Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
PETA State Inspection 2010

PETA State Inspection 2010

Ratings: (0)|Views: 233|Likes:
Published by John Sibley
The state of VA grows tired of PETA's games.
The state of VA grows tired of PETA's games.

More info:

Published by: John Sibley on Dec 23, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/04/2013

pdf

text

original

 
IRGINIA
DEPARTMENT
Animal
and
Food
Industry
Services
Office
of
Veterinary
ServicesSUMMARY OF FINDINGS
PAGE 1
of
3
OF AGRICULTURE
AND
CONSUMER
SERVICES
DATE Investigation X Site Visit
07/07/10
Inquest Telephone CallNAME OF SUBJECT People for the Ethical Treatment
of
Animals (herein PETA)PETACONTACT INFO
(Address, Phone
#,
Fax
#,
Email)
attn: Ms. Oaphna Nachminovitch
501
Front StreetNorfolk, VA 23510DATE07/07/10DATE(757) 622-7382FINDINGSA site visit was performed to the PETA headquarters building on July
7,2010
to determine
if
the organization's current activities allowed for the continuedinspection
of
the facility as an animal shelter; if the primary purpose of thefacility was to facilitate finding permanent adoptive homes for companionanimals. The following items were noted during the course
of
this visit:
1.
The receptionist stated that PETA did not operate an animal shelter.WhenI indicated that PETA did report to operate
an
animal shelter
and
that this office has inspected
in
it
in
the past,
an
additional staff memberwas called to the desk and reiterated that there was no shelter. At thispoint I asked for Ms. Nachminovitch.
Ms.
Nachminovitch was calledand indicated that she would
be
at the facility shortly.
No
other staffwas available to begin the inspection.
2.
The facility contains three rooms designated
as
animal enclosures.The rooms are not further subdivided into runs or cages. The threeanimals occupying the rooms were not being held for adoptionpurposes (one was being held
in
conjunction with the clinic operations,one was being boarded for
an
indigent community member, and one
on
behalf
of
a PETA employee). The facility does not contain sufficientanimal enclosures to routinely house the number of animals annuallyreported as taken into custody.
3.
2902010
animal custody records were reviewed.
17
or
6%
wererecorded as adopted
or
in foster homes, 273 or
94%
were recorded
as
euthanized.
Of
these, 245 or 90% were euthanized within the first 24hours
of
custody.PREPARED
BY
Dan Kovich, DVM,
MPH
SIGNATURE
 
IRGINIA
DEPAR'IMENT
Animal and Food Industry ServicesOffice
of
Veterinary ServicesSUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONTINUED
PAGE 2
of
3
OF AGRICULTUREANDCONSUMER
SERVICES
DATEDATEFINDINGS
4.
Ms. Nachminovitch indicated that the majority
of
the animals that weretaken into custody by PETA were considered by them to beunadoptable. Adoptable animals were routinely referred to other areaanimal shelters; conversely PETA often took custody
of
animals deniedadmittance by other area shelters. Ms. Nachminovitch confirmed thatthe shelter was not accessible to the public, and that most adoptions
of
animals were to PETA employees and affiliates.The findings of this site visit support the assertion that PETA does notoperate a facility that meets the statutory definition
of
an animal shelter as theprimary purpose
is
not to find permanent adoptive homes for animals. This isfurther supported by other information gathered by or reported to this officesummarized as follows:
1.
The shelter is not accessible
to
the public, promoted, or engaged
in
efforts to facilitate the adoption of animals taken into custody. PETAreception has historically been unaware
of
the existence
of
an
animalshelter (Attachment 1), and has stated to enquiring members of thepublic that no such facility exists (Attachment 2). PETA has publishedsuggested guidelines for animal shelters on their website that indicatetheir organizational preference for the operation
of
such facilities; theirown facility does not satisfy many
of
the key recommendations(Attachment
3).
The agency
is
not aware
of
any substantive efforts tofacilitate adoption
of
animals taken into custody.
2.
Previous inspections
of
this office have found no animals to
be
housed
in
the facility, or few animals
in
custody.
3.
Review
of
submitted annual animal record summaries by PETA and allreporting animal shelters for the past six years does not support thatthe facility has a primary intent to find permanent adoptive homes forcompanion animals. The following data was compiled by this officeconcerning the reported dispositions of dogs and cats taken intocustody over this period:
PREPARED
BY
Dan Kovich, DVM, MPH
SIGNATURE

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->