
 
FACTS, UNREBUTTED OR UNREBUTTABLE ALLEGATIONS AS ADMISSIONS OF
4
FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION
5
19.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. makes his profit by litigating controversies in courts.
6
20.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. makes his profit by creating controversies in courts.
7
21.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. does not participate in mediations.
8
22.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. charged Defendant SVENSON to litigate against Plaintiff.
9
23.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. most of the time wins child support payments for the women with
10
child custody.
11
24.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. most of the time gets his fees awarded against men by the court.
12
25.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. knew that Family Court discriminate against men.
13
26.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ., knew above mentioned statistics and facts.
14
27.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. during consultation with Defendant SVENSON in some shape or
15
form explained this statistics to her.
16
28.
 
YORAM NACHIMOVSKY, ESQ. charged Defendant SVENSON and Codefendants VICTORIA
17
EDELSTEIN and BORIS KOTLYAR (as tenants) in Kings County Landlord & Tenant Court against
18
each other in eviction action.
19
29.
 
YONATAN LEVORITZ, ESQ. makes his profit by litigating controversies in family courts.
20
30.
 
YONATAN LEVORITZ, ESQ makes his profit by creating controversies in courts.
21
31.
 
YONATAN LEVORITZ, ESQ does not participate in mediations.
22
32.
 
YONATAN LEVORITZ, ESQ. allegedly charged Defendant SVENSON $300 per hour to litigate
23
against Plaintiff.
24

Activity (51)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->