Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Neg File to the Court

Neg File to the Court

Ratings: (0)|Views: 37|Likes:
Published by winona mae marzocco
new york suffolk courty cps corruption
new york suffolk courty cps corruption

More info:

Published by: winona mae marzocco on Dec 18, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/13/2012

pdf

text

original

 
F.C.A. 1012, 1031
FAMILY
COURT OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF SUFFOLKIn the Matter of
Winona
Piscitelli
{7/6/05}
(A)
Child(ren) under Eighteen Years
of Age
Alleged
to be
Neglected
by
Winona Palmiotti
{4/7/73}
Respondent(s)Form 10-6
(Child
Protective-
Petition-Neglect)
2/2001
Docket
No. NN-16863-09
AMENDEDPETITION(Neglect)
NOTICE: PLACEMENT
OF
YOUR CHILD
IN
FOSTER CARE
MAY
RESULT
IN
YOUR LOSS
OF
YOUR RIGHTS
TO
YOUR CHILD.
IF
YOUR CHILDSTAYS
IN
FOSTER
CARE
FOR 15 OF THE
MOST RECENT
22
MONTHS,
THE
AGENCY
MAY BE
REQUIRED
BY LAW TO
FILE
A
PETITION
TO
TERMINATE YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS
AND MAY
FILE BEFORE
THEEND OF THE
15-MONTH PERIOD.
TO THE
FAMILY COURT:The undersigned Petitioner respectfully alleges that:
1.
Petitioner
[specify}:
Suffolk
County Department of Social Services is a [checkapplicable box]:
[x]
duly authorized agency having
its
office
and
place
of
business
at[specify]:
P.O.
Box
18100,Hauppauge, New York,
11788-8900
D
person directedby theCourttooriginate this proceeding,whoresidesat
[specify]:2.
The child(ren) who (is) (are) the subject(s) of this proceeding (is) (are):Name Sex Date of Custodial Parent/Guardian Child's Address
BirthF
7/6/05 Winona Palmiotti
DSS
custody
inona
Piscitelli
 
VERIFICATIONSTATE
OF NEW
YORK
)
I
-
">
!
)ss.:
COUNTY
OF
SUFFOLK
)
]
Nancy Haddock, being
duly
sworn, deposes
and
says:
That
(s)he
is a
Caseworker
and is
acquainted with
the
facts
and
circumstances
of the
above-entitled proceeding; that (s)he has read the foregoing petition and knows the contentsthereof; that the same is true to (his)(her) own knowledge except as to those matters therein
stated
to bealleged upon informationandbelief,andthatas tothose matters (s)he believesit to
be
true,Petitioner
Swornto
before
me
this
"".'I
day of K^o^'^wio-i
\
I V
s^>
Ct
Jfcp
<X4_t
v
V
BARBARA
HAYNES
Notary
Public,
State
of New
YorK
Commission#01HA602795S
Qualified
in Suffolk
Courvw
Commission
Expires
07/19/-.U6..
 
r
f
2.
Upon informationandbelief,
from
in oraround April
2009
topresent, respondent
j
Winona Palmiotti placed Winona Piscitelli,
the
child alleged
to be
neglected herein,
in
'
imminent risk
of
becoming physically, mentally,
or
emotionally impaired
by
failing
to
ensure said child
receives
proper medical care
and
services
due to
developmental delays.Said child
is
extremely developmentally delayed,
was
observed
to be
wearing diapers,
drinking
from
a baby bottle, and has limited verbal communication skills. In addition,said child
was
observed
to
communicate with
one
syllable words
and
grunts. While
the
respondent agreed
to
voluntary services
in
Ohio,
she
failed
to
follow through with
referrals
provided
and
refused
to
cooperate
with
her
caseworker.
In
addition,
the
respondent
failed
to
follow through with obtaining immunizations
and
preventive wellexams for said child since in or around 2006.The source and belief of this information are the records of
Suffolk
County ChildProtective Services and the oral statements of caseworker
Brianne
Kindinger of
Mansfield,
Ohio
to
Suffolk
County Child Protective Services senior caseworker Kevin
Tase.
3. Upon information and belief, respondent Winona Palmiotti aka Winona Grant has along history of
failure
to ensure her child receives proper medical care and educationalservices, and fleeing with her child when she becomes
aware
of reports to the StateCentral Registry. The respondent's history includes being adjudicated for the neglect of
Timothy
Grant, sibling of Winona Piscitelli, the child alleged to be neglected herein.Timothy Grant
was
taken into protective custody
on or
about August
18,
2004
as a
resultof the respondent's failure to provide adequate physical, emotional, and educational care
for
the
child.
At a
Fact-Finding Hearing
and
Disposition
in
Sullivan County Family Courton January 20, 2005, under
DocketNN-01782-04,
the respondent mother, having failedto appear and the matter having come on for a fact-finding hearing by inquest, was foundto have neglected the child by failing to ensure he attended school since the 2
nd
grade and
he was 15
years
of age at the time. The
respondent also neglected
the
child
by
failing
to
ensure
he
attend counseling which
was
needed because
the
child
had
untreated autism.
An
order
was
entered that placed Timothy Grant
in
foster
care.
Despite
the
respondent's
*
knowledge
of
Timothy's
placement
in
foster care,
the
respondent
failed
to
make
any
attempts to contact the Department to plan for or visit her son, and on July 26, 2005. at aPermanency Hearing and Extension of Placement, the goal for Timothy Grant waschanged
to
permanent placement
in an
alternative planned living arrangement
at age
18.
On February
15,
2007 an Order to Terminate Placement was entered in Sullivan CountyFamily Court, as Timothy turned and was placed in an Adult Care Facility.
The
source
and
belief
of
this information
are the
records
of
Sullivan County Family Court
under
Dockets
NN-01782-04
and NN-01854-04.
Rev. 6/01
Addendum
L

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->