TAITZ ET AL V GARDNER, BALLOT LAW COMMISSION PETITION TO THESUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 2
Petitioners herein are seeking a review by the Supreme Court of NewHampshire of the decision reached by the Ballot Law commission.Petitioners are seeking such review under Rule 7 (Discretionary Review)and under Rule 10 (Review by Petition of the Decision by the Agency),which was unlawful and unreasonable as well as under Rule 11.
Every issuespecifically raised herein has been presented to the administrativeagency and has been properly preserved for appellate review by acontemporaneous objection or, where appropriate, by a properly filedpleading.
NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE PARTIES SEEKING REVIEW OFTHE ORDER
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., -civil rights attorney, licensed in the state of California,admitted to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of the United States and a member of theInternational Criminal Bar panel in Hague.Larry Rappaport -duly elected state representative state of New Hampshire,in propria persona