Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Source of Ron Paul Newsletters

Source of Ron Paul Newsletters

Ratings: (0)|Views: 492|Likes:
Published by fdirezhp

More info:

Published by: fdirezhp on Dec 24, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Source of Ron Paul Newsletters?
From the remorseless liars that brought America into the Iraq War, have kept the US mired inAfghanistan for now over a decade, oversaw the genocide in Libya wrought by NATO-backed Al Qaeda terrorists,and are attempting to incite war with both Syria and Iran, comes a frothing, if not entirely elementary attack against one of the few obstacles that stands in their way of perpetual war fought at America's expense but for their personal gain. That obstacle is Ron Pauland the Constitutional reawakening he has spurred.Leading the charge is a slightly misfitting addition to the Neo-Conservative corporate-fascistpropaganda machine, openly-homosexual warmongering "libertarian" James Kirchick. WhileKirchick's sexual orientation really is a matter of his own personal business, the necessity of himmaking it a public issue and the fact that those he works for have used anti-homosexual rhetoricto manipulate the American political landscape for decades is already a display of underminingand astounding hypocrisy.
: James Kirchick, of the Neo-Con corporate-fascist "Foundation for the Defense of Democracies"leads the attack on Ron Paul. Having previously worked for the US StateDepartment funded Radio Free Europe (RFE/RL), he is no stranger to peddling propaganda.
Kirchick's argument is based on the same tired, already addressed "newsletter" published in RonPaul's name decades ago, and despite none of the articles cited by Kirchick actually even being
written by Ron Paul, he still enjoys preceding each accusation with, "He says..." Kirchick's servileobedience to the Neo-Con agenda, which has cultivated and is directing Ron Paul's competition- Cain, Romney, Perry, and Gingrich - is fairly obvious to detect. However, it is now a matter of  record that Kirchick literally sits, as a "fellow" within a Neo-Con corporate and US StateDepartment-funded think-tank,the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD).The FDD features as its "executive team," the likes of James Woolsey and Clifford May while its "leadership council"includes Paula Dobriansky, Steve Forbes, Max Kampelman, Bill Kristol, and Senator Joseph Lieberman. Richard Perle, Eric Cantor, Gary Bauer, and Charles Krauthammer siton the FDD's "board of advisors," while Reuel Marc Gerecht, Bill Roggio, and James Kirchick himself sit as FDD "fellows." Truly exemplary of everything that is wrong with America, and everything Ron Paul and the ideals he promotes aim at fixing, the FDD is a weed that needs tobe pulled from America's political landscape.
(For further reading regarding these names, pleasesee"NED & Freedom House are run by Warmongering Imperialists ,""Neo-Cons for Human Rights? "and to see a good example of FDD's contrived propaganda exposed and in action,"Neo- Con Infomercial: Iranium.")
Of course, despite a "Democratic" president sitting in the White House, America's foreign anddomestic policy has been drawn up and carried out by corporate-fascists who hold sway over both sides of America's political aisle. "Obama's" military adventure in Libya, for instance, wasnotonly supported by what Americans might call "Neo-Conservatives," but the war itself was drawnup by them in the first place. This indicates an overarching agenda that transcends presidenciesand the perceived political ideologies they supposedly adhere to. The necessity then, to keeppuppets like Bush or Obama in place is realized, as any truly independent, principled presidentwould expose and disrupt this long running charade.From April, 2011's"The Globalists Coming Full Circle:" "Ten days after 9/11, General Wesley Clark visited the Pentagon where an officer from the JointStaff warned him of an impending attack on Iraq. After the Afghan invasion, this officer sharedwith Clark a document handed down from the Office of the Secretary of Defense indicatingplans to attack and destroy the governments of 7 countries; Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Iran,Lebanon and Libya. General Wesley Clark would go on to share this story in a 2007 speech givento the Commonwealth Club of California where he repeated this list.Of course, the campaigns have already begun against each of the nations Clark listed. Iraq wasinvaded, decimated, and has been occupied by US troops since 2003. In 2006, Israel attemptedto invade and dismantle Hezbollah in Lebanon but the conflict ended in a stalemate and aneventual Israeli withdrawal.Somalia was attacked by a proxy Ethiopian invasion force with US air support starting in 2007, but it too eventually ended in failure. A silent war has already begun within Iran,including covert military operations, the arming of terrorists, assassinations, and 2failed US backed color revolutions. Sudan has been recently carved into two states and Syria isnow being intentionally destabilized by US trained and funded activists. 
 And now, of course in Libya's case, aerial bombardment by US, UK, and French warplanes hasbegun, while the CIA and MI6 are on the ground attempting to collapse the Qaddafi regime. Wesley Clark would backtrack in his 2007 talk in California and recall a conversation he had in1991 with then Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz regarding Desert Storm.Clark was told that America's intervention in Iraq proved that the US could use its military forceand the Soviets wouldn't stop them. Wolfowitz said the US had 5-10 years to clean up the oldSoviet "client regimes" before the next super power rose up and challenged western hegemony.Clark claimed that this, along with the aftermath of 9/11 constituted a policy coup where DickCheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and the other members of the of  Project for a NewAmerican Century had hijacked US foreign policy to destabilize and turn the nations of theMiddle East upside down - much the way they are now. The "Neo-Conservative" element of thiscurrent round of destabilization goes deeper than the promotion of war, as the "Neo-Cons"have uncharacteristically dedicated themselves to "human rights" and "democracy"side-by-side with the likes of George Soros and Zbigniew Brzezinski.Bush campaigned on an anti-war, anti-nation building platform. Obama then pledged to rollback the agenda Bush swindled the nation into, only to then continue it in earnest. All along wehave been treated to the theatrics of the corporate-owned media, with pundits on the left andright reacting in shock and surprise as these engineered events unfolded according to plan.Despite Wolfowitz' agenda being meted out nearly 20 years ago, the ham-fisted nature of boththe operation itself in Libya and the propaganda surrounding it suggests a rushed sense of desperation on the globalists' behalf. Wesley Clark suggested that the operation to destabilizethe Middle East and Northern Africa would take 5 years, starting in 2001. Wolfowitz believedthat in 1991 the operation would have taken 5-10 years. The failed FBI attack on the WorldTrade Center in 1993 was most likely the staged impetus to trigger the first blitzkrieg. Not onlydid the attacks fail to cause the catastrophic effects needed to justify such an operation, theEgyptian informant assisting the FBI had recorded his conversations with agents [which are published in the NYT] indicating that they were indeed building a bomb for extremists andproviding them with real explosives as well.1993 would have fit in perfectly to tip off Wolfowitz' plan. Upon failing, he and his PNAC cadrewould attempt to destroy the World Trade Center buildings again, this time successfully onSeptember 11, 2001.The catastrophic loss of life, the confusion, and the rage that was left in itswake gave the PNAC what they called a "new Pearl Harbor" they claimed they needed in theirSeptember 2000 report titled"Rebuilding America's Defenses."  These men, who in fact helped create Al Qaeda in the mountains of Afghanistan to face theSoviets in the 80s would call on their legion of foreign mercenaries to wreck havoc across theplanet, heralding globalist intervention along the way. Certainly this had nothing to do withdefending America or spreading "democracy" but rather bolstering the hegemony of the corporate-financier oligarchy that both the PNAC cadre and the bankers who thoroughly saturate Obama's administration constitute.

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->