12/26/11Grand Forks Herald | Grand Forks, North Dakota3/4https://secure.forumcomm.com/?event=article_view&publisher_ID=40&pnr
The correspondence released to Carlson also included a brief email sent Jan. 24 by Athletic Director BrianFaison to Fullerton, providing the Big Sky commissioner “a quick heads up” that Faison would testify that week at a House Education Committee hearing on the nickname.“It is my intention to make only the following reference to the Big Sky Conference,” Faison wrote: “The issue of the nickname and logo had been resolved prior to our conversations with the Big Sky Conference and thereforewas never an issue.”He provided Fullerton with an email address and his cell phone number in case “you have anything to share withme” prior to the House hearing, but there was no indication that Fullerton followed up.After the House and Senate passed the nickname bill and Gov. Jack Dalrymple signed it into law, state anduniversity leaders looked to a face-to-face meeting with the NCAA for a way out of the impasse. On March 21,Patricia Bohnet, executive assistant to Kelley, sent an email to an assistant to the NCAAs Franklin, conveyingKelleys request “that a meeting be scheduled within the next couple of weeks with Dr. Franklin and whomever else he wishes from the NCAA” and a North Dakota delegation that could include the governor, legislativeleaders, other state officials, Kelley and Faison.That was to be the meeting at which Carlson and other nickname defenders explained why they and many NorthDakotans — including many Native Americans — feel so deeply about keeping the Sioux name. They hoped to persuade the NCAA to modify its position.A week later, the emails show, Faison wrote to let Fullerton know of that impending North Dakota-NCAAconference, and on April 8 Kelley and Franklin spoke about it by telephone.On April 13, Kelleys assistant acknowledged receipt of an email from Franklin, but Franklins correspondencewas not attached. Two days later, Kelley wrote to Franklin, noting that the nickname law would take effect onAug. 1. That email, and Franklins response, were made public shortly afterward.“I need to request clarification of the NCAAs position regarding the relationship between the University of North Dakota and the NCAA (with specific reference to the 2007 settlement agreement),” Kelley told the NCAA vice president. “In addition, I wish to inquire whether the NCAA is willing to revisit, in any aspect, theterms of the agreement.”Franklin responded on April 19, reiterating the NCAA policy against use of American Indian names and images,the 2007 legal settlement with UND and UNDs failure to “obtain necessary support from the identified Siouxtribes,” as required under the settlement.Thus, given the new state law and the consequent halt in UNDs transition away from the nickname, “NorthDakota will be subject to the provisions of the policy,” Franklin wrote. “Unfortunately, HB 1263 cannot changethe NCAA policy nor alter the contracted terms of the Agreement.”State leaders continue working to arrange a meeting in Indianapolis with NCAA officials, despite another declaration earlier this month that the athletics association “has no intention of changing its position” and thatUND continues to face sanctions after Aug. 15.The NCAA has provided two dates in late July when its leaders could be available to meet with a North Dakotadelegation, and Grant Shaft of the State Board of Higher Education is checking those dates with Carlson, the