Upload_transparent

Why people would not stop contributing if an unconditional basic income were introduced

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 6 43
Words: 2541 13640
Characters: 16216 81678
Lines: 47 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.38 5.99
Words per line: 54.06 21.89
Words per page: 423.5 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

513 Reads | 0 Comments

Description

"Why people would not stop contributing if an unconditional basic income were introduced: an argumentation from within the sociology of religion."

The fear that with the existence of an unconditional basic income sufficient for living many people would cease to engage in a productive life, would only relax, consume and devote to having fun, can be addressed from different perspectives. One of these is the sociology of religion, which allows elaborating the argument that with such a way of life the question about the meaning of life cannot be answered. But this “meaning question”, the whole research within the field of the sociology of religion speaks for this, compellingly must be answered by each life praxis. It cannot remain unanswered, as is said already in the Bible: “Man does not live on bread alone, [but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.]” (5. Moses 8.3, Matthew 4.4, Lukas 4.4) The paper examines the reasons of this fact and its consequences in regard to a life with an unconditional basic income sufficient for living.

Pdf_16x16 6 Pages


Date Added

10/31/2008

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial No-derivs

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect